Percutaneous CT-Guided Abdominal and Pelvic Biopsies: Comparison of an Electromagnetic Navigation System and CT Fluoroscopy.

PURPOSE: To compare electromagnetic navigation (EMN) with computed tomography (CT) fluoroscopy for guiding percutaneous biopsies in the abdomen and pelvis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective matched-cohort design was used to compare biopsies in the abdomen and pelvis performed with EMN (consecutive cases, n = 50; CT-Navigation; Imactis, Saint-Martin-d'Hères, France) with those performed with CT fluoroscopy (n = 100). Cases were matched 1:2 (EMN:CT fluoroscopy) for target organ and lesion size (±10 mm). RESULTS: The population was well-matched (age, 65 vs 65 years; target size, 2.0 vs 2.1 cm; skin-to-target distance, 11.4 vs 10.7 cm; P > .05, EMN vs CT fluoroscopy, respectively). Technical success (98% vs 100%), diagnostic yield (98% vs 95%), adverse events (2% vs 5%), and procedure time (33 minutes vs 31 minutes) were not statistically different (P > .05). Operator radiation dose was less with EMN than with CT fluoroscopy (0.04 vs 1.2 µGy; P < .001), but patient dose was greater (30.1 vs 9.6 mSv; P < .001) owing to more helical scans during EMN guidance (3.9 vs 2.1; P < .001). CT fluoroscopy was performed with a mean of 29.7 tap scans per case. In 3 (3%) cases, CT fluoroscopy was performed with gantry tilt, and the mean angle out of plane for EMN cases was 13.4°. CONCLUSIONS: Percutaneous biopsies guided by EMN and CT fluoroscopy were closely matched for technical success, diagnostic yield, procedure time, and adverse events in a matched cohort of patients. EMN cases were more likely to be performed outside of the gantry plane. Radiation dose to the operator was higher with CT fluoroscopy, and patient radiation dose was higher with EMN. Further study with a wider array of procedures and anatomic locations is warranted.

Percutaneous Lung Biopsy with Pleural and Parenchymal Blood Patching: Results and Complications from 1,112 Core Biopsies.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the outcomes of computed tomography (CT) fluoroscopy-guided core lung biopsies with emphasis on diagnostic yield, complications, and efficacy of parenchymal and pleural blood patching to avoid chest tube placement. METHODS: This is a single-center retrospective analysis of CT fluoroscopy-guided percutaneous core lung biopsies between 2006 and 2020. Parenchymal blood patching during introducer needle withdrawal was performed in 74% of cases as a preventive measure, and pleural blood patching was the primary salvage maneuver for symptomatic or growing pneumothorax in 60 of 83 (72.2%) applicable cases. RESULTS: A total of 1,029 patients underwent 1,112 biopsies (532 men; mean age, 66 years; 38.6%, history of emphysema; lesion size, 16.7 mm). The diagnostic yield was 93.6% (1,032/1,103). Fewer complications requiring intervention were observed in patients who underwent parenchymal blood patching (5.7% vs 14.2%, P < .001). Further intervention was required in 83 of 182 pneumothorax cases, which included the following: (a) pleural blood patch (5.4%, 60/1,112), (b) chest tube placement without a pleural blood patch attempt (1.5%, 17/1,112), and (c) simple aspiration (0.5%, 6/1,112). Pleural blood patch as monotherapy was successful in 83.3% (50/60) of cases without need for further intervention. The overall chest tube rate was 2.6% (29/1,112). Emphysema was the only significant risk factor for complications requiring intervention (P ≤ .001). CONCLUSIONS: Parenchymal blood patching during introducer needle withdrawal decreased complications requiring intervention. Salvage pleural blood patching reduced the frequency of chest tube placement for pneumothorax.

How to Create a Great Radiology Report.

