Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor Activity in Patients with NSCLC Harboring Uncommon EGFR Mutations: A Retrospective International Cohort Study (UpSwinG).

BACKGROUND: Epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR TKIs) are standard of care for patients with EGFR mutation-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with common mutations (Del19 or L858R); however, 7%-23% of NSCLC tumors harbor uncommon EGFR mutations. These mutations are highly heterogeneous, and developments in detection techniques are helping to identify mutations with little or no clinical data. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this retrospective, global, multi-center study (NCT04179890), existing health records were identified for consecutive EGFR TKI-naïve patients with uncommon EGFR mutations (T790M, ex20ins, major uncommon [G719X, L861Q, or S768I], or "other" mutations; compound mutations) treated with erlotinib, gefitinib, afatinib, or osimertinib in first or second line. Endpoints included time-to-treatment failure (TTF), objective response rate (ORR), and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: Overall, 246 patients (median age: 69.5 years; Asian: 84%) were included from 9 countries. Most patients (92%) received an EGFR TKI as first-line therapy; 54%, 43% and 3% received afatinib, first-generation TKIs, and osimertinib, respectively. Median TTF and OS with EGFR TKIs were 9.9 and 24.4 months; ORR was 43%. In patients treated with first-line chemotherapy (n = 20), median TTF and ORR were 6.6 months and 41%. Outcomes were most favorable in patients with major uncommon or compound mutations. Overall, TTF was 11.3 months with afatinib and 8.8 months with first-generation EGFR TKIs across mutation categories. In most mutation categories, median OS was >2 years. CONCLUSION: In a real-world setting, EGFR TKIs were the preferred treatment option in patients with uncommon EGFR mutations; strongest outcomes were seen in patients with major uncommon and compound mutations.

Lazertinib in patients with EGFR mutation-positive advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: results from the dose escalation and dose expansion parts of a first-in-human, open-label, multicentre, phase 1-2 study.

BACKGROUND: Patients with EGFR-mutated non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) given EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) inevitably become resistant to first-generation or second-generation drugs. We assessed the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and activity of lazertinib-an irreversible, third-generation, mutant-selective, EGFR TKI-in patients with advanced NSCLC progressing after EGFR TKI therapy. METHODS: This first-in-human, open-label, multicentre, phase 1-2 study had three parts: dose escalation, dose expansion, and dose extension; here, we report results on dose escalation and dose expansion. The study was done in 14 hospitals in Korea. Eligible patients were aged 20 years or older and had advanced NSCLC harbouring an activating EGFR mutation and progressing after first-generation or second-generation EGFR TKI treatment, a defined tumour T790M mutation status, an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-1, at least one measurable extracranial lesion, defined according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1, and adequate organ function. Patients were enrolled to seven dose-escalation cohorts according to a rolling six design; five cohorts were expanded. Patients were given oral lazertinib 20 mg, 40 mg, 80 mg, 120 mg, 160 mg, 240 mg, or 320 mg once daily continuously in 21-day cycles. Primary endpoints were safety and tolerability and secondary endpoints included objective response in evaluable patients. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03046992, and the phase 2 extension study is ongoing. FINDINGS: Between Feb 15, 2017, and May 28, 2018, 127 patients were enrolled into the dose escalation group (n=38) and dose expansion group (n=89). No dose-limiting toxicities occurred. There was no dose-dependent increase in adverse events. The most commonly reported adverse events were grade 1-2 rash or acne (in 38 [30%] of 127 patients) and pruritus (in 34 [27%]). Grade 3 or grade 4 adverse events occurred in 20 (16%) patients, with the most common being grade 3 pneumonia (four [3%]). Treatment-related grade 3 or 4 adverse events occurred in four (3%) patients; treatment-related serious adverse events were reported in six patients (5%). There were no adverse events with an outcome of death and no treatment-related deaths. The proportion of patients achieving an objective response by independent central review assessment was 69 (54%; 95% CI 46-63) of 127. INTERPRETATION: Lazertinib had a tolerable safety profile and showed promosing clinical activity in patients with NSCLC progressing on or after EGFR TKI therapy. Our findings provide a rationale for further clinical investigations. FUNDING: Yuhan Corporation.

