Neuromodulation using a hybrid technique of combined perineural local anesthetic and nerve stimulation in six challenging clinical scenarios.

PURPOSE: Postamputation pain is challenging because of complex mechanisms involving a multitude of pain pathways and psychological factors. This patient population also tends to have extensive comorbidities with or without a background of chronic pain. Electrical neuromodulation such as peripheral nerve stimulation has gained traction in the realm of chronic pain. Recently, the off-label use of hybrid perineural nerve stimulation in combination with locoregional block via the stimulating nerve block catheter has been described in single-center case reports. CLINICAL FEATURES: Herein, we present a case series of six patients from two different Canadian hospitals using such a hybrid technique in three different clinical scenarios. These scenarios were (1) local anesthetic dose minimization in the presence of multiple nerve block catheters, (2) analgesia augmentation when local anesthetic alone is insufficient, and (3) provision of an analgesic adjunct as part of a multimodal regimen. A stimulating sciatic nerve block catheter was inserted under ultrasound and nerve stimulation guidance for these cases. Patients tended to experience pain on the subsequent postoperative days whereby the off-label use of nerve stimulation successfully reduced their pain score and stabilized or decreased their opioid consumption or minimized the need to increase the local anesthetic dose when doing so could have precipitated local anesthetic toxicity. CONCLUSION: Our case series supports the feasibility of using a combination of low-frequency perineural stimulation and local anesthetic infusion via a single perineural nerve block catheter to manage challenging postamputation pain.

RéSUMé: OBJECTIF: La douleur post-amputation est difficile à soulager en raison de mécanismes complexes impliquant une multitude de voies de la douleur et de facteurs psychologiques. Cette population de patients a également tendance à présenter de nombreuses comorbidités, avec ou sans antécédents de douleur chronique. Les techniques de neuromodulation électrique, telle que la stimulation nerveuse périphérique, sont de plus en plus populaires dans le domaine de la douleur chronique. Récemment, des présentations de cas monocentriques ont décrit l'utilisation hors indication d'une modalité hybride de stimulation nerveuse périneurale en combinaison avec un bloc locorégional via un cathéter de bloc nerveux stimulant. CARACTéRISTIQUES CLINIQUES: Nous présentons ici une série de cas de six patients de deux hôpitaux canadiens différents utilisant une telle technique hybride dans trois cas cliniques différents. Ces cas étaient (1) la minimisation de la dose d'anesthésique local en présence de plusieurs cathéters de blocs nerveux, (2) l'augmentation de l'analgésie lorsque l'anesthésique local seul était insuffisant, et (3) la fourniture d'un adjuvant analgésique dans le cadre d'un régime multimodal. Un cathéter stimulant pour l'administration d'un bloc du nerf sciatique a été inséré sous échoguidage et guide de stimulation nerveuse pour ces cas. Les patients ont eu tendance à ressentir de la douleur les jours postopératoires suivants, et l'utilisation hors indication de la stimulation nerveuse a alors réussi à réduire leur score de douleur, à stabiliser ou diminuer leur consommation d'opioïdes, ou à réduire la nécessité d'augmenter la dose d'anesthésique local alors que cela aurait pu précipiter une toxicité anesthésique locale. CONCLUSION: Notre série de cas soutient la faisabilité de l'utilisation d'une technique combinée de stimulation périnerveuse à basse fréquence et de perfusion d'anesthésique local via un seul cathéter de bloc nerveux périneural pour prendre en charge la douleur post-amputation.

Perioperative Pain and Addiction Interdisciplinary Network (PAIN): consensus recommendations for perioperative management of cannabis and cannabinoid-based medicine users by a modified Delphi process.

In many countries, liberalisation of the legislation regulating the use of cannabis has outpaced rigorous scientific studies, and a growing number of patients presenting for surgery consume cannabis regularly. Research to date suggests that cannabis can impact perioperative outcomes. We present recommendations obtained using a modified Delphi method for the perioperative care of cannabis-using patients. A steering committee was formed and a review of medical literature with respect to perioperative cannabis use was conducted. This was followed by the recruitment of a panel of 17 experts on the care of cannabis-consuming patients. Panellists were blinded to each other's participation and were provided with rater forms exploring the appropriateness of specific perioperative care elements. The completed rater forms were analysed for consensus. The expert panel was then unblinded and met to discuss the rater form analyses. Draft recommendations were then created and returned to the expert panel for further comment. The draft recommendations were also sent to four independent reviewers (a surgeon, a nurse practitioner, and two patients). The collected feedback was used to finalise the recommendations. The major recommendations obtained included emphasising the importance of eliciting a history of cannabis use, quantifying it, and ensuring contact with a cannabis authoriser (if one exists). Recommendations also included the consideration of perioperative cannabis weaning, additional postoperative nausea and vomiting prophylaxis, and additional attention to monitoring and maintaining anaesthetic depth. Postoperative recommendations included anticipating increased postoperative analgesic requirements and maintaining vigilance for cannabis withdrawal syndrome.

Patient-reported outcomes in those consuming medical cannabis: a prospective longitudinal observational study in chronic pain patients.

PURPOSE: We investigated patients with chronic pain seeking medical cannabis. We assessed their demographics, patterns of cannabis use, and the long-term effectiveness of cannabis on their pain and functional domains. METHODS: This observational study enrolled patients between 8 September 2015 and 31 July 2018 from community-based cannabis clinics in Ontario, Canada. In addition to collecting demographic information, the primary outcomes studied were pain intensity and pain-related interference scores assessed at baseline, three, six, and 12 months. Using validated questionnaires, we also assessed anxiety, depression, quality of life (QoL), general health symptoms, neuropathic pain, self-reported opioid consumption, and adverse events. RESULTS: Of the 1,000 patients consented, 757 (76%) participated at one or more of the study time points. At six and 12 months, 230 (30.4%) and 104 (13.7%) of participants were followed up, respectively. Most participants were female (62%), Caucasian (91%), and sought cannabis for pain relief (88%). Time was a significant factor associated with improvement in pain intensity (P < 0.001), pain-related interference scores (P < 0.001), QoL (P < 0.001), and general health symptoms (P < 0.001). Female sex was significantly associated with worse outcomes than male sex including pain intensity (P < 0.001) and pain-related interference (P < 0.001). The proportion of individuals who reported using opioids decreased by half, from 40.8% at baseline to 23.9% at 12 months. CONCLUSION: Despite significant challenges to collecting long-term observational data on patients who attempted a trial of cannabis products, approximately one-third of patients in the cohort remained on medical cannabis for six months. In this cohort, pain intensity and pain-related interference scores were reduced and QoL and general health symptoms scores were improved compared with baseline.

RéSUMé: OBJECTIF: Nous avons étudié des patients souffrant de douleur chronique et cherchant à obtenir du cannabis médical. Nous avons évalué leurs données démographiques, leurs habitudes de consommation de cannabis et l'efficacité à long terme du cannabis sur leur douleur et leurs domaines fonctionnels. MéTHODE: Cette étude observationnelle a recruté des patients entre le 8 septembre 2015 et le 31 juillet 2018 dans des cliniques communautaires de cannabis en Ontario, au Canada. En plus de recueillir des renseignements démographiques, les critères d'évaluation principaux étudiés étaient l'intensité de la douleur et les scores d'interférence liés à la douleur évalués au début de l'étude et à trois, six et 12 mois. À l'aide de questionnaires validés, nous avons également évalué l'anxiété, la dépression, la qualité de vie (QdV), les symptômes généraux de santé, la douleur neuropathique, la consommation d'opioïdes rapportée et les effets indésirables. RéSULTATS: Sur les 1000 patients consentants, 757 (76 %) ont participé à un ou plusieurs des points d'analyse de l'étude. À six et douze mois, 230 (30,4 %) et 104 (13,7 %) patients ont participé, respectivement. La plupart des participants étaient des femmes (62 %) d'origine caucasienne (91 %) et cherchaient à soulager leur douleur avec du cannabis (88 %). Le temps était un facteur important associé à l'amélioration de l'intensité de la douleur (P < 0,001), aux scores d'interférence liés à la douleur (P < 0,001), à la QdV (P < 0,001), et aux symptômes de santé généraux (P < 0,001). Le sexe féminin a été significativement associé à des pronostics moins bons que le sexe masculin, y compris en matière d'intensité de la douleur (P < 0,001) et d'interférences liées à la douleur (P < 0,001). La proportion de personnes qui ont déclaré utiliser des opioïdes a diminué de moitié, passant de 40,8 % au début de l'étude à 23,9 % à 12 mois. CONCLUSION: Malgré des défis importants dans la collecte de données observationnelles à long terme concernant les patients qui participent à une étude sur les produits du cannabis, environ un tiers des patients de la cohorte ont continué à prendre du cannabis médical pendant six mois. Dans cette cohorte, l'intensité de la douleur et les scores d'interférence liés à la douleur ont été réduits, et les scores de QdV et de symptômes généraux de santé se sont améliorés par rapport au début de la période à l'étude.

Remote buprenorphine-naloxone initiation as an essential service for people with chronic pain and opioid dependence during the COVID-19 pandemic: Case reports, clinical pathways, and implications for the future.

Many health care professions have reacted swiftly to the COVID-19 pandemic. In-person care has been ramped down and telemedicine/telehealth has been thrust to the forefront of clinical care. For people living with chronic pain and often concomitantly dealing with opioid-related issues, this is a time of great stress. With population-wide movements to shelter in place, people living with pain are more isolated, more stressed, and more vulnerable to mental health concerns like depression and anxiety that can increase pain-related suffering. This article presents two case reports of patients struggling with chronic pain and opioid dependence in which a telemedicine-based buprenorphine-naloxone conversion was chosen as a treatment option by two Canadian programs: The Transitional Pain Service at the Toronto General Hospital in Toronto, Ontario, and The Opioid Deprescribing Program in Calgary, Alberta. Both cases presented highlight the use of telemedicine during the COVID-19 pandemic and suggest that there will be substantial need for these services well beyond the apex of the crisis. A buprenorphine-naloxone home induction protocol is presented and we provide insight into important lessons learned regarding the appropriate selection of patients with chronic pain struggling with opioid use disorder for buprenorphine-naloxone conversion. The provision of health care during the COVID-19 pandemic has rapidly forced practitioners to evolve novel health care practices, and these changes will have long-term implications.

De nombreuses professions de santé ont réagi rapidement à la pandémie de COVID-19. Les soins en personne ont diminué, tandis que la télémédecine et la télésanté ont été propulsées au premier plan des soins cliniques. Pour les personnes vivant avec la douleur chronique, souvent confrontées de manière concomitante à des problèmes liés aux opioïdes, il s'agit d'une période de grand stress. Avec les mouvements de confinemen de la population mis en place, les personnes vivant avec la douleur sont plus isolées, plus stressées et plus vulnérables aux problèmes de santé mentale comme la depression et l'anxiété, qui peuvent augmenter la souffrance liée à la douleur. Cet article présente deux rapports de cas de patients aux prises avec la douleur chronique et la dépendance aux opioides où la conversion à la buprénorphine-naloxone par télémédecine a été choisie comme option de traitement par deux programmes canadiens : Le Service de la douleur transitoire de l'Hôpital général de Toronto, en Ontario, et le Programme de déprescription des opioides à Calgary, Alberta. Les deux cas présentés mettent en évidence l'utilisation de la télémédecine pendant la pandémie de COVID-19 et indiquent qu'il y aura un besoin important pour ces services bien au-delà du sommet de la crise. Un protocole d'induction de la buprénorphine-naloxone à domicile est présenté et nous donnons un aperçu des seignemens tirés quant à la selection appropriée de patients souffrant de douleur chronique et d'un trouble lié à l'usage d'opioïdes pour la conversion à la buprénorphine-naloxone. La prestation de soins de santé durant la pandémie de COVID-19 a rapidement obligé les praticiens à mettre au point de nouvelles pratiques de soins de santé, et ces changements auront des implications à long terme.

