Autophagy Inhibition Increased Sensitivity of Pancreatic Cancer Cells to Carbon Ion Radiotherapy.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Pancreatic cancer has the poorest survival rate among all cancer types. Therefore, it is essential to develop an effective treatment strategy for this cancer. METHODS: We performed carbon ion radiotherapy (CIRT) in human pancreatic cancer cell lines and analyzed their survival, apoptosis, necrosis, and autophagy. To investigate the role of CIRT-induced autophagy, autophagy inhibitors were added to cells prior to CIRT. To evaluate tumor formation, we inoculated CIRT-treated murine pancreatic cancer cells on the flank of syngeneic mice and measured tumor weight. We immunohistochemically measured autophagy levels in surgical sections from patients with pancreatic cancer who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) plus CIRT or NAC alone. RESULTS: CIRT reduced the survival fraction of pancreatic cancer cells and induced apoptotic and necrotic alterations, along with autophagy. Preincubation with an autophagy inhibitor accelerated cell death. Mice inoculated with control pancreatic cancer cells developed tumors, while those inoculated with CIRT/autophagy inhibitor-treated cells showed significant evasion. Surgical specimens of NAC-treated patients expressed autophagy comparable to control patients, while those in the NAC plus CIRT group expressed little autophagy and nuclear staining. CONCLUSION: CIRT effectively killed the pancreatic cancer cells by inhibiting their autophagy-inducing abilities.

Physical and biological beam modeling for carbon beam scanning at Osaka Heavy Ion Therapy Center.

We have developed physical and biological beam modeling for carbon scanning therapy at the Osaka Heavy Ion Therapy Center (Osaka HIMAK). Carbon beam scanning irradiation is based on continuous carbon beam scanning, which adopts hybrid energy changes using both accelerator energy changes and binary range shifters in the nozzles. The physical dose calculation is based on a triple Gaussian pencil-beam algorithm, and we thus developed a beam modeling method using dose measurements and Monte Carlo simulation for the triple Gaussian. We exploited a biological model based on a conventional linear-quadratic (LQ) model and the photon equivalent dose, without considering the dose dependency of the relative biological effectiveness (RBE), to fully comply with the carbon passive dose distribution using a ridge filter. We extended a passive ridge-filter design method, in which carbon and helium LQ parameters are applied to carbon and fragment isotopes, respectively, to carbon scanning treatment. We then obtained radiation quality data, such as the linear energy transfer (LET) and LQ parameters, by Monte Carlo simulation. The physical dose was verified to agree with measurements to within ±2% for various patterns of volume irradiation. Furthermore, the RBE in the middle of a spread-out Bragg peak (SOBP) reproduced that from passive dose distribution results to within ±1.5%. The developed carbon beam modeling and dose calculation program was successfully applied in clinical use at Osaka HIMAK.

Carbon ion radiotherapy using fiducial markers for prostate cancer in Osaka HIMAK: Treatment planning.

PURPOSE: Carbon ion radiotherapy for prostate cancer was performed using two fine needle Gold Anchor (GA) markers for patient position verification in Osaka Heavy Ion Medical Accelerator in Kansai (Osaka HIMAK). The present study examined treatment plans for prostate cases using beam-specific planning target volume (bsPTV) based on the effect of the markers on dose distribution and analysis of target movements. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Gafchromic EBT3 film was used to measure dose perturbations caused by markers. First, the relationships between the irradiated film density and absolute dose with different linear energy transfer distributions within a spread-out Bragg peak (SOBP) were confirmed. Then, to derive the effect of markers, two types of markers, including GA, were placed at the proximal, center, and distal depths within the same SOBP, and dose distributions behind the markers were measured using the films. The amount of internal motion of prostate was derived from irradiation results and analyzed to determine the margins of the bsPTV. RESULTS: The linearity of the film densities against absolute doses was constant within the SOBP and the amount of dose perturbations caused by the markers was quantitatively estimated from the film densities. The dose perturbation close behind the markers was smallest (<10% among depths within the SOBP regardless of types of markers) and increased with depth. The effect of two types of GAs on dose distributions was small and could be ignored in the treatment planning. Based on the analysis results of internal motions of prostate, required margins of the bsPTV were found to be 8, 7, and 7 mm in left-right (LR), anterior-posterior (AP), and superior-inferior (SI) directions, respectively. CONCLUSION: We evaluated the dose reductions caused by markers and determined the margins of the bsPTV, which was applied to the treatment using fiducial markers, using the analysis results of prostate movements.