The radiology report represents the sum of a radiologist's highest level of synthesis and insight into a patient's condition. It is the most important product that radiologists generate to help direct patient care. Despite the self-evident importance of clear and effective radiology reporting, radiologists usually receive little or no formal reporting education during training. Instead, it is learned in a piecemeal and often indirect fashion through occasional correction and imitating the reports of other radiologists. The audience of the radiology report extends far beyond the ordering provider and includes patients and their families, medical support staff, subspecialty providers, other radiologists, and research interests. Creating a report that fulfills the needs of this diverse group is a formidable if not quixotic ambition. However, there are certain key principles to reporting the imaging findings, impression, and recommendations that serve as a guide and promote careful consideration about how reports are understood. The findings section should emphasize short, informative, and factual observations while avoiding inappropriate interpretation, excessive use of terms of perception, and redundancy. The impression is the thoughtful synthesis of the meaning of the findings leading to a diagnosis, a differential diagnosis, and management recommendations. Creating a clear and impactful impression allows radiologists to provide the highest level of clinical care and direction but takes time and effort beyond simply restating the findings. The impression should use language that is understandable, memorable, and actionable. Reporting skills require ongoing attention and must adapt to the evolving practice patterns and communication styles in medicine. ©RSNA, 2020.

Safety and Efficacy of Minimally Invasive Acetabular Stabilization for Periacetabular Metastatic Disease with Thermal Ablation and Augmented Screw Fixation.

PURPOSE: To evaluate minimally invasive acetabular stabilization (MIAS) with thermal ablation and augmented screw fixation for impending or minimally displaced fractures of the acetabulum secondary to metastatic disease. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between February 2011 and July 2014, 13 consecutive patients underwent thermal ablation, percutaneous screw fixation, and polymethyl methacrylate augmentation for impending or nondisplaced fractures of the acetabulum secondary to metastatic disease. Functional outcomes were evaluated before and after the procedure using the Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS) scoring system. Complications, hospital length of stay, and eligibility for chemotherapy and radiation therapy were assessed. RESULTS: All procedures were technically successful with no major periprocedural complications. The mean total MSTS score improved from 23% ± 11 before MIAS to 51% ± 21 after MIAS (P < .05). The mean MSTS pain scores improved from 0% (all) to 32% ± 22 after MIAS (P < .05). The mean MSTS walking ability score improved from 22% ± 19 to 55% ± 26 after MIAS (P < .05). Two complications occurred; a patient had a minimally displaced fracture of the superior pubic ramus at the site of repair but remained ambulatory, and septic arthritis was diagnosed in another patient 12 months after repair. The average length of hospital stay was 2 days ± 3.6; six patients were discharged within 24 hours of the procedure. All patients were eligible for chemotherapy and radiation therapy immediately after the procedure. CONCLUSIONS: MIAS is feasible, improves pain and mobility, and offers a minimally invasive alternative to open surgical reconstruction.

MRI for acute chest pain: current state of the art.

This article reviews the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and angiography (MRA) techniques, imaging findings, and evidence for evaluating patients with acute chest pain due to acute pulmonary embolus (PE), aortic dissection (AD), and myocardial infarction (MI). When computed tomographic angiography (CTA) is contraindicated, MRI and MRA are important alternative imaging modalities for diagnosis and management of patients with acute PE, AD, and MI. Familiarity with the techniques, imaging findings, and evidence is critical to safely and appropriately managing patients presenting with acute chest pain.

CT without borders: Comparison of diagnoses for abdominal pain from a teaching hospital in rural Kenya and a US academic medical center.

