Can Socially Assistive Robots Be Accepted by Older People Living Alone in the Community?: Empirical Findings from a Social Work Project in China.

A pilot study was undertaken between March 2019 and September 2021, loaning socially assistive robots (SARs) for a 7-day trial to older people living alone in China. Quantitative assessments of participants' acceptance of technology and loneliness were conducted before and after the intervention, supplemented with qualitative interviews. Unexpectedly, participants' intention to use SARs decreased significantly, largely due to emotional anxiety. Meanwhile, participants' level of loneliness remained unchanged. Follow-up interviews revealed anxious emotion, hesitant attitudes, unreal social presence, usability difficulties as contributing factors. The study provides social workers with valuable insights into introducing SARs into community care of older people.

Deep learning for spirometry quality assurance with spirometric indices and curves.

BACKGROUND: Spirometry quality assurance is a challenging task across levels of healthcare tiers, especially in primary care. Deep learning may serve as a support tool for enhancing spirometry quality. We aimed to develop a high accuracy and sensitive deep learning-based model aiming at assisting high-quality spirometry assurance. METHODS: Spirometry PDF files retrieved from one hospital between October 2017 and October 2020 were labeled according to ATS/ERS 2019 criteria and divided into training and internal test sets. Additional files from three hospitals were used for external testing. A deep learning-based model was constructed and assessed to determine acceptability, usability, and quality rating for FEV1 and FVC. System warning messages and patient instructions were also generated for general practitioners (GPs). RESULTS: A total of 16,502 files were labeled. Of these, 4592 curves were assigned to the internal test set, the remaining constituted the training set. In the internal test set, the model generated 95.1%, 92.4%, and 94.3% accuracy for FEV1 acceptability, usability, and rating. The accuracy for FVC acceptability, usability, and rating were 93.6%, 94.3%, and 92.2%. With the assistance of the model, the performance of GPs in terms of monthly percentages of good quality (A, B, or C grades) tests for FEV1 and FVC was higher by ~ 21% and ~ 36%, respectively. CONCLUSION: The proposed model assisted GPs in spirometry quality assurance, resulting in enhancing the performance of GPs in quality control of spirometry.

Deep Learning for Automatic Upper Airway Obstruction Detection by Analysis of Flow-Volume Curve.

BACKGROUND: Due to the similar symptoms of upper airway obstruction to asthma, misdiagnosis is common. Spirometry is a cost-effective screening test for upper airway obstruction and its characteristic patterns involving fixed, variable intrathoracic and extrathoracic lesions. We aimed to develop a deep learning model to detect upper airway obstruction patterns and compared its performance with that of lung function clinicians. METHODS: Spirometry records were reviewed to detect the possible condition of airway stenosis. Then they were confirmed by the gold standard (e.g., computed tomography, endoscopy, or clinic diagnosis of upper airway obstruction). Images and indices derived from flow-volume curves were used for training and testing the model. Clinicians determined cases using spirometry records from the test set. The deep learning model evaluated the same data. RESULTS: Of 45,831 patients' spirometry records, 564 subjects with curves suggesting upper airway obstruction, after verified by the gold standard, 351 patients were confirmed. These cases and another 200 cases without airway stenosis were used as the training and testing sets. 432 clinicians evaluated 20 cases of each of the three patterns and 20 no airway stenosis cases (n = 80). They assigned an accuracy of 41.2% (±15.4) (interquartile range: 27.5-52.5%), with poor agreements (κ = 0.12). For the same cases, the model generated a correct detection of 81.3% (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Deep learning could detect upper airway obstruction patterns from other classic patterns of ventilatory defects with high accuracy, whereas clinicians presented marked errors and variabilities. The model may serve as a support tool to enhance clinicians' correct diagnosis of upper airway obstruction using spirometry.

Clinical analysis of the "small plateau" sign on the flow-volume curve followed by deep learning automated recognition.

BACKGROUND: Small plateau (SP) on the flow-volume curve was found in parts of patients with suspected asthma or upper airway abnormalities, but it lacks clear scientific proof. Therefore, we aimed to characterize its clinical features. METHODS: We involved patients by reviewing the bronchoprovocation test (BPT) and bronchodilator test (BDT) completed between October 2017 and October 2020 to assess the characteristics of the sign. Patients who underwent laryngoscopy were assigned to perform spirometry to analyze the relationship of the sign and upper airway abnormalities. SP-Network was developed to recognition of the sign using flow-volume curves. RESULTS: Of 13,661 BPTs and 8,168 BDTs completed, we labeled 2,123 (15.5%) and 219 (2.7%) patients with the sign, respectively. Among them, there were 1,782 (83.9%) with the negative-BPT and 194 (88.6%) with the negative-BDT. Patients with SP sign had higher median FVC and FEV1% predicted (both P < .0001). Of 48 patients (16 with and 32 without the sign) who performed laryngoscopy and spirometry, the rate of laryngoscopy-diagnosis upper airway abnormalities in patients with the sign (63%) was higher than those without the sign (31%) (P = 0.038). SP-Network achieved an accuracy of 95.2% in the task of automatic recognition of the sign. CONCLUSIONS: SP sign is featured on the flow-volume curve and recognized by the SP-Network model. Patients with the sign are less likely to have airway hyperresponsiveness, automatic visualizing of this sign is helpful for primary care centers where BPT cannot available.

Deep Learning-Based Analytic Models Based on Flow-Volume Curves for Identifying Ventilatory Patterns.

INTRODUCTION: Spirometry, a pulmonary function test, is being increasingly applied across healthcare tiers, particularly in primary care settings. According to the guidelines set by the American Thoracic Society (ATS) and the European Respiratory Society (ERS), identifying normal, obstructive, restrictive, and mixed ventilatory patterns requires spirometry and lung volume assessments. The aim of the present study was to explore the accuracy of deep learning-based analytic models based on flow-volume curves in identifying the ventilatory patterns. Further, the performance of the best model was compared with that of physicians working in lung function laboratories. METHODS: The gold standard for identifying ventilatory patterns was the rules of ATS/ERS guidelines. One physician chosen from each hospital evaluated the ventilatory patterns according to the international guidelines. Ten deep learning models (ResNet18, ResNet34, ResNet18_vd, ResNet34_vd, ResNet50_vd, ResNet50_vc, SE_ResNet18_vd, VGG11, VGG13, and VGG16) were developed to identify patterns from the flow-volume curves. The patterns obtained by the best-performing model were cross-checked with those obtained by the physicians. RESULTS: A total of 18,909 subjects were used to develop the models. The ratio of the training, validation, and test sets of the models was 7:2:1. On the test set, the best-performing model VGG13 exhibited an accuracy of 95.6%. Ninety physicians independently interpreted 100 other cases. The average accuracy achieved by the physicians was 76.9 ± 18.4% (interquartile range: 70.5-88.5%) with a moderate agreement (κ = 0.46), physicians from primary care settings achieved a lower accuracy (56.2%), while the VGG13 model accurately identified the ventilatory pattern in 92.0% of the 100 cases (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: The VGG13 model identified ventilatory patterns with a high accuracy using the flow-volume curves without requiring any other parameter. The model can assist physicians, particularly those in primary care settings, in minimizing errors and variations in ventilatory patterns.