Calculation of Stopping-Power Ratio from Multiple CT Numbers Using Photon-Counting CT System: Two- and Three-Parameter-Fitting Method.

The two-parameter-fitting method (PFM) is commonly used to calculate the stopping-power ratio (SPR). This study proposes a new formalism: a three-PFM, which can be used in multiple spectral computed tomography (CT). Using a photon-counting CT system, seven rod-shaped samples of aluminium, graphite, and poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA), and four types of biological phantom materials were placed in a water-filled sample holder. The X-ray tube voltage and current were set at 150 kV and 40 µA, respectively, and four CT images were obtained at four threshold settings. A semi-empirical correction method that corrects the difference between the CT values from the photon-counting CT images and theoretical values in each spectral region was also introduced. Both the two- and three-PFMs were used to calculate the effective atomic number and electron density from multiple CT numbers. The mean excitation energy was calculated via parameterisation with the effective atomic number, and the SPR was then calculated from the calculated electron density and mean excitation energy. Then, the SPRs from both methods were compared with the theoretical values. To estimate the noise level of the CT numbers obtained from the photon-counting CT, CT numbers, including noise, were simulated to evaluate the robustness of the aforementioned PFMs. For the aluminium and graphite, the maximum relative errors for the SPRs calculated using the two-PFM and three-PFM were 17.1% and 7.1%, respectively. For the PMMA and biological phantom materials, the maximum relative errors for the SPRs calculated using the two-PFM and three-PFM were 5.5% and 2.0%, respectively. It was concluded that the three-PFM, compared with the two-PFM, can yield SPRs that are closer to the theoretical values and is less affected by noise.

External dosimetry audit for quality assurance of carbon-ion radiation therapy clinical trials.

PURPOSE: The QA team of the Japan carbon-ion radiation oncology study group (J-CROS) was organized in 2015 to enhance confidence in the accuracy of clinical dosimetry and ensure that the facility QA procedures are adequate. The team conducted onsite dosimetry audits in all the carbon-ion radiation therapy centers in Japan. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A special phantom was fabricated for the onsite dosimetry audit. Target volumes such as the GTV, CTV, and PTV were contoured to the obtained CT images, and two plans with different isocenter depths were created. The dose at the isocenter was measured by an ionization chamber, in the onsite audit and compared with the calculated dose. RESULTS: For all the centers, the average of the percentage ratio between the measured and calculated doses (measured/calculated) was 0.5% (-2.7% to +2.6%) and the standard deviation, 1.7%. In all the centers, the beams were within the set tolerance level of 3%. CONCLUSIONS: The audit demonstrated that the dose at a single point in the water phantom was within tolerance, but it is a big step to say that all doses are correct. In addition, this external dosimetry audit encouraged centers to improve the quality of their dosimetry systems.

Evaluation of the accuracy and clinical practicality of a calculation system for patient positional displacement in carbon ion radiotherapy at five sites.

PURPOSE: We developed a system for calculating patient positional displacement between digital radiography images (DRs) and digitally reconstructed radiography images (DRRs) to reduce patient radiation exposure, minimize individual differences between radiological technologists in patient positioning, and decrease positioning time. The accuracy of this system at five sites was evaluated with clinical data from cancer patients. The dependence of calculation accuracy on the size of the region of interest (ROI) and initial position was evaluated for clinical use. METHODS: For a preliminary verification, treatment planning and positioning data from eight setup patterns using a head and neck phantom were evaluated. Following this, data from 50 patients with prostate, lung, head and neck, liver, or pancreatic cancer (n = 10 each) were evaluated. Root mean square errors (RMSEs) between the results calculated by our system and the reference positions were assessed. The reference positions were manually determined by two radiological technologists to best-matching positions with orthogonal DRs and DRRs in six axial directions. The ROI size dependence was evaluated by comparing RMSEs for three different ROI sizes. Additionally, dependence on initial position parameters was evaluated by comparing RMSEs for four position patterns. RESULTS: For the phantom study, the average (± standard deviation) translation error was 0.17 ± 0.05, rotation error was 0.17 ± 0.07, and ΔD was 0.14 ± 0.05. Using the optimal ROI size for each patient site, all cases of prostate, lung, and head and neck cancer with initial position parameters of 10 mm or under were acceptable in our tolerance. However, only four liver cancer cases and three pancreatic cancer cases were acceptable, because of low-reproducibility regions in the ROIs. CONCLUSION: Our system has clinical practicality for prostate, lung, and head and neck cancer cases. Additionally, our findings suggest ROI size dependence in some cases.

A Novel Evaluation Method for Displacement between Carbon Beam Axis and Positioning X-ray Axis Using an Imaging Plate.

PURPOSE: We developed an evaluation method for easily calculating displacement directly between the carbon beam axis and positioning X-ray axis. METHODS: A verification image was acquired by irradiating an imaging plate with a carbon beam and X-ray. The X-ray passed through a lead plate inserted in the range compensator holder. The displacement was calculated on the verification image from the center of a wire irradiated with carbon using a multi leaf collimator (MLC) and a wire irradiated with X-ray also using MLC. The accuracy of the method was evaluated by moving the carbon beam axis, the X-ray axis, and the setup angle. The weekly changes of vertical and lateral beams in all rooms were also evaluated. RESULTS: The displacements of the carbon beam axis and the setup angle did not influence the calculation results, whereas the displacement of the X-ray axis did (R=0.999). The displacements including weekly changes were all less than 1.00 mm. CONCLUSION: An evaluation method for calculating the displacement directly and simply between the carbon beam axis and positioning X-ray axis was developed and verified. The weekly changes of displacement between axes were evaluated to be acceptable at our facility.

Development of an automatic evaluation method for patient positioning error.

Highly accurate radiotherapy needs highly accurate patient positioning. At our facility, patient positioning is manually performed by radiology technicians. After the positioning, positioning error is measured by manually comparing some positions on a digital radiography image (DR) to the corresponding positions on a digitally reconstructed radiography image (DRR). This method is prone to error and can be time-consuming because of its manual nature. Therefore, we propose an automated measuring method for positioning error to improve patient throughput and achieve higher reliability. The error between a position on the DR and a position on the DRR was calculated to determine the best matched position using the block-matching method. The zero-mean normalized cross correlation was used as our evaluation function, and the Gaussian weight function was used to increase importance as the pixel position approached the isocenter. The accuracy of the calculation method was evaluated using pelvic phantom images, and the method's effectiveness was evaluated on images of prostate cancer patients before the positioning, comparing them with the results of radiology technicians' measurements. The root mean square error (RMSE) of the calculation method for the pelvic phantom was 0.23 ± 0.05 mm. The coefficients between the calculation method and the measurement results of the technicians were 0.989 for the phantom images and 0.980 for the patient images. The RMSE of the total evaluation results of positioning for prostate cancer patients using the calculation method was 0.32 ± 0.18 mm. Using the proposed method, we successfully measured residual positioning errors. The accuracy and effectiveness of the method was evaluated for pelvic phantom images and images of prostate cancer patients. In the future, positioning for cancer patients at other sites will be evaluated using the calculation method. Consequently, we expect an improvement in treatment throughput for these other sites.

Dosimetric consequences of flap dose due to rapid beam off control for a high intensity carbon ion radiation therapy synchrotron.

