Diagnostic accuracy of fine needle biopsy for metastatic melanoma and its implications for patient management.

BACKGROUND: The use of fine needle biopsy (FNB) for the diagnosis of metastatic melanoma can lead to the early removal and treatment of metastases, reduce the frequency of unnecessary surgery, and facilitate the staging of patients enrolled in clinical trials of adjuvant therapies. In this study, the accuracy of FNB for the diagnosis of metastatic melanoma was investigated. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was performed with 2204 consecutive FNBs performed on 1416 patients known or suspected to have metastatic melanoma. Almost three-quarters (1582) of these FNBs were verified by either histopathologic diagnosis following surgical resection or clinical follow-up. RESULTS: FNB for metastatic melanoma was found to have an overall sensitivity of 92.1% and a specificity of 99.2%, with 69 false-negative and 5 false-positive findings identified. The sensitivity of the procedure was found to be influenced by six factors. The use of immunostains, reporting of the specimen by a cytopathologist who had reported >500 cases, lesions located in the skin and subcutis, and patients with ulcerated primary melanomas were factors associated with a significant improvement in the sensitivity of the test. However, FNBs performed in masses located in lymph nodes of the axilla and FNBs that required more than one needle pass to obtain a sample were far more likely to result in false-negative results. CONCLUSIONS: FNB is a rapid, accurate, and clinically useful technique for the assessment of disease status in patients with suspected metastatic melanoma.

Diagnosis of metastatic melanoma by fine-needle biopsy: analysis of 2,204 cases.

Fine-needle biopsy (FNB) has been reported as a rapid, minimally invasive technique for the diagnosis of metastatic melanoma. The diagnostic accuracy of FNB was assessed in a consecutive series of 2,204 FNBs of clinically suspicious lesions from patients with previous primary melanomas treated at the Sydney Melanoma Unit, Sydney, Australia, between January 1992 and December 2002. The sensitivity and specificity of FNB were 96.3% and 98.9%, respectively. There were 5 false-positive cases (0.6%), which were verified as metastatic adenocarcinoma (3 cases) or reactive processes (organizing hematoma and chronic osteomyelitis, 1 each). False-negative diagnoses (6.7% of cases) were associated with a variety of clinicopathologic factors, including difficult-to-access anatomic sites (eg, high axilla or deep inguinal), small lesions, and lesional characteristics such asfibrosis, necrosis, or cystic change. FNB is a highly accurate, rapid, and cost-effective procedure for the diagnosis of metastatic melanoma and should be considered as the initial diagnostic procedure of choice in patients with melanoma with clinically suspected metastases.

Posttransplant interleukin-4 treatment converts rat liver allograft tolerance to rejection.

BACKGROUND: Previous studies showed that liver transplant rejection in the Piebald Virol Glaxo (PVG)-to-Lewis combination was associated with more intragraft interleukin (IL)-4 mRNA expression than in spontaneously tolerant grafts in the PVG-to-Dark Agouti (DA) combination. There was also immunoglobulin (Ig) G1 antibody deposition, suggesting an IL-4-induced IgG class switch in rejection. The aim of this study was to investigate whether IL-4 treatment converts PVG-->DA liver transplant tolerance to rejection. METHODS: DA (RT1a) rats were recipients of orthotopic PVG (RT1c) liver transplants and DA liver transplants were syngeneic controls. Supernatant from IL-4-transfected Chinese hamster ovary cells (0.5 mL, 30,000 U) or from untransfected cells was injected intraperitoneally on days 3 through 7. Samples were taken for immunohistochemical staining of frozen tissue sections to analyze cellular infiltrate and antibody deposition. RESULTS: IL-4 treatment significantly reduced survival of liver allografts from greater than 100 days in untreated animals to 9 days (P=0.004). Pathologic analysis of IL-4-treated animals showed that death was caused by liver transplant rejection, with a heavy infiltrate of mononuclear cells, disruption of portal tract areas, and infarction. Immunohistochemistry revealed an extensive infiltrate of T cells, CD25-expressing cells, and B cells that was similar to the level in PVG--> Lewis liver allograft recipients that reject the liver. There was also a more extensive monocyte-macrophage infiltrate and more major histocompatibility complex class II expression in IL-4-treated animals compared with untreated animals. There was moderate increase of IgM, little IgG1, and no IgE or IgG2a antibody deposition. CONCLUSIONS: IL-4, a T-helper type 2 cytokine that has previously been shown to inhibit delayed-type hypersensitivity responses such as rejection, was found to promote rejection of liver allografts. There was only slight evidence of a graft-specific antibody response, showing that IL-4 induces liver allograft rejection in association with some, but not all, of the changes accompanying rejection in the PVG-->Lewis strain combination.