Phase I trial of volasertib, a Polo-like kinase inhibitor, plus platinum agents in solid tumors: safety, pharmacokinetics and activity.

BACKGROUND: This trial evaluated the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), safety, pharmacokinetics, and activity of volasertib, a selective Polo-like kinase 1 inhibitor that induces mitotic arrest and apoptosis, combined with cisplatin or carboplatin in patients with advanced/metastatic solid tumors (NCT00969761; 1230.6). METHODS: Sequential patient cohorts (3 + 3 dose-escalation design) received a single infusion of volasertib (100-350 mg) with cisplatin (60-100 mg/m(2)) or carboplatin (area under the concentration versus time curve [AUC]4-AUC6) on day 1 every 3 weeks for up to six cycles. Sixty-one patients received volasertib/cisplatin (n = 30) or volasertib/carboplatin (n = 31) for a median of 3.5 (range, 1-6) and 2.0 (range, 1-6) treatment cycles, respectively. RESULTS: The most common cycle 1 dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) were thrombocytopenia, neutropenia and fatigue. MTDs (based on cycle 1 DLTs) were determined to be volasertib 300 mg plus cisplatin 100 mg/m(2) and volasertib 300 mg plus carboplatin AUC6. Co-administration did not affect the pharmacokinetics of each drug. Partial responses were observed in two patients in each arm. Stable disease was achieved in 11 and six patients treated with volasertib/cisplatin and volasertib/carboplatin, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Volasertib plus cisplatin or carboplatin at full single-agent doses was generally manageable and demonstrated activity in heavily pretreated patients with advanced solid tumors.

A phase I study of two dosing schedules of oral BI 847325 in patients with advanced solid tumors.

PURPOSE: This study determined the safety, maximum tolerated dose (MTD), pharmacokinetics, and preliminary efficacy of BI 847325, an oral dual MEK and Aurora kinase inhibitor, in patients with refractory solid tumors. METHODS: This trial recruited patients with an advanced non-resectable and/or metastatic solid tumor following failure of conventional treatment (NCT01324830; 1287.1). BI 847325 was administered orally, once daily (starting at 6 mg in the first cohort) using two dosing schedules: Schedule A (2 weeks on, 1 week off) and Schedule B (three periods of 5 days on, 2 days off). The primary objective was to identify the MTD of BI 847325 for both dosing schedules. RESULTS: Sixty-nine patients (Schedule A, n = 47; Schedule B, n = 22) were treated. The MTD was 120 mg per day for Schedule A (cumulative dose of 1680 mg per 3-week cycle) and 150 mg per day for Schedule B (cumulative dose of 2250 mg per 3-week cycle). Reversible hematologic and gastrointestinal toxicities were the most common dose-limiting toxicities. One patient with esophageal cancer (receiving 160 mg BI 847325, Schedule A) experienced a partial response for 67 days, and 21 patients (n = 11 [23.4%], Schedule A; n = 10 [45.5%], Schedule B) had stable disease. Pharmacokinetic analyses showed at least bi-exponential disposition, with high inter-subject variability. There was no obvious relationship between markers of MEK or Aurora kinase inhibition and exposure to BI 847325 (exploratory analysis). CONCLUSIONS: This first-in-human trial suggests that BI 847325 has an acceptable safety profile. However, due to insufficient drug exposure at the MTD to achieve relevant MEK inhibition, a decision was taken to halt the development of BI 847325.

Effect of levetiracetam on cardiac repolarization in healthy subjects: a single-dose, randomized, placebo- and active-controlled, four-way crossover study.

