Capecitabine in combination with oxaliplatin or irinotecan in elderly patients with advanced colorectal cancer: results of a randomized phase II study.

BACKGROUND: To determine the efficacy and tolerability of capecitabine combined with oxaliplatin (CAPOX) or irinotecan (CAPIRI) as first-line treatment in patients with advanced/metastatic colorectal cancer aged > or =70 years. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients aged > or =70 years were randomly assigned to receive CAPOX [oxaliplatin 65 mg/m(2) intravenously (i.v.) days 1 and 8 and capecitabine 1000 mg/m(2) orally b.i.d. days 1-14; q21d] or CAPIRI (irinotecan 80 mg/m(2) i.v. days 1 and 8 and capecitabine 1000 mg/m(2) orally b.i.d. days 1-14; q21d). The primary study end point was overall response rate (ORR). RESULTS: Ninety-four patients were enrolled. In an intent-to-treat analysis, 2 complete responses (CRs) and 16 partial responses (PRs) were reported with CAPOX (ORR 38%), and 2 CRs and 15 PRs with CAPIRI (ORR 36%; P = 0.831). Median time to progression was 8 months for CAPOX and 7 months for CAPIRI (P = 0.195), with median survival times of 19.3 months and 14.0 months (P = 0.165), respectively. Global health status was improved in 45% and in 21% of patients in the CAPOX and CAPIRI arms, respectively. The most common treatment-related grade 3-4 adverse events in CAPIRI versus CAPOX patients were diarrhea (32% versus 15%; P = 0.052) and neutropenia (23% versus 6%; P = 0.021). CONCLUSION: CAPOX and CAPIRI had similar efficacy in elderly patients, although CAPOX seemed to be better tolerated.

[Downstaging after neoadjuvant therapy for rectal cancer modifies the planned original surgery]. / Il downstaging dopo terapia neoadiuvante del cancro del retto modifica l'intervento originariamente programmato.

Cancer of the rectum has been for more years burdened with a heavy rate of local relapse about 30%. The introduction of total meso-rectum excision has reduced the rate of up to 5-8%. Later more studies proved how the preoperative radiotherapy was able to reduce the rate of local relapse. The Authors introduce studies about downstaging after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer and discuss about their own series from 2005 to 2007.

Gemcitabine combined with oxaliplatin (GEMOX) as salvage treatment in elderly patients with advanced ovarian cancer refractory or resistant to platinum: a single institution experience.

Both oxaliplatin (OXA) and gemcitabine (GEM) have shown single agent activity in patients with recurrent ovarian cancer. Response rates to second-line therapies remain low and there is a need to develop more effective regimens. In view of the synergistic effect of using GEM followed by OXA, we studied these agents in elderly patients with recurrent ovarian cancer refractory or resistant to first-line chemotherapy using platinum with or without paclitaxel. The aim of the study was to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of combination GEM 1000 mg/m(2) Day 1 i.v. and OXA 100 mg/m(2) in 2h infusion Day 2; treatment was repeated every 2 weeks for 6 courses or until progression of disease or intolerable toxicity. The study was monoinstitutional and started in November 2002. 21 patients, median age 68.6 years (range 65-82) have been treated. Median Performance Status was 0-1, all had at least 1 prior platinum based chemotherapy and 11 had received also a taxane. Patients received a median of 6 cycles of treatment (range 4-11). There were 2 patient (9%) with complete response, 3 patients (14%) achieved a partial response. Low profile toxicity (grade 1-2, WHO criteria) was observed: nausea/vomiting 52%, thrombocytopenia 13%, neuropathy 28%. The GEMOX combination is well tolerated and even in this small group of patients, encouraging responses were documented.

Phase II trial of a biweekly regimen of fluorouracil and leucovorin plus irinotecan in patients with previously untreated advanced gastric cancer.

