Unscheduled general surgery has higher costs for older adults.

BACKGROUND: With health care costs increasing, the cost of caring for older adults is rising. Understanding the costs of surgical care for older adults is crucial in planning for health care services. We hypothesize that increasing age predicts increasing surgical inpatient costs. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of general surgical inpatient costs at 4 hospitals over 2 fiscal years. We assessed the cost and number of procedures by age, procedure, hospital, cost category and surgical urgency. Costs were compared between surgical risk profile, urgency and age. Cost differences of 10% or more were considered clinically important. RESULTS: We examined the surgical inpatient costs for 12 070 procedures, representing 84% of all admissions in the region. The average cost was $4351 for scheduled admissions and $4054 for unscheduled admissions. Only unscheduled admissions resulted in higher costs in older age groups, more than doubling in patients aged 80 years and older undergoing low- and moderate-risk unscheduled surgery. The higher costs for older adults was primarily because of higher postoperative costs. In addition, the screening of candidates for elective surgery may have resulted in preoperative medical optimization leading to decreased admission costs. CONCLUSION: Older adults requiring surgery incur increased costs only if admitted for emergency surgery. The cost increase associated with unscheduled admissions was primarily for increased postoperative costs. Innovative programs to reduce costs for postoperative care for older adults undergoing emergency surgery should be investigated.

A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Examining the Impact of Age on Perioperative Inflammatory Biomarkers.

BACKGROUND: Dysregulation of immune responses to surgical stress in older patients and those with frailty may manifest as differences in inflammatory biomarkers. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to examine differences in perioperative inflammatory biomarkers between older and younger patients, and between patients with and without frailty. METHODS: MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane, and CINAHL databases were searched (Inception to June 23, 2020). Observational or experimental studies reporting the perioperative level or activity of biomarkers in surgical patients stratified by age or frailty status were included. The primary outcome was inflammatory biomarkers (grouped by window of ascertainment: pre-op; post-op: <12 hours, 12-24 hours, 1-3 days, 3 days to 1 week, and >1 week). Quality assessment was conducted using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Inverse-variance, random-effects meta-analysis was conducted. RESULTS: Forty-five studies (4263 patients) were included in the review, of which 36 were pooled for meta-analysis (28 noncardiac and 8 cardiac studies). Two studies investigated frailty as the exposure, while the remaining investigated age. In noncardiac studies, older patients had higher preoperative levels of interleukin (IL)-6 and C-reactive protein (CRP), lower preoperative levels of lymphocytes, and higher postoperative levels of IL-6 (<12 hours) and CRP (12-24 hours) than younger patients. In cardiac studies, older patients had higher preoperative levels of IL-6 and CRP and higher postoperative levels of IL-6 (<12 hours and >1 week). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings demonstrate a paucity of frailty-specific studies; however, the presence of age-associated differences in the perioperative inflammatory response is consistent with age-associated states of chronic systemic inflammation and immunosenescence. Additional studies assessing frailty-specific changes in the systemic biologic response to surgery may inform the development of targeted interventions.

The Relationship Between Visceral Obesity and Post-operative Complications: A Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Body composition can have important influence on surgical outcome. There is substantial literature examining sarcopenia, however much less in known about the impact of fat. Visceral fat area (VFA) is a reliable measures of fat distribution that can be quantified with CT scan. The aim of this study is to determine the impact of VFA to predict complications and mortality after emergent or elective surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines. The primary objective was to determine impact of VFA, quantified by preoperative CT scan, has on in-hospital complications and 30-day mortality after emergent or elective surgery. We included peer review English studies of adult patients who underwent elective or emergency surgery and had VFA quantified on preoperative CT scan. Obstetrical patients, case studies, and case series were excluded. RESULTS: Our search strategy identified 3782 citations. After removal of duplicates, application of inclusion criteria and full text review, 19 studies were included. Methodological quality of all studies was fair to good as assessed by Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. There were no significant differences between patients with visceral obesity compared to normal VFA for 30-day mortality or overall postoperative complications. Our analysis did demonstrated an association between visceral obesity and increased surgical site infection, pneumonia, and postoperative pancreatic fistula. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest further studies are necessary to determine the impact of VFA on postoperative outcomes and identifies the importance of establishing standardized assessment for body composition on CT.

Thigh Ultrasound Used to Identify Frail Elderly Patients with Sarcopenia Undergoing Surgery: A Pilot Study.

BACKGROUND: Computed tomography (CT) scan quantifying skeletal muscle mass is the gold standard tool to identify sarcopenia. Unfortunately, high cost, limited availability, and radiation exposure limit its use. We suggest that ultrasound of the thigh muscle could be an objective, reproducible, portable, and risk-free tool, used as a surrogate to a CT scan, to help identify frail patients with sarcopenia. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We included 49 patients over 64 y old, referred to the acute care surgery service. An ultrasound of thigh muscle thickness was standardized to patient thigh length (U/Swhole/L). CT skeletal muscle index (SMI) was calculated using skeletal muscle surface area of the L3 region divided by height2. Frailty status was assessed using the Canadian Study of Healthy Aging Clinical Frailty Scale. RESULTS: The mean (SD) age was 76 (8) y, and 34% (n = 17) were men. CT-defined sarcopenia was identified in 65% (n = 11) of men and 75% (n = 24) of women. In general, women had longer stay in hospital than men (mean + SD 14 ± 9 versus 7 ± 3 d, P = 0.003). There was a significant positive correlation between thigh U/Swhole/L and CT SMI. There was an inverse correlation between thigh U/Swhole/L and frailty score; a similar relationship was observed between CT SMI and frailty. There was an association between U/Swhole/L and postoperative major complications. CONCLUSIONS: This prospective observational study illustrates that the U/Swhole/L index can be used as a surrogate to CT scan, whereby it can identify elderly frail patients with sarcopenia. Thigh ultrasound should be further tested as an objective tool to assess for stratifying frailty.

Survival of Staphylococcus epidermidis in Propofol and Intralipid in the Dead Space of Intravenous Injection Ports.

We tested whether propofol or Intralipid inoculated with Staphylococcus epidermidis would promote bacterial growth within an intravenous (IV) injection hub, a site prone to bacterial contamination. In tubes incubated under optimal conditions, S epidermidis exhibited growth in Intralipid, but not in propofol. In contrast, within the IV hub incubated with either propofol or intralipid at room temperature, S epidermidis bacterial numbers declined with time, and virtually no contamination remained after 12 hours. These data suggest that certain IV lines are inhospitable for S epidermidis.

Incidence and predictors of postoperative delirium in the older acute care surgery population: a prospective study

Background: Among older inpatients, the highest incidence of delirium is within the surgical population. Limited data are available regarding postoperative delirium risk in the acute care surgical population. The purpose of our study was to establish the incidence of and risk factors for delirium in an older acute care surgery population. Methods: Patients aged 65 years or more who had undergone acute care surgery between April 2014 and September 2015 at 2 university-affiliated hospitals in Alberta were followed prospectively and screened for delirium by means of a validated chart review method. Delirium duration was recorded. We used separate multivariable logistic regression models to identify independent predictors for overall delirium and longer episodes of delirium (duration ≥ 48 h). Results: Of the 322 patients included, 73 (22.7%) were identified as having experienced delirium, with 49 (15.2%) experiencing longer episodes of delirium. Postoperative delirium risk factors included Foley catheter use, intestinal surgery, gallbladder surgery, appendix surgery, intensive care unit (ICU) admission and mild to moderate frailty. Risk factors for prolonged postoperative delirium included Foley catheter use and mild to moderate frailty. Surgical approach (open v. laparoscopic) and overall operative time were not found to be significant. Conclusion: In keeping with the literature, our study identified Foley catheter use, frailty and ICU admission as risk factors for delirium in older acute care surgical patients. We also identified an association between delirium risk and the specific surgical procedure performed. Understanding these risk factors can assist in prevention and directed interventions for this high-risk population.

Contexte: Parmi les patients âgés, l'incidence la plus élevée d'épisodes de délire s'observe chez les patients opérés. On dispose de données limitées au sujet du risque de délire postopératoire chez les patients soumis à une chirurgie d'urgence. Le but de notre étude était de connaître l'incidence des épisodes de délire et les facteurs de risque chez la population âgée soumise à une chirurgie d'urgence. Méthodes: Nous avons suivi de façon prospective les patients de 65 ans ou plus soumis à une chirurgie d'urgence entre avril 2014 et septembre 2015 dans 2 centres hospitaliers universitaires de l'Alberta et nous avons recensé les épisodes de délire au moyen d'une méthode validée d'analyse des dossiers. La durée des épisodes de délire a été notée. Nous avons utilisé des modèles séparés d'analyse de régression logistique multivariée pour dégager les prédicteurs indépendants des épisodes globaux de délire et des épisodes plus longs (durée ≥ 48 h). Résultats: Parmi les 322 patients inclus, 73 (22,7 %) ont manifesté un épisode de délire, dont 49 (15,2 %) un épisode plus long. Les facteurs de risque à l'égard des épisodes de délire postopératoire ont inclus : l'emploi d'une sonde Foley, la chirurgie intestinale, la chirurgie de la vésicule biliaire, l'appendicectomie, un séjour à l'unité de soins intensifs (USI) et un état de fragilité léger ou modéré. Les facteurs de risque à l'égard d'un épisode de délire postopératoire prolongé ont inclus : l'emploi d'une sonde Foley et un état de fragilité léger ou modéré. L'approche chirurgicale (ouverte c. laparoscopique) et la durée globale de l'intervention n'ont pas joué un rôle significatif. Conclusion: Faisant écho à la littérature publiée, notre étude a identifié l'emploi de la sonde Foley, l'état de fragilité et le séjour à l'USI comme des facteurs de risque de délire chez les patients âgés soumis à une chirurgie d'urgence. Nous avons aussi observé un lien entre le risque de délire et certains types d'interventions chirurgicales. En comprenant mieux ces facteurs, il sera possible de prévenir ces épisodes et d'orienter les interventions chez cette population à risque élevé.