BACKGROUND: Nonantiarrhythmic drugs may have the potential to prolong the QT interval, leading to potentially fatal ventricular tachycardias, including torsades de pointes. OBJECTIVE: This study evaluated the potential of the newer-generation, multiple-action antiepileptic drug levetiracetam, which binds to the synaptic vesicle protein SV2A, to affect cardiac repolarization, as detected by prolongation of the QT/corrected QT (QTc) interval. METHODS: This was a single-dose, randomized, placebo- and active-controlled, 4-way crossover study in healthy subjects. Subjects were randomly allocated to 1 of 4 different administration sequences. Each sequence included 3 double-blind treatments (levetirace-tam 1000 mg, levetiracetam 5000 mg, and placebo) and 1 open-label treatment (moxifloxacin 400 mg). Triplicate electrocardiograms (ECGs) were obtained at baseline and at various time points over 24 hours after each treatment using continuous Holter monitoring. ECGs were read centrally in a blinded manner. Blood samples for the determination of plasma concentrations of levetiracetam and moxifloxacin were collected before dosing and at 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 4, 6, 12, and 24 hours after dosing, within 5 minutes after the ECG recordings. The QT interval was corrected for heart rate using a sex- and study-specific correction (QTc(ss)) as the primary outcome measure and Fridericia's correction (QTc(F))as a secondary outcome measure. The primary analysis was performed on the time-matched, baseline-subtracted QTc(ss) (DeltaQTc(ss)). The maximum DeltaQTc(ss) difference between each active treatment and placebo (DeltaDeltaTc(ss)) was derived from a mixed-effect analysis of variance. Clinical laboratory tests, standard 12-lead ECGs, and vital signs were monitored at regular intervals. Spontaneously reported adverse events were recorded throughout the study. RESULTS: Fifty-two healthy, nonsmoking subjects (26 men, 26 women; 37 white, 9 black, 3 Hispanic, and 3 Asian/Pacific Islander) with a mean (SD) age of 28.4 (7.5) years (range, 18-45 years) and a mean weight of 71.5 (12.6) kg (range, 49-103 kg) participated in the study. Levetiracetam did not significantly prolong the QTc(ss). The upper bound of the 1-sided 95% CI for the maximum DeltaDeltaTc(ss) was 8.0 milliseconds for levetiracetam 1000 mg and 8.1 milliseconds for levetiracetam 5000 mg, with mean estimates of 4.0 and 4.1 milliseconds, respectively; similar results were obtained for the maximum DeltaDeltaQTc(F). Moxifloxacin significantly prolonged the QTc(ss), with a lower bound of the 1-sided 95% CI for the maximum DeltaDeltaQTc(ss) of 3.7 milliseconds and a mean estimate of 7.7 milliseconds. There was no statistically significant relationship between measured DeltaQTc(ss) and the levetiracetam plasma concentration, whereas a significant linear relationship was observed between measured DeltaQTc(ss) and the moxifloxacin plasma concentration (slope estimate: 4.4 milliseconds/[microg/mL]); 95% CI, 3.2-5.7; P < 0.001). No unexpected safety concerns arose based on reported adverse events, clinical laboratory evaluations, physical examinations, vital signs, or ECG monitoring during the course of the study. CONCLUSION: This randomized, placebo- and active-controlled study in healthy adult subjects found no clinically relevant changes in the QTc interval after a single levetiracetam dose of 1000 or 5000 mg.

Levocetirizine does not prolong the QT/QTc interval in healthy subjects: results from a thorough QT study.

OBJECTIVE: To conduct a thorough QT study of levocetirizine, a non-sedating antihistamine, in accordance with International Conference on Harmonisation (ICH) E14 guidance. METHODS: The study was designed as a single-dose, placebo and positive-controlled, four-way crossover, randomised trial in which 52 healthy male and female subjects participated. Levocetirizine (5 and 30 mg) and placebo were administered double-blind, and the positive control, moxifloxacin (400 mg), was open-label. Electrocardiograms (ECGs) were obtained by continuous Holter monitoring at various time points (three per time point) during a 24-h period at baseline and after each treatment. The ECGs were read centrally in a blinded manner. QT intervals were corrected for heart rate using a gender- and study-specific correction (QTcSS) and Fridericia's correction (QTcF). The largest QTc time-matched and baseline-subtracted difference between each active drug and the placebo (largest delta delta QTcSS) was derived from a mixed-effect analysis of variance. RESULTS: The one-sided 95% upper limits of the largest delta delta QTcSS for levocetirizine were 5.7 ms (5 mg) and 3.9 ms (30 mg), with mean estimates of 2.9 and 1.1 ms, respectively. Similar results were obtained for the delta delta QTcF data. Statistically, moxifloxacin significantly lengthened the QTcSS, with a one-sided 95% lower limit of the largest delta delta QTcSS of 10.5 ms and a mean estimate of 13.4 ms. There was no relationship between the measured delta QTcSS and the plasma concentration of levocetirizine, whereas a statistically significant linear relationship was observed with the plasma concentration of moxifloxacin [slope estimate 0.004 ms/(ng/mL); 95% confidence interval: 0.003-0.005]. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, the results of this thorough QT study indicate that the methodology of the trial was valid and sensitive enough to demonstrate the absence of effect of levocetirizine at both therapeutic (5 mg) and supra-therapeutic (30 mg) doses on cardiac repolarisation.

Seletracetam (UCB 44212).

Better pharmacotherapies for epilepsy are needed for patients who are refractory to or have tolerability difficulties with current treatments. Seletracetam, a new drug in epilepsy development, is a pyrrolidone derivative structurally related to levetiracetam (trade name Keppra). It was discovered because of its high binding affinity to the synaptic vesicle 2A (SV2A) protein, which is now known to be the binding site for this family of compounds. Seletracetam shows very potent seizure suppression in models of acquired or genetic epilepsy, as well as high CNS tolerability in various animal models. Pharmacokinetic studies in animals suggest that seletracetam is rapidly and highly absorbed, with linear and time-independent pharmacokinetics. Seletracetam appears neither to inhibit nor to induce the major human drug metabolizing enzymes, and it demonstrates low plasma protein binding (<10%), which suggests a low potential for drug-drug interactions. Initial studies in humans demonstrated first-order monocompartmental kinetics with a half-life of 8 h and an oral bioavailability of >90%. Studies in healthy volunteers showed that the treatment emergent adverse events were of mild to moderate severity, were mostly of CNS origin and were resolved within 24 h. Altogether, these results suggest that seletracetam represents a promising new antiepileptic drug candidate, one that demonstrates a potent, broad spectrum of seizure protection and a high CNS tolerability in animal models, with initial clinical findings suggestive of straightforward pharmacokinetics and good tolerability.