BACKGROUND: In carbon ion radiation therapy (CIRT) the predominant method of irradiation is raster scanning, called dose driven continuous scanning (DDCS) by Hitachi, allowing for continuous synchrotron extraction. The reduction in irradiation time is highly beneficial in minimizing the impact of patient and target movement on dose distribution. The RF knock out (RFKO) slow-extraction method is commonly used for beam on/off control. When the Hitachi synchrotron receives a beam off signal the control system stops the RFKO and after some delay time (t-delay) during which the beam intensity declines, a high-speed steering magnet (HSST) is used to sweep the remaining beam from isocenter to a beam dump for safety reasons. Mayo Clinic Florida (MCF) will use a very short delay of the HSST operation from the RFKO beam OFF signal to minimize the delay time and delayed dose. MCF clinical beam intensity, a tenfold increase over HIMAK, is still less than 100 mMU/ms (approximately 4.9 × 109 pps for 430 MeV/u). PURPOSE: The rapid beam off control (RBOC) proposed for MCF is associated with the occurrence of flap dose (FD), which refers to the asymmetric shoulder of the spot dose profile formed from the beam bent by HSST deviating from its planned spot position on the isocenter plane. In this study, we quantitatively assessed FD, proposed a treatment planning system (TPS) implementation using a flap spot (FS) and evaluated its impact on dose distribution. METHOD: The experiments were conducted at the Osaka Heavy Ion Therapy Center (HIMAK) varying the t-delay from 0.01 to 1 ms in a research environment to simulate the MCF RBOC. We studied the dependence of FD position on beam transport and its dependence on energy and beam intensity. FD was generated by delivering 10000 continuous spots on the central axis that are occasionally triggered by an external 10 Hz gate signal. Measurements were conducted using an oscilloscope, and the nozzle's spot position monitor (SPM) and dose monitor (DM). RESULT: All spot profile data were corrected for the gain of the SPM's beam intensity dependence. FD was determined by fitting the (SPM) Profile data to a double Gaussian. The position of the FS was found to be transport path dependent, with FS occurring on the opposite sides of the scanning x-direction for vertical and horizontal ports, respectively, as predicted by transport calculations. It was observed that the FD increases with beam intensity and did not exhibit a significant dependence on energy. The effect of FD on treatment planning is shown to have no significant dose impact on the organs at risk (OARs) near the target for clinical beam intensities and a modest increase for very high intensities. CONCLUSION: Using HIMAK in research mode the implications are that the FD has no clinical impact on the clinical CIRT beam intensities for MCF and maybe planned for higher intensities by incorporating FS into the TPS to predict the modest increased dose to OARs. A method for commissioning and quality assurance of FD has been proposed.

Beam delivery characteristics of the Hitachi carbon ion scanning system at Osaka Heavy Ion Medical Accelerator in Kansai (HIMAK).

BACKGROUND: Using the pencil beam raster scanning method employed at most carbon beam treatment facilities, spots can be moved without interrupting the beam, allowing for the delivery of a dose between spots (move dose). This technique is also known as Dose-Driven-Continuous-Scanning (DDCS). To minimize its impact on HIMAK patient dosimetry, there's an upper limit to the move dose. Spots within a layer are grouped into sets, or "break points," allowing continuous irradiation. The beam is turned off when transitioning between sets or at the end of a treatment layer or spill. The control system beam-off is accomplished by turning off the RF Knockout (RFKO) extraction and after a brief delay the High Speed Steering Magnet (HSST) redirects the beam transport away from isocenter to a beam dump. PURPOSE: The influence of the move dose and beam on/off control on the dose distribution and irradiation time was evaluated by measurements never before reported and modelled for Hitachi Carbon DDCS. METHOD: We conducted fixed-point and scanning irradiation experiments at three different energies, both with and without breakpoints. For fixed-point irradiation, we utilized a 2D array detector and an oscilloscope to measure beam intensity over time. The oscilloscope data enabled us to confirm beam-off and beam-on timing due to breakpoints, as well as the relative timing of the RFKO signal, HSST signal, and dose monitor (DM) signals. From these measurements, we analyzed and modelled the temporal characteristics of the beam intensity. We also developed a model for the spot shape and amplitude at isocenter occurring after the beam-off signal which we called flap dose and its dependence on beam intensity. In the case of scanning irradiation, we measured move doses using the 2D array detector and compared these measurements with our model. RESULT: We observed that the most dominant time variation of the beam intensity was at 1 kHz and its harmonic frequencies. Our findings revealed that the derived beam intensity cannot reach the preset beam intensity when each spot belongs to different breakpoints. The beam-off time due to breakpoints was approximately 100 ms, while the beam rise time and fall time (tdecay ) were remarkably fast, about 10 ms and 0.2 ms, respectively. Moreover, we measured the time lag (tdelay ) of approximately 0.2 ms between the RFKO and HSST signals. Since tdelay ≈ tdecay at HIMAK then the HSST is activated after the residual beam intensity, resulting in essentially zero flap dose at isocenter from the HSST. Our measurements of the move dose demonstrated excellent agreement with the modelled move dose. CONCLUSION: We conducted the first move dose measurement for a Hitachi Carbon synchrotron, and our findings, considering beam on/off control details, indicate that Hitachi's carbon synchrotron provides a stable beam at HIMAK. Our work suggests that measuring both move dose and flap dose should be part of the commissioning process and possibly using our model in the Treatment Planning System (TPS) for new facilities with treatment delivery control systems with higher beam intensities and faster beam-off control.

