Validation of reference data on wisdom tooth mineralization and eruption for forensic age estimation in living persons.

Estimation of dental age is an important part of forensic age estimation in living persons. As the quality of the values given in population-specific reference studies has a great impact on the estimation, the aim of this study was to validate reference data for wisdom teeth mineralization and eruption of a German population concerning the diagnosis of the age limit of 18 years in persons with known age. Mineralization and eruption was evaluated in 307 orthopantomograms of Central European subjects aged 17.5-18.5 years. Dental age was estimated using reference data and compared to chronological age. Statistical methods were used to analyze the differences and to propose adjusted reference values. Estimation of dental age relying on mineralization resulted in overestimations of 2 years on average in 76% of the males and 82% of the females. Using eruption, all men and 75% of the women were overestimated by up to 7 years. The differences between estimated and chronological age in both men and women were associated with the mineralization and eruption stage, respectively. The higher the stage, the higher was the risk of overestimation. The mineralization stages up to stage E were associated with underestimations. Using the proposed adjusted reference values resulted in more accurate estimations of dental age. Validation of reference values for dental age estimation showed great overestimations resulting in high error rates with numerous persons being younger than the estimated dental age. Adjustments are proposed which reduce differences between estimated dental age and chronological age.

Dental age estimation: The chronology of mineralization and eruption of male third molars with 3T MRI.

Forensic age estimation has recently become an important topic due to a steady increase of cross border migration. Dental age assessment is one pillar of the forensic age estimation in living persons. Currently it is done by evaluating an orthopantomogram, which is generated using ionizing radiation. Nevertheless, the use of X-ray without medical indication is ethically questionable. Therefore, the aim of the study was to provide reference values for dental MRI to have an alternative radiation-free method for the assessment of dental age. In this cross-sectional study, 316 adolescent, male individuals were investigated. Two dentists evaluated the stage of mineralization and eruption of the third molars of the upper and lower jaws, according to the staging systems established by Demirjian and Olze. Following data analysis and the creation of reference tables, the likelihood ratios to be over specific age limits were calculated. In the mineralization evaluation mainly stages D-H were seen (range A-H); regarding eruption, all four stages (A-D) appeared. A significant difference between the teeth was only found for eruption stage A. However, the evaluation of participants who had all four third molars, showed partly different stages for the individual teeth as well for mineralization as for the eruption. Therefore, it seems to be important to include all available teeth in the age estimation. The likelihood ratios showed about 99% probability to be 18 years or older for stage H (mineralization), but only about 93% for stage D (eruption). In summary, it can be concluded that dental MRI holds promise as an alternative to conventional orthopantomogram based age assessment.

Dental age estimation of living persons: Comparison of MRI with OPG.

The need for forensic age estimations in living adolescents is high mainly due to migration, particularly from countries where birth dates are not reliably documented. To date, the gold standard of dental age estimation is the evaluation of the mineralization and eruption stages of the third molars using an orthopantomogram (OPG). However, the use of ionizing radiation without medical indication is ethically controversial and not permitted in many countries. Thus, the aim of this study was to investigate if dental MRI can be used for the assessment of dental age with equally good results as when using an OPG. 27 healthy volunteers (19 ♀, 8 ♂, age range 13.6-23.1 years, median 18.9 years) underwent an MRI scan of the jaw after a clinically indicated OPG. Mineralization and eruption stages of the molars were independently analyzed on OPGs and MRI by two blinded dentists according to the staging system established by Demirjian and Olze, respectively. The results of OPG and MRI were compared and inter-rater agreement was determined. The developmental stages of the 262 evaluated molars could be clearly differentiated in MRI. For both, mineralization and eruption, there was a good correlation between MRI and OPG. Overall MRI tended to yield slightly lower stages than the OPG. Inter-rater agreement was moderate for mineralization and good regarding eruption. Although a validation of these results using modality-specific reference values is needed, dental MRI seems to be suitable for a use in dental age estimation.