Validation testing to determine the sensitivity of lateral flow testing for asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 detection in low prevalence settings: Testing frequency and public health messaging is key.

Lateral flow devices (LFDs) are quickly being implemented for use in large-scale population surveillance programs for SARS-CoV-2 infection in the United Kingdom. These programs have been piloted in city-wide screening in the city of Liverpool and are now being rolled out to support care home visits and the return home of University students for the Christmas break. Here, we present data on the performance of LFDs to test almost 8,000 students at the University of Birmingham between December 2 and December 9, 2020. The performance is validated against almost 800 samples using PCR performed in the University Pillar 2 testing lab and theoretically validated on thousands of Pillar 2 PCR testing results performed on low-prevalence care home testing samples. Our data show that LFDs do not detect infections presenting with PCR Ct values over 29 to 30 as determined using the Thermo Fisher TaqPath asssay. This may be of particular importance in detecting individuals that are either at the early, or late stages of infection, and reinforces the need for frequent, recurrent testing.

S-Variant SARS-CoV-2 Lineage B1.1.7 Is Associated With Significantly Higher Viral Load in Samples Tested by TaqPath Polymerase Chain Reaction.

A SARS-CoV-2 variant B1.1.7 containing mutation Δ69/70 has spread rapidly in the United Kingdom and shows an identifiable profile in ThermoFisher TaqPath RT-qPCR, S gene target failure (SGTF). We analyzed recent test data for trends and significance. Linked cycle threshold (Ct) values for respiratory samples showed that a low Ct for ORF1ab and N were clearly associated with SGTF. Significantly more SGTF samples had higher inferred viral loads between 1×107 and 1×108. Our conclusion is that patients whose samples exhibit the SGTF profile are more likely to have high viral loads, which may explain higher infectivity and rapidity of spread.

The Development and Content Validation of the Sjögren's Related Quality of Life Instrument (SRQoL).

INTRODUCTION: Several clinical outcome assessment (COA) instruments assess Sjögren's disease (Sjögren's) symptoms, but do not provide comprehensive assessment of the health-related quality of life (HRQoL) impact of Sjögren's. This study aimed to develop a patient-reported outcome (PRO) instrument for the assessment of HRQoL, intended for use in clinical trials and clinical practice in the assessment of treatment benefit. METHODS: Review of study sponsor proprietary data and qualitative interviews informed the development of a conceptual model, the Sjögren's Related Quality of Life (SRQoL) and patient global impression of severity (PGI-S) and change (PGI-C) items. Combined concept elicitation and cognitive debriefing interviews with patients with Sjögren's explored their HRQoL impact experience and content validity of the SRQoL and PGI items. RESULTS: Twenty participants were interviewed about their Sjögren's experience. Following inductive analysis of interviews, concepts were categorized into eight domains: emotional well-being (e.g., worry and stress; n = 20/20; 100%), sleep (e.g., daytime sleepiness and waking up during the night; n = 20/20; 100%), activities of daily living (e.g., difficulty looking at screens and difficulty driving; n = 20/20; 100%), cognition (e.g., concentration difficulties and word finding difficulties; n = 19/20; 95.0%), physical functioning (e.g., difficulty walking and difficulty exercising; n = 19/20; 95.0%), social and family functioning (e.g., dependent on others and relationship difficulties; n = 17/20; 85.0%), work (n = 15/20; 75.0%), and sexual functioning (n = 12/20; 60.0%). SRQoL and PGI items, instructions, response options, and recall period were well understood and relevant to participants. CONCLUSIONS: The SRQoL is a new PRO instrument to assess Sjögren's impact on HRQoL, developed in accordance with regulatory guidance. This study provides considerable insight into the patient experience of Sjögren's and evidence to support the content validity of the SRQoL. Future research should evaluate the psychometric properties of the SRQoL to support its use in clinical trials and clinical practice and further validate its use as an assessment of treatment benefit.

Patient and physician completed questionnaires used in clinical trials and clinical practice have previously focused on symptoms. These questionnaires do not cover the full experience of living with Sjögren's, such as differences in symptoms between individual patients, and their use has also been known to result in inaccurate reports. Another way of thinking about patients' experiences is to use a questionnaire to ask about the impact Sjögren's has on patients' health-related quality of life, meaning how Sjögren's might affect their life in different ways including physically, emotionally, and socially. The goal of this study was to develop a new questionnaire (named the Sjögren's-Related Quality of Life [SRQoL] questionnaire) to measure the impact that Sjögren's has on patients' lives. Interviews were conducted with people with Sjögren's to explore their understanding of the new questionnaire and how relevant the content is to their experience of the condition. The results of this study suggest that the SRQoL includes relevant and easy-to-understand questions, suitable for use in future clinical trials and clinical practice, to measure if patients' HRQoL improves with treatment. Future research is needed to confirm that the questionnaire accurately measures the impact of Sjögren's on HRQoL for use with patients with Sjögren's.