Influence of exercise on nutritional requirements.

There is no consensus on the best diet for exercise, as many variables influence it. We propose an approach that is based on the total energy expenditure of exercise and the specific macro- and micronutrients used. di Prampero quantified the impact of intensity and duration on the energy cost of exercise. This can be used to determine the total energy needs and the balance of fats and carbohydrates (CHO). There are metabolic differences between sedentary and trained persons, thus the total energy intake to prevent overfeeding of sedentary persons and underfeeding athletes is important. During submaximal sustained exercise, fat oxidation (FO) plays an important role. This role is diminished and CHO's role increases as exercise intensity increases. At super-maximal exercise intensities, anaerobic glycolysis dominates. In the case of protein and micronutrients, specific recommendations are required. We propose that for submaximal exercise, the balance of CHO and fat favors fat for longer exercise and CHO for shorter exercise, while always maintaining the minimal requirements of each (CHO: 40% and fat: 30%). A case for higher protein (above 15%) as well as creatine supplementation for resistance exercise has been proposed. One may also consider increasing bicarbonate intake for exercise that relies on anaerobic glycolysis, whereas there appears to be little support for antioxidant supplementation. Insuring minimal levels of substrate will prevent exercise intolerance, while increasing some components may increase exercise tolerance.

Statin therapy depresses total body fat oxidation in the absence of genetic limitations to fat oxidation.

Cholesterol lowering drugs are associated with myopathic side effects in 7% of those on therapy, which is reversible in most, but not all patients. This study tested the hypothesis that total body fat oxidation (TBFO) is reduced by statins in patients with genetic deficiencies in FO, determined by white blood cells (FOwbc) and by molecular analysis of common deficiencies, and would cause intolerance in some patients. Six patients on statin therapy without myopathic side effects (tolerant) and 7 patients who had previously developed statin-induced myopathic symptoms (intolerant) (age = 58 +/- 8.25 yrs, ht. = 169 +/- 11 cm, and wt. = 75.4 +/- 14.2 kg) were tested for TBFO (Respiratory Exchange Ratio, RER) pre- and during exercise. FOwbc was not significantly different between tolerant and intolerant (0.261 +/- 0.078 vs. 0.296 +/- 0.042 nmol/h per 10(9) wbc), or normals (0.27 +/- 0.09 nmol/h per 10(9) wbc) and no common molecular abnormalities were found. Pre-exercise RER (0.73 +/- 0.05 vs. 0.84 +/- 0.05) was significantly lower in the intolerant group and the VO2 at RER = 1.0 (1.27 +/- 0.32 vs. 1.87 +/- 0.60 L/min) greater than the tolerant. Post-exercise lactates were not different between groups. Although dietary fat intake was not different, blood lipoprotein levels, particularly triglycerides were 35% lower in tolerant than previously intolerant. TBFO and blood lipoproteins were reduced in tolerant patients in spite of the absence of genetic limitations, but not in the intolerant group as hypothesized. Although not conclusive, these data suggest the need for a prospective study of the effects of statins on fat oxidation.