Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
País/Região como assunto
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Europace ; 20(12): 1974-1980, 2018 12 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29672690

RESUMO

Aims: This study assessed the contemporary occurrence of cardiac device infections (CDIs) following implantation in French hospitals and estimated associated costs. Methods and Results: A retrospective analysis was conducted on the French National Hospital Database (PMSI). Patients with a record of de novo cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) implantation or replacement interventions in France in 2012 were identified and followed until the end of 2015. Cardiac device infections (CDIs) were identified based on coding using the French classification for procedures [Classification Commune des Actes Médicaux (CCAM)] and International Classification of Diseases (ICD-10). Associated costs were estimated based on direct costs from the perspective of the French social security system. In total 78 267 CIED patients (72% de novo implants) were identified (15% defibrillators; 84% pacemakers). The 36-month infection rate associated with de novo defibrillator-only implants, as well as for cardiac resynchronisation therapy - defibrillators (CRT-Ds) was 1.6%. The CDI risk was 2.9% and 3.9% for replacement ICDs and CRT-Ds. Infection rates were lower for de novo single-chamber pacemaker (SCP)/dual-chamber pacemaker (DCP) (0.5%) and cardiac resynchronisation therapy - pacemaker (CRT-P) implants (1.0%), while for replacement procedures the risk increased to 1.4% (SCP/DCP) and 1.3% (CRT-P). Mean infection-related costs over 24 months were €20 623 and €23 234 for CDIs associated with replacement and de novo procedures, and overall costs were not significantly different between pacemaker and defibrillator patients. Conclusion: Cardiac device infections in France are associated with substantial costs, when considering inpatient hospitalizations. Strategies to minimize the rate of CIED infection should be a priority for health care providers and payers.


Assuntos
Estimulação Cardíaca Artificial/efeitos adversos , Desfibriladores Implantáveis/efeitos adversos , Cardioversão Elétrica/efeitos adversos , Cardioversão Elétrica/instrumentação , Marca-Passo Artificial/efeitos adversos , Infecções Relacionadas à Prótese/epidemiologia , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Estimulação Cardíaca Artificial/economia , Bases de Dados Factuais , Desfibriladores Implantáveis/economia , Remoção de Dispositivo/economia , Cardioversão Elétrica/economia , Feminino , França/epidemiologia , Custos Hospitalares , Hospitalização/economia , Humanos , Incidência , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Marca-Passo Artificial/economia , Infecções Relacionadas à Prótese/diagnóstico , Infecções Relacionadas à Prótese/economia , Infecções Relacionadas à Prótese/terapia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA