Multimorbidity among inflammatory bowel disease patients in a tertiary care center: a retrospective study.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is a chronic systemic inflammatory condition that debilitate the quality of life. Multimorbidity, a concept only beginning to emerge in IBD, is defined as two or more comorbidities present in the same individual. Notably, we used the term multimorbidity to refer to two or more comorbidities excluding IBD. Multimorbidity is linked to decreased quality of life, poorer disease outcomes, increased hospitalizations, healthcare costs and polypharmacy complications. We aim to estimate the prevalence of multimorbidity and to explore its effect on IBD patients. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed all IBD patients registered in a validated web-based registry since February 2018. Data on patient demographics, comorbidities, IBD and extraintestinal complications were obtained. We analyzed the date using univariate, bivariate and multivariable analysis. RESULTS: Among 767 IBD patients, 54.6% had Crohn's disease (CD), 41.9% had ulcerative colitis (UC) and 3.5% had IBD unclassified. The median age at diagnosis was 22 years (IQR: 15-29). Males compromised 50.2% of patients. According to the Montréal IBD classification, most UC patients had moderate UC (47.8%) while most CD patients had non-stricturing non-penetrating CD (49.8%). Overall, 10.3% IBD patients had multimorbidity and 23.9% had at least one comorbidity. The most common comorbidity was diabetes mellitus (4.9%) followed by essential hypertension (4%) and iron deficiency anemia (3%). Female gender (P = 0.008) and UC (P = 0.005) were more likely to have multimorbidity. Multimorbid IBD patients were more likely to develop thrombosis than non-multimorbid peers (16.7% vs. 1.6%; P < 0.001). Higher age at diagnosis (OR = 1.04, 95%CI: 1.01-1.07) and having a history of thrombosis (OR = 7.82, 95% CI: 2.67-22.92) are associated with increased risk of multimorbidity. CONCLUSION: Multimorbidity is not uncommon among IBD patients, especially females diagnosed with UC. Our findings indicate that future studies are needed to explore the effects of multimorbidity on IBD patients.

Prevalence and Predictors of Reduced Bone Density in Child and Adolescent Patients With Crohn's Disease.

Reduced bone mineral density (BMD) has broadly been found to be associated with inflammatory bowel disease across a number of geographical locations and cultures. We aimed to estimate the prevalence of reduced BMD and identify clinical predictors in a cohort of Crohn's disease patients (CD) in Saudi Arabia. We conducted a retrospective study involving children and adolescents with CD between 2013 and 2018. BMD was evaluated using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry scans of the spine and body. A multivariate analysis was performed for the detection of predictors of low BMD. Sixty-four patients were enrolled. The median age was 16 years (range, 8-19 years) and 55% of patients were males. Total body BMD scanning identified 25 patients (39%) with osteoporosis. Twenty patients (31.3%) were found to have z scores consistent with osteopenia. A multivariate regression analysis identified a low weight-for-age z score (B coefficient = 0.347, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.211-0.482, p < 0.001 for Spine BMD and B coefficient = 0.321, 95% CI = 0.170-0.472, p < 0.001 for total body BMD), a low height-for-age z score (B coefficient = 0.187, 95% CI = 0.035-0.338, p = 0.017 for spine BMD and B coefficient = 0.0.258, 95% CI = 0.089-0.427, p = 0.004 for total body BMD), a low 25-hyroxyvitamin D level (B coefficient = 0.026, 95% CI = 0.013-0.038, p < 0.001 for spine BMD and B coefficient = 0.016, 95% CI = 0.002-0.031, p = 0.026 for total body BMD), and a higher number of corticosteroid induction courses (B coefficient = -0.567, 95% CI = -0.923 to -0.212, p = 0.003 for spine BMD and B coefficient = -0.566, 95% CI = 0.963-0.169, p = 0.007 for total body BMD) as predictors of low BMD. In the spine BMD analysis, older age at the time of presentation was identified as a significant predictor for low bone density (B coefficient = 0.254, 95% CI = 0.141-0.368, p < 0.001). In conclusion, Saudi Arabian children and adolescents with CD have a high prevalence rate of low bone density compared to Western populations. Several clinical characteristics are identified as significant predictors for low BMD.