Impact of frailty on outcomes after discharge in older surgical patients: a prospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Frailty is a state of vulnerability to diverse stressors. We assessed the impact of frailty on outcomes after discharge in older surgical patients. METHODS: We prospectively followed patients 65 years of age or older who underwent emergency abdominal surgery at either of 2 tertiary care centres and who needed assistance with fewer than 3 activities of daily living. Preadmission frailty was defined according to the Canadian Study of Health and Aging Clinical Frailty Scale as "well" (score 1 or 2), "vulnerable" (score 3 or 4) or "frail" (score 5 or 6). We assessed composite end points of 30-day and 6-month all-cause readmission or death by multivariable logistic regression. RESULTS: Of 308 patients (median age 75 [range 65-94] yr, median Clinical Frailty Score 3 [range 1-6]), 168 (54.5%) were classified as vulnerable and 68 (22.1%) as frail. Ten (4.2%) of those classified as vulnerable or frail received a geriatric consultation. At 30 days after discharge, the proportions of patients who were readmitted or had died were greater among vulnerable patients (n = 27 [16.1%]; adjusted odds ratio [OR] 4.60, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.29-16.45) and frail patients (n = 12 [17.6%]; adjusted OR 4.51, 95% CI 1.13-17.94) than among patients who were well (n = 3 [4.2%]). By 6 months, the degree of frailty independently and dose-dependently predicted readmission or death: 56 (33.3%) of the vulnerable patients (adjusted OR 2.15, 95% CI 1.01-4.55) and 37 (54.4%) of the frail patients (adjusted OR 3.27, 95% CI 1.32-8.12) were readmitted or had died, compared with 11 (15.3%) of the patients who were well. INTERPRETATION: Vulnerability and frailty were prevalent in older patients undergoing surgery and unlikely to trigger specialized geriatric assessment, yet remained independently associated with greater risk of readmission for as long as 6 months after discharge. Therefore, the degree of frailty has important prognostic value for readmission. TRIAL REGISTRATION FOR PRIMARY STUDY: ClinicalTrials.gov, no. NCT02233153.

Comprehensive geriatric assessment for older people admitted to a surgical service.

BACKGROUND: Aging populations are at increased risk of postoperative complications. New methods to provide care for older people recovering from surgery may reduce surgery-related complications. Comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) has been shown to improve some outcomes for medical patients, such as enabling them to continue living at home, and has been proposed to have positive impacts for surgical patients. CGA is a coordinated, multidisciplinary collaboration that assesses the medical, psychosocial and functional capabilities and limitations of an older person, with the goal of establishing a treatment plan and long-term follow-up. OBJECTIVES: To assess the effectiveness of CGA interventions compared to standard care on the postoperative outcomes of older people admitted to hospital for surgical care. SEARCH METHODS: We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, CINAHL and two clinical trials registers on 13 January 2017. We also searched grey literature for additional citations. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomized trials of people undergoing surgery aged 65 years and over comparing CGA with usual surgical care and reporting any of our primary (mortality and discharge to an increased level of care) or secondary (length of stay, re-admission, total cost and postoperative complication) outcomes. We excluded studies if the participants did not receive a complete CGA, did not undergo surgery, and if the study recruited participants aged less than 65 years or from a setting other than an acute care hospital. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors independently screened, assessed risk of bias, extracted data and assessed certainty of evidence from identified articles. We expressed dichotomous treatment effects as risk ratio (RR) with 95% confidence intervals and continuous outcomes as mean difference (MD). MAIN RESULTS: We included eight randomised trials, seven recruited people recovering from a hip fracture (N = 1583) and one elective surgical oncology trial (N = 260), conducted in North America and Europe. For two trials CGA was done pre-operatively and postoperatively for the remaining. Six trials had adequate randomization, five had low risk of performance bias and four had low risk of detection bias. Blinding of participants was not possible. All eight trials had low attrition rates and seven reported all expected outcomes.CGA probably reduces mortality in older people with hip fracture (RR 0.85, 95% CI 0.68 to 1.05; 5 trials, 1316 participants, I² = 0%; moderate-certainty evidence). The intervention reduces discharge to an increased level of care (RR 0.71, 95% CI 0.55 to 0.92; 5 trials, 941 participants, I² = 0%; high-certainty evidence).Length of stay was highly heterogeneous, with mean difference between participants allocated to the intervention and the control groups ranging between -12.8 and 8.3 days. CGA probably leads to slightly reduced length of stay (4 trials, 841 participants, moderate-certainty evidence). The intervention probably makes little or no difference in re-admission rates (RR 1.00, 95% CI 0.76 to 1.32; 3 trials, 741 participants, I² = 37%; moderate-certainty evidence).CGA probably slightly reduces total cost (1 trial, 397 participants, moderate-certainty evidence). The intervention may make little or no difference for major postoperative complications (2 trials, 579 participants, low-certainty evidence) and delirium rates (RR 0.75, 95% CI 0.60 to 0.94, 3 trials, 705 participants, I² = 0%; low-certainty evidence). AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: There is evidence that CGA can improve outcomes in people with hip fracture. There are not enough studies to determine when CGA is most effective in relation to surgical intervention or if CGA is effective in surgical patients presenting with conditions other than hip fracture.

