Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 268
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
País/Região como assunto
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Am J Cardiol ; 56(4): 333-6, 1985 Aug 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-4025174

RESUMO

Sixty-eight patients (mean age 49 years) were studied with contrast echocardiography (CE) and Doppler echocardiography (DE) to evaluate both methods for detecting and grading tricuspid regurgitation (TR). In all patients, right ventricular (RV) angiography was performed. The severity of TR was graded on a 4-point scale. Only 68 of 88 patients who underwent RV angiography (77%) could be evaluated, but 65 of 68 patients who underwent CE (96%) and all 68 who underwent DE (100%) could be evaluated. TR was present in 33 patients as seen on RV angiography. CE and DE correctly diagnosed 27 and 30 patients, respectively, corresponding to a sensitivity of 82% for CE and 91% for DE. Specificity was 100% for CE and 86% for DE. CE and DE grading, respectively, of TR vs RV angiographic grading showed no difference in 50 and 47 patients, a 1-level difference in 8 and 13 and a 2-level difference in 7 and 5 cases. (CE-RV angiography, r = 0.84, p less than 0.001; DE-RV angiography, r = 0.82, p less than 0.001). Thus, CE and DE are accurate methods for routine diagnosis of TR, with DE having higher sensitivity and easier grading. Considering the possibility of false-positive findings of our standard RV angiography, sensitivity and specificity of CE and DE could be even higher.


Assuntos
Ecocardiografia/métodos , Insuficiência da Valva Tricúspide/diagnóstico , Adulto , Reações Falso-Negativas , Reações Falso-Positivas , Feminino , Ventrículos do Coração/diagnóstico por imagem , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Radiografia , Valores de Referência
20.
Eur Heart J ; 9 Suppl E: 57-64, 1988 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-3042404

RESUMO

Despite different aetiologies, acquired aortic stenosis is a self-maintaining, slowly progressive process with good long-term prognosis. In 142 patients with mild stenosis, there was clinical progression within 10 years of the initial diagnosis in only 12% of patients. Twenty-five years after the diagnosis had been established, the severity of aortic stenosis was clinically unchanged in 38%, while 25% of patients had moderate stenosis and 35% had undergone valve replacement. Progression of moderate aortic stenosis was more rapid: the average time interval between the manifestation of moderate aortic stenosis and surgery was 13.4 years. Age at the onset of initial symptoms was related to aetiology: 39 +/- 18 years with rheumatic aortic stenoses, 48 +/- 6 years in patients with bicuspid valves who had no history of rheumatic fever, infective endocarditis or myocarditis, and 66 +/- 12 years in degenerative, calcific stenoses of tricuspid aortic valves. Patients with haemodynamically severe stenosis who had refused the recommended operation (n = 55) had an overall poor prognosis: mean survival averaged 23 +/- 5 months and the five-year probability of survival was 18 +/- 7%. All these patients died within 12 years of observation. Mean survival after the occurrence of angina pectoris was 45 +/- 13 months, after syncope 27 +/- 15 months, and after first occurrence of left heart failure 11 +/- 10 months.


Assuntos
Estenose da Valva Aórtica , Adolescente , Adulto , Estenose da Valva Aórtica/complicações , Estenose da Valva Aórtica/congênito , Estenose da Valva Aórtica/mortalidade , Estenose da Valva Aórtica/patologia , Estenose da Valva Aórtica/cirurgia , Criança , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA