Internal Mammary Lymphadenopathy Does Not Impact Oncologic Outcomes in Patients Treated with Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy: Results from the I-SPY2 Clinical Trial.

BACKGROUND: Internal mammary lymphadenopathy (IML) plays a role in breast cancer stage and prognosis. We aimed to evaluate method of IML detection, how IML impacts response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC), and oncologic outcomes. METHODS: We evaluated patients enrolled in the I-SPY-2 clinical trial from 2010 to 2022. We captured the radiographic method of IML detection (magnetic resonance imaging [MRI], positron emission tomography/computed tomography [PET/CT], or both) and compared patients with IML with those without. Rates of locoregional recurrence (LRR), distant recurrence (DR) and event-free survival (EFS) were compared by bivariate analysis. RESULTS: Of 2095 patients, 198 (9.5%) had IML reported on pretreatment imaging. The method of IML detection was 154 (77.8%) MRI only, 11 (5.6%) PET/CT only, and 33 (16.7%) both. Factors associated with IML were younger age (p = 0.001), larger tumors (p < 0.001), and higher tumor grade (p = 0.027). Pathologic complete response (pCR) was slightly higher in the IML group (41.4% vs. 34.0%; p = 0.03). There was no difference in breast or axillary surgery (p = 0.41 and p = 0.16), however IML patients were more likely to undergo radiation (68.2% vs. 54.1%; p < 0.001). With a median follow up of 3.72 years (range 0.4-10.2), there was no difference between IM+ versus IM- in LRR (5.6% vs. 3.8%; p = 0.25), DR (9.1% vs. 7.9%; p = 0.58), or EFS (61.6% vs. 57.2%; p = 0.48). This was true for patients with and without pCR. CONCLUSIONS: In this large cohort of patients treated with NAC, outcomes were not negatively impacted by IML. We demonstrated that IML influences treatment selection but is not a poor prognostic indicator when treated with modern NAC and multidisciplinary disease management.

Clipping the Positive Lymph Node in Patients with Clinically Node Positive Breast Cancer Treated with Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy: Impact on Axillary Surgery in the ISPY-2 Clinical Trial.

BACKGROUND: For patients with clinically node-positive (cN+) breast cancer undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC), retrieving previously clipped, biopsy-proven positive lymph nodes during sentinel lymph node biopsy [i.e., targeted axillary dissection (TAD)] may reduce false negative rates. However, the overall utilization and impact of clipping positive nodes remains uncertain. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed cN+ ISPY-2 patients (2011-2022) undergoing axillary surgery after NAC. We evaluated trends in node clipping and associations with type of axillary surgery [sentinel lymph node (SLN) only, SLN and axillary lymph node dissection (ALND), or ALND only] and event-free survival (EFS) in patients that were cN+ on a NAC trial. RESULTS: Among 801 cN+ patients, 161 (20.1%) had pre-NAC clip placement in the positive node. The proportion of patients that were cN+ undergoing clip placement increased from 2.4 to 36.2% between 2011 and 2021. Multivariable logistic regression showed nodal clipping was independently associated with higher odds of SLN-only surgery [odds ratio (OR) 4.3, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.8-6.8, p < 0.001]. This was also true among patients with residual pathologically node-positive (pN+) disease. Completion ALND rate did not differ based on clip retrieval success. No significant differences in EFS were observed in those with or without clip placement, both with or without successful clip retrieval [hazard ratio (HR) 0.85, 95% CI 0.4-1.7, p = 0.7; HR 1.8, 95% CI 0.5-6.0, p = 0.3, respectively]. CONCLUSION: Clip placement in the positive lymph node before NAC is increasingly common. The significant association between clip placement and omission of axillary dissection, even among patients with pN+ disease, suggests a paradigm shift toward TAD as a definitive surgical management strategy in patients with pN+ disease after NAC.

Does Preoperative MRI Reduce Positive Margins after Breast-Conserving Surgery?