Carbon ion therapy for laterally located tumors require multiple fixed ports or a rotating gantry.

Mayo Clinic Florida will initially open with the capability to treat with a single horizontal port for carbon ion therapy. Carbon ion therapy is traditionally done using a multi fixed port treatment approach. In this study, for nine treatment sites, clinically approved treatment plan of Osaka Heavy Ion Therapy Center was compared to a treatment plan using only a horizontal port. The treatment sites evaluated in this study were prostate cancer, pancreatic cancer, cervical cancer, recurrent rectal cancer, liver cancer, head and neck cancer, bone cancer (sarcoma and chordoma), and lung cancer. As expected, the prostate plans are identical and are only included for completeness. The DVH results for the pancreas and cervical cancer were very similar. The results for recurrent rectal, head and neck, sarcoma, chordoma, and lung cancer indicate that a single horizontal port with couch roll and yaw will accommodate certain medial targets but will be challenging to treat for laterally located targets without creative mitigations.

Dosimetric impact of stopping power for human bone porosity with dual-energy computed tomography in scanned carbon-ion therapy treatment planning.

Few reports have documented how the accuracy of stopping power ratio (SPR) prediction for porous bone tissue affects the dose distribution of scanned carbon-ion beam therapy. The estimated SPR based on single-energy computed tomography (SECT) and dual-energy CT (DECT) were compared for the femur of a Rando phantom which simulates the porosity of human bone, NEOBONE which is the hydroxyapatite synthetic bone substitute, and soft tissue samples. Dose differences between SECT and DECT were evaluated for a scanned carbon-ion therapy treatment plan for the Rando phantom. The difference in the water equivalent length was measured to extract the SPR of the examined samples. The differences for SPR estimated from the DECT-SPR conversion were small with - 1.8% and - 3.3% for the Rando phantom femur and NEOBONE, respectively, whereas the differences for SECT-SPR were between 7.6 and 70.7%, illustrating a 1.5-mm shift of the range and a dose difference of 13.3% at maximum point in the evaluation of the dose distribution. This study demonstrated that the DECT-SPR conversion method better estimated the SPR of the porosity of bone tissues than SECT-SPR followed by the accurate range of the carbon-ion beams on carbon-ion dose calculations.

Development and characterization of a dedicated dose monitor for ultrahigh-dose-rate scanned carbon-ion beams.

The current monochromatic beam mode (i.e., uHDR irradiation mode) of the scanned carbon-ion beam lacks a dedicated dose monitor, making the beam control challenging. We developed and characterized a dedicated dose monitor for uHDR-scanned carbon-ion beams. Furthermore, a simple measurable dose rate (dose rate per spot (DRspot)) was suggested by using the developed dose monitor and experimentally validating quantities relevant to the uHDR scanned carbon-ion beam. A large plane-parallel ionization chamber (IC) with a smaller electrode spacing was used to reduce uHDR recombination effects, and a dedicated operational amplifier was manufactured for the uHDR-scanned carbon-ion beam. The dose linearity of the IC was within ± 1% in the range of 1.8-12.3 Gy. The spatial inhomogeneity of the dose response of the IC was ± 0.38% inside the ± 40-mm detector area, and a systematic deviation of approximately 2% was measured at the edge of the detector. uHDR irradiation with beam scanning was tested and verified for different doses at the corresponding dose rates (in terms of both the average dose rate and DRspot). We confirmed that the dose monitor can highlight the characteristics (i.e., dose, dose rate, and dose profile) of uHDR-scanned carbon-ion beams at several dose levels in the monochromatic beam mode.

Treatment planning of carbon ion radiotherapy for prostate cancer based on cellular experiments with PC3 human prostate cancer cells.

[Purpose] Treatment plans for carbon ion radiotherapy (CIRT) in Japan are designed to uniformly deliver the prescribed clinical dose based on the radiosensitivity of human salivary gland (HSG) cells to the planning target volume (PTV). However, sensitivity to carbon beams varies between cell lines, that is, it should be checked that the clinical dose distribution based on the cell radiosensitivity of the treatment site is uniform within the PTV. [Methods] We modeled the linear energy transfer (LET) dependence of the linear-quadratic (LQ) coefficients specific to prostate cancer, which accounts for the majority of CIRT. This was achieved by irradiating prostate cancer cells (PC3) with X-rays from a 4 MV-Linac and carbon beams with different LETs of 11.1-214.3 keV/µm. By using the radiosensitivity of PC3 cells derived from cellular experiments, we reconstructed prostate-cancer-specific clinical dose distributions on patient computed tomography (CT). [Results] The LQ coefficient, α, of PC3 cells was larger than that of HSG cells at low (<50 keV/µm) LET and smaller at high (>50 keV/µm) LET, which was validated by cellular experiments performed on rectangular SOBPs. The reconstructed dose distribution on patient CT was sloped when 1 fraction incident from the one side of the patient was considered, but remained uniform from the sum of 12 fractions of the left-right opposing beams (as is used in clinical practice). [Conclusion] Our study reveals the inhomogeneity of clinical doses in single-field plans calculated using the PC3 radiosensitivity data. However, this inhomogeneity is compensated by using the combination of left-right opposing beams.

Ultra-high Dose-rate Carbon-ion Scanning Beam With a Compact Medical Synchrotron Contributing to Further Development of FLASH Irradiation.

BACKGROUND/AIM: The focus of this report is establishing an irradiation arrangement to realize an ultra-high dose-rate (uHDR; FLASH) of scanned carbon-ion irradiation possible with a compact commonly available medical synchrotron. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Following adjustments to the operation it became possible to extract ≥1.0×109 carbon ions at 208.3 MeV/u (86 mm in range) per 100 ms. The design takes the utmost care to prevent damage to monitors, particularly in the nozzle, achieved by the uHDR beam not passing through this part of the apparatus. Doses were adjusted by extraction times, using a function generator. After one scan by the carbon-ion beam it became possible to create a field within the extraction time. The Advanced Markus chamber (AMC) and Gafchromic film are then able to measure the absolute dose and field size at a plateau depth, with the operating voltage of the chamber at 400 V at the uHDR for the AMC. RESULTS: The beam scanning utilizing this uHDR irradiation could be confirmed at a dose of 6.5±0.08 Gy (±3% homogeneous) at this volume over at least 16×16 mm2 corresponding to a dose-rate of 92.3 Gy/s (±1.3%). The dose was ca. 0.7, 1.5, 2.9, and 5.4 Gy depending on dose-rate and field size, with the rate of killed cells increasing with the irradiation dose. CONCLUSION: The compact medical synchrotron achieved FLASH dose-rates of >40 Gy/s at different dose levels and in useful field sizes for research with the apparatus and arrangement developed here.

Validation of robust radiobiological optimization algorithms based on the mixed beam model for intensity-modulated carbon-ion therapy.

Currently, treatment planning systems (TPSs) that can compute the intensities of intensity-modulated carbon-ion therapy (IMCT) using scanned carbon-ion beams are limited. In the present study, the computational efficacy of the newly designed IMCT algorithms was analyzed for the first time based on the mixed beam model with respect to the physical and biological doses; moreover, the validity and effectiveness of the robust radiobiological optimization were verified. A dose calculation engine was independently generated to validate a clinical dose determined in the TPS. A biological assay was performed using the HSGc-C5 cell line to validate the calculated surviving fraction (SF). Both spot control (SC) and voxel-wise worst-case scenario (WC) algorithms were employed for robust radiobiological optimization followed by their application in a Radiation Therapy Oncology Group benchmark phantom under homogeneous and heterogeneous conditions and a clinical case for range and position errors. Importantly, for the first time, both SC and WC algorithms were implemented in the integrated TPS platform that can compute the intensities of IMCT using scanned carbon-ion beams for robust radiobiological optimization. For assessing the robustness, the difference between the maximum and minimum values of a dose-volume histogram index in the examined error scenarios was considered as a robustness index. The relative biological effectiveness (RBE) determined by the independent dose calculation engine exhibited a -0.6% difference compared with the RBE defined by the TPS at the isocenter, whereas the measured and the calculated SF were similar. Regardless of the objects, compared with the conventional IMCT, the robust radiobiological optimization enhanced the sensitivity of the examined error scenarios by up to 19% for the robustness index. The computational efficacy of the novel IMCT algorithms was verified according to the mixed beam model with respect to the physical and biological doses. The robust radiobiological optimizations lowered the impact of range and position uncertainties considerably in the examined scenarios. The robustness of the WC algorithm was more enhanced compared with that of the SC algorithm. Nevertheless, the SC algorithm can be used as an alternative to the WC IMCT algorithm with respect to the computational cost.

Commissioning of carbon-ion radiotherapy for moving targets at the Osaka Heavy-Ion Therapy Center.

PURPOSE: Herein, we report the methods and results of the Hitachi carbon-ion therapy facility commissioning to determine the optimum values of the magnitude of movement and repaint number in respiratory-gated irradiation. METHODS: A virtual-cylinder target was created using the treatment-planning system (VQA Plan), and measurements were performed to study the effects of respiratory movements using a two-dimensional ionization-chamber array detector and a phantom with movable wedge and stage. For simulations, we selected a 10 × 10 × 10 cm3 cubic irradiation pattern with a uniform physical dose and two actual cases of liver-cancer treatments, whose prescribed doses were 60 Gy(RBE)/4 fraction (Case 1) and 60 Gy(RBE)/12 fraction (Case 2). We employed two types of repainting methods, one produced by the algorithm of VQA Plan (VQA algorithm) and the other by ideal repainting. The latter completely repeats all spots with set number of repaintings. We performed flatness calculations and gamma analysis to evaluate the effects of each condition. RESULTS: From the measurements, the gamma passing rates for which the criteria were 3%/3 mm exceeded 95% for displacements in the head-to-tail direction if the repaint number was greater than 3 and the magnitude of the residual motions was less than 5.0 mm. In simulations with the cubic irradiation pattern, the gamma passing rates (with criteria of 2%/2 mm) exceeded 95% when the magnitude of the residual motions was 3.0 mm and the repaint number was greater than 3. When the repaint number was set to 4 in the VQA with the actual liver cases, the flatness results for Case 2 was minimal. For ideal repainting, the flatness results for all ports fell within ∼3.0% even when the magnitude of the residual motions was 5.0 mm if the repaint number was 6. However, the flatness was less than 3.0% for almost all ports if the magnitude of the residual motions was less than 3.0 mm with a repaint number of 4 in case of both types of repaint methods. CONCLUSIONS: At our facility, carbon-ion radiotherapy can be provided safely to a moving target with residual motions of 3.0 mm magnitude and with a repaint number of 4.

Clinical dose assessment for scanned carbon-ion radiotherapy using linear energy transfer measurements and Monte Carlo simulations.

Objective. Dosimetric commissioning of treatment planning systems (TPS) focuses on validating the agreement of the physical dose with experimental data. For carbon-ion radiotherapy, the commissioning of the relative biological effectiveness (RBE) is necessary to predict the clinical outcome based on the radiation quality of the mixed radiation field. In this study, we proposed a approach for RBE commissioning using Monte Carlo (MC) simulations, which was further strengthen by RBE validation based on linear energy transfer (LET) measurements.Approach. First, we tuned the MC simulation based on the results of dosimetric experiments including the beam ranges, beam sizes, and MU calibrations. Furthermore, we compared simulated results to measured depth- and radial-LET distributions of the 430 MeV u-1carbon-ion spot beam with a 1.5 mm2, 36µm thick silicon detector. The measured dose-averaged LET (LETd) and RBE were compared with the simulated results. The RBE was calculated based on the mixed beam model with linear-quadratic parameters depending on the LET. Finally, TPS-calculated clinical dose profiles were validated through the tuned MC-based calculations.Main results. A 10 keVµm-1and 0.15 agreement for LETdand RBE, respectively, were found between simulation and measurement results obtained for a 2σlateral size of 430 MeV u-1carbon-ion spot beam in water. These results suggested that the tuned MC simulation can be used with acceptable precision for the RBE and LET calculations of carbon-ion spot beam within the clinical energy range. For physical and clinical doses, the TPS- and MC-based calculations showed good agreements within 1.0% at the centre of the spread-out Bragg peaks.Significance. The tuned MC simulation can accurately reproduce the actual carbon-ion beams, and it can be used to validate the physical and clinical dose distributions calculated by TPS. Moreover, the MC simulation can be used for dosimetric commissioning, including clinical doses, without LET measurements.

Commissioning a newly developed treatment planning system, VQA Plan, for fast-raster scanning of carbon-ion beams.

In this study, we report our experience in commissioning a commercial treatment planning system (TPS) for fast-raster scanning of carbon-ion beams. This TPS uses an analytical dose calculation algorithm, a pencil-beam model with a triple Gaussian form for the lateral-dose distribution, and a beam splitting algorithm to consider lateral heterogeneity in a medium. We adopted the mixed beam model as the relative biological effectiveness (RBE) model for calculating the RBE values of the scanned carbon-ion beam. To validate the modeled physical dose, we compared the calculations with measurements of various relevant quantities as functions of the field size, range and width of the spread-out Bragg peak (SOBP), and depth-dose and lateral-dose profiles for a 6-mm SOBP in water. To model the biological dose, we compared the RBE calculated with the newly developed TPS to the RBE calculated with a previously validated TPS that is in clinical use and uses the same RBE model concept. We also performed patient-specific measurements to validate the dose model in clinical situations. The physical beam model reproduces the measured absolute dose at the center of the SOBP as a function of field size, range, and SOBP width and reproduces the dose profiles for a 6-mm SOBP in water. However, the profiles calculated for a heterogeneous phantom have some limitations in predicting the carbon-ion-beam dose, although the biological doses agreed well with the values calculated by the validated TPS. Using this dose model for fast-raster scanning, we successfully treated more than 900 patients from October 2018 to October 2020, with an acceptable agreement between the TPS-calculated and measured dose distributions. We conclude that the newly developed TPS can be used clinically with the understanding that it has limited accuracies for heterogeneous media.

The Majority of United States Citizens With Cancer do not Have Access to Carbon Ion Radiotherapy.

As of December 31, 2020, there were 12 facilities located in Asia and Europe which were treating cancer patients with carbon ion radiotherapy (CIRT). Between June 1994 and December 2020, 37,548 patients were treated with CIRT worldwide. Fifteen of these patients were United States (U.S.) citizens. Using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results cancer statistics database, the Mayo Clinic in Rochester, MN has conservatively estimated that there are approximately 44,340 people diagnosed each year in the U.S. with malignancies that would benefit from treatment with CIRT. The absence of CIRT facilities in the U.S. not only limits access to CIRT for cancer care but also prevents inclusion of U.S. citizens in phase III clinical trials that will determine the comparative effectiveness and cost effectiveness of CIRT for a variety of malignancies for FDA approval and insurance coverage. Past and present phase III clinical trials have not been able to enroll U.S. citizens due to their unwillingness or inability to travel abroad for CIRT for an extended period. These barriers could be overcome with a limited number of CIRT facilities in the U.S.