Exposição ambiental e risco à saúde - Brasil / Environmental exposure and health risks in Brazil

Objetivo: Identificar possíveis fatores sociodemográficos, econômicos, de saúde, ambientais e de hábitos de vida associados a efeitos adversos sobre a saúde de moradores em três cidades brasileiras. Método: Estudo transversal com abordagem quantitativa realizado nas cidades de Imperatriz (Maranhão), Palmas (Tocantins) e Salvador (Bahia). Participaram 975 pacientes (18 a 75 anos) atendidos em unidades básicas de saúde no período de junho de 2021 a junho de 2022. Esses indivíduos foram selecionados aleatoriamente (amostra de conveniência). Foi aplicado o questionário padronizado sobre fatores sociodemográficos e exposição a fatores ambientais, assim como o de hábitos de vida. Empregou-se a situação de saúde (excelente/boa x regular/ má/péssima) como desfecho, foi realizada análise multivariada seguida por regressão logística respeitando-se cada município individualmente e o seu coletivo. Os dados foram apresentados como odds ratio (OR) e intervalos de confiança de 95% (IC95%). Resultados: Em todas as cidades houve predomínio de pacientes do sexo feminino: 58,3% em Imperatriz, 67,5% em Tocantins e 65,4% em Salvador. A prevalência de tabagismo (presente e/ou passado) foi significantemente mais elevada em Salvador, assim como a de consumo de álcool. Houve maior referência de saúde regular/má/péssima entre os moradores de Imperatriz, apesar de em Salvador haver o maior relato de comorbidades. Os fatores ambientais associados à condição precária de saúde, em ambos os modelos de análise, foram: ter sido exposto durante a infância a fogão a lenha/carvão/querosene/outro; passar mais de duas horas na cozinha, com fogão em funcionamento; e residir próximo a uma fonte poluidora. Morar em Imperatriz revelou chance 1,8 vezes maior de ter saúde debilitada quando comparado aos moradores de Salvador, e de 1,7 vezes para os de Palmas. Conclusões: Profissionais de saúde deverão orientar a população quanto as questões socioambientais que interferem nos índices de saúde. Os dados demográficos, ambientais e econômicos podem interferir nas condições de saúde.

Objective: To identify potential sociodemographic, socioeconomic, health, environmental, and lifestyle factors associated with adverse health effects in residents of 3 Brazilian cities. Methods: This cross-sectional study with a quantitative approach was conducted in the cities of Imperatriz (Maranhão), Palmas (Tocantins), and Salvador (Bahia). A total of 975 patients aged 18 to 75 years treated at primary health care units from June 2021 to June 2022 were selected via convenience sampling. A standardized questionnaire on sociodemographic characteristics, exposure to environmental factors, and lifestyle habits was administered. The outcome measured was health status (excellent/good vs fair/bad/very poor). Multivariate analysis was performed using logistic regression, respecting each municipality individually and collectively. Data were presented as odds ratios (OR) and 95%CIs. Results: Women predominated in all cities: 58.3% in Imperatriz, 67.5% in Tocantins, and 65.4% in Salvador. The prevalence of smoking (present and/or past) was significantly higher in Salvador, as was the prevalence of alcohol consumption. Despite Salvador having the highest rate of comorbidities, residents of Imperatriz reported more instances of fair/poor/very poor health. Environmental factors significantly associated with poor health conditions in both analysis models included exposure to wood/ coal/kerosene/other stoves during childhood, spending more than 2 hours in the kitchen with a working stove, and living close to a pollution source. Residents of Imperatriz were 1.8 times and 1.7 times more likely to have poor health compared with residents of Salvador (a more developed center with more health resources) and Palmas, respectively. Conclusions: Health professionals should guide the population regarding socio-environmental issues affecting health indices. Demographic, environmental, and economic data can impact health conditions.

Impact of Pulmonary Rehabilitation on Exercise Tolerance and Quality of Life in Patients With Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS.

BACKGROUND: Patients with pulmonary fibrosis are living longer and present with an increasing number of comorbidities over time. Pulmonary rehabilitation, as a nonpharmacological approach, may be promising in these patients, although there is limited information on the impact of pulmonary rehabilitation on exercise tolerance and quality of life. Thus, conducting a systematic review and meta-analysis, the purpose of this study was to determine the effects of pulmonary rehabilitation on exercise tolerance and quality of life in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. METHODS: We searched MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, Embase, Scielo, PEDro, and CINAHL (from the earliest date available to June 2016) for trials. Study selection included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that examined the effects of pulmonary rehabilitation in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Two reviewers selected studies independently. Data were extracted from published RCTs. Study quality was evaluated using the PEDro scale. Weighted mean differences, standard mean differences, and 95% CIs were calculated. RESULTS: We analyzed data from 5 RCTs comparing a pulmonary rehabilitation group with a control group. Pulmonary rehabilitation improved exercise tolerance weighted mean differences (44 m; 95% CI, 5.3-82.8) compared with no exercise. The meta-analyses also showed significant improvement in symptoms, impact, and total score from the St George's Respiratory Questionnaire for participants in pulmonary rehabilitation compared with control. No serious adverse events were reported. CONCLUSION: Pulmonary rehabilitation is effective in increasing exercise tolerance and improving quality of life in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis.