Creatine-loading preserves intestinal barrier function during organ preservation.

We have developed a novel, intraluminal preservation solution that is tailored to the metabolic requirements of the intestine. This organ-specific solution addresses many of the problems associated with low temperature organ storage including energy, oxidative and osmotic stresses. However, conservation of energy levels remains one of the most difficult obstacles to overcome due to the inherent sensitivity of the mucosa to ischemia. Creatine-loading has become a popular and scientifically proven method of augmenting energy reserves in athletes performing anaerobic burst work activities. We hypothesized that if we could develop a method that was able to augment cellular energy levels, the structure and function of the mucosa would be more effectively preserved. The purpose of this study was to determine if creatine-loading is a feasible and effective strategy for preserving the intestine. Our data indicate that creatine loading has significant impact on energy levels during storage with corresponding improvements in mucosal structure and function. Both of our rodent models, a) continuous perfusion for 4 h and b) a single flush with our intraluminal preservation solution supplemented with 50 mM creatine, demonstrated significant improvements in creatine phosphate, ATP, Energy Charge and ATP/AMP following cold storage (P < 0.05). Notably, after 10 h creatine phosphate was 324% greater in Creatine-treated tissues compared to Controls (P < 0.05). Preferential utilization of glutathione in the Creatine group was effective at controlling oxidative injury after 10 h storage (P < 0.05). Improvements in barrier function and electrophysiology with creatine-treatment reflected superior mucosal integrity after 10 h storage; Permeability and Transepithelial resistance measurements remained at fresh tissue values. This was in stark contrast to Control tissues in which permeability rose to >300% of fresh tissue values (P < 0.005) and transepithelial resistance dropped by 95% (P < 0.005). After 10 h storage, Park's grading of histologic injury reflected extensive villus denudation (grade 4) in control tissues compared to healthy tissue (grade 0) in the Creatine group. This study demonstrates that a strategy of creatine supplementation of our intraluminal preservation solution facilitates the preservation of the intestinal mucosa during storage.

Analysis of postdischarge costs following emergent general surgery in elderly patients.

BACKGROUND: As populations age, more elderly patients will undergo surgery. Frailty and complications are considered to increase in-hospital cost in older adults, but little is known on costs following discharge, particularly those borne by the patient. We examined risk factors for increased cost and the type of costs accrued following discharge in elderly surgical patients. METHODS: Acute abdominal surgery patients aged 65 years and older were prospectively enrolled. We assessed baseline clinical characteristics, including Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS) scores. We calculated 6-month cost (in Canadian dollars) from patient-reported use following discharge according to the validated Health Resource Utilization Inventory. Primary outcomes were 6-month overall cost and cost for health care services, medical products and lost productive hours. Outcomes were log-transformed and assessed in multivariable generalized linear and zero-inflated negative binomial regressions and can be interpreted as adjusted ratios (AR). Complications were assessed according to Clavien-Dindo classification. RESULTS: We included 150 patients (mean age 75.5 ± 7.6 yr; 54.1% men) in our analysis; 10.8% had major and 43.2% had minor complications postoperatively. The median 6-month overall cost was $496 (interquartile range $140-$1948). Disaggregated by cost type, frailty independently predicted increasing costs of health care services (AR 1.76, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.43-2.18, p < 0.001) and medical products (AR 1.61, 95% CI 1.15-2.25, p = 0.005), but decreasing costs in lost productive hours (AR 0.39, p = 0.002). Complications did not predict increased cost. CONCLUSION: Frail patients accrued higher health care services and product costs, but lower costs from lost productive hours. Interventions in elderly surgical patients should consider patient-borne cost in older adults and lost productivity in less frail patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT02233153 (clinicaltrials.gov).