To investigate the therapeutic value and safety of the biweekly regimen of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and leucovorin (LV) plus irinotecan (CPT-11) in patients with previously untreated advanced gastric cancer (AGC). A total of 50 patients (M/F 35/15; median age = 65) with AGC, none of whom had received chemotherapy for advanced disease, were accrued in this trial. Fifteen patients (30%) were 70 years old or older. At the time of their accrual, cytotoxic chemotherapy, consisting of LV 100 mg/m(2) (2-hour i.v. infusion) followed by 5-FU 400 mg/m(2) (bolus) and 5-FU 600 mg/m(2) (22-hour continuous infusion) on therapeutic days 1 and 2 plus CPT-11 180 mg/m(2) (1-hour infusion) on day 1, was initiated. Treatment courses were repeated every 2 weeks until evidence of progressive disease, unacceptable toxicity or withdrawal of consent. All patients were assessable for toxicity and 48 of 50 for response evaluation, having completed at least four courses of chemotherapy. Complete response was achieved in 2 patients (4%, intent to treat) and partial response in 16 (32%) (overall response rate, 36%; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 22%-50%). Twenty-four patients (48%) had stable disease and 6 patients (16%) progressed. The median time to progression was 8 months (95% CI: 6-10 months) and median overall survival 14 months (95% CI: 6-22 months). Between the subgroups of patients <70 years old and 70 or older, there were no significant differences in efficacy. One toxic death occurred. Treatment tolerance was generally mild to moderate and easy to treat. The main grade 3/4 toxicities were neutropenia (32%), diarrhea (16%), and anemia (8%). Grade 3-4 neutropenia was the only treatment-related serious adverse event significantly more common in patients older than those aged <70 (53.3% vs 22.8%, respectively; P = 0.03). Our data suggest that the biweekly regimen of LV and 5-FU plus CPT-11 in untreated patients with AGC is active and has an acceptable safety profile. Further evaluation of this regimen seems to be warranted in a phase III trial.

Randomized trial comparing cisplatin, gemcitabine, and vinorelbine with either cisplatin and gemcitabine or cisplatin and vinorelbine in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: interim analysis of a phase III trial of the Southern Italy Cooperative Oncology Group.

PURPOSE: In our previous phase II study, the cisplatin, gemcitabine, and vinorelbine (PGV) regimen produced a median survival time (MST) of approximately 1 year in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. The present study was aimed at comparing the MST of patients treated with this triplet regimen with the MSTs of patients receiving cisplatin and vinorelbine (PV) or cisplatin and gemcitabine (PG). PATIENTS AND METHODS: From April 1997, patients with locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC, an age of < or = 70 years, and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status < or = 1 were randomized to receive one of the following regimens: cisplatin 50 mg/m(2), gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m(2), and vinorelbine 25 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks (arm A); cisplatin 100 mg/m(2) on day 1 and gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m(2) on days 1, 8, and 15 every 4 weeks (arm B); or cisplatin 120 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 29 and vinorelbine 30 mg/m(2)/wk (arm C). According to the two-stage design for phase III trials, an interim analysis was planned when the first 60 patients per arm were assessable for survival. RESULTS: The survival data of 180 NSCLC patients (stage IIIB, 76 patients; stage IV, 104 patients) were analyzed in April 1999. Overall, 128 patients had died (PGV, n = 33; PG, n = 42; and PV, n = 53). The MST of patients in the PGV, PG, and PV arms was 51, 42, and 35 weeks, respectively, and the corresponding 1-year projected survival rates were 45%, 40%, and 34%, respectively. When only patients with stage IV disease were considered, an even stronger difference was seen between PGV (MST = 47 weeks) and both PG (34 weeks) and PV (27 weeks). At multivariate Cox analysis, the estimate hazard of death for patients receiving PGV compared with those receiving PV was 0.35 (95% confidence interval, 0.16 to 0.77; P <.01). The response rates were 47% in the PGV arm, 30% in the PG arm, 25% in the PV arm. Both hematologic and nonhematologic toxicities were not substantially worse in patients who received the PGV regimen. CONCLUSION: The PGV regimen is associated with a substantial survival gain (MST > 3 months longer) when compared with the PV combination. Because this difference in survival met one of the early stopping rules, the accrual in the PV arm has been stopped (null hypothesis rejected). Enrollment still continues in the PGV and PG arm to ascertain whether the PGV regimen can also produce a significantly longer survival than that obtained with the PG regimen.