Improving trends in survival of patients who receive chemotherapy for metastatic or recurrent gastric cancer: 12 years of experience at a single institution.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate the changes in clinical features and treatment outcomes of the patients with metastatic or recurrent gastric cancer (MRGC) treated in the past 12 years. METHODS: A total of 3888 patients who received chemotherapy for MRGC between January 2000 and December 2011 were analyzed via a prospectively collected registry. The analysis focused on the comparison among three periods: 2000-2003 (period 1), 2004-2007 (period 2) and 2008-2011 (period 3). RESULTS: There were 880 patients (23%) in period 1, 1573 (40%) in period 2 and 1435 (37%) in period 3. The most commonly used first-line chemotherapy regimen was fluoropyrimidine with/without platinum (72%) for all periods. The use of second- and third-line chemotherapy was slightly but significantly more common in the two recent periods: 46 and 19 % in period 1, 54 and 26% in period 2, and 53 and 27% in period 3, respectively. Overall, 3494 patients (89.9%) died with a median overall survival (OS) of 10.6 months (95% CI 10.2-11.0). The OS was statistically significantly improved over the study period: 9.6 months (95% CI 9.0-10.2) in period 1, 10.3 months (95% CI 9.8-10.9) in period 2 and 11.7 months (95% CI 11.0-12.4) in period 3 (p for trend <0.001). Multivariate analysis including eight prognostic factors (performance, gastrectomy, peritoneal/bone/lung metastasis, abnormal alkaline phosphatase/albumin/total bilirubin) showed that the more recent treatment period was an independent favorable prognostic factor for OS (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The OS of patients who receive chemotherapy for MRGC has been shown to improve over time.

Genomic predictors for recurrence patterns of hepatocellular carcinoma: model derivation and validation.

BACKGROUND: Typically observed at 2 y after surgical resection, late recurrence is a major challenge in the management of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). We aimed to develop a genomic predictor that can identify patients at high risk for late recurrence and assess its clinical implications. METHODS AND FINDINGS: Systematic analysis of gene expression data from human liver undergoing hepatic injury and regeneration revealed a 233-gene signature that was significantly associated with late recurrence of HCC. Using this signature, we developed a prognostic predictor that can identify patients at high risk of late recurrence, and tested and validated the robustness of the predictor in patients (n = 396) who underwent surgery between 1990 and 2011 at four centers (210 recurrences during a median of 3.7 y of follow-up). In multivariate analysis, this signature was the strongest risk factor for late recurrence (hazard ratio, 2.2; 95% confidence interval, 1.3-3.7; p = 0.002). In contrast, our previously developed tumor-derived 65-gene risk score was significantly associated with early recurrence (p = 0.005) but not with late recurrence (p = 0.7). In multivariate analysis, the 65-gene risk score was the strongest risk factor for very early recurrence (<1 y after surgical resection) (hazard ratio, 1.7; 95% confidence interval, 1.1-2.6; p = 0.01). The potential significance of STAT3 activation in late recurrence was predicted by gene network analysis and validated later. We also developed and validated 4- and 20-gene predictors from the full 233-gene predictor. The main limitation of the study is that most of the patients in our study were hepatitis B virus-positive. Further investigations are needed to test our prediction models in patients with different etiologies of HCC, such as hepatitis C virus. CONCLUSIONS: Two independently developed predictors reflected well the differences between early and late recurrence of HCC at the molecular level and provided new biomarkers for risk stratification. Please see later in the article for the Editors' Summary.

A phase 2 study of spartalizumab (PDR001) among patients with recurrent or metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (KCSG HN18-17, K-MASTER project 12).

Spartalizumab (PDR001) is a humanized IgG4 monoclonal antibody targeting programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1). We conducted a single-arm, phase 2 trial to investigate the efficacy and safety of spartalizumab in patients with refractory esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). Patients with histologically confirmed ESCC who experienced disease progression after platinum-based chemotherapy received 300 mg of intravenous spartalizumab every three weeks until disease progression or occurrence of unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was centrally assessed objective response according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, version 1.1. Adverse events were closely monitored throughout the study. From March 2020 through April 2021, 44 patients with ESCC were enrolled. Of the 44 patients, the objective response rate was 20.5% (95% confidence interval: 8.5-32.4). With a median follow-up of 10.9 months, median progression-free survival and overall survival were 3.2 months and 11.2 months, respectively. In addition, the median duration of response was 24.7 months. The most common grade 3 or 4 adverse event was grade 3 dysphagia (eight [18%] patients). Biomarker analyses explored programmed cell death ligand 1 and CD20 as potential predictive markers for PD-1 blockade. Spartalizumab showed promising activity with a manageable safety profile, indicating its potential as a new treatment option for patients with refractory ESCC. Trial registration: The trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov under the identifier NCT03785496.

Real-world treatment patterns and clinical outcomes in patients with stage III NSCLC in Korea: The KINDLE study.

OBJECTIVE: KINDLE-Korea is part of a real-world KINDLE study that aimed to characterize the treatment patterns and clinical outcomes of patients with stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: The KINDLE was an international real-world study that explores patient and disease characteristics, treatment patterns, and survival outcomes. The KINDLE-Korea included stage III NSCLC patients diagnosed between January 2013 and December 2017. RESULTS: A total of 461 patients were enrolled. The median age was 66 years (range: 24-87). Most patients were men (75.7%) with a history of smoking (74.0%), stage IIIA NSCLC (69.2%), and unresectable disease (52.9%). A total of 24.3% had activating EGFR mutation and 62.2% were positive for PDL1 expression. Broadly categorized, 44.6% of the patients received chemoradiation (CRT)-based therapy, 35.1% underwent surgery, and 20.3% received palliative therapies as initial treatment. The most commonly adopted approaches for patients with stage IIIA and IIIB disease were surgery and CRT, respectively. The median PFS was 15.2 months and OS was 66.7 months. Age >65 years, adenocarcinoma histology, and surgery as the initial treatment were significantly associated with longer OS. CONCLUSION: This study revealed the heterogeneity of treatment patterns and survival outcomes in patients with stage III NSCLC before durvalumab consolidation came into clinical practice. There is an unmet need for patients who are not eligible for surgery as an initial therapy. Novel therapeutic approaches are highly warranted to improve clinical outcomes.

Lazertinib versus Gefitinib as First-Line Treatment for EGFR-mutated Locally Advanced or Metastatic NSCLC: LASER301 Korean Subset.

PURPOSE: This subgroup analysis of the Korean subset of patients in the phase 3 LASER301 trial evaluated the efficacy and safety of lazertinib versus gefitinib as first-line therapy for epidermal growth factor receptor mutated (EGFRm) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with locally advanced or metastatic EGFRm NSCLC were randomized 1:1 to lazertinib (240 mg/day) or gefitinib (250 mg/day). The primary endpoint was investigator-assessed progression-free survival (PFS). RESULTS: In total, 172 Korean patients were enrolled (lazertinib, n=87; gefitinib, n=85). Baseline characteristics were balanced between the treatment groups. One-third of patients had brain metastases (BM) at baseline. Median PFS was 20.8 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 16.7 to 26.1) for lazertinib and 9.6 months (95% CI, 8.2 to 12.3) for gefitinib (hazard ratio [HR], 0.41; 95% CI, 0.28 to 0.60). This was supported by PFS analysis based on blinded independent central review. Significant PFS benefit with lazertinib was consistently observed across predefined subgroups, including patients with BM (HR, 0.28; 95% CI, 0.15 to 0.53) and those with L858R mutations (HR, 0.36; 95% CI, 0.20 to 0.63). Lazertinib safety data were consistent with its previously reported safety profile. Common adverse events (AEs) in both groups included rash, pruritus, and diarrhoea. Numerically fewer severe AEs and severe treatment-related AEs occurred with lazertinib than gefitinib. CONCLUSION: Consistent with results for the overall LASER301 population, this analysis showed significant PFS benefit with lazertinib versus gefitinib with comparable safety in Korean patients with untreated EGFRm NSCLC, supporting lazertinib as a new potential treatment option for this patient population.

A Phase 3 Randomized Clinical Trial to Compare Efficacy and Safety between Combination Therapy and Monotherapy in Elderly Patients with Advanced Gastric Cancer (KCSG ST13-10).

PURPOSE: This study evaluated whether combination therapy is more effective than monotherapy in elderly patients with metastatic or recurrent gastric cancer (MRGC) as first-line chemotherapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Elderly (≥ 70 years) chemo-naïve patients with MRGC were allocated to receive either combination therapy (group A: 5-fluorouracil [5-FU]/oxaliplatin, capecitabine/oxaliplatin, capecitabine/cisplatin, or S-1/cisplatin) or monotherapy (group B: 5-FU, capecitabine, or S-1). In group A, starting doses were 80% of standard doses, and they could be escalated to 100% at the discretion of the investigator. Primary endpoint was to confirm superior overall survival (OS) of combination therapy vs. monotherapy. RESULTS: After 111 of the planned 238 patients were randomized, enrollment was terminated due to poor accrual. In the full-analysis population (group A [n=53] and group B [n=51]), median OS of combination therapy vs. monotherapy was 11.5 vs. 7.5 months (hazard ratio [HR], 0.86; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.56 to 1.30; p=0.231). Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 5.6 vs. 3.7 months (HR, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.34 to 0.83; p=0.005). In subgroup analyses, patients aged 70-74 years tended to have superior OS with combination therapy (15.9 vs. 7.2 months, p=0.056). Treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) occurred more frequently in group A vs. group B. However, among severe TRAEs (≥ grade 3), there were no TRAEs with a frequency difference of > 5%. CONCLUSION: Combination therapy was associated with numerically improved OS, although statistically insignificant, and a significant PFS benefit compared with monotherapy. Although combination therapy showed more frequent TRAEs, there was no difference in the frequency of severe TRAEs.

Lazertinib Versus Gefitinib Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors in Treatment-Naíve Patients With EGFR-Mutated Advanced NSCLC: Analysis of the Asian Subpopulation in LASER301.

INTRODUCTION: Lazertinib is a third-generation central nervous system-penetrant tyrosine kinase inhibitor targeting mutant EGFR in NSCLC. Lazertinib exhibited improved efficacy versus gefitinib in the LASER301 study; this subset analysis compared lazertinib with gefitinib among Asian patients. METHODS: The phase 3 LASER301 study evaluated lazertinib efficacy and safety in treatment-naive patients with EGFR-mutated (exon 19 deletion or L858R) locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC. Patients were randomized one-to-one and received either lazertinib or gefitinib. The primary end point was investigator-assessed progression-free survival using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1. Secondary end points included overall survival, objective response rate, duration of response, and safety. RESULTS: Between February 13, 2020, and July 29, 2022, among 258 patients of Asian descent, the median progression-free survival was significantly longer with lazertinib than gefitinib (20.6 versus 9.7 mo; hazard ratio: 0.46; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.34-0.63, p < 0.001), and the benefit was consistent across predefined subgroups (exon 19 deletion, L858R, baseline central nervous system metastases). Objective response rate and disease control rates were similar between treatment groups. The median duration of response was 19.4 months (95% CI: 16.6-24.9) versus 9.6 months (95% CI: 6.9-12.4) in the lazertinib versus gefitinib group. Adverse event rates in Asian patients were comparable with the overall LASER301 population. Adverse events leading to discontinuation in the lazertinib and gefitinib groups were 13% and 12%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In LASER301, efficacy and safety results in Asian patients were consistent with the overall population. Lazertinib exhibited better efficacy than gefitinib in Asian patients with a tolerable safety profile.

Central Nervous System Outcomes of Lazertinib Versus Gefitinib in EGFR-Mutated Advanced NSCLC: A LASER301 Subset Analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Lazertinib, a third-generation mutant-selective EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor, improved progression-free survival compared with gefitinib in the phase 3 LASER301 study (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04248829). Here, we report the efficacy of lazertinib and gefitinib in patients with baseline central nervous system (CNS) metastases. METHODS: Treatment-naive patients with EGFR-mutated advanced NSCLC were randomized one-to-one to lazertinib (240 mg/d) or gefitinib (250 mg/d). Patients with asymptomatic or stable CNS metastases were included if any planned radiation, surgery, or steroids were completed more than 2 weeks before randomization. For patients with CNS metastases confirmed at screening or subsequently suspected, CNS imaging was performed every 6 weeks for 18 months, then every 12 weeks. End points assessed by blinded independent central review and Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1 included intracranial progression-free survival, intracranial objective response rate, and intracranial duration of response. RESULTS: Of the 393 patients enrolled in LASER301, 86 (lazertinib, n = 45; gefitinib, n = 41) had measurable and or non-measurable baseline CNS metastases. The median intracranial progression-free survival in the lazertinib group was 28.2 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 14.8-28.2) versus 8.4 months (95% CI: 6.7-not reached [NR]) in the gefitinib group (hazard ratio = 0.42, 95% CI: 0.20-0.89, p = 0.02). Among patients with measurable CNS lesions, the intracranial objective response rate was numerically higher with lazertinib (94%; n = 17) versus gefitinib (73%; n = 11, p = 0.124). The median intracranial duration of response with lazertinib was NR (8.3-NR) versus 6.3 months (2.8-NR) with gefitinib. Tolerability was similar to the overall LASER301 population. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with CNS metastases, lazertinib significantly improved intracranial progression-free survival compared with gefitinib, with more durable responses.

