Asthma severity categorization using a claims-based algorithm or pulmonary function testing.

OBJECTIVES: This study was performed to determine whether pulmonary function test results would appreciably alter asthma severity categorization determined by an algorithm using information readily available in administrative databases. METHODS: Patients 6 to 64 years of age with asthma diagnosed from 1999-2005, who had at least one pulmonary function test, were identified from a claims database of a medical group practice located in central Massachusetts. Asthma severity for these patients was categorized using information available in an administrative database (claims-based algorithm) and by percent predicted forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV(1)) or peak expiratory flow (PEF) abstracted from medical charts (pulmonary function test method). Gamma rank correlation index was used to measure the association between the two severity categorization methods. Total and asthma-related healthcare costs for each severity category were compared between the two different approaches. RESULTS: There was a significant ordinal association between severity categorization with the two classification approaches (p = 0.0002). The pulmonary function test method resulted in more frequent mild categorizations and less frequent moderate and severe categorizations than the claims-based algorithm. In only 10.9% of patients did the pulmonary function test method result in a more severe asthma category than the claims-based algorithm. Patients with more severe asthma, determined by both methods, had higher total and asthma-related health care costs. Total and asthma-related health care costs were similar for each asthma severity categorization for the two classification approaches, except for asthma-related costs in the moderate severity categories. CONCLUSION: The claims-based algorithm generally categorized patients as having more severe asthma than the approach using pulmonary function test results. Pulmonary function test results would have appreciably changed asthma severity categorization in only a small percent of patients. These findings add further support to the use of administrative database analyses for the evaluation of asthma care in large populations.

Impact of medication adherence to disease-modifying drugs on severe relapse, and direct and indirect costs among employees with multiple sclerosis in the US.

OBJECTIVE: To compare rates of severe relapse and total direct and indirect costs over a 2-year period between US-based employees with multiple sclerosis (MS) who were adherent and non-adherent to disease-modifying drugs (DMDs). METHODS: Employees with ≥1 MS diagnosis (ICD-9-CM: 340.x) and ≥1 DMD pharmacy claim between 1/1/2002-12/31/2007 were identified from a large US administrative claims database. Patients had continuous coverage ≥6 months before (baseline) and ≥24 months after (study period) their index date (first DMD claim). Adherence was measured using medication possession ratio (MPR) over the study period. Patients with MPR ≥80% were considered adherent (n = 448) and those with MPR <80% as non-adherent (n = 200). Multivariate analyses were used to compare rates of severe relapse (inpatient or Emergency Department visit with MS diagnosis) and costs in 2007 dollars between DMD adherent and non-adherent patients. Direct costs were calculated as reimbursements to providers for medical services and prescription drugs excluding DMDs. Indirect costs included disability and medically-related absenteeism costs. RESULTS: DMD adherent patients were on average older (43.5 vs 41.8 years, p = 0.015) and more likely to be male (38.6% vs 26.0%, p = 0.002) compared with non-adherent patients. Adherent patients had lower rates of depression, higher rates of previous DMD use, and higher baseline MS-related costs. After adjusting for differences in baseline characteristics, DMD adherent patients had a lower rate of severe relapse (12.4% vs 19.9%, p = 0.013) and lower total (direct and indirect) costs ($14,095 vs $16,638, p = 0.048) over the 2-year study period. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, DMD adherence was associated with a significantly lower rate of severe relapse and lower total costs over 2 years. Causality cannot be inferred because adherence and outcomes were measured over the same period. The study was subject to limitations associated with use of claims data and the absence of clinical measures.