Perioperative pain and addiction interdisciplinary network (PAIN): protocol for the perioperative management of cannabis and cannabinoid-based medicines using a modified Delphi process.

INTRODUCTION: At the conception of this study (January 2019), a literature search by the authors found no evidence-based or consensus perioperative guidelines for patients consuming cannabis products, or for those patients in whom a cannabinoid medication could be considered for perioperative treatment. Currently, there is a large global population that consumes cannabis. The availability of cannabis has also increased this decade with greater legal access to cannabis products in some countries such as USA, Canada, Uruguay, Israel, Australia and Germany. There are recognised possible therapeutic benefits for the use of cannabis in patients with chronic pain, chronic neuropathic pain and chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting. There are also potential side effects from cannabis use such as psychosis, cannabis hyperemesis syndrome, misuse disorder and cannabis withdrawal syndrome. There is evidence that cannabis may also affect factors in the perioperative period such as monitoring, quality of analgesia, sleep and opioid consumption. Given the large population of persons using cannabis, the heterogeneity of cannabis products and the paucity (and heterogeneity) of perioperative literature surrounding it, perioperative guidelines for cannabis consuming patients are both lacking and necessary. In this paper, we present the design for a modified Delphi technique that has been started with the intent of deriving cannabis perioperative guidelines from the available medical literature and the consensus of multidisciplinary experts. MATERIALS, METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This study will use a scoping narrative literature review and modified Delphi process to generate cannabis perioperative guidelines. A scoping narrative review of cannabis in the perioperative period by the authors of this proposal was completed and provided to a panel of 17 experts. These experts were recruited for their knowledge and expertise regarding cannabis and/or perioperative medicine. They were asked to rate a series of indications and clinical scenarios in two rounds. During the first round, the expert panel was blinded to each other's participation. During the second round of this process, the expert panel met after being provided with an analysis of the first round's submissions so they could be discussed further and, if possible, reach a further consensus regarding them. Using the results obtained from the Delphi review process, a draft of proposed cannabis perioperative guidelines will be generated. These proposed guidelines will be returned to the expert panel for critiquing prior to their finalisation. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Study and panellist data will be deidentified and stored as per institutional (Toronto General Hospital) guidelines. Institutional research ethics board provided a waiver for this modified Delphi protocol. Findings will be presented and published in peer-reviewed publications and conferences.

Engagement with Manage My Pain mobile health application among patients at the Transitional Pain Service.

OBJECTIVE: Mobile health platforms have become an important component of pain self-management programs and hundreds of mobile applications are commercially available for patients to monitor pain. However, few of these applications have been developed in collaboration with healthcare professionals or have been critically evaluated. Manage My Pain is a user-driven mobile health platform developed by ManagingLife in collaboration with clinician researchers. Manage My Pain allows patients to keep a "pain record" and supports communication of this information with clinicians. The current report describes a user engagement study of Manage My Pain among patients at the Transitional Pain Service (TPS) at Toronto General Hospital, a multidisciplinary clinic for patients at high risk of developing postsurgical pain. METHODS: Patients at the TPS were encouraged to register on Manage My Pain as one component of a larger, non-randomized prospective study of treatment predictors and treatment enhancement. Uptake of the application and rates of registration, use, and retention were tracked for 90 days. RESULTS: Of the 196 patients who consented to the larger study, 132 (67%) also provided consent to the Manage My Pain component, indicating that they found this to be an acceptable treatment adjunct, and 119 (61%) completed registration. Of those who used the app, 67.9% and 43.2% continued to use Manage My Pain beyond 30 and 90 days, respectively. On average, users engaged with the app for 93.14 days (SD = 151.9 days) logged an average of 47.39 total records (SD = 136.1). CONCLUSIONS: Manage My Pain was found acceptable by a majority of patients at an academic pain management program. Rates of user registration and retention were favorable compared to those reported by other applications. Further research is needed to develop strategies to retain users and maximize patient benefit.