A pilot study of S-1 plus cisplatin versus 5-fluorouracil plus cisplatin for postoperative chemotherapy in histological stage IIIB-IV (M0) gastric cancer.

BACKGROUND: Although its efficacy is unproven, 5-fluorouracil plus cisplatin (FP) is used to prevent postoperative relapse in gastric cancer. We investigated the safety and feasibility of S-1 plus cisplatin (SP) vs. FP for stage IIIB-IV (M0) gastric cancer. METHODS: Following curative resection, 41 stage IIIB-IV (M0) gastric cancer patients were assigned to SP (eight 14-day cycles of S-1 [40 mg/m(2) twice daily] plus cisplatin [60 mg/m(2) day 1] administered every 3 weeks) or FP (six 3-day cycles of FU [1 g/m(2) per day] plus cisplatin [80 mg/m(2) day 1] every 4 weeks). Doses were reduced based on predefined criteria. RESULTS: Patient characteristics were balanced between the two arms. In total, 124 cycles of SP (N = 20, median = 7, range 1-8) and 113 cycles of FP (N = 21, median 6, range 1-6) were administered. The median relative dose intensity per patient was 75% (49.99-100%) for S-1, 100% (75-100%) for cisplatin in SP, and 100% (64-100%) for 5-FU, 100% (60-100%) for cisplatin in FP. The relative dose intensity of FP was stable, while that of SP decreased during treatment. After median follow-up of 7.9 months (3.8-14.55), the median RFS was not reached. Relapse occurred in two (10%) patients on SP and five (23.8%) in the FP arm (P = 0.24). The incidence of grade 3-4 granulocytopenia was 36.8% with SP and 14.3% with FP. Grade 3-4 non-hematologic toxicities included fatigue (5.2% with SP vs. 4.8% with FP), vomiting (10.5% with SP vs. 0% with FP), and infection (5.2% with SP vs. 0% FP). CONCLUSION: S-1 plus cisplatin was feasible and tolerable as adjuvant treatment for stage IIIB-IV (M0) gastric cancer. However, because of decreased relative dose intensity during treatment, further study is warranted to determine optimal dosage and combination.

A Phase II study of clinical outcomes of 3-week cycles of irinotecan and S-1 in patients with previously untreated metastatic colorectal cancer: influence of the UGT1A1 and CYP2A6 polymorphisms on clinical activity.

OBJECTIVES: We investigated the efficacy and safety of the combination of irinotecan (CPT-11) and S-1 (IRIS regimen) as a first-line treatment in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. We also evaluated the association between UGT1A1 and CYP2A6 polymorphisms and clinical phenotypes. METHODS: The patients received CPT-11 (225 mg/m(2)) on day 1 and S-1 (80 mg/m(2)) on days 1-14 every 3 weeks. The association of the UGT1A1 (*6 and *28) and CYP2A6(*4, *7, *9, and *10) polymorphisms with toxicities and efficacy were analyzed. RESULTS: Thirty patients were treated. The overall response rate was 66.7% (95% CI 48.7-84.6). The median time to progression was 7.6 months (95% CI 5.8-9.5). The most common grade 3/4 hematologic and non-hematologic toxicity were neutropenia (53.4%) and diarrhea (16.7%), respectively. The allele frequencies of UGT1A1*6 and *28 were 15.5 and 10.3%, respectively. The frequencies of CYP2A6*4, *7, *9, and *10 were 15.5, 8.6, 29.3, and 3.5%, respectively. Stratification of patients according to the number of UGT1A1*28 and *6 alleles showed a significant correlation between the number of defective alleles and the incidence of grade 3/4 neutropenia. CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that IRIS is a promising first-line regimen in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Severe neutropenia may be associated with interindividual variations in UGT1A1 polymorphisms.

Randomized phase II trial of S-1 and cisplatin versus gemcitabine and cisplatin in patients with advanced biliary tract adenocarcinoma.

BACKGROUND: We evaluated the efficacy and safety of a combination of S-1 and cisplatin (SP) versus gemcitabine and cisplatin (GP) as first-line therapy for advanced biliary tract adenocarcinoma (ABTA). MATERIAL AND METHODS: Patients were randomized to receive cisplatin (60 mg/m(2) intravenously [IV] on Day 1) plus S-1 (40 mg/m(2) bid orally on Days 1-14) or gemcitabine (1000 mg/m(2) IV at 10 mg/m(2)/min on Days 1 and 8) every three weeks. The primary end point was six-month progression-free survival (PFS). RESULTS: Of 96 eligible patients, 49 were randomized to GP and 47 to SP. At a median follow-up time of 14.2 months, the six-month PFS rates were 43.8% and 34.7%, respectively [unadjusted HR (GP/SP) =0.85, 95% CI 0.52-1.36]. The median OS values in the GP and SP groups were 10.1 months and 9.9 months, respectively [unadjusted HR (GP/SP) =0.72, 95% CI 0.45-1.17]. Grade 3-4 toxicities in the GP and SP groups included neutropenia (49.0% vs. 31.8%), anemia (22.4% vs. 2.3%), thrombocytopenia (22.4% vs. 4.5%), and asthenia (4.1% vs. 2.1%). CONCLUSION: Both GP and SP has comparable efficacy with favorable safety profile as first-line treatment for ABTA. (ClinicalTrials.gov number NCT 01375972).

Three-week combination chemotherapy with S-1 and cisplatin as first-line treatment in patients with advanced gastric cancer: a retrospective study with 159 patients.

BACKGROUND: Doses and schedules of the combination of S-1 and cisplatin for the treatment of advanced gastric cancer (AGC) have not been standardized. We therefore evaluated the efficacy and feasibility of a 3-week schedule of S-1 and cisplatin in patients with AGC, as well as assessing factors prognostic of patient outcomes. METHODS: A total of 159 patients with AGC were treated with S-1 (40 mg/m(2) bid on days 1-14) and cisplatin (60 mg/m(2) IV on day 1) between January 2004 and December 2008. RESULTS: Median follow-up duration was 20.0 months (range, 11.4-48.5 months), during which time 129 patients (81.1%) died. Patients received a median 6 cycles of chemotherapy (range, 1-19 cycles). Among the 59 patients with measurable disease, 1 achieved a complete response (1.7%) and 24 (40.7%) had partial responses, giving an overall response rate of 42.4% (95% CI, 23.0-61.8%). The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 5.8 months (95% CI, 4.8-6.9 months), and the median overall survival (OS) was 11.3 months (95% CI, 9.6-13.0 months). Multivariate analysis showed that initial metastasis, bone metastasis, and liver metastasis were independent prognostic factors for reduced PFS, whereas poor performance status, initial metastasis, and bone metastasis were prognostic for reduced OS. Application of a previous prognostic model showed that observed PFS and OS survival curves for patients in various risk groups differed significantly (P < 0.001 each). CONCLUSIONS: A 3-week regimen of S-1 plus cisplatin was active and well tolerated as first-line treatment in patients with AGC. Disease status and bone metastasis were the most important prognostic factors.

A Multicenter Two-arm, Phase II Trial Assessing the Safety and Efficacy of First-line Lazertinib and Locally Ablative Radiotherapy in Patients With Synchronous Oligo-metastatic EGFR-mutant Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (ABLATE, KCSG-LU21-11).

BACKGROUND: The current standard treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation is upfront EGFR targeted therapy. However, patients invariably experience disease progression at primary tumors or metastatic sites. Adding stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) to systemic therapy can improve progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). This multicenter, 2-arm, phase II study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of lazertinib, a third generation EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor, combined with upfront locally ablative radiotherapy in EGFR-mutant NSCLC patients with synchronous oligometastatic disease (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT05167851). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Key inclusion criteria are biopsy-proven EGFR-mutated adenocarcinoma with synchronous, oligometastatic (≤5 metastases) NSCLC. Patients will be randomized 1:1 to receive lazertinib or lazertinib + SBRT to the primary tumor and metastatic sites. The primary endpoint is PFS according to RECIST: Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumor version 1.1, and the secondary endpoints are OS, objective response rate, and safety. RESULTS: Patient enrolment began in January 2021 and is ongoing at 7 sites in the Republic of Korea. CONCLUSION: This trial will provide valuable information on the efficacy and safety of lazertinib in combination with SBRT in patients with synchronous, oligometastatic EGFR-mutant NSCLC.

