Racial Inequities in Receiving Neoadjuvant Treatment in Patients With Pancreatic Cancer Are Associated With Worse Outcomes in Louisiana.

BACKGROUND: Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is the third leading cause of cancer-related deaths. In recent years, the approach to managing this malignancy has evolved toward embracing neoadjuvant treatment (NAT), backed by studies reporting its survival benefit. This study aimed to identify factors that contribute to disparities in NAT utilization and their impact on outcomes in patients with PDAC who underwent resection in Louisiana. METHODS: Data on diagnosed PDAC cases were obtained from the Louisiana Tumor Registry between 2000 and 2020. We conducted multivariable logistic regression to adjust for potential confounding factors in assessing the covariate relationships with NAT use. Multivariate Cox regression analysis was performed to determine which factors were associated with survival. Chained multiple imputation was performed on covariates with missing data in multivariable regressions. RESULTS: The study encompassed 2121 patients who underwent resection for PDAC. Upon controlling for potential confounding variables, Black patients were on average 5.7% less likely to receive NAT than their White counterparts (ATE = 5.7, aOR= 0.56, 95% CI = 0.40-0.80, p = 0.001). After adjustment for confounding factors, there was a significant decrease in the risk of overall death for patients who received NAT (aHR = 0.82, 95% CI = 0.71-0.94, p = 0.006). There was no significant interaction between race and NAT for the risk of death. CONCLUSION: Black patients with PDAC were less likely to receive NAT before resection in Louisiana. Overall survival improved in patients who underwent NAT. These differences were independent of insurance status and poverty zip codes, and future investigations should identify modifiable barriers to access and receipt of NAT in patients with PDAC.

Liposomal and Nonliposomal Bupivacaine for Mohs Surgery: A Systematic Review.

BACKGROUND: Lidocaine is the most commonly used local anesthetic for Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS), but given its limited half-life, postoperative pain remains a significant concern for patients. Bupivacaine is used in various surgical subspecialty procedures and has demonstrated improved pain control compared with lidocaine. However, its role in MMS is insufficiently explored. OBJECTIVE: To systematically review the current literature for reports on use of bupivacaine, traditional nonliposomal and newer liposomal formulations, for MMS. METHODS: A systematic review was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses 2020 guidelines. The MEDLINE, PubMed, and EMBASE databases were queried for articles presenting original data on the use of bupivacaine for MMS. RESULTS: Of 483 potentially relevant articles, 3 studies met final inclusion criteria, capturing a total of 253 patients involved in primary investigations comparing bupivacaine to traditional local anesthesia for MMS. Bupivacaine was well-tolerated and associated with comparable or modestly reduced intraoperative and postoperative pain and opioid use. CONCLUSION: Bupivacaine may have a role in prolonging intraoperative anesthesia, reducing acute postoperative pain, and reducing postoperative opioid use after MMS. However, large, prospective studies are needed to solidify the generalizability and clinical utility of these findings.

Hidradenocarcinoma: A Case Series From the Scripps Clinic With a Systematic Review of the Literature.

BACKGROUND: Hidradenocarcinoma (HAC) is a rare adnexal carcinoma. To the best of the authors' knowledge, there are no published systematic reviews on HAC. OBJECTIVE: To incorporate a case series from the authors' institution and systematically integrate reported information to provide a reference tool for optimization of diagnosis and management. METHODS: A comprehensive MEDLINE search was conducted from database inception to 2021 using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. This yielded 225 studies with 165 cases of HAC. References of included articles were also searched. In addition, 9 patients with HAC were identified from the authors' institution over the past 10 years. RESULTS: The mean age of HAC presentation is 60 years with a slight male predilection (60%). The head and neck is the most commonly affected region. Over 36% of cases either presented with metastatic disease or went on to metastasize. The most common treatment type was wide local excision, followed by Mohs micrographic surgery. CONCLUSION: Early detection with accurate histologic interpretation is prudent in all cases of HAC. Wide local excision is the current first-line treatment. However, Mohs micrographic surgery offers complete marginal analysis with evidence of reduced risk of metastasis and better outcomes compared with wide local excision. Currently, there are no National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines for the treatment of HAC, and consensus guidelines are limited to tumor and nodal metastasis staging provided by the American Joint Committee on Cancer, eighth edition. Thus, this case series and systematic review integrates important aspects of diagnosis, workup, and management of HAC.

Clearing the Haze: What Do We Still Need to Learn about Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems?

Electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS; i.e., electronic cigarettes, e-cigarettes, vaping devices, vape pens) were introduced to the U.S. market in 2007 as a potential harm reduction alternative for people who smoked combustible cigarettes. Since that time, ENDS popularity grew very quickly, particularly among individuals who smoke cigarettes. However, young people and never smokers also started using ENDS, cohorts for whom these products were not intended. There are now a broad range of devices and e-liquid constituents. ENDS devices vary considerably in their design and generation of potentially toxic chemicals, with higher power devices likely much more hazardous than lower power devices. This landscape may further change after September 9, 2020, when all ENDS manufacturers are required to submit a premarket tobacco product application to the FDA to obtain authorization for marketing. Research has not kept pace with this rapidly changing technology and important questions remain regarding the relative benefits versus risks of ENDS. In light of these challenges, we propose key ENDS research priorities to address these gaps.