Cisplatin, gemcitabine, and vinorelbine combination therapy in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a phase II randomized study of the Southern Italy Cooperative Oncology Group.

PURPOSE: In a previous phase I study cisplatin (CDDP), gemcitabine (GEM), and vinorelbine (VNR) combination therapy was safe and very active in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This study was aimed at better defining the activity and toxicity of this regimen. PATIENTS AND METHODS: One hundred eleven chemotherapy-naive patients, age < or = 70 years, with stage IIIB or IV NSCLC and a performance status of 0 or 1 (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group scale) were randomized to two treatment arms. Patients on arm A received CDDP 50 mg/m2, GEM 1,000 mg/m2, and VNR 25 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8 of an every-3-weeks cycle (57 patients). Patients on arm B received CDDP 80 mg/m2, epirubicin 80 mg/m2, and vindesine 3 mg/m2, all delivered on day 1 every 4 weeks, plus lonidamine orally 150 mg three times daily (54 patients). In December 1996, randomization was stopped early, and an additional 30 patients were treated with the experimental regimen to obtain a more accurate estimation of its activity rate. RESULTS: Among 87 patients who received the CDDP-GEM-VNR combination, four complete responses (CRs) and 46 partial responses (PRs) were observed, for an overall response rate of 57% (95% confidence interval [CI], 46% to 68%). Two CRs and 18 PRs were recorded among 54 patients on arm B, giving a 37% activity rate (95% CI , 24% to 51%). After a median follow-up duration of 19 months, the median progression-free and overall survival durations were 32 and 50 weeks in arm A, and 18 and 33 weeks in arm B, respectively. World Health Organization grade 3 to 4 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia occurred in 46% and 14% of patients in arm A and in 22% and 11% of those in arm B, respectively. Severe nonhematologic toxicity was uncommon in both arms. CONCLUSION: The CDDP-GEM-VNR combination is a highly effective treatment for patients with advanced NSCLC and has a manageable toxicity. A phase III trial comparing this new combination with both CDDP-VNR and CDDP-GEM regimens is underway.

Cisplatin, gemcitabine, and paclitaxel in locally advanced or metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer: a phase I-II study. Southern Italy Cooperative Oncology Group.

PURPOSE: Because both cisplatin-paclitaxel and cisplatin-gemcitabine combinations are generally considered to be among the most active regimens in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients, this study aimed to determine the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) of paclitaxel when combined with fixed doses of cisplatin and gemcitabine in advanced NSCLC patients and aimed to define the therapeutic activity of this new regimen. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From October 1996 to September 1998, 75 patients with stage IIIB-IV NSCLC, who were either chemotherapy-naive (65 patients) or who had been pretreated (10 patients), received fixed doses of cisplatin (50 mg/m(2)) and gemcitabine (1,000 mg/m(2)) and escalating doses of paclitaxel in a 1-hour infusion, all on days 1 and 8, every 3 weeks. RESULTS: Five different paclitaxel doses were tested, for a total of 275 cycles delivered. The escalation was stopped at the paclitaxel dose of 75 mg/m(2) in pretreated patients, whereas it continued to 150 mg/m(2) in chemotherapy-naive patients. A total of 65 chemotherapy-naive patients were treated. A paclitaxel dose of 125 mg/m(2) was recommended for phase II, and a total of 39 patients were treated at this level, for a total of 158 cycles delivered. No treatment-related deaths occurred. Five patients were hospitalized because of sepsis, and packed RBC transfusion was required in 13 patients. Grade 4 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia occurred in 23 (31%) and eight (11%) patients, respectively. Overall, 74 of the 75 patients were assessable for response. Four complete (CR) and 38 partial (PR) responses were recorded, for an overall response rate (ORR) of 57%. Three of the ten pretreated patients achieved a PR, compared with four CRs and 35 PRs in the 64 chemotherapy-naive patients (ORR, 61%). Thirty-eight of 39 patients included in phase II were assessable for response and quality of life (QOL) (one patient's disease was not measurable). Two CRs and 24 PRs were recorded in this group, for an ORR of 68% (95% confidence interval, 51% to 82%). The QOL score improved in 27 of 38 (71%) patients. The median survival time was 15 months in the 65 chemotherapy-naive patients, but it had not yet been reached in the 39 patients included in phase II, for whom the 1-year projected survival was 70%. CONCLUSION: The cisplatin-gemcitabine-paclitaxel combination is a feasible and well-tolerated approach in advanced NSCLC patients. Both a major response and a QOL improvement can be obtained in a high proportion of patients, with a median survival time exceeding 1 year. A phase III trial comparing this combination with other effective regimens is under way.

FOLFIRI regimen in advanced colorectal cancer: the experience of the Gruppo Oncologico dell'Italia Meridionale (GOIM).

PURPOSE: To verify the experience of the GOIM in the treatment of advanced colorectal cancer patients with the FOLFIRI combination therapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients entered in three consecutive trials of the GOIM (protocols no. 9706, 9901, and 2301) were reported in this analysis. A total of 287 chemotherapy-naive patients were treated with FOLFIRI regimen: Irinotecan 180 mg/m(2) on day 1 with LV5FU2 regimen (LV at 100 mg/m(2) administered as a 2-hour infusion before FU at 400 mg/m(2) as an intravenous bolus injection, and FU at 600 mg/m(2) as a 22-hour infusion immediately after 5FU bolus injection on day 1 and 2); the treatment was repeated every 2 weeks. RESULTS: 287 patients entered in these three trials, and 264 (92%) were evaluable for response. The overall response rate was 34.5% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 29% to 40%). When only assessable patients were analyzed, overall response rate was 37% (95% CI: 31% to 43%). Median time to progression, median duration of response and survival were 7 months, 10.5 months and 14 months, respectively. All but three patients were evaluable for toxicity which was globally mild; grade 3-4 toxicity was uncommon, and gastrointestinal disturbances were the most common. CONCLUSIONS: FOLFIRI regimen is effective and well-tolerated as first-line treatment in patients with advanced colorectal cancer. Further studies needed to evaluate the improvement in results with the addition of new drugs to this combination therapy.

Randomised, open-label, phase II trial of paclitaxel, gemcitabine and cisplatin versus gemcitabine and cisplatin as first-line chemotherapy in advanced transitional cell carcinoma of the urothelium.

The purpose of the study was to evaluate the antitumor activity and the safety of paclitaxel combined with gemcitabine and cisplatin in patients affected by advanced transitional cell carcinoma of the urothelium (TCC). Eighty-five patients affected by advanced TCC and measurable disease were randomized to receive either paclitaxel at dosage of 70 mg/m2, gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 and cisplatin 35 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks (GCP) or gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 on days 1, 8, 15 and cisplatin 70 mg/m2 on day 2 every 4 weeks (GC). All enrolled patients were considered evaluable for response and toxicity (intention to treat). The observed response rate was 43% for GCP and 44% for GC combination, respectively. Median time to treatment failure was 32 weeks for GCP and 26 weeks for GC and overall survival 61 vs 49 weeks, respectively (p-value not significant). Grade 3-4 neutropenia was observed in 49% of patients treated with GCP vs 35% of those treated with GC (P=0.05) and grade 3-4 thrombocytopenia was observed in 36% of GCP treated patients as compared to 21% of those treated with GC (P=0.01). Seven patients over 70 years old or with poor PS were removed from the study: 6 patients from GCP group (2 toxic deaths, 2 grade 4 myelotoxicity and 2 grade 3 asthenia) and 1 from GC group was lost to follow-up after the first cycle. The combination of paclitaxel, gemcitabine and cisplatin is effective in the treatment of TCC. However, the addition of paclitaxel to the combination of gemcitabine plus cisplatin seems to increase toxicity, therefore it seems not suitable for poor PS patients and those over 70 years old. Larger and more powered studies are needed to exactly define the role of paclitaxel in this combination.

Patients treated with antitumor drugs displaying neurological deficits are characterized by a low circulating level of nerve growth factor.