A Phase 1/2 Study of Lazertinib 240 mg in Patients With Advanced EGFR T790M-Positive NSCLC After Previous EGFR Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors.

INTRODUCTION: This integrated analysis of a phase 1/2 study (NCT03046992) evaluated the efficacy and safety of lazertinib, a third-generation EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), in patients with advanced EGFR T790M-positive NSCLC after previous EGFR TKI therapy. METHODS: Adults with EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC that progressed after prior EGFR-directed TKIs received once daily oral lazertinib 240 mg continuously until disease progression. Prior TKIs to treat T790M-positive NSCLC were prohibited. Primary endpoints were safety and objective response rate (ORR). Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival, overall survival, and intracranial ORR. RESULTS: A total of 78 patients received lazertinib 240 mg at 17 centers in South Korea. Among patients with T790M-positive tumors at baseline (N = 76), one (1.3%) had a complete response and 41 (53.9%) had partial responses, giving an ORR of 55.3% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 44.1-66.4). Median progression-free survival was 11.1 months (95% CI: 5.5-16.4). Median overall survival was not reached (median follow-up = 22.0 mo). In patients with measurable intracranial lesions (n = 7), one (14.3%) had a complete intracranial response and five (71.4%) had partial responses, giving an intracranial ORR of 85.7% (95% CI: 59.8%-100.0%). The most common treatment-emergent adverse events were rash (37.2%), pruritus (34.6%), and paresthesia (33.3%); most were mild to moderate in severity. Serious drug-related adverse events occurred in three patients (gastritis, pneumonia, pneumonitis). The major mechanism of resistance was EGFR T790M loss. CONCLUSIONS: Lazertinib 240 mg/d has a manageable safety profile with durable antitumor efficacy, including brain metastases, in patients with advanced T790M-positive NSCLC after previous EGFR TKI therapy.

YH29407 with anti-PD-1 ameliorates anti-tumor effects via increased T cell functionality and antigen presenting machinery in the tumor microenvironment.

Among cancer cells, indoleamine 2, 3-dioxygenase1 (IDO1) activity has been implicated in improving the proliferation and growth of cancer cells and suppressing immune cell activity. IDO1 is also responsible for the catabolism of tryptophan to kynurenine. Depletion of tryptophan and an increase in kynurenine exert important immunosuppressive functions by activating regulatory T cells and suppressing CD8+ T and natural killer (NK) cells. In this study, we compared the anti-tumor effects of YH29407, the best-in-class IDO1 inhibitor with improved pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics, with first and second-generation IDO1 inhibitors (epacadostat and BMS-986205, respectively). YH29407 treatment alone and anti-PD-1 (aPD-1) combination treatment induced significant tumor suppression compared with competing drugs. In particular, combination treatment showed the best anti-tumor effects, with most tumors reduced and complete responses. Our observations suggest that improved anti-tumor effects were caused by an increase in T cell infiltration and activity after YH29407 treatment. Notably, an immune depletion assay confirmed that YH29407 is closely related to CD8+ T cells. RNA-seq results showed that treatment with YH29407 increased the expression of genes involved in T cell function and antigen presentation in tumors expressing ZAP70, LCK, NFATC2, B2M, and MYD88 genes. Our results suggest that an IDO1 inhibitor, YH29407, has enhanced PK/PD compared to previous IDO1 inhibitors by causing a change in the population of CD8+ T cells including infiltrating T cells into the tumor. Ultimately, YH29407 overcame the limitations of the competing drugs and displayed potential as an immunotherapy strategy in combination with aPD-1.

SKI-G-801, an AXL kinase inhibitor, blocks metastasis through inducing anti-tumor immune responses and potentiates anti-PD-1 therapy in mouse cancer models.

