RESUMO
PURPOSE: To explore the optimal strategies of therapeutic embolization for patients with carotid blowout syndrome in the external carotid artery (ECA), who may also present with arterial tumor invasion or necrosis extending to the internal carotid artery (ICA) or common carotid artery (CCA). MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study included 110 patients with ECA blowout between 2005 and 2022. Antecedent cross-sectional imaging features were examined, including tumor size, extent of arterial invasion, and air-containing necrosis. Patients were divided into Groups 1 (n = 53, simultaneous ICA/CCA invasion + ECA therapeutic embolization), 2 (n = 18, simultaneous ICA/CCA invasion + ECA-ICA/CCA therapeutic embolization), and 3 (n = 39, no ICA/CCA invasion + ECA therapeutic embolization). Kaplan-Meier and multivariable Cox regression analyses were performed to evaluate associations of clinical, imaging, and therapeutic embolization characteristics with recurrent bleeding. RESULTS: Multivariable Cox regression revealed that Group 1 was independently associated with a higher risk of recurrent bleeding than that in Group 2 (adjusted hazard ratio, 6.3; 95% CI, 1.7â23.4; P = .005) and Group 3 (adjusted hazard ratio, 3.8; 95% CI, 1.8â8.3; P = .001). In the subgroup with simultaneous ICA/CCA invasion, air-containing necrosis around the ICA/CCA was independently associated with recurrent bleeding after therapeutic embolization of the ECA (adjusted hazard ratio, 5.0; 95% CI, 1.8â13.6; P = .002). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with ECA blowout treated with therapeutic embolization, there was a lower risk of recurrent bleeding when the extents of arterial invasion and therapeutic embolization were concordant. Air-containing necrosis around the ICA/CCA was associated with recurrent bleeding, so extensive therapeutic embolization to the ICA/CCA should be evaluated in such patients.
Assuntos
Estenose das Carótidas , Embolização Terapêutica , Ataque Isquêmico Transitório , Neoplasias , Humanos , Artéria Carótida Externa/diagnóstico por imagem , Artéria Carótida Interna/diagnóstico por imagem , Artéria Carótida Primitiva , Embolização Terapêutica/efeitos adversos , Hemorragia/diagnóstico por imagem , Hemorragia/etiologia , Hemorragia/terapia , NecroseRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Patient with carotid blowout syndrome (CBS) may demonstrated non-bleeding digital subtraction angiography (DSA) without identifying pseudoaneurysm or contrast extravasation. Our objective is to evaluate the clinical outcomes for this specific subset of patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective observational study was conducted on 172 CBS patients who received DSA for evaluation of transarterial embolization (TAE) between 2005 and 2022, of whom 19 patients had non-bleeding DSA and did not undergo TAE. RESULTS: The age (55.2 ± 7.3 vs. 54.8 ± 11.1), male sex (17/19 vs. 135/153), tumor size (5.6 ± 2.4 vs. 5.2 ± 2.2), cancer locations were similar (P > 0.05) between both groups; except for there were more pseudoaneurysm/active bleeding (85.6% vs. 0%) and less vascular irregularity (14.4% vs. 94.7%) in the TAE group (P < 0.001). In the multivariable Cox regression model adjusting for age, sex, and tumor size, non-bleeding DSA group was independently associated with recurrent bleeding compared to TAE group (adjusted hazard ratio = 3.5, 95% confidence interval: 1.9-6.4, P < 0.001). Furthermore, the presence of vascular irregularity was associated with segmental recurrent bleeding (adjusted HR = 8.0, 95% CI 2.7-23.3, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Patient showing non-bleeding DSA thus not having TAE had higher risk of recurrent bleeding, compared to patient who received TAE. Level of Evidence Level 4, Case Series.