BACKGROUND: Breast-conserving surgery (BCS) is a mainstay for breast cancer management, and obtaining negative margins is critical. Some have advocated for the use of preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in reducing positive margins after BCS. We sought to determine whether preoperative MRI was associated with reduced positive margins. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The SHAVE/SHAVE2 trials were multicenter trials in ten US centers with patients with stage 0-3 breast cancer undergoing BCS. Use of preoperative MRI was at the discretion of the surgeon. We evaluated whether or not preoperative MRI was associated with margin status prior to randomization regarding resection of cavity with shave margins. RESULTS: A total of 631 patients participated. Median age was 64 (range 29-94) years, with a median tumor size of 1.3 cm (range 0.1-9.3 cm). Patient factors included 26.1% of patients (165) had palpable tumors, and 6.5% (41) received neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Tumor factors were notable for invasive lobular histology in 7.0% (44) and extensive intraductal component (EIC) in 32.8% (207). A preoperative MRI was performed in 193 (30.6%) patients. Those who underwent preoperative MRI were less likely to have a positive margin (31.1% versus 38.8%), although this difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.073). On multivariate analysis, controlling for patient and tumor factors, utilization of preoperative MRI was not a significant factor in predicting margin status (p = 0.110). Rather, age (p = 0.032) and tumor size (p = 0.040) were the only factors associated with margin status. CONCLUSION: These data suggest that preoperative MRI is not associated margin status; rather, patient age and tumor size are the associated factors.

Omission of Radiation in Conservative Treatment for Breast Cancer: Opportunity for De-escalation of Care.

INTRODUCTION: De-escalation of breast cancer treatment aims to reduce patient and financial toxicity without compromising outcomes. Level I evidence and National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines support omission of adjuvant radiation in patients aged >70 y with hormone-sensitive, pT1N0M0 invasive breast cancer treated with endocrine therapy. We evaluated radiation use in patients eligible for guideline concordant omission of radiation. METHODS: Subgroup analysis of patients eligible for radiation omission from two pooled randomized controlled trials, which included stage 0-III breast cancer patients undergoing breast conserving surgery, was performed to evaluate factors associated with radiation use. RESULTS: Of 631 patients, 47 (7.4%) met radiation omission criteria and were treated by 14 surgeons at eight institutions. The mean age was 75.3 (standard deviation + 4.4) y. Majority of patients identified as White (n = 46; 97.9%) and non-Hispanic (n = 44; 93.6%). The mean tumor size was 1.0 cm; 37 patients (88.1%) had ductal, 4 patients (9.5%) had lobular, and 17 patients (40.5%) had low-grade disease. Among patients eligible for radiation omission, 34 (72.3%) patients received adjuvant radiation. Those who received radiation were significantly younger than those who did not (74 y, interquartile range = 4 y, versus 78 y, interquartile range = 11 y, P = 0.03). There was no difference in radiation use based on size (P = 0.4), histology (P = 0.5), grade (P = 0.7), race (P = 1), ethnicity (P = 0.6), institution (P = 0.1), gender of the surgeon (P = 0.7), or surgeon (P = 0.1). CONCLUSIONS: Fewer than 10% of patients undergoing breast conservation met criteria for radiation omission. Nearly three-quarters received radiation therapy with younger age being a driver of radiation use, suggesting ample opportunity for de-escalation, particularly among younger eligible patients.

Resection of Cavity Shave Margins in Stage 0-III Breast Cancer Patients Undergoing Breast Conserving Surgery: A Prospective Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial.

OBJECTIVE: Single-center studies have demonstrated that resection of cavity shave margins (CSM) halves the rate of positive margins and re-excision in breast cancer patients undergoing partial mastectomy (PM). We sought to determine if these findings were externally generalizable across practice settings. METHODS: In this multicenter randomized controlled trial occurring in 9 centers across the United States, stage 0-III breast cancer patients undergoing PM were randomly assigned to either have resection of CSM ("shave" group) or not ("no shave" group). Randomization occurred intraoperatively, after the surgeon had completed their standard PM. Primary outcome measures were positive margin and re-excision rates. RESULTS: Between July 28, 2016 and April 13, 2018, 400 patients were enrolled in this trial. Four patients (2 in each arm) did not meet inclusion criteria after randomization, leaving 396 patients for analysis: 196 in the "shave" group and 200 to the "no shave" group. Median patient age was 65 years (range; 29-94). Groups were well matched at baseline for demographic and clinicopathologic factors. Prior to randomization, positive margin rates were similar in the "shave" and "no shave" groups (76/196 (38.8%) vs. 72/200 (36.0%), respectively, P = 0.604). After randomization, those in the "shave" group were significantly less likely than those in the "no shave" group to have positive margins (19/196 (9.7%) vs. 72/200 (36.0%), P < 0.001), and to require re-excision or mastectomy for margin clearance (17/196 (8.7%) vs. 47/200 (23.5%), P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Resection of CSM significantly reduces positive margin and re-excision rates in patients undergoing PM.

The impact of obesity on outcomes for patients undergoing mastectomy using the ACS-NSQIP data set.

PURPOSE: According to the World Health Organization (WHO), 34.7% of females in the United States are obese (BMI ≥ 30) in 2014, compared to 32.5% in 2010. The previous research has demonstrated high BMI as an independent risk factor for surgical complications after breast surgery. As more patients become obese, we sought to examine whether increasing obesity had an effect on outcomes of women who underwent a unilateral mastectomy without breast reconstruction. METHODS: The study reviewed the 2007-2012 ACS-NSQIP database and identified all patients who underwent a unilateral mastectomy without reconstruction. Patients were then categorized and compared according to the World Health Organization obesity classification. Data were analyzed for minor complications (e.g., UTI and SSI) and major complications (e.g., renal failure, sepsis, deep vein thrombosis, return to operating room [RTOR], and cardiac arrest). RESULTS: A total of 7207 women were identified. Median BMI was 27.3 kg/m2. From the cohort, 453 patients (6.29%) had a major complication and 173 patients (2.40%) had a minor complication. 53 (0.74%) had bleeding complications, 148 (2.05%) had a surgical site infection (SSI), 352 (4.88%) RTOR, and 7 (0.01%) died within 30 days. Major complications (p = 0.005) and minor complications (p < 0.001) significantly increased as BMI increased. SSI and RTOR had increasing trends, but were not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: This study characterizes the risk of complications in women undergoing unilateral mastectomies and shows that increasing obesity is associated with major and minor postoperative complications. Our finding highlights the need for personalized preoperative risk assessment and counseling of obese patients.

Outcomes After Mastectomy and Lumpectomy in Elderly Patients with Early-Stage Breast Cancer.

INTRODUCTION: Survival in elderly patients undergoing mastectomy or lumpectomy has not been specifically analyzed. METHODS: Patients older than 70 years of age with clinical stage I invasive breast cancer, undergoing mastectomy or lumpectomy with or without radiation, and surveyed within 3 years of their diagnosis, were identified from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results and medicare health outcomes survey-linked dataset. The primary endpoint was breast cancer-specific survival (CSS). RESULTS: Of 1784 patients, 596 (33.4 %) underwent mastectomy, 918 (51.4 %) underwent lumpectomy with radiation, and 270 (15.1 %) underwent lumpectomy alone. Significant differences were noted in age, tumor size, American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) stage, lymph node status (all p < 0.0001) and number of positive lymph nodes between the three groups (p = 0.003). On univariate analysis, CSS for patients undergoing lumpectomy with radiation [hazard ratio (HR) 0.61, 95 % confidence interval (CI) 0.43-0.85; p = 0.004] was superior to mastectomy. Older age (HR 1.3, 95 % CI 1.09-1.45; p = 0.002), two or more comorbidities (HR 1.57, 95 % CI 1.08-2.26; p = 0.02), inability to perform more than two activities of daily living (HR 1.61, 95 % CI 1.06-2.44; p = 0.03), larger tumor size (HR 2.36, 95 % CI 1.85-3.02; p < 0.0001), and positive lymph nodes (HR 2.83, 95 % CI 1.98-4.04; p < 0.0001) were associated with worse CSS. On multivariate analysis, larger tumor size (HR 1.89, 95 % CI 1.37-2.57; p < 0.0001) and positive lymph node status (HR 1.99, 95 % CI 1.36-2.9; p = 0.0004) independently predicted worse survival. CONCLUSIONS: Elderly patients with early-stage invasive breast cancer undergoing breast conservation have better CSS than those undergoing mastectomy. After adjusting for comorbidities and functional status, survival is dependent on tumor-specific variables. Determination of lymph node status remains important in staging elderly breast cancer patients.

Quality of life of older African American breast cancer survivors: a population-based study.

INTRODUCTION: Factors associated with lower health-related quality of life (HRQOL) among older African American (AA) breast cancer survivors (BCS) have not been elucidated. METHODS: Using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-Medicare Health Outcome Survey linked dataset, all resected AA BCS over 65 were identified. Using the most recent survey after diagnosis, individuals with a VR12 physical (PCS) or mental (MCS) component score 10 points lower than the median were categorized as having poor HRQOL. Univariate and multivariate (MV) analyses identified predictors of poor HRQOL. RESULTS: Of 373 AA BCS (median age 74.6), median time from diagnosis to survey was 68.4 months with median follow-up of 138.6 months. Median PCS was 35.9 (IQR 28.5-44.5) with 76 (20.1%) reporting poor PCS. Median MCS was 50.6 (IQR 41.3-59.1) with 101 (27.1%) reporting poor MCS. Predictors of poor PCS included advanced age, larger tumor size, ≥2 comorbidities, inability to perform >2 of 6 activities of daily living (ADLs), modified/radical mastectomy, infiltrating lobular carcinoma, and stage III or IV disease (all p < 0.05). Comorbidities ≥2 and inability to perform >2 of 6 ADLs (p < 0.05) predicted poor MCS. Inability to perform >2 of 6 ADLs was the only independent predictor of poor PCS (OR 10.9, 95% CI 3.0-39.3; p < 0.001) and MCS (OR 7.6, 95% CI 4.3-13.3; p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: In elderly AA BCS, poor HRQOL was not associated with socioeconomic status or tumor-specific factors but rather impairment in ADLs. Physical and mental HRQOL in African American breast cancer survivors is not dependent on socioeconomic or tumor-related characteristics, but rather on inability to perform ADLs.

Rates of high-risk screening prior to a breast cancer diagnosis in patients under age 40.

BACKGROUND: NCCN Guidelines recommend screening young women with an increased breast cancer risk (>20 â€‹% lifetime risk). We sought to evaluate our institutional rates of high-risk screening in young breast cancer patients prior to their diagnoses." METHODS: A single-institution retrospective review (2013-2018) was performed investigating risk scores (Tyrer-Cuzick model) and characteristics of breast cancer patients (age <40 â€‹y) prior to diagnosis. RESULTS: 92 breast cancer patients age <40 â€‹y were identified (average age 34.5). Only 3.3 â€‹% (n â€‹= â€‹3) underwent appropriate screening, despite 35.8 â€‹% meeting high-risk criteria. Nearly all patients underwent genetic testing (98.9 â€‹%) with pathogenic mutations identified in 36.5 â€‹%, including 15.3 â€‹% with BRCA1/2 mutations. CONCLUSIONS: This analysis highlights a significant discrepancy between those meeting criteria for high-risk screening and those who underwent appropriate screening. We identified that this cohort carries significant genetic burden. Future analysis should investigate these findings on a broader scale and strategies to improve screening.

The Impact of Frailty on Adjuvant Therapies Not Offered to or Declined by Breast Cancer Surgery Patients.