CONTEXTE: Avec le vieillissement de la population, les personnes âgées seront plus nombreuses à subir des chirurgies. Il est déjà reconnu que la fragilité et les complications font augmenter les coûts d'hospitalisation chez les adultes âgés, mais on en sait relativement peu sur les coûts posthospitaliers, particulièrement ceux assumés par le patient lui-même. Nous avons analysé les facteurs de risque d'augmentation de ces coûts et les types de dépenses assumées après le congé par les patients âgés opérés. MÉTHODES: Pour l'étude, nous avons recruté des patients de 65 ans et plus qui allaient subir une chirurgie abdominale d'urgence. Nous avons déterminé leurs caractéristiques cliniques initiales, y compris leur score à l'échelle de fragilité clinique (EFC). Nous avons calculé les coûts échelonnés sur 6 mois (en dollars canadiens) rapportés par les patients après leur congé, selon un inventaire validé de l'utilisation des ressources de santé. Les paramètres principaux étaient le montant total des dépenses et le coût des services de santé, des produits médicaux et des heures de travail perdues pour une période de 6 mois. Une transformation logarithmique a été appliquée aux données, qui ont été évaluées par une analyse de régression linéaire multivariée généralisée et par une analyse binomiale négative avec surreprésentation des zéros. Les résultats peuvent être interprétés comme des rapports ajustés (RA). Les complications ont été évaluées selon la classification de Clavien-Dindo. RÉSULTATS: Nous avons inclus 150 patients dans notre analyse (âge moyen : 75,5 ± 7,6 ans; proportion d'hommes : 54,1 %). Après l'opération, 10,8 % ont présenté des complications majeures, et 43,2 %, des complications mineures. Le montant total médian des dépenses sur 6 mois était de 496 $ (éventail interquartile : 140-1948 $). Dans des analyses effectuées selon le type de dépenses, la fragilité était une variable explicative permettant de prédire indépendamment l'accroissement des coûts des services de santé (RA : 1,76; intervalle de confiance [IC] à 95 % : 1,43-2,18; p < 0,001) et des produits médicaux (RA : 1,61; IC à 95 % : 1,15-2,25; p = 0,005) ainsi que la réduction des coûts associés aux heures de travail perdues (RA : 0,39; p = 0,002). Les complications n'avaient pas de valeur prédictive en ce qui a trait à l'accroissement des coûts. CONCLUSION: Les patients fragiles ont assumé des coûts plus élevés en services de santé et en produits médicaux, mais des coûts moindres en lien avec la perte d'heures de travail. Les interventions chez les patients en chirurgie âgés devraient tenir compte des coûts assumés par cette population et de la perte de productivité chez les patients moins fragiles. ENREGISTREMENTDEL'ESSAI: ClinicalTrials.gov, no NCT02233153.

Urine intestinal fatty acid-binding protein predicts acute mesenteric ischemia in patients.

BACKGROUND: Acute mesenteric ischemia (AMI) has a high morbidity and mortality and often presents as a diagnostic challenge. Currently, there is no blood, urine, or radiologic tests that provide a definitive diagnosis of AMI. The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical accuracy of urine intestinal fatty acid-binding protein (I-FABP) to diagnosis AMI. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty patients referred to the Acute Care Surgery service at University of Alberta Hospital with suspected AMI taken to the operating room for definitive diagnosis were recruited. Pathologic findings from surgical specimens confirmed a gold standard diagnosis for intestinal ischemia. The patients found to be nonischemic became the internal controls. Conventional clinical markers were examined in blood including white blood cell count, lactate, and creatinine. Blood was also examined by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs) for I-FABP and interleukin-6. Urine was examined preoperatively and 6 and 24 h postoperatively for I-FABP. RESULTS: Thirteen patients were pathologically diagnosed with AMI while five patients were nonischemic; two were excluded due to missing biologic specimens. There was no difference in age or gender between ischemic and nonischemic patients (56 ± 5 versus 66 ± 11 years old, respectively; six females with ischemic and three females in the nonischemic group). There was no difference in serum lactate and creatinine between the two groups. Serum interleukin-6 levels in patients with AMI were significantly higher than nonischemic controls (0.4 ± 0.2 ng/mL versus 0.2 ± 0.07 ng/mL, respectively, P = 0.03). There was a nonstatistically significant increase in serum I-FABP in AMI patients compared to internal controls (9 ± 3 ng/mL versus 2.4 ± 0.9 ng/mL, respectively, P = 0.2). Urine I-FABP was significantly higher in patients diagnosed with AMI than in controls (7 ± 1 ng/mL versus 2 ± 1 ng/mL, respectively, P = 0.007). The receiver operating characteristic curve illustrated that urine I-FABP discriminates significantly between patients with AMI and controls (area under receiver operating characteristic = 0.88, P = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: The traditional clinical markers lactate and white blood cell count were not able to differentiate AMI from nonischemic bowel. However, we found that urine I-FABP was a noninvasive biomarker with high specificity and sensitivity for accurately diagnosing AMI in patients. A noninvasive accurate tool for AMI would facilitate for a rapid treatment, while preventing unnecessary surgical interventions in high-risk patient populations.

Economic evaluations of comprehensive geriatric assessment in surgical patients: a systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Seniors presenting with surgical disease face increased risk of postoperative morbidity and mortality and have increased treatment costs. Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (CGA) is proposed to reduce morbidity, mortality, and the cost after surgery. METHODS: A systematic review of CGA in emergency surgical patients was conducted. The primary outcome was cost-effectiveness; secondary outcomes were length of stay, return of function, and mortality. Inclusion and exclusion criteria were predefined. Systematic searches of MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane, and National Health Service Economic Evaluation Database were performed. Text screening, bias assessment, and data extraction were performed by two authors. RESULTS: There were 560 articles identified; abstract review excluded 499 articles and full-text review excluded 53 articles. Eight studies were included; one nonorthopedic trauma and seven orthopedic trauma studies. Bias assessment revealed moderate to high risk of bias for all studies. Economic evaluation assessment identified two high-quality studies and six moderate or low quality studies. Pooled analysis from four studies assessed loss of function; loss of function decreased in the experimental arm (odds ratio 0.92, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.88-0.97). Pooled results for length of stay from five studies found a significant decrease (mean difference: -1.17, 95% CI: -1.63 to -0.71) after excluding the nonorthopedic trauma study. Pooled mortality was significantly decreased in seven studies (risk ratio: 0.78, 95% CI: 0.67-0.90). All studies decreased cost and improved health outcomes in a cost-effective manner. CONCLUSIONS: CGA improved return of function and mortality with reduced cost or improved utility. Our review suggests that CGA is economically dominant and the most cost-effective care model for orthogeriatric patients. Further research should examine other surgical fields.

