Brief Resolved Unexplained Event: Not Just a New Name for Apparent Life-Threatening Event.

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to evaluate patients who presented to the pediatric emergency department with an apparent life-threatening event (ALTE) to (1) determine if these patients would meet the criteria for brief resolved unexplained event (BRUE), a new term coined by the American Academy of Pediatrics in May, 2016; (2) risk stratify these patients to determine if they meet the BRUE low-risk criteria; and (3) evaluate outcomes of patients meeting the criteria for BRUE. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective chart review of patients who presented to a large urban academic center pediatric emergency department with an ALTE from January 2013 to May 2015 (before the publication of the BRUE guideline). Children ≤12 months of age were identified by the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth/Tenth Revision. Two physician reviews were performed to determine if patients met the ALTE diagnostic criteria. Data were then extracted from these charts to complete objectives. RESULTS: Seventy-eight patients met the diagnostic criteria for ALTE. Only 1 of those patients met the diagnostic criteria for BRUE, but not for low-risk BRUE. This patient underwent an extensive inpatient evaluation and was eventually discharged after monitoring with a benign diagnosis. Most patients did not meet the criteria for BRUE because the event was not unexplained. CONCLUSIONS: Only 1 patient who presented to the ED with ALTE met the criteria for BRUE, and this patient did not meet the low-risk criteria. This study corroborates previous research on BRUE and continues to highlight the importance of conducting a thorough history and physical examination on all patients presenting to the ED with concerning events.

Children requiring psychiatric consultation in the pediatric emergency department: epidemiology, resource utilization, and complications.

METHODS: A cohort of children younger than 18 years presenting to an urban pediatric emergency department (PED) who underwent psychiatric consultation was analyzed. A standardized data collection sheet was prospectively completed and included: patient characteristics, extent of medical evaluation and findings, ancillary diagnostic studies, resources utilized, dangerous behaviors, and disposition. RESULTS: Two hundred ten patients required psychiatric evaluation. Median age was 14 years; 51.9% were boys; 71.9% had a past psychiatric history; 39.0% had prior psychiatric admission(s), and 40.5% were on psychiatric medications. The admission rate was 49.5%. Patients spent a median of 5.7 hours in the PED. Hospital police monitored 51.9% patients. Forty-five patients had 91 dangerous behaviors. Those patients presenting with a complaint of aggressive behavior (P = 0.00006), a past psychiatric history (P = 0.003), or a history of prior psychiatric hospitalization (P = 0.005) were more likely to have dangerous behaviors. Two hundred nine patients underwent a complete medical evaluation, and 207 were considered medically cleared. Patients who had diagnostic evaluations for medically indicated reasons were significantly more likely to have abnormal results than those requested by the psychiatric consultant for screening purposes (43.6% vs. 9.2%; relative risk, 2.33; 95% confidence interval, 1.33-4.08) but were not statistically more likely to result in medical intervention (5.4% vs. 0%, P = 0.243). CONCLUSIONS: PED patients requiring psychiatric consultation and psychiatric admission had a prolonged PED stay and a high incidence of dangerous behaviors requiring intervention. History and physical examination adequately identified medical illness. Laboratory evaluation obtained for psychiatric transfer or admission purposes was of low yield.