AURKB targets DHX9 to promote hepatocellular carcinoma progression via PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway.

Aurora kinase B (AURKB) is known to play a carcinogenic role in a variety of cancers, but its underlying mechanism in liver cancer is unknown. This study aimed to investigate the role of AURKB in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and its underlying molecular mechanism. Bioinformatics analysis revealed that AURKB was significantly overexpressed in HCC tissues and cell lines, and its high expression was associated with a poorer prognosis in HCC patients. Furthermore, downregulation of AURKB inhibited HCC cell proliferation, migration, and invasion, induced apoptosis, and caused cell cycle arrest. Moreover, AURKB downregulation also inhibited lung metastasis of HCC. AURKB interacted with DExH-Box helicase 9 (DHX9) and targeted its expression in HCC cells. Rescue experiments further demonstrated that AURKB targeting DHX9 promoted HCC progression through the PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway. Our results suggest that AURKB is significantly highly expressed in HCC and correlates with patient prognosis. Targeting DHX9 with AURKB promotes HCC progression via the PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway.

Development and validation of nomograms to evaluate the survival outcome of HCC patients undergoing selective postoperative adjuvant TACE.

PURPOSE: The objective of this study was to develop and validate a novel prognostic nomogram to evaluate the survival benefit of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients receiving postoperative adjuvant transarterial chemoembolization (PA-TACE). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Clinical data of HCC patients who underwent hepatectomy at four medical centers were retrospectively analyzed, including those who received PA-TACE and those who did not. These two categories of patients were randomly allocated to the development and validation cohorts in a 7:3 ratio. RESULTS: A total of 1505 HCC patients who underwent hepatectomy were included in this study, comprising 723 patients who did not receive PA-TACE and 782 patients who received PA-TACE. Among them, patients who received PA-TACE experienced more adverse events, although these events were mild and manageable (Grade 1-2, all p < 0.05). Nomograms were constructed and validated for patients with and without PA-TACE using independent predictors that influenced disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). These two nomograms had C-indices greater than 0.800 in the development cohort and exhibited good calibration and discrimination ability compared to six conventional HCC staging systems. Patients in the intermediate-to-high-risk group in the nomogram who received PA-TACE had higher DFS and OS (all p < 0.05). In addition, tumor recurrence was significantly controlled in the intermediate-to-high-risk group of patients who received PA-TACE, while there was no significant difference in the low-risk group of patients who received PA-TACE. CONCLUSION: The nomograms were developed and validated based on large-scale clinical data and can serve as online decision-making tools to predict survival benefits from PA-TACE in different subgroups of patients.

Efficacy of adjuvant TACE on the prognosis of patients with HCC after hepatectomy: a multicenter propensity score matching from China.

BACKGROUND: The survival benefit of adjuvant transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) in patients with hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) after hepatectomy remains controversial. We aimed to investigate the survival efficacy of adjuvant TACE after hepatectomy for HCC. METHODS: 1491 patients with HCC who underwent hepatectomy between January 2018 and September 2021 at four medical centers in China were retrospectively analyzed, including 782 patients who received adjuvant TACE and 709 patients who did not receive adjuvant TACE. Propensity score matching (PSM) (1:1) was performed to minimize selection bias, which balanced the clinical characteristics of the two groups. RESULTS: A total of 1254 patients were enrolled after PSM, including 627 patients who received adjuvant TACE and 627 patients who did not receive adjuvant TACE. Patients who received adjuvant TACE had higher disease-free survival (DFS, 1- ,2-, and 3-year: 78%-68%-62% vs. 69%-57%-50%, p < 0.001) and overall survival (OS, 1- ,2-, and 3-year: 96%-88%-80% vs. 90%-77%-66%, p < 0.001) than those who did not receive adjuvant TACE (Median DFS was 39 months). Among the different levels of risk factors affecting prognosis [AFP, Lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio, Maximum tumor diameter, Number of tumors, Child-Pugh classification, Liver cirrhosis, Vascular invasion (imaging), Microvascular invasion, Satellite nodules, Differentiation, Chinese liver cancer stage II-IIIa], the majority of patients who received adjuvant TACE had higher DFS or OS than those who did not receive adjuvant TACE. More patients who received adjuvant TACE accepted subsequent antitumor therapy such as liver transplantation, re-hepatectomy and local ablation after tumor recurrence, while more patients who did not receive adjuvant TACE accepted subsequent antitumor therapy with TACE after tumor recurrence (All p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Adjuvant TACE may be a potential way to monitor early tumor recurrence and improve postoperative survival in patients with HCC.

Development and Validation of a Nomogram for Predicting Postoperative Early Relapse and Survival in Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Early relapse after hepatectomy presents a significant challenge in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The aim of this study was to construct and validate a novel nomogram model for predicting early relapse and survival after hepatectomy for HCC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We conducted a large-scale, multicenter retrospective analysis of 1,505 patients with surgically treated HCC from 4 medical centers. All patients were randomly divided into either the training cohort (n=1,053) or the validation cohort (n=452) in a 7:3 ratio. A machine learning-based nomogram model for prediction of HCC was established by integrating multiple risk factors that influence early relapse and survival, which were identified from preoperative clinical data and postoperative pathologic characteristics of the patients. RESULTS: The median time to early relapse was 7 months, whereas the median time from early relapse to death was only 19 months. The concordance indexes of the postoperative nomogram for predicting disease-free survival and overall survival were 0.741 and 0.739, respectively, with well-calibrated curves demonstrating good consistency between predicted and observed outcomes. Moreover, the accuracy and predictive performance of the postoperative nomograms were significantly superior to those of the preoperative nomogram and the other 7 HCC staging systems. The patients in the intermediate- and high-risk groups of the model had significantly higher probabilities of early and critical recurrence (P<.001), whereas those in the low-risk group had higher probabilities of late and local recurrence (P<.001). CONCLUSIONS: This postoperative nomogram model can better predict early recurrence and survival and can serve as a useful tool to guide clinical treatment decisions for patients with HCC.

Development and validation of a nomogram for predicting microvascular invasion and evaluating the efficacy of postoperative adjuvant transarterial chemoembolization.

Background and aim: Accurately predicting microvascular invasion (MVI) before surgery is beneficial for surgical decision-making, and some high-risk hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients may benefit from postoperative adjuvant transarterial chemoembolization (PA-TACE). The purpose of this study was to develop and validate a novel nomogram for predicting MVI and assessing the survival benefits of selectively receiving PA-TACE in HCC patients. Methods: The 1372 HCC patients who underwent hepatectomy at four medical institutions were randomly divided into training and validation datasets according to a 7:3 ratio. We developed and validated a nomogram for predicting MVI using preoperative clinical data and further evaluated the survival benefits of selective PA-TACE in different risk subgroups. Results: The nomogram for predicting MVI integrated alpha-fetoprotein, tumor diameter, tumor number, and tumor margin, with an area under the curve of 0.724, which was greater than that of any single predictive factor. The calibration curve, decision curve, and clinical impact curve demonstrated that the nomogram had strong predictive performance. Risk stratification based on the nomogram revealed that patients in the low-risk group did not achieve better DFS and OS with PA-TACE (all p > 0.05), while patients in the medium-to-high risk groups could benefit from higher DFS (Medium-risk, p = 0.039; High-risk, p = 0.027) and OS (Medium-risk, p = 0.001; High-risk, p = 0.019) with PA-TACE. Conclusions: The nomogram predicting MVI demonstrated strong predictive performance, and its risk stratification aided in identifying different subgroups of HCC patients who may benefit from PA-TACE with improved survival outcomes.

Survival effects of postoperative adjuvant TACE in early-HCC patients with microvascular invasion: A multicenter propensity score matching.

Background: The presence of microvascular invasion (MVI) significantly worsens the surgical outcome of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The purpose of this research was to investigate the survival benefit of adjuvant transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) in patients with MVI after hepatectomy. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 1372 HCC patients who underwent curative liver resection in four medical institutions. In order to minimize confounding factors and selection bias between groups, Propensity Score Matching (PSM) (1:1) was performed to ensure balanced clinical characteristics. Results: A total of 1056 patients were enrolled after PSM, including 672 patients with MVI and 384 patients without MVI. Adjuvant TACE improves DFS (Median, 36 months vs 14 months, p < 0.001) and OS (Median, NA vs 32 months, p < 0.001) in patients harboring MVI, but not in those (all p > 0.05) lacking MVI. In different different CNLC stages, adjuvant TACE improved DFS (CNLC stage I, Median, 37 vs 15 months; CNLC stage II, Median, 25 vs 11 months, p < 0.001) and OS (CNLC stage I, Median, NA vs 32 months, p < 0.001; CNLC stage II, Median, NA vs 26 months, p = 0.002) in patients who carried MVI, but not in those (CNLC stage I-II, all p > 0.05) who lacked MVI. Conclusions: Adjuvant TACE may be a potentially effective treatment option for improving survival outcomes in early-HCC patients harboring MVI, but not in those lacking MVI.

Exploring the factors affecting the occurrence of postoperative MVI and the prognosis of hepatocellular carcinoma patients treated with hepatectomy: A multicenter retrospective study.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the influencing factors affecting the occurrence of microvascular invasion (MVI) and the prognosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients treated with hepatectomy, and to explore how MVI affects prognosis in subgroups with different prognostic factors. METHODS: Clinical data of a total of 1633 patients treated surgically for HCC in four treatment centers were included, including 754 patients with MVI. By using the Cox risk regression model and the Mann-Whitney U-test, the common independent influences on prognosis and MVI were made clear. The incidence of MVI in various subgroups was then examined, as well as the relationship between MVI in various subgroups and prognosis. RESULTS: The Cox risk regression model showed that MVI, Child-Pugh classification, alpha-fetoprotein (AFP), hepatocirrhosis, tumor diameter, lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (LMR), and, Barcelona clinic liver cancer (BCLC) grade were independent determinants of overall survival (OS), and MVI, AFP, hepatocirrhosis, tumor diameter, and LMR were influencing determinants for disease-free survival (DFS). The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve showed that MVI was most closely associated with patient prognosis compared to other prognostic factors. AFP, hepatocirrhosis, tumor diameter, and LMR were discovered to be common influences on the prognosis of patients with HCC and MVI when combined with the results of the intergroup comparison of MVI. After grouping, it was showed that patients with hepatocirrhosis, positive AFP (AFP ≥ 20 ng/mL), tumor diameter >50 mm, and LMR ≤3.4 had a significantly higher incidence of MVI than patients in other subgroups, and all four subgroups of MVI-positive patients had higher rates of early recurrence and mortality (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: MVI was found to be substantially linked with four subgroups of HCC patients with hepatocirrhosis, positive AFP, tumor diameter >50 mm, and LMR ≤3.4, and the prognosis of MVI-positive patients in all four subgroups tended to be worse.

Postoperative adjuvant transarterial chemoembolisation improves survival of hepatocellular carcinoma patients with microvascular invasion: A multicenter retrospective cohort.

BACKGROUND: We aimed to investigate the efficacy of postoperative adjuvant transarterial chemoembolisation (PA-TACE) in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) complicated by microvascular invasion (MVI). METHODS: A retrospective analysis of 1505 patients with HCC who underwent hepatectomy at four medical centers, including 782 patients who received PA-TACE and 723 patients who did not receive adjuvant PA-TACE, has been conducted. Propensity score matching (PSM) (1:1) was performed on the data to minimise selection bias, which resulted in a balanced clinical profile between groups. RESULTS: After PSM, 620 patients who received PA-TACE and 620 patients who did not receive PA-TACE were included. Disease-free survival (DFS, 1-, 2-, and 3-year: 88%-68%-61% vs. 70%-58%-51%, p < 0.001) and overall survival (OS, 1-, 2-, and 3-year: 96%-89%-82% vs. 89%-77%-67%, p < 0.001) were significantly higher in patients who received PA-TACE than in those who did not. Patients with MVI who received PA-TACE had significantly higher DFS (1-, 2-, and 3-year: 68%-57%-48% vs. 46%-31%-27%, p < 0.001) and OS (1-, 2-, and 3-year: 96%-84%-77% vs. 79%-58%-40%, p < 0.001) than those who did not receive PA-TACE. Among the six different liver cancer stages, MVI-negative patients did not have significant survival outcomes from PA-TACE (p > 0.05), whereas MVI-positive patients achieved higher DFS and OS from it (p < 0.05). Liver dysfunction, fever, and nausea/vomiting were the most common adverse events in patients receiving PA-TACE. There was no significant difference in grade 3 or 4 adverse events between the groups (p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Postoperative adjuvant transarterial chemoembolisation has a good safety profile and may be a potentially beneficial treatment modality for survival outcomes in patients with HCC, especially those with concomitant MVI.

Hepatectomy After Conversion Therapy for Initially Unresectable HCC: What is the Difference?

Purpose: Conversion therapy gives some patients with initially unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) access to surgery. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of hepatectomy after conversion therapy and how it differed from those who undergoing direct hepatectomy. Patients and Methods: From January 2018 to April 2022, 745 patients underwent hepatectomy for HCC were enrolled. Among them, 41 patients of unresectable HCC underwent hepatectomy after conversion therapy. A demographically and clinically comparable cohort was created from the remaining patients in a 1:1 ratio using propensity score matching. Results: The median duration of conversion therapy was 108 (42-298) days, 8 patients achieved complete response (CR) and 33 achieved partial response (PR). Conversion therapy resulted in some degree of myelosuppression, but liver function index remained good. Compared with the direct hepatectomy group, the conversion group had more blood loss (600 mL vs 400 mL, p=0.015), longer operative time (270 min vs 240 min, p=0.02), higher blood transfusion rates, and longer hospital stay (8 days vs 11 days, p<0.001). Patients in the conversion group had significantly more complications of any grade (82.9% vs 51.2%, p=0.002) and grade 3/4 (26.8% vs 4.9%, p=0.013), and 6 patients developed post-hepatectomy liver failure (PHLF). There were no deaths in either group. All patients achieved R0 resection, 6 (6/41, 14.6%) achieved pathological complete response (pCR), 14 achieved major pathologic responses (MPR). During a median follow-up of 12.8 months, 14 patients in the conversion group experienced recurrence or metastasis, no deaths. Conclusion: Hepatectomy after conversion therapy was more difficult than direct hepatectomy, but accurate preoperative assessment could ensure the safety of the surgery. The damage of liver function after conversion therapy was more severe than expected, PHLF should be prevented and treated. Hepatectomy was effective and necessary, postoperative pathological examination could provide guidance for adjuvant therapy.