Inflammatory bowel disease and restless leg syndrome.

OBJECTIVE: Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) has been associated with restless leg syndrome (RLS). This study aims to explore the prevalence, clinical predictors, and severity of RLS in IBD patients compared to controls. METHODS: We conducted a case-control study between January and December of 2019 comparing IBD patients with controls. Assessment of RLS was performed using the previously validated diagnostic restless leg syndrome questionnaire (RLSQ). Logistic regression analyses were applied to investigate associations between patient demographics and clinical features and RLS diagnosis. RESULTS: A total of 218 IBD patients and 211 healthy controls were incorporated after excluding 6 patients with positional discomfort and 4 patients with habitual foot tapping. The mean age was 30.2+/-11.7 and 64% were females. The prevalence of RLS was 16/218 (7.34%) and 17/211 (8.06%) among cases and controls, respectively. Based on the RLSQ severity score, 6/16 (37.5%), 4/16 (25%) and 1/16 (6.3%) of the IBD patients with RLS had mild, moderate and severe RLS; respectively. The odds of IBD were lower among patients with confirmed RLS (OR=0.90, 95% CI=0.44-1.84, p=0.78). In the logistic regression analysis, only vitamin B12 deficiency (OR=10.20, 95% CI=1.40-74.10, p=0.022) was associated with RLS diagnosis among IBD patients. CONCLUSION: No difference was found in the prevalence of RLS between IBD patients and non-IBD controls. Vitamin B12 deficiency was associated with RLS diagnosis among patients with IBD.

Reliability among central readers in the evaluation of endoscopic disease activity in pouchitis.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Pouchitis is a common adverse event after proctocolectomy with ileal pouch anal anastomosis for ulcerative colitis. Evaluation of pouchitis disease activity and response to treatment requires use of validated indices. We assessed the reliability of items evaluating endoscopic pouchitis disease activity. METHODS: Twelve panelists used a modified RAND appropriateness methodology to rate the appropriateness of items evaluating endoscopic pouchitis disease activity derived from a systematic review and also identified additional potential endoscopic items based on expert opinion. Four central readers then evaluated 50 pouchoscopy videos in triplicate, in random order. Intra- and inter-rater reliability for each item was assessed by calculating and comparing intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs). A Delphi process identified common sources of disagreement among the readers. RESULTS: Ten existing endoscopic items were identified from the systematic review and an additional 7 exploratory items from the panelists. ICCs for inter-rater reliability were highest for the existing item of pouch ulceration (.72; 95% confidence interval [CI], .60-.82) and for the exploratory item of ulcerated surface in the pouch body (.67; 95% CI, .53-.75). Inter-rater reliability for all other existing and exploratory items was "moderate" (ICC < .60). The item "ulcerated surface in the pouch body" demonstrated the best correlation with a global evaluation of lesion severity (r = .80; 95% CI, .73-.85). CONCLUSION: Substantial reliability was observed only for the endoscopic items of ulceration and ulcerated surface in the pouch body. Future studies should assess responsiveness to treatment in the next stage toward development of an endoscopic pouchitis disease activity index.

Endoscopic scoring indices for evaluation of disease activity in ulcerative colitis.

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic assessment of mucosal disease activity is routinely used to determine eligibility and response to therapy in clinical trials of ulcerative colitis. The operating properties of the existing endoscopic scoring indices are unclear. OBJECTIVES: A systematic review was undertaken to evaluate the development and operating characteristics of endoscopic scoring indices for the evaluation of ulcerative colitis. SEARCH METHODS: We searched MEDLINE, Embase and CENTRAL from inception to 5 July 2016. We also searched references and conference proceedings (Digestive Disease Week, United European Gastroenterology Week, European Crohn's and Colitis Organization). SELECTION CRITERIA: Any study design (e.g. randomized controlled trials, cohort studies, case series) that evaluated endoscopic indices for evaluation of ulcerative colitis disease activity were considered for inclusion. Eligible participants were adult patients (> 16 years), diagnosed with ulcerative colitis using conventional clinical, radiologic and endoscopic criteria. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two authors independently reviewed the studies identified from the literature search. These authors also independently extracted and recorded data on the number of patients enrolled; number of patients per treatment arm; patient characteristics including age and gender distribution; endoscopic index; and outcomes such as reliability (intra-rater and inter-rater), validity (content, construct, criterion), responsiveness and feasibility. Any disagreements regarding study inclusion or data extraction were resolved by discussion and consensus with a third author. Risk of bias was assessed by determining whether assessors were blinded to clinical information and whether assessors scored the endoscopic index independently. We also assessed the methodological quality of the validation studies using the COSMIN checklist MAIN RESULTS: A total of 23 reports of 20 studies met the pre-defined inclusion criteria and were included in the review. Of the 20 included validation studies, 19 endoscopic scoring indices were assessed, including the Azzolini Classification, Baron Score, Blackstone Endoscopic Interpretation, Chinese Grading System of Ulcerative Colitis, Endoscopic Activty Index, Jeroen Score, Magnifying Colonoscopy Grade, Matts Score, Mayo Clinic Endoscopic Subscore, Modified Baron Score, Modified Mayo Clinic Endoscopic Subscore, Osada Score, Rachmilewtiz Endoscopic Score, St. Mark's Index, Ulcerative Colitis Colonoscopic Index of Serverity (UCCIS), endoscopic component of the Ulcerative Colitis Disease Activity Index (UCDAI), Ulcerative Colitis Endoscopic Index of Severity (UCEIS), Witts Sigmoidoscopic Score and Watson Grade. The individuals who performed the endoscopic scoring were blinded to clinical and/or histologic information in ten of the included studies, not blinded to clinical and/or histologic information in one of the included studies, and it was unclear whether blinding occurred in the remaining nine included studies. Independent observation was confirmed in four of the included studies, unclear in five of the included studies, and non-applicable (since inter-rater reliability was not assessed) in the remaining eleven included studies. The methodological quality (COSMIN checklist) of most of the included studies was rated as 'good' or 'excellent'. One study that assessed responsiveness was rated as 'fair'. The inter-rater reliability of nine endoscopic scoring indices including the Baron Score, Blackstone Endoscopic Interpretation, Endoscopic Activity Index, Matts Score, Mayo Clinic Endoscopic Subscore, Osada Score, UCCIS, UCEIS, Watson Grade was assessed in seven studies, with estimates of correlation, ƙ, ranging from 0.44 to 0.97. The iIntra-rater reliability of seven endoscopic scoring indices including the Baron Score, Blackstone Endoscopic Interpretation, Matts Score, Mayo Clinic Endoscopic Subscore, Osada Score, UCCIS and UCEIS was assessed in three studies, with estimates of correlation, ƙ, ranging from 0.41 to 0.86. No studies assessed content validity. Three studies evaluated the criterion validity of three endoscopic scoring indices including the Rachmilewitz Endoscopic Score, Magnifying Colonoscopy Grade and the UCCIS. These indices were correlated with objective markers of disease activity including albumin, blood leukocytes, C-reactive protein, fecal calprotectin, hemoglobin, mucosal interleukin-8 concentration and platelet count. Correlation estimates ranged from r = -0.19 to 0.83. Thirteen endoscopic scoring indices were tested for construct validity in 13 studies. Estimates of correlation between the endoscopic scoring indices and other measures of disease activity ranged from r = 0.27 to 0.93. Two studies explored the responsiveness of four endoscopic scoring indices including the Mayo Endoscopic Subscore, Modified Baron Score, Modified Mayo Endoscopic Subscore and UCEIS. One study concluded that the Modified Baron Score, Modified Mayo Endoscopic Subscore and UCEIS had similar responsiveness for detecting disease change in ulcerative colitis. The other included study concluded that the UCEIS may be the most accurate endoscopic scoring tool. None of the included studies formally assessed feasibility. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: While the UCEIS, UCCIS and Mayo Clinic Endoscopic Subscore have undergone extensive validation, none of these instruments have been fully validated and only two studies assessed responsiveness. Further research on the operating properties of these indices is needed given the lack of a fully-validated endoscopic scoring instrument for the evaluation of disease activity in ulcerative colitis.

Development and validation of a histological index for UC.