The aim of our study was to explore whether nerve growth factor (NGF) plays any role in the development of peripheral neuropathy induced by anticancer treatment. We measured the circulating NGF levels in 23 cancer patients before and after chemotherapy. We evaluated whether the development of peripheral neurotoxicity was associated with changes in basal NGF concentrations in patients studied with a comprehensive neurological and neurophysiological examination. The results of these studies showed that the circulating levels of NGF, which are about 20 pg/ml in plasma of controls, decrease during chemotherapy and in some cases completely disappeared after prolonged treatment with antitumor agents. The decrease in NGF levels seems to be correlated with the severity of neurotoxicity. These results clearly suggest that NGF might become a useful agent to prevent neuropathies induced by antineoplastic drugs and restore peripheral nerve dysfunction induced by these pharmacological compounds.

Activity and toxicity of gemcitabine and gemcitabine + vinorelbine in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer elderly patients: Phase II data from the Multicenter Italian Lung Cancer in the Elderly Study (MILES) randomized trial.

BACKGROUND: Following the demonstration that vinorelbine improves survival and quality of life compared with best supportive care in elderly patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), we started the three-arm prospective Multicenter Italian Lung Cancer in the Elderly Study (MILES) trial of vinorelbine, gemcitabine and gemcitabine + vinorelbine. DESIGN: Within the randomized phase 3 trial, pilot single-stage phase 2 studies were planned for gemcitabine and for gemcitabine + vinorelbine. Eligible patients are aged 70 or more, with stage IV or IIIb (with metastatic supraclavear nodes or malignant pleural effusion) NSCLC. Single-agent gemcitabine is given at 1200 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 8; in the combination, gemcitabine is given at 1000 mg/m(2) and vinorelbine at 25 mg/m(2), both on days 1 and 8, every 3 weeks. RESULTS: As planned 49 patients were enrolled in each group. Median age was 74 in both groups. Two-thirds of patients had stage IV disease. The response rate was 18.4% (95% exact CI 8.8-32.0) with both treatments. With single-agent gemcitabine main toxicities were grade 4 thrombocytopenia and grade 2 hepatic toxicity, in one patient each, and grade 2 pulmonary toxicity in two patients. With gemcitabine + vinorelbine combination there were grade 4 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia (one patient each), grade 3 anemia requiring red blood cell transfusion (two patients), and grade 4 fever in two patients. Four patients, with severe cardiac comorbidities, suffered grade 3 heart toxicity with atrial flutter or fibrillation, followed by congestive heart failure responsive to treatment. CONCLUSION: Both single-agent gemcitabine and the gemcitabine + vinorelbine combination are sufficiently active and tolerable to allow continuation of the MILES study.

Amifostine plus cisplatin plus vinorelbine in the treatment of advanced non small cell lung cancer: a multicenter phase II study.

PURPOSE: to evaluate the activity and toxicity of the combination cisplatin plus vinorelbine plus amifostine in advanced non small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: a two-stage Simon design was applied. To proceed after the first stage, responses from seven of 19 patients were needed. Overall, 17 responses from 40 treated patients were required to comply with the design parameter. Inclusion criteria were cyto-histologically proven stage IIIB-IV NSCLC; age of 70 years or less; Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 2 or less; normal cardiac, hepatic, renal and bone marrow functions; and no previous chemotherapy. Patients were staged by physical examination, biochemistry, chest radiograph, brain, thoracic and abdominal computed tomographic (CT) scans, and bone scan. All patients received cisplatin 100 mg/m(2) intravenously (iv) day 1, vinorelbine 25 mg/m(2) iv days 1-8-15-22, amifostine 740 mg/m(2) iv day 1 every 4 weeks up to six cycles. Eleven of 40 enrolled patients were stage IIIB and 29 stage IV, with a median age of 57 years (range, 38-70 years). RESULTS: all patients were evaluable for response and toxicity (intention to treat analysis). We observed 20 (50%) objective responses, with four (10%) complete responses. Median time to progression was 20 weeks, and median survival was 45 weeks. The toxicity was manageable. The reported main toxicities were neutropenia grade 4 in 10% of patients, grade 1 and grade 3 nephrotoxicity both in 5% of patients and grade 1 amifostine-related hypotension in 15% of patients. CONCLUSION: these data show that cisplatin plus vinorelbine plus amifostine is an active and feaseable regimen in stage IIIB-IV NSCLC. A phase III trial comparing cisplatin plus vinorelbine versus cisplatin plus vinorelbine plus amifostine in advanced NSCLC is warranted.