Surgical frailty assessment: a missed opportunity.

BACKGROUND: Preoperative frailty predicts adverse postoperative outcomes. Despite the advantages of incorporating frailty assessment into surgical settings, there is limited research on surgical healthcare professionals' use of frailty assessment for perioperative care. METHODS: Healthcare professionals caring for patients enrolled at a Canadian teaching hospital were surveyed to assess their perceptions of frailty, as well as attitudes towards and practices for frail patients. The survey contained open-ended and 5-point Likert scale questions. Responses were compared across professions using independent sample t-tests and correlations between survey items were analyzed. RESULTS: Nurses and allied health professionals were more likely than surgeons to think frailty should play a role in planning a patient's care (nurses vs. surgeons p = 0.008, allied health vs. surgeons p = 0.014). Very few respondents (17.5%) reported that they 'always used' a frailty assessment tool. Results from qualitative data analysis identified four main barriers to frailty assessment: institutional, healthcare system, professional knowledge, and patient/family barriers. CONCLUSION: Across all disciplines, the lack of knowledge about frailty issues was a prominent barrier to the use of frailty assessments in practice, despite clinicians' understanding that frailty affects their patients' outcomes. Confidence in frailty assessment tool use through education and addressing barriers to implementation may increase use and improve patient care. Healthcare professionals agree that frailty assessments should play a role in perioperative care. However, few perform them in practice. Lack of knowledge about frailty is a key barrier in the use of frailty assessments and the majority of respondents agreed that they would benefit from further training.

Facilitators and barriers of change toward an elder-friendly surgical environment: perspectives of clinician stakeholder groups.

BACKGROUND: Current acute care surgical practices do not focus on the unique needs of older adults. Adverse outcomes in older patients result from a complex interrelationship between baseline vulnerability and insults experienced during hospitalization. The purpose of this study is to assess the organizational readiness and the barriers and facilitators for the implementation of elder-friendly interventions in the acute care of unplanned abdominal surgery patients. METHODS: This cross-sectional mixed methods study included a convenience sample of clinician stakeholder groups. Eight focus groups were conducted with 33 surgical team members including: 10 health care aides, 6 licensed practical nurses, 6 registered nurses, 4 nurse managers and 7 surgeons, to identify barriers and facilitators to the implementation of an elder-friendly surgical unit. Audio recordings of the focus groups were transcribed verbatim and analysed using interpretive description techniques. Transcripts were coded along with explanatory memos to generate a detailed description of participant experiences. Themes were identified followed by refining the codes. Participants also completed the Organizational Readiness for Implementing Change questionnaire. Differences in organizational readiness scores across clinician stakeholder groups were assessed using Kruskal-Wallice tests. Mann-Whitney tests (Bonferroni's corrections for multiple comparisons) were conducted to assess pair-wise relationships. RESULTS: The focus group data were conceptualized to represent facilitators and barriers to change at two levels of care delivery. Readiness to change at the organizational level was evident in five categories that reflected the barriers and facilitators to implementing an elder-friendly surgical unit. These included education, environment, staffing, policies and other research projects. At the individual level barriers and facilitators were apparent in staff members' acceptance of new roles and duties with other staff, family and patients. Examples of these included communication, teamwork and leadership. The mean change commitment and change efficacy scores on the Organizational Readiness for Implementing Change Questionnaire were 3.7 (0.8) and 3.5 (0.9) respectively. No statistically significant differences were detected between the stakeholder groups. CONCLUSIONS: Staff are interested in contributing to improved care for elderly surgical patients; however, opportunities were identified to enhance facilitators and reduce barriers in advance of implementing the elder-friendly surgical unit intervention.

Is current preoperative frailty assessment adequate?

SUMMARY: Preoperative frailty predicts adverse postoperative outcomes. Recommendations for preoperative assessment of elderly patients include performing a frailty assessment. Despite the advantages of incorporating frailty assessment into surgical settings, there is limited research on surgical health care professionals' perception and use of frailty assessment for perioperative care. We surveyed local health care employees to assess their attitudes toward and practices for frail patients. Nurses and allied health professionals were more likely than surgeons to agree frailty should play a role in planning a patient's care. Lack of knowledge about frailty issues was a prominent barrier to the use of frailty assessments in practice, despite clinicians understanding that frailty affects their patients' outcomes. Results of this survey suggest further training in frailty issues and the use of frailty assessment instruments is necessary and could improve the uptake of such tools for perioperative care planning.

Optimizing senior's surgical care - Elder-friendly Approaches to the Surgical Environment (EASE) study: rationale and objectives.

BACKGROUND: It is estimated that seniors (≥65 years old) account for >50% of acute inpatient hospital days and are presenting for surgical evaluation of acute illness in increasing numbers. Unfortunately, conventional acute care models rarely take into account needs of the elderly population. The failure to consider these special needs have resulted in poor outcomes, longer lengths of hospital stay and have likely increased the need for institutional care. Acute Care for the Elderly models on medical wards have demonstrated decreased cost, length of hospital stay, readmissions and improved cognition, function and patient/staff satisfaction. We hypothesize that specific Elder-friendly Approaches to the Surgical Environment (EASE) interventions will similarly improve health outcomes in a cost-effective manner. METHODS/DESIGN: Prospective, before-after study with a concurrent control group. Four cohorts of 140 consecutively-screened older patients (≥65 years old) will be enrolled (560 patients in total). The EASE interventions involves co-locating all older surgical patients on a single unit, involving an interdisciplinary care team (including a geriatric specialist) in the development of individual care plans, implementing evidence-informed elder-friendly practices, use of a reconditioning program, and optimizing discharge planning. Subjects will be followed via chart review for their hospital stay, and will then complete in-person or telephone interviews at 6 weeks and 6 months after discharge. Measured outcomes include clinical (postoperative major in-hospital complication or death [primary composite outcome]; death or readmission within 30-days of initial discharge; length of hospital stay), humanistic (quality of life; functional, cognitive, and nutritional status) and economic (health care resource utilization and costs) endpoints. Within-site mean change scores will be computed for the composite primary outcome and the overall covariate-adjusted between-site pre-post difference will be the dependent variable analyzed using generalized linear mixed model procedures including adjustment for clustering. DISCUSSION: Our findings will generate new knowledge on outcomes from acute surgical care in older patients and validate a novel elder-friendly surgical model including assessment of both clinical and economic benefits. If effective, we expect the EASE initiatives to be generalizable to other surgical centres. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.govidentifier: NCT02233153.

Perioperative factors predicting poor outcome in elderly patients following emergency general surgery: a multivariate regression analysis.

BACKGROUND: Older adults (≥ 65 yr) are the fastest growing population and are presenting in increasing numbers for acute surgical care. Emergency surgery is frequently life threatening for older patients. Our objective was to identify predictors of mortality and poor outcome among elderly patients undergoing emergency general surgery. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients aged 65-80 years undergoing emergency general surgery between 2009 and 2010 at a tertiary care centre. Demographics, comorbidities, in-hospital complications, mortality and disposition characteristics of patients were collected. Logistic regression analysis was used to identify covariate-adjusted predictors of in-hospital mortality and discharge of patients home. RESULTS: Our analysis included 257 patients with a mean age of 72 years; 52% were men. In-hospital mortality was 12%. Mortality was associated with patients who had higher American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class (odds ratio [OR] 3.85, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.43-10.33, p = 0.008) and in-hospital complications (OR 1.93, 95% CI 1.32-2.83, p = 0.001). Nearly two-thirds of patients discharged home were younger (OR 0.92, 95% CI 0.85-0.99, p = 0.036), had lower ASA class (OR 0.45, 95% CI 0.27-0.74, p = 0.002) and fewer in-hospital complications (OR 0.69, 95% CI 0.53-0.90, p = 0.007). CONCLUSION: American Society of Anesthesiologists class and in-hospital complications are perioperative predictors of mortality and disposition in the older surgical population. Understanding the predictors of poor outcome and the importance of preventing in-hospital complications in older patients will have important clinical utility in terms of preoperative counselling, improving health care and discharging patients home.

CONTEXTE: La population qui connaît la croissance la plus rapide est celle des adultes âgés (≥ 65 ans). Ces personnes nécessitent un nombre croissant d'interventions chirurgicales urgentes. Or, la chirurgie d'urgence comporte souvent un risque de décès pour les patients âgés. Notre objectif était d'identifier les prédicteurs de la mortalité et d'une issue négative chez les patients âgés soumis à une chirurgie générale d'urgence. MÉTHODES: Nous avons procédé à une étude de cohorte rétrospective chez des patients de 65 à 80 ans soumis à une chirurgie générale d'urgence entre 2009 et 2010 dans un centre de soins tertiaires. Nous avons recueilli les données démographiques, les comorbidités, les complications perhospitalières, la mortalité et les détails sur l'état général de santé des patients. Nous avons utilisé l'analyse de régression logistique afin de dégager les prédicteurs ajustés en fonction des covariables pour la mortalité perhospitalière et les congés hospitaliers des patients vers leur domicile. RÉSULTANTS: Notre analyse a regroupé 257 patients âgés en moyenne de 72 ans; 52 % étaient des hommes. La mortalité perhospitalière a été de 12 %. La mortalité a été associée à des patients qui se classaient dans une catégorie ASA (American Society of Anesthesiologists) plus élevée (rapport des cotes [RC] 3,85, intervalle de confiance [IC] de 95 % 1,43­10,33, p = 0,008) et présentaient plus de complications perhospitalières (RC 1,93, IC de 95 % 1,32­2,83, p = 0,001). Près des deux tiers des patients qui ont reçu leur congé pour retourner à la maison étaient plus jeunes (RC 0,92, IC de 95 % 0,85­0,99, p = 0,036), se classaient dans une catégorie ASA moins élevée (RC 0,45, IC de 95 % 0,27­ 0,74, p = 0,002) et avaient connu moins de complications perhospitalières (RC 0,69, IC de 95 % 0,53­0,90, p = 0,007). CONCLUSION: La catégorie ASA et les complications perhospitalières sont des prédicteurs périopératoires de mortalité et d'état général de santé dans la population âgée soumise à la chirurgie. Comprendre les prédicteurs d'une issue négative et l'importance de prévenir les complications perhospitalières chez les patients âgés aura une importante utilité clinique pour les consultations préopératoires, l'amélioration des soins de santé et le retour des patients à la maison.

Increased health services use by severely obese patients undergoing emergency surgery: a retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to assess perioperative outcomes in obese patients undergoing emergency surgery. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the charts of all adult (> 17 yr) patients admitted to the acute care emergency surgery service at the University of Alberta Hospital between January 2009 and December 2011 who had a body mass index (BMI) of 35 or higher. Patients were divided into subgroups for analysis based on "severe" (BMI 35-39.9) and "morbid" obesity (BMI ≥ 40). Multivariate logistic regression was performed to identify predictors of in-hospital mortality after controlling for confounding factors. RESULTS: Data on 111 patients (55% women, median BMI 39) were included in the final analysis. Intensive care unit (ICU) support was required for 40% of patients. Postoperative complications occurred in 42% of patients, and 31% required reoperation. Overall in-hospital mortality was 17%. Morbidly obese patients had increased rates of reoperation (40% v. 23%, p = 0.05) and increased lengths of stay compared with severely obese patients (14.5 v. 6.0 d, p = 0.09). Age (odds ratio [OR] 1.08 per increment) and preoperative ICU stay (OR 12) were significantly associated with in-hospital mortality after controlling for confounding, but BMI was not. CONCLUSION: Obese patients requiring emergency surgery represent a complex patient population at high risk for perioperative morbidity and mortality. Greater resources are required for their care, including ICU support, repeat surgery and prolonged ICU stay. Future studies could help identify predictors of reoperation and strategies to optimize nutrition, rehabilitation and resource allocation.

CONTEXTE: Cette étude avait pour objet d'évaluer les résultats périopératoires chez des patients obèses soumis à une chirurgie d'urgence. MÉTHODES: Nous avons passé en revue de manière rétrospective les dossiers de tous les patients adultes (> 17 ans) pris en charge par l'équipe de chirurgie d'urgence du Centre hospitalier de l'Université de l'Alberta entre janvier 2009 et décembre 2011 et dont l'indice de masse corporelle (IMC) était de 35 ou plus. Aux fins de l'analyse, les patients ont été répartis en 2 groupes selon qu'ils présentaient une obésité « grave ¼ (IMC 35­39,9) ou « morbide ¼ (IMC ≥ 40). Nous avons utilisé un modèle d'analyse de régression logistique multivariée pour reconnaître les prédicteurs de la mortalité perhospitalière après avoir tenu compte des facteurs de confusion. RÉSULTANTS: L'analyse finale a porté sur les données concernant 111 patients (55 % de femmes, IMC médian 39). Il a fallu faire appel à l'Unité des soins intensifs (USI) pour 40 % des patients. Des complications postopératoires sont survenues chez 42 % des patients et 31 % ont nécessité une réopération. Dans l'ensemble, la mortalité perhospitalière a été de 17 %. Les patients atteints d'obésité morbide ont présenté des taux plus élevés de réopération (40 % c. 23 %, p = 0,05) et des séjours hospitaliers plus longs comparativement aux patients souffrant d'obésité grave (14,5 c. 6,0 jours, p = 0,09). L'âge (rapport des cotes [RC] 1,08 par palier) et un séjour préopératoire à l'USI (RC 12) ont été significativement associés à la mortalité perhospitalière après contrôle des facteurs de confusion, mais non l'IMC. CONCLUSION: Les patients obèses qui ont besoin d'une chirurgie urgente forment une population de patients complexe exposée à un risque élevé de morbidité et de mortalité périopératoires. Leurs soins requièrent plus de ressources, y compris recours à l'USI, reprise de la chirurgie et prolongation du séjour à l'USI. D'autres études pourraient aider à recenser les prédicteurs des réopérations et à trouver des stratégies d'optimisation de la nutrition, de la réadaptation et de l'attribution des ressources.