PURPOSE: Radiology global health opportunities are expanding as more hospitals in low- and middle-income countries utilize CT. This creates opportunities for global health program building, education, service, and research. This study determines the diagnostic yield and variety of abdominopelvic CT diagnoses for abdominal pain in a US academic medical center (UW) compared to a rural Kenyan teaching hospital (Tenwek). METHODS: A retrospective, cross-sectional sequential sample of 750 adults from both hospitals who underwent abdominopelvic CT for abdominal pain from February 2019 through July 2020 was obtained. Exclusion criteria were trauma, cancer staging, and recent hospitalization or surgery. Patient age, sex, comparison studies, use of contrast, known cancer diagnosis, and CT diagnoses were compared. Negative exam rate, acute abdomen diagnosis, and new cancer diagnosis were recorded. Statistical analysis was performed using R. RESULTS: 750 UW patients met inclusion criteria (mean age 53.3 ± 20 years; 442 women) and 750 Tenwek patients met inclusion criteria (mean age 52.5 ± 18 years; 394 women). 72% of UW patients had comparison imaging compared to 6% of Tenwek patients. 11% (83/750) of UW patients had a known cancer diagnosis compared to 1% (10/750) of Tenwek patients. 39% of UW patients had a negative exam compared to 23% of Tenwek patients (p < 0.001). 58% of UW patients had an acute abdomen diagnosis compared to 38% of Tenwek patients (p < 0.001). 10 of the 15 top acute abdomen diagnoses were shared, but in different order of frequency. Diagnoses unique to UW were diverticulitis, constipation, stercoral colitis, and epiploic appendagitis. Diagnoses unique to Tenwek were tuberculosis and hydatidosis. 3% of UW patients received a new cancer diagnosis (7/19 metastatic), compared to 40% of Tenwek patients (153/303 metastatic) (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: For adults undergoing CT for abdominal pain, there are differences in the prevalence of abdominal pain diagnoses, new cancer diagnosis, and negative exam rate between the rural Kenyan teaching hospital and the US academic medical center.

Ultrasound-guided biopsy of challenging abdominopelvic targets.

Percutaneous ultrasound-guided biopsies have become the standard of practice for tissue diagnosis in the abdomen and pelvis for many sites including liver, kidney, abdominal wall, and peripheral nodal stations. Additional targets may appear difficult or impossible to safely biopsy by ultrasound due to interposed bowel loops/vasculature, deep positioning, association with the bowel, or concern for poor visibility; however, by optimizing technique, it is often possible to safely and efficiently use real-time ultrasound guidance for sampling targets that normally would be considered only appropriate for CT guided or surgical/endoscopic biopsy.

Magnetic resonance angiography: current status and future directions.

With recent improvement in hardware and software techniques, magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) has undergone significant changes in technique and approach. The advent of 3.0 T magnets has allowed reduction in exogenous contrast dose without compromising overall image quality. The use of novel intravascular contrast agents substantially increases the image windows and decreases contrast dose. Additionally, the lower risk and cost in non-contrast enhanced (NCE) MRA has sparked renewed interest in these methods. This article discusses the current state of both contrast-enhanced (CE) and NCE-MRA. New CE-MRA methods take advantage of dose reduction at 3.0 T, novel contrast agents, and parallel imaging methods. The risks of gadolinium-based contrast media, and the NCE-MRA methods of time-of-flight, steady-state free precession, and phase contrast are discussed.

Bridging the gap: interactive, case-based learning in radiology education.

Traditional teaching methods in radiology education have not kept pace with advances in technology that foster successful transition into independent practice. This deficit has been exacerbated by the COVID-19 pandemic, as the need for social distancing and the introduction of hybrid staffing models have decreased the critical educational interactions at the reading room workstations between staff and trainees. By leveraging interactive, case-based learning, educators have the opportunity to bridge the substantial gap between basic pattern recognition and successfully making a diagnosis in independent practice. For the educator, this signals a shift away from perfect case selection and presenter authority, and toward the role of a guide facilitating an active case-based learning experience. This form of learning is best accompanied by guided interpretation and iterative feedback with the goal of developing similar levels of mastery and autonomy among graduating trainees. In this article, we present the tools and methods for incorporating interactive cases into existing and novel teaching materials to meet the unique challenges educators are facing today.