INTRODUCTION: The impact of frailty on adjuvant therapies not offered to or declined by elderly breast cancer surgery patients has been understudied. METHODS: This is a retrospective review of a prospectively managed single-center database including all breast cancer patients >65 years undergoing surgery in 2021. Frailty was determined using an electronic frailty index (eFI) derived from electronic health data. Patients were categorized as Fit (eFI ≤ .10), Pre-frail (.10 < eFI ≤.21), or Frail (eFI > .21). Chart review was performed to collect data on adjuvant therapies not offered or declined. Descriptive statistics and logistic regression were performed. RESULTS: Of 133 patients, 16.5% were frail, 46.6% were pre-frail, and 36.8% were fit. Demographics were similar among groups except age and comorbidities. Of those with adjuvant therapy indicated (n = 123), 15.4% were not offered at least one indicated therapy. Of those offered therapy, some therapy was declined in 22.7%. Frail patients more often were not offered or declined some therapy (frail: 63.2%, pre-frail 36.2%, fit: 28.2%, P = .03). Frailty was associated with having some therapy not offered or declined on univariate modeling (OR 4.4 95% CI 1.4-13.5, P = .01) but not on multivariate. Being frail was associated with higher odds of readmission at 6 months on multivariate analysis (OR 9.5, 95% CI: 1.7-54.2. P = .01). CONCLUSION: Over half of frail patients are not offered or decline some adjuvant therapy. The impact of this requires further study. Given their higher odds of readmission, frail patients require close postoperative monitoring to prevent the interruption of adjuvant therapies.

Are Breast Cancer Patients Presenting With Higher Stage Since the COVID-19 Pandemic?

The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on health care is vast and continuing to unfold. As much progress related to breast cancer has resulted from screening and public health measures, we analyzed the stage at which patients with breast cancer presented for surgical consultation from 2019 to 2021. From 2019 to 2021, retrospective analysis was performed on breast cancer patients, comparing differences in patient demographics and cancer stage at diagnosis pre- and post-recommendation (COVID-era) to postpone mammographic screening on March 26, 2020. Proportion analysis was performed to identify similar percentages for each stage, and a weighed stage severity score with sign test was crafted to compare overall stage for a given year. The study included 1107 breast cancer patients from breast cancer surgery registry. These groups were similar demographically. We performed analysis comparing pre-COVID and COVID-era stage severity score. This showed a statistically higher stage at presentation when comparing pre-COVID to COVID-era data (P = .0027). Additionally, we identified a higher rate of stage 3 at presentation or greater in the COVID-era with 7.79% pre-COVID vs 12.3% COVID-era (P = .016). We found that in comparing pre-COVID to COVID-era data that breast cancer patients presented with higher stages, in particular, stage 3 or higher stage disease. This analysis reveals the impact of COVID on the multidisciplinary treatment of breast cancer patients. Additional efforts are needed to address the stage migration, the disproportionate burden of disease, and the access to care.

Is intraoperative imprint cytology evaluation still feasible for the evaluation of sentinel lymph nodes for lobular carcinoma of the breast?

BACKGROUND: The evaluation of sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) from a patient with lobular breast cancer is challenging. Metastatic lobular cancer is difficult to identify in SLNs because of its low-grade cytomorphology and its tendency to resemble lymphocytes. Intraoperative imprint cytology (IIC) is a rapid, reliable method for evaluating SLNs intraoperatively. We sought to reexamine our experience with this technique in the identification of invasive lobular breast cancer SLN metastases. METHODS: A retrospective review of a prospectively maintained database of IIC results of 1010 SLN mapping procedures for breast cancer was performed. From this cohort we reviewed SLN cases of lobular cancer. The SLNs were evaluated intraoperatively by bisecting the SLN. Imprints were made of each cut surface and stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) and Diff-Quik. Permanent sections were evaluated with up to 4 H&E-stained levels and cytokeratin immunohistochemistry. IIC results were compared with final pathologic results. RESULTS: A total of 67 cases of pure invasive lobular cancer were identified. The sensitivity was 71%, specificity was 100%, and accuracy was 92%. No statistically significant differences in sensitivity, specificity, or accuracy were identified between the intraoperative detection of lobular carcinoma vs ductal carcinoma. The specificity has remained the same since 2004. However the accuracy (82% vs 92%; P = .09) and sensitivity (52% vs 71%; P = .02) has improved since 2004. CONCLUSIONS: As we have previously shown, the sensitivity and specificity of IIC in evaluating lobular carcinoma is feasible and accurate. IIC continues to be a viable alternative to frozen section for intraoperative evaluation.