Interim analysis of a phase III trial comparing cisplatin, gemcitabine, and vinorelbine vs. either cisplatin and gemcitabine or cisplatin and vinorelbine in advanced non small-cell lung cancer. A Southern Italy Cooperative Oncology Group Study.

In a previous phase II randomized study, a cisplatin/gemcitabine/vinorelbine (PGV) regimen produced a 50-week median survival time (MST) in advanced non small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. The present trial was planned to randomly compare the outcome of patients treated with this new triplet regimen with those of patients receiving either cisplatin plus vinorelbine (PV) or cisplatin plus gemcitabine (PG) doublet combinations. One hundred eighty patients with stage IIIB (76) or IV (104) disease, aged

Gemcitabine plus epirubicin in advanced pancreatic cancer: a phase II multicenter trial.

The aim of this phase II multicenter trial was to evaluate the activity of a novel combination of gemcitabine (GEM) and epirubicin (EPI) in advanced pancreatic cancer patients. Clinical benefit and response rate were the main efficacy end-points. From December 1997 to October 1999, 30 consecutive patients with measurable advanced pancreatic cancer were enrolled. Gemcitabine was administered intravenously in 30 min at a dose of 800 mg/m2 on days 1, 8, 15 followed by i.v. injection of epirubicin 25 mg/m(2); treatment was repeated every 28 days. With regard to clinical benefit response, 8/21 patients (38%) experienced significant palliation of tumor-related symptoms; the median symptom control time was 25 weeks. No complete responses were recorded while 6 patients achieved a partial remission, for an overall response rate of 20%; 10 patients (30%) had a stable disease and 14 (46%) had progressive disease. The median time to progression was 14 weeks. Median survival was 26 weeks, with 6 patients (20%) having long-term survival at 46 weeks. In general, chemotherapy was well tolerated; 9 patients (30%) suffered from WHO grade 3-4 haematological toxicity and 5 patients (16.6%) suffered from grade 3 non-haematological toxicity. In conclusion, the GEM plus EPI regimen represent a feasible approach for improvement of clinical benefit in advanced pancreatic cancer patients, but confirmatory investigations are required.

Single agent docetaxel plus granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) in previously treated patients with advanced non small cell lung cancer. A phase II study and review of the literature.

The use of salvage chemotherapy in advanced non small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is controversial. However, many patients need to be treated in order to achieve relief of their symptoms. Docetaxel (taxotere) is one of the most active drugs for the treatment of advanced NSCLC and several studies have also shown its effectiveness in pretreated patients. In the present study, 23 patients were treated in order to evaluate both the effectiveness and toxicity of the single agent docetaxel. Furthermore, granulocyte-colony stimulating (G-CSF) factor was administered in order to reduce neutropenia related to docetaxel. Docetaxel was administered intravenously at a dose of 100 mg/m2, on day 1, and it was repeated every 3 weeks. G-CSF was administered for primary prophylaxis of neutropenia at the standard dose of 30 mg/day from day 4 to day 10 of each cycle. The treatment was tolerated well and 5 (21.7%) partial responses were obtained. The median time to progression and the median survival time were 3 and 5 months, respectively. The main side effect noted was fatigue, the intensity of which was grade 2 in 43.4% of cases and grade 3 in 8.7% of patients, respectively. One patient (4.3%) had grade 4 cutaneous toxicity. No cases of grade 4 neutropenia were reported. In conclusion, docetaxel is active when used for salvage chemotherapy in advanced NSCLC whilst concurrent primary prophylactic administration of granulocyte-colony stimulating factor seems to decrease severe neutropenia.

Rectal neurogenic sarcoma: case report and review of the literature.

A neurogenic sarcoma without NF-1 was discovered in a 73-year-old woman in the anorectal region, an unusual site for these tumors. The tumor was of high-grade malignancy and deeply located with mesorectal infiltration; it did not originate from a major nerve. We presume an origin from less differentiated neural crest cells and present a review of the literature on the best treatment for these neoplasms.