OBJECTIVES: AXL-mediated activation of aberrant tyrosine kinase drives various oncogenic processes and facilitates an immunosuppressive microenvironment. We evaluated the anti-tumor and anti-metastatic activities of SKI-G-801, a small-molecule inhibitor of AXL, alone and in combination with anti-PD-1 therapy. METHODS: In vitro pAXL inhibition by SKI-G-801 was performed in both human and mouse cancer cell lines. Immunocompetent mouse models of tumor were established to measure anti-metastatic potential of SKI-G-801. Furthermore, SKI-G-801, anti-PD-1 or their combination was administered as an adjuvant or neoadjuvant in the 4T1 tumor model to assess their potential for clinical application. RESULTS: SKI-G-801 robustly inhibited pAXL expression in various cell lines. SKI-G-801 alone or in combination with anti-PD-1 potently inhibited metastasis in B16F10 melanoma, CT26 colon and 4T1 breast models. SKI-G-801 inhibited the growth of B16F10 and 4T1 tumor-bearing mice but not immune-deficient mice. An antibody depletion assay revealed that CD8+ T cells significantly contributed to SKI-G-801-mediated survival. Anti-PD-1 and combination group were observed the increased CD8+Ki67+ and effector T cells and M1 macrophage and decreased M2 macrophage, and granulocytic myeloid-derived suppressor cell (G-MDSC) compared to the control group. The neoadjuvant combination of SKI-G-801 and anti-PD-1 therapy achieved superior survival benefits by inducing more profound T-cell responses in the 4T1 syngeneic mouse model. CONCLUSION: SKI-G-801 significantly suppressed tumor metastasis and growth by enhancing anti-tumor immune responses. Our results suggest that SKI-G-801 has the potential to overcome anti-PD-1 therapy resistance and allow more patients to benefit from anti-PD-1 therapy.

Biochemical characterization of metnase's endonuclease activity and its role in NHEJ repair.

Metnase (SETMAR) is a SET-transposase fusion protein that promotes nonhomologous end joining (NHEJ) repair in humans. Although both SET and the transposase domains were necessary for its function in DSB repair, it is not clear what specific role Metnase plays in the NHEJ. In this study, we show that Metnase possesses a unique endonuclease activity that preferentially acts on ssDNA and ssDNA-overhang of a partial duplex DNA. Cell extracts lacking Metnase poorly supported DNA end joining, and addition of wt-Metnase to cell extracts lacking Metnase markedly stimulated DNA end joining, while a mutant (D483A) lacking endonuclease activity did not. Given that Metnase overexpression enhanced DNA end processing in vitro, our finding suggests a role for Metnase's endonuclease activity in promoting the joining of noncompatible ends.

Clinical features and course of brain metastases in triple-negative breast cancer: comparison with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive and other type at single institution in Korea.

The incidences and clinical aggressiveness of intracranial metastases have not been as well characterized in patients with triple-negative (TN) breast cancer as in patients with human epidermal growth factor 2-positive (HER2+) breast cancer. Patients diagnosed with brain metastases from primary breast cancer, as determined by computed tomography and/or magnetic resonance imaging, at Asan Medical Center from January 1990 to July 2006 were identified and classified into three subtypes: TN, HER2+, and other. The clinical features and outcomes of these three groups were compared. Of the 7,872 patients diagnosed with primary breast cancer, 198 developed brain metastases; of these, 61 patients with unknown estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, and HER2 status were excluded. Of the remaining 137 patients, 44 (32%) were classified as TN, 69 (50%) as HER2+, and 24 (18%) as other. Clinical parameters, including performance status and previous adjuvant chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy, were well balanced among groups, except that earlier staged tumors (I and II) were more prevalent in the TN than in the HER2+ and other (59 vs. 36 vs. 38%, P = 0.01). At a median follow-up of 99 months, the median times from initial diagnosis to brain metastasis (20 vs. 32 vs. 45 months, P = 0.01) and to first distant metastasis at any site (16 vs. 23 vs. 23 months, P = 0.005) were significantly shorter in TN than in the HER2+ and other. Median overall survival (OS) from primary cancer diagnosis was significantly shorter in the TN than in the HER2+ and other (31 vs. 39 vs. 57 months, P = 0.02), but survival after brain metastasis was similar (5.9 vs. 5.2 vs. 8.8 months, P = 0.31). Compared with other breast cancer phenotypes, TN breast cancer was characterized by earlier brain and other distant metastases and shorter OS, despite a higher proportion of tumors diagnosed at early stages.