Primary Breast Neuroendocrine Tumor.

Breast primary neuroendocrine tumors (BNETs) are rare, making up less than 1% of all breast carcinoma diagnosis. Their detection relies on physical exams and mammography. Diagnosis of primary BNET requires findings of no other source of neuroendocrine tumor (eg, pancreatic, lung, and appendix). Histopathologically, they typically stain positive for chromogranin A and/or synaptophysin, as do most neuroendocrine tumors. Currently, there are no agreed upon and standardized treatment protocols as it is a rare diagnosis. Treatment protocols are often built on anecdotal evidence and small case reports and series. Here we discuss a case of BNET in a 51-year-old female and discuss commonly encountered treatment protocols.

Intraductal Papilloma on Breast Biopsy: Upstaging Rate and Implications for Practice Guidelines.

BACKGROUND: The recommendation for management of intraductal papilloma has not been clearly established and its surgical excision criteria remain controversial. This study determines the institutional malignancy upstage rate of benign intraductal papillomas and identifies risk factors for upstage. METHODS: Retrospective review was conducted on female patients who were diagnosed with intraductal papillomas without atypia on core needle biopsy at Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist Hospital between 1/2012 and 6/2021. Patients were excluded if there was a concomitant malignancy or atypia or deemed to be discordant with imaging. Features associated with upstage on imaging and histopathology were obtained from the electronic medical record. RESULTS: This study included 245 intraductal papillomas without atypia in 231 women (mean age, 59.1 ± 12.3 [SD] years). Approximately 31% (76/245) of the papillomas were excised, whereas 69% (169/245) of the papillomas underwent surveillance. Of the patients who underwent excisional biopsy, upstage rate for DCIS was 1.3% (1/76) and 5.3% (4/76) for atypia. All of the papillomas upstaged to DCIS or atypia had lesion size ≥10 mm on imaging. Out of the 139 intraductal papillomas that underwent radiologic surveillance, two (1.4%) developed malignancy and three (2.2%) developed atypia. DISCUSSION: The risk of upstaging of intraductal papilloma without atypia to malignancy remains extremely low. Therefore, routine surgical excision may not be necessary. While the papillomas upstaged to either malignancy or atypia have size abnormality ≥10 mm, other potential selective excision criteria should be explored to further decrease the risk of an upstage.

Evaluation of the Axillary Surgery Performed in Clinically Node-Positive Breast Cancer Patients Following Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy.

BACKGROUND: The American College of Surgeons Oncology Group Z1071 trial in 2013 demonstrated the fesability of sentinel lymph node biopsy in clinically node-positive patients following neoadjuvant chemotherapy. The goal of this study was to determine the continued impact of this study on our practice pattern. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a retrospective review of institutional changes in the management of axillary nodal disease following the publication of Z1071. Patients with clinically node-positive disease that completed neoadjuvant chemotherapy between 2014 and 2020 were included. The Cocoran-Armitage trend test was used to analyze change in categorical variables over time, and the Spearman's rank coefficient was used to analyze two-ranked variables. RESULTS: A cohort of 102 patients were included in the study and demonstrated that the number of sentinel lymph node biopsies to evaluate axillary disease increased over time. Additionally, the number of biopsies of suspicious nodes, and the use of marker clips on the biopsied nodes increased over time. CONCLUSION: Our institution has continued to incorporate the result from Z1071 in our practice patterns.