Concurrent modulation of 5-fluorouracil with methotrexate and L-leucovorin: an effective and moderately toxic regimen for the treatment of advanced colorectal carcinoma. A multicenter phase II study of the Southern Italy Cooperative Oncology Group.

AIMS AND BACKGROUND: Methotrexate (MTX) and leucovorin (LV) can enhance the cytotoxicity of 5-fluorouracil (5FU) by modifying its metabolic pathway inside target cells. Some preclinical studies and clinical trials have suggested that the concurrent or sequential double modulation of 5FU by means of MTX and LV may give a higher activity than single biochemical modulations. The purpose of our phase II study was to assess the activity and toxicity of a biweekly regimen including MTX, levo-LV and 5FU in colorectal cancer patients. METHODS: From July 1994 to May 1997, 100 consecutive patients affected by advanced or metastatic colorectal carcinoma were given MTX, 750 mg/m2 iv (2-h infusion) on day 1, and levo-LV, 250 mg/m2 iv (2-h infusion) followed by 5FU, 800 mg/m2 iv bolus on day 2, every two weeks. Patients were treated until complete response or progressive disease was documented, or for a maximum of 16 courses. RESULTS: Among 97 eligible patients, 5 complete and 25 partial responses were obtained, giving an overall response rate of 31% (95% exact confidence limits, 22-41%). Response rate was significantly higher in patients with a good (ECOG scale 0) than with a poor (ECOG scale 1 or 2) performance status (40% versus 17%, P <0.02). Median time to treatment failure was 27 weeks, median survival time was 63 (95% confidence limits, 54-71) weeks, and 2- and 3-year probability of survival were 34% and 12%, respectively. Performance status was the only pretreatment characteristic significantly affecting the outcome of patients. Indeed, median survival time was 94 weeks for patients with a performance status = 0 and 37 weeks for patients with a performance status > or = 1 (P<0.05). Toxicity of the treatment was low and manageable; grade 3 to 4 leukopenia affected 8% of patients, whereas grade 3 diarrhea and mucositis occurred in 5% and 4%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The double biochemical modulation of 5FU by MTX and levo-LV is at least as effective as, and probably more effective than, the single modulation by MTX or by LV. It may therefore represent a therapeutic option for the palliative treatment of patients with advanced colorectal carcinoma.

5-Fluorouracil cardiotoxicity.

The authors report a case of cardiotoxicity secondary to 5-FU, the 67th in literature in a 46-year-old woman subjected to adjuvant therapy with a CMF protocol after surgical treatment for carcinoma of the breast, and presenting onset of clinical symptoms 16 hours after administration of the first dose. Analysis of previous cases reported in literature revealed no evidence of age or sex as risk factors. Doubts exist as to whether or not pre-existing heart disease and thoraco-mediastinic radiotherapy increase the risk. With regard to the causes of the syndrome, the authors are inclined to attribute its onset to an auto-immune mechanism. 5-FU-induced cardiotoxicity, though rare, should be borne in mind and the use of the drug should be discontinued at the first signs of cardiotoxicity.

[Malignant tumors of the vulva. Incidence and epidemiologic characteristics]. / Tumori maligni della vulva. Incidenza e caratteristiche epidemiologiche.

Over recent years cancer of the vulva has occupied an important position among gynecological neoplasia. It is possible that in the future, due to increased life expectation and the consequent aging of the population, there will be a considerable increase in this pathology. Today the survival rate after five years in patients affected by this invasive tumour is just over 50%, notwithstanding the mutilating and complex surgical treatment. Greater attention on behalf of both patient and doctor to a difficult and often neglected symptomatology, the identification of effective risk factors and a greater knowledge of the natural history of this disease may allow early diagnosis in the future and possibly help reduce the incidence of the disease.

[Primary malignant melanoma of the vagina]. / Il melanoma maligno primitivo della vagina.

We report two cases of primary malignant melanoma of the vagina explaining the essential clinical pathological and therapeutic features. They themselves, added those represented in literature, might constitute a further contribution to best definition of the unusual genital pathology, especially as regards prognostic and therapeutic aspects.