Sociodemographic and clinical variables associated with negative illness perception in patients newly diagnosed with rheumatoid arthritis, axial spondyloarthritis, or psoriatic arthritis-a survey based cross-sectional study.

When newly diagnosed with inflammatory arthritis (IA), acquiring self-management skills is beneficial, to enhance quality of life. The personal beliefs and mental representations patients hold about their illness, known as illness perception, significantly influence the development of these skills. Recognizing characteristics that affect illness perception is key to identifying patients requiring additional support for the development of self-management skills. This study aimed at identifying the sociodemographic and clinical characteristics associated with a negative illness perception. This cross-sectional study was based on survey data from patients diagnosed for ≤ 2 years. The Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire (B-IPQ) was used to measure illness perception. After psychometric testing, we divided the B-IPQ into two domains: (1) a control domain and (2) a consequence domain. We performed logistic regression analyses with multiple imputations. A total of 1,360 patients (61% females) were included. Among them, 64%, 20%, and 16% were diagnosed with rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis (PsA) and axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA), respectively. Younger patients with lower socioeconomic status, a diagnosis of PsA or axSpA, high disease activity (OR 3.026, CI 2.208;4.147), severe physical disability (OR 4.147. CI 2.883;6.007), severe pain (OR 3.034, CI 1.991;4.622), and severe fatigue (OR 2.612, CI 1.942;3.513) were significantly more likely to report having a negative illness perception. Younger patients with a higher symptom burden, increased disease activity, lower socioeconomic status, and a diagnosis of PsA or axSpA may require additional attention and support in rheumatology clinical practice to aid in the development of their self-management skills.

[Abdominal surgical treatment of extreme obesity in Denmark].

Increasing overweight is a rising issue worldwide. In 2017, 17% of the Danish population had a body mass index (BMI) > 40 kg/m2 also defined as extreme obesity. Bariatric surgery is the most effective long-term treatment and the status in Denmark is summarized in this review. The most common procedures are Roux-en-Y-gastric bypass and gastric sleeve which have led to excess weight loss (EWL) up to 70%. Regardless of these results, the increasing BMI presents a problem both technically and in regard to achieving a BMI within normal range. In preliminary studies Single anastomosis sleeve ileal bypass (SASI) has shown an EWL of up to 90% and a high resolution of diabetes 2. SASI may be the future of bariatric surgery in the super obese patients.

[Development and methods of bariatric surgery].

Bariatric surgery is the only documented treatment for weight loss in patients with severe obesity and is associated with an overall decrease in mortality. As a result of a generally more obese population the number of bariatric surgical and endoscopic procedures and different methods have increased dramatically during the latest two decades. However, the long-term consequences remain yet to be shown except for a few bariatric procedures. The aim of this article was to describe the most important bariatric surgical and endoscopic techniques for weight loss and the evidence behind.

Internal herniation after laparoscopic antecolic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: a nationwide Danish study based on the Danish National Patient Register.

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) is the most common surgical treatment for morbid obesity in Denmark. Internal herniation (IH) or intermittent internal herniation (IIH) is a major late complication after LRYGB due to persistent mesenteric defects. However, the incidence of IH/IIH is still not known in Denmark. OBJECTIVES: The primary aim of the study was to assess the incidence of IH/IIH after LRYGB performed in the period between 2006 and 2011 with a follow-up until 2013, where mesenteric defects were not routinely closed during the primary operation. SETTING: Department of Bariatric Surgery, Koege University Hospital, Denmark METHODS: We performed a retrospective nationwide analysis of prospectively collected data from all patients with LRYGB performed in Denmark from 2006 to 2011 based on the Danish National Patient Registry (NPR). From January 2006 to December 2011, 12,221 patients underwent an LRYGB procedure in Denmark. Relevant data from all 12,221 patients were retrieved from the NPR during the follow-up period from January 2006 to May 2013; we registered possible subsequent abdominal operations in these patients. RESULTS: Operations were performed on 398 patients because of suspected IH/IIH; 383 of these patients had IH/IIH (3.1%; 95% CI 2.8-3.5). The estimate for the 5-year cumulative incidence of clinically significant cases with IH/IIH was 4%. The median time interval until the onset of IH/IIH after LRYGB was 15 months (range 0-67 months) in a follow-up period with a median of 38 months (range 16-87 months). CONCLUSION: In the period from 2006 to 2011, mesenteric defects were not routinely closed during LRYGB in Denmark. The cumulative 5-year incidence of IH/IIH after LRYGB was 4% in a median follow-up period of 38 months (range 16-87) in Denmark when data was retrieved from the NPR.

Does the closure of mesenteric defects during laparoscopic gastric bypass surgery cause complications?

BACKGROUND: A well-known complication of laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass surgery (LRYGB) is bowel obstruction due to internal herniation (IH). Evidence suggests that mesenteric defects should be closed during LRYGB to reduce the risk of IH. Therefore, surgeons are now closing mesenteric defects during LRYGB using sutures, clips, or fibrin glue. However, it has been reported that complications may arise due to the closure of mesenteric defects. The aim of this review was to summarize the reported possible complications associated with the closure of mesenteric defects during LRYGB. METHODS: A literature search of PubMed and EMBASE was performed to identify studies related to the closure of mesenteric defects during LRYGB. The studies were screened for the listing of possible complications associated with the closure of mesenteric defects. This systematic review was performed in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis recommendations. RESULTS: Thirty studies complied with the inclusion criteria for our analysis, which included 21,789 patients. Reported complications related to closure of the mesenteric defects were: small bowel obstruction because of IH, kinking, and adhesions. IH occurred because of incomplete closure of the mesenteric defects in 1.4% of all patients, 1.2% by the antecolic approach, and 1.9% by the retrocolic approach, respectively. Kinking of the small bowel occurred in .2% of 1630 patients after closure of the mesenteric defects with clips and adhesion formation was found among 4.6% of 152 patients after closure of the mesenteric defects with nonabsorbable sutures. CONCLUSIONS: The reported risk of complications caused by closure of the mesenteric defects during LRYGB seems low.

Effect of closure of the mesenteric defect during laparoscopic gastric bypass and prevention of internal hernia.

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study is to evaluate the benefits and disadvantages of closing the mesenteric defects during gastric bypass to avoid internal herniation (IH). MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study is performed as a single-centre, randomised, controlled, blinded trial. Patients are randomly assigned to either conventional laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) without closing the mesenteric defects (n = 250) or RYGB with closing of the defects with hernia clips (n = 250). Follow-up is conducted at six months, one year, two years and five years after RYGB. The primary endpoint is the incidence of IH. CONCLUSION: This study will be the first Danish, randomised, controlled study comparing conventional LRYGB with and without closure of the mesenteric defects. The results will contribute to evidence-based recommendations for the prevention of IH. FUNDING: not relevant. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study was registered with the Danish Data Protection Agency (SN-10-2012) and The Central Denmark Regional Committees on Biomedical Research Ethics (1-01-83-0209-12, SJ-284). The study is registered with clinicaltrials.gov: NCT01595230.

[Gum chewing reduces duration of postoperative ileus]. / Brug af tyggegummi reducerer varigheden af postoperativ ileus.

Postoperative ileus (POI) after abdominal surgery is characterized by delayed passage of flatus and stool due to decreased bowel motility. Research has been performed in order to find new approaches such as fast track to reduce patient discomfort and durability of POI. One of the latest approaches attempting to reduce POI is gum chewing. Four controlled studies have been published on the subject and the results of two of these studies found a significant decrease in time until first passage of flatus and defaecation. The remaining two studies showed no significant difference, but a slight tendency towards a reduction of POI.