Predictors of adherence to treatment in patients with severe asthma treated at a referral center in Bahia, Brazil.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the rate of adherence to treatment with inhaled corticosteroids in patients with severe asthma, to identify predictive factors for adherence and to evaluate the relationship between adherence to treatment and parameters of clinical and functional response. METHODS: Prospective cohort study of patients enrolled in the Program for the Control of Asthma and Allergic Rhinitis in the state of Bahia, Brazil. The study comprised 160 patients with severe asthma, monitored for 180 days in order to evaluate adherence (dependent variable) to the prescribed inhaled corticosteroid. Independent variables were assessed at baseline and for a six-month follow-up period by means of interviews and the completion of a standardized questionnaire.Patients recorded the missed doses in a diary. RESULTS: Of the 160 patients. 158 completed the study. Adherence rate was 83.8%. Of the 158 patients, 112 (70.9%) were considered adherent (cut-off point: 80% of prescribed doses administered). There was a significant association between asthma control and adherence to treatment.Predictors of poor adherence were adverse effects, living far from the referral center, limited resources to pay for transportation and dose schedule. Other factors, such as depressive symptoms, religion and economic status, were not associated with poor adherence. CONCLUSIONS: Adherence to asthma treatment was high and was associated with the clinical response to treatment, in a sample of patients with severe asthma enrolled in a public program that provides free medication and the assistance of a multiprofessional specialized team in a referral center.

Preditores da adesão ao tratamento em pacientes com asma grave atendidos em um centro de referência na Bahia / Predictors of adherence to treatment in patients with severe asthma treated at a referral center in Bahia, Brazil

OBJETIVO: Determinar a taxa de adesão ao tratamento padrão com corticóide inalatório em pacientes com asma grave, identificar seus fatores preditores e avaliar a relação entre adesão ao tratamento e os parâmetros de resposta clínica e funcional. MÉTODOS: Coorte prospectiva de pacientes atendidos no Programa de Controle da Asma e da Rinite Alérgica na Bahia, Brasil. O estudo incluiu 160 pacientes com asma grave, acompanhados por um período de 180 dias para medida da adesão (variável dependente) ao corticóide inalatório prescrito. As variáveis independentes foram determinadas na avaliação inicial e durante seis meses através de entrevistas e aplicação de questionário estruturado. Os pacientes registraram em um diário as doses não utilizadas. RESULTADOS: Do total de 160 pacientes, 158 completaram o estudo. A taxa de adesão ao tratamento foi de 83,8 por cento. Dos 158 pacientes, 112 (70,9 por cento) foram considerados aderentes ao tratamento (ponto de corte: 80 por cento de todas as doses administradas). Houve associação significante entre o controle da asma e adesão ao tratamento. Os fatores relacionados a uma baixa adesão foram efeitos adversos, local de residência distante do centro de referência, dificuldade de pagar pelo transporte e regime posológico. Outros fatores, como sintomas depressivos, religião e classe econômica, não tiveram relação com a adesão. CONCLUSÕES: A adesão ao tratamento foi considerada elevada, havendo relação com a resposta clínica ao tratamento em uma amostra de pacientes com asma grave atendidos em um programa público com fornecimento gratuito de medicamentos e atendimento multidisciplinar em unidade de referência.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the rate of adherence to treatment with inhaled corticosteroids in patients with severe asthma, to identify predictive factors for adherence and to evaluate the relationship between adherence to treatment and parameters of clinical and functional response. METHODS: Prospective cohort study of patients enrolled in the Program for the Control of Asthma and Allergic Rhinitis in the state of Bahia, Brazil. The study comprised 160 patients with severe asthma, monitored for 180 days in order to evaluate adherence (dependent variable) to the prescribed inhaled corticosteroid. Independent variables were assessed at baseline and for a six-month follow-up period by means of interviews and the completion of a standardized questionnaire.Patients recorded the missed doses in a diary. RESULTS: Of the 160 patients. 158 completed the study. Adherence rate was 83.8 percent. Of the 158 patients, 112 (70.9 percent) were considered adherent (cut-off point: 80 percent of prescribed doses administered). There was a significant association between asthma control and adherence to treatment.Predictors of poor adherence were adverse effects, living far from the referral center, limited resources to pay for transportation and dose schedule. Other factors, such as depressive symptoms, religion and economic status, were not associated with poor adherence. CONCLUSIONS: Adherence to asthma treatment was high and was associated with the clinical response to treatment, in a sample of patients with severe asthma enrolled in a public program that provides free medication and the assistance of a multiprofessional specialized team in a referral center