OBJECTIVE: Although the Geboes score (GS) and modified Riley score (MRS) are commonly used to evaluate histological disease activity in UC, their operating properties are unknown. Accordingly, we developed an alternative instrument. DESIGN: Four pathologists scored 48 UC colon biopsies using the GS, MRS and a visual analogue scale global rating. Intra-rater and inter-rater reliability for each index and individual index items were measured using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs). Items with high reliability were used to develop the Robarts histopathology index (RHI). The responsiveness/validity of the RHI and multiple histological, endoscopic and clinical outcome measures were evaluated by analyses of change scores, standardised effect size (SES) and Guyatt's responsiveness statistic (GRS) using data from a clinical trial of an effective therapy. RESULTS: Inter-rater ICCs (95% CIs) for the total GS and MRS scores were 0.79 (0.63 to 0.87) and 0.80 (0.69 to 0.87). The correlation estimates between change scores in RHI and change score in GS and MRS were 0.75 (0.67 to 0.82) and 0.84 (0.79 to 0.88), respectively. The SES and GRS estimates for GS, MRS and RHI were: 1.87 (1.54 to 2.20) and 1.23 (0.97 to 1.50), 1.29 (1.02 to 1.56) and 0.88 (0.65 to 1.12), and 1.05 (0.79 to 1.30) and 0.88 (0.64 to 1.12), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The RHI is a new histopathological index with favourable operating properties.

Histologic scoring indices for evaluation of disease activity in ulcerative colitis.

BACKGROUND: Disease activity can be determined using clinical, endoscopic or histologic criteria in patients with ulcerative colitis (UC). Persistent disease activity is associated with poor outcomes. Histologic disease activity has been shown to be associated with relapse, colectomy and colorectal cancer. The ability to objectively evaluate microscopic disease activity using histology is important for both clinical practice and clinical trials. However, the operating properties of the currently available histologic indices remain unclear. OBJECTIVES: A systematic review was undertaken to identify and evaluate the development and operating characteristics of histologic disease activity indices used to assess disease activity in people with ulcerative colitis. SEARCH METHODS: We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, PubMed, CENTRAL and the Cochrane IBD Review Group Specialized Trials Register from inception to 2 December 2016 for applicable studies. There were no language or document type restrictions. SELECTION CRITERIA: Any study design (e.g. randomized controlled trials, cohort studies, case series) that evaluated a histologic index in patients with UC were considered for inclusion. Eligible patients were adults (> 18 years), diagnosed with UC using conventional clinical, radiographic, endoscopic and histologic criteria. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two authors (MHM and CEP) independently reviewed the titles and abstracts of the studies identified from the literature search. A standardized form was used to assess eligibility of trials for inclusion and for data extraction.Two authors (MHM and CEP) independently extracted and recorded data, which included the number of patients enrolled, number of patients per treatment arm, patient characteristics including age and gender distribution, and the name of the histologic index. Outcomes (i.e. intra-rater reliability, inter-rater reliability, internal consistency, content validity, criterion validity, construct validity, responsiveness, and feasibility) were recorded for each trial. MAIN RESULTS: In total, 126 reports describing 30 scoring indices were identified through the screening process. Eleven of the 30 scoring indices have undergone some form of index validation. Intra-rater reliability was assessed for eight scoring indices. Inter-rater reliability was evaluated for all 11 of the scoring indices. Three of the indices underwent content validation. Two of the included scoring indices assessed criterion validity. Six of the included scoring indices explored content validity. Two of the included scoring indices were tested for responsiveness. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: The Nancy Index and the Robarts Histopathology Index have undergone the most validation in that four operating properties including reliability, content validity, construct validity (hypothesis testing) and criterion validity have been tested. However, none of the currently available histologic scoring indices have been fully validated. In order to determine the optimal endpoint for histologic healing in UC, more research is required. The optimal index would need to be fully validated.

Placebo response and remission rates in randomised trials of induction and maintenance therapy for ulcerative colitis.

BACKGROUND: It is important to minimize placebo rates in randomised controlled trials (RCTs) to efficiently detect treatment differences between interventions. Historically, high placebo rates have been observed in clinical trials of ulcerative colitis (UC). A better understanding of factors influencing placebo rates may lead to more informed clinical trial design. OBJECTIVES: A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted to evaluate placebo response and remission rates in RCTs evaluating UC treatments in adult patients. SEARCH METHODS: Electronic databases (i.e. MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CENTRAL) were searched from inception to 1 March 2017 with no language restrictions applied. Reference lists and conference proceedings of major gastroenterology meetings were also handsearched to identify additional studies. SELECTION CRITERIA: Placebo-controlled RCTs of adult patients with UC treated with corticosteroids, aminosalicylates, immunosuppressives or biologics were eligible, provided enrolment and outcome assessment was conducted using the Ulcerative Colitis Disease Activity Index (UCDAI) or the Mayo Clinic Score. The minimum trial duration was two weeks for induction trials and four months maintenance trials. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Pairs of authors independently determined study eligibility and extracted data with any disagreements resolved through consensus. Outcomes of interest included the proportion of patients with clinical response and remission. Trial characteristics such as the design, participant demographics and disease history, interventions, and enrolment and assessment criteria were also recorded. The methodological quality of the included studies was evaluated using the Cochrane risk of bias tool. Pooled placebo response and remission rates and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were calculated using a binomial normal model for proportions. Induction of remission and maintenance studies were pooled separately. The impact of study-level characteristics on placebo response and remission rates was investigated using mixed-effects meta-regression analyses with logits of event rates as the outcome variables. An assessment of pooled placebo rates over time was conducted using a cumulative meta-analysis based on date of publication. Publication bias was examined using funnel plots. MAIN RESULTS: The screening process identified 61 included studies which encompass 58 induction phases (5111 patients randomised to placebo) and 12 maintenance phases (1579 patients randomised to placebo). For induction trials, the pooled estimate of placebo response was 33% (95% CI 30% to 36%) while the pooled estimate of placebo remission was 12% (95% CI 9% to 15%). For maintenance trials, the pooled estimate of placebo response was 23% (95% CI 19% to 28%) while the pooled estimate of placebo remission was 17% (95% CI 10% to 27%).Studies enrolling patients with more active disease confirmed objectively by endoscopy were associated with significantly lower placebo remission and response rates than trials enrolling patients with less active disease (27% versus 4%, OR 2.60, 95% CI 1.25 to 5.42, P = 0.01 for UCDAI endoscopy sub score ≥1 versus ≥ 2 for remission; and 27% versus 4%, OR 1.70, 95% CI 1.02 to 2.82, P = 0.02 for UCDAI endoscopy sub score greater than or equal to one versus greater than or equal to two for response). With respect to drug class, the lowest placebo response and remission rates were observed in trials evaluating corticosteroids (23%; 95% CI 19 to 29%, and 5%; 95% CI 2 to 11%, respectively). Trials of biologics had the highest placebo response rate (35%; 95% CI 30 to 41%), while trials evaluating aminosalicylates had the highest placebo remission rate (18%; 95% CI 12 to 24%). Disease duration of greater than five years prior to enrolment was associated with a significantly lower placebo response rate compared to disease duration of less than or equal to five years (29% versus 47%, respectively; OR 0.54, 95% CI 0.32 to 0.92, P = 0.02). The requirement of a minimum rectal bleeding score for study eligibility was associated with an increased placebo response rate compared to studies that did not use rectal bleeding for trial eligibility (37% versus 32%, respectively; OR 1.70, 95% CI 1.02 to 2.82, P = 0.02). Finally, the time point of primary outcome assessment was found to be significantly associated with placebo remission rates such that every one week increment in endpoint assessment was associated with a 6% increase in the placebo remission rate (OR 1.06, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.10, P = 0.01).Cumulative meta-analysis indicated a consistent increase in the placebo response rate from 1987 to 2007 (from 13% to 33%), although rates have remained constant from 2008 to 2015 (32% to 34%). Similarly, placebo remission rates increased from 1987 to 2007 (5% to 14%) but have remained constant from 2008 to 2015 (12 to 14%). On meta-regression, there were no statistically significant differences between the 1987-2007 and 2008-2015 point estimates for both response (P = 0.81) and remission (P = 0.32). AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Placebo response and remission rates vary according to endoscopic disease severity and rectal bleeding score at trial entry, class of agent, disease duration, and the time point at which the primary outcome was measured. These observations have important implications for the design and conduct of future clinical trials in UC and will help researchers design trials, determine required sample sizes and also provide useful information about trial design features which should be considered when planning new trials.

Anti-Integrins in Ulcerative Colitis and Crohn's Disease: What Is Their Place?

BACKGROUND: Inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) are a group of heterogeneous conditions, characterized by immune-mediated inflammation of the gastrointestinal tract. Traditionally, medical management of these disorders has been based on use of systemic immunosuppressives. The development of new drugs that selectively inhibit leukocyte trafficking to the gut has the potential to reduce inflammation and minimize systemic toxicities. KEY MESSAGES: In this article, we review the immunology of the gut and the mechanism of action these emerging therapies for IBD. Natalizumab, a monoclonal antibody to the α4 integrin, was approved for the treatment of multiple sclerosis and showed promise in Crohn's disease (CD), however it is encumbered by the risk of progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy. Vedolizumab inhibits the α4ß7 integrin to induce clinical remission in patients with both ulcerative colitis and CD. Long-term safety data on this agent is not yet available. We also review agents in the pipeline. Finally, we discuss the positioning of therapies and potential alterations to therapeutic algorithms as new medications emerge. CONCLUSIONS: New therapies are emerging for IBD; however, long-term data are pending. The positioning of these agents in algorithms will evolve.

Reproducibility of histological assessments of disease activity in UC.

OBJECTIVE: Histopathology is potentially an important outcome measure in UC. Multiple histological disease activity (HA) indices, including the Geboes score (GS) and modified Riley score (MRS), have been developed; however, the operating properties of these instruments are not clearly defined. We assessed the reproducibility of existing measures of HA. DESIGN: Five experienced pathologists with GI pathology fellowship training and expertise in IBD evaluated, on three separate occasions at least two weeks apart, 49 UC colon biopsies and scored the GS, MRS and a global rating of histological severity using a 100 mm visual analogue scale (VAS). The reproducibility of each grading system and for individual instrument items was quantified by estimates of intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) based on two-way random effects models. Uncertainty of estimates was quantified by 95% two-sided CIs obtained using the non-parametric cluster bootstrap method. Biopsies responsible for the greatest disagreement based on the ICC estimates were identified. A consensus process was used to determine the most common sources of measurement disagreement. Recommendations for minimising disagreement were subsequently generated. RESULTS: Intrarater ICCs (95% CIs) for the total GS, MRS and VAS scores were 0.82 (0.73 to 0.88), 0.71 (0.63 to 0.80) and 0.79 (0.72 to 0.85), respectively. Corresponding inter-rater ICCs were substantially lower: 0.56 (0.39 to 0.67), 0.48 (0.35 to 0.66) and 0.61 (0.47 to 0.72). Correlation between the GS and VAS was 0.62 and between the MRS and VAS was 0.61. CONCLUSIONS: Although 'substantial' to 'almost perfect' ICCs for intrarater agreement were found in the assessment of HA in UC, ICCs for inter-rater agreement were considerably lower. According to the consensus process results, standardisation of item definitions and modification of the existing indices is required to create an optimal UC histological instrument.

C-Reactive Protein, Fecal Calprotectin, and Stool Lactoferrin for Detection of Endoscopic Activity in Symptomatic Inflammatory Bowel Disease Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

OBJECTIVES: Persistent disease activity is associated with a poor prognosis in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Therefore, monitoring of patients with intent to suppress subclinical inflammation has emerged as a treatment concept. As endoscopic monitoring is invasive and resource intensive, identification of valid markers of disease activity is a priority. The objective was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of C-reactive protein (CRP), fecal calprotectin (FC), and stool lactoferrin (SL) for assessment of endoscopically defined disease activity in IBD. METHODS: Databases were searched from inception to November 6, 2014 for relevant cohort and case-control studies that evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of CRP, FC, or SL and used endoscopy as a gold standard in patients with symptoms consistent with active IBD. Sensitivities and specificities were pooled to generate operating property estimates for each test using a bivariate diagnostic meta-analysis. RESULTS: Nineteen studies (n=2499 patients) were eligible. The pooled sensitivity and specificity estimates for CRP, FC, and SL were 0.49 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.34-0.64) and 0.92 (95% CI 0.72-0.96), 0.88 (95% CI 0.84-0.90) and 0.73 (95% CI 0.66-0.79), and 0.82 (95% CI 0.73-0.88) and 0.79 (95% CI 0.62-0.89), respectively. FC was more sensitive than CRP in both diseases and was more sensitive in ulcerative colitis than Crohn's disease. CONCLUSIONS: Although CRP, FC, and SL are useful biomarkers, their value in managing individual patients must be considered in specific clinical contexts.

Targeting Leukocyte Trafficking in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: What Is the Clinical Evidence?

Since the cause of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is unknown, therapy has traditionally been based on the empiric use of anti-inflammatory drugs. However, the recent identification of specific mechanisms that regulate cellular migration into inflamed intestinal tissue has provided novel targets for drug development. In this article, we discuss these mechanisms and review emerging safety and efficacy data regarding use of selective inhibitors of leukocyte trafficking for the treatment of IBD.

The impact of biological interventions for ulcerative colitis on health-related quality of life.

BACKGROUND: Ulcerative colitis (UC) is a chronic inflammatory disorder of the colon that has a relapsing-remitting course. Health related quality of life (HRQL) is significantly lower in patients with UC than the general population due to the negative effects of the disease on physical, psychological and social well-being. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating medical interventions for UC have traditionally used clinical disease activity indices that focus on symptoms to define primary outcomes such as clinical remission or improvement. However, this approach does not evaluate benefits that are highly relevant to patients such as HRQL OBJECTIVES: The primary objective was to assess the impact of biologic therapy on the HRQL of UC patients. SEARCH METHODS: We searched PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE and CENTRAL from inception to September, 2015. Conference abstracts and reference lists were also searched. SELECTION CRITERIA: RCTs that compared biologics to placebo in UC patients and reported on HRQL using the Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ), or the SF-36 or EQ-5D to measure HRQL were included. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two authors independently screened studies for inclusion, extracted data and assessed study quality using the Cochrane risk of bias tool. The primary outcome was improvement in HRQL. For dichotomous outcomes we calculated the risk ratio (RR) and 95% confidence interval (CI). For continuous outcomes we calculated the mean difference (MD) and 95% CI. The overall quality of the evidence supporting the primary outcome was assessed using GRADE. MAIN RESULTS: Nine RCTs (n = 4143) were included. Biologics included rituximab (one small study), interferon-ß-1a (one study), vedolizumab (one study), and the tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) antagonists infliximab (two studies), adalimumab (three studies), and golimumab (one study). Risk of bias was low in eight studies. The rituximab study was judged to be at high risk of bias due to attrition bias. The studies comparing interferon-ß-1a and rituximab to placebo found no clear evidence of a difference in the proportion of patients who experienced an improvement in HRQL at 8 or 12 weeks respectively. The proportion of patients with a clinically meaningful improvement in HRQL at 6 or 52 weeks was significantly higher in vedolizumab patients compared to placebo. At 6 weeks 37% (83/225) of vedolizumab patients had an improvement in IBDQ score of at least 16 points from baseline compared to 23% (34/149) of placebo patients (RR 1.62, 95% CI 1.15 to 2.27; 1 study). At 52 weeks, 64% (157/247) of vedolizumab patients had an improvement in IBDQ score of at least 16 points from baseline compared to 38% (48/126) of placebo patients (RR 1.62, 95% CI 1.15 to 2.27; 1 study). A GRADE analysis indicated that the overall quality of the evidence supporting these outcomes was moderate due to sparse data (< 400 events). Patients who received maintenance vedolizumab every eight weeks had significantly higher mean SF-36 scores than placebo patients at 52 weeks (MD 3.40, 95% CI 1.56 to 5.24, 1 study 248 patients). This difference appears to be clinically meaningful as the lower boundary for a clinically meaningful change in SF-36 is three points. A GRADE analysis indicated that the overall quality of the evidence supporting this outcome was moderate due to sparse data (< 400 events). Adalimumab patients had significantly higher mean IBDQ scores than placebo patients at weeks 8 (MD 9.00, 95% CI 2.65 to 15.35; 1 study, 494 patients) and 52 (MD 8.00, 95% CI 0.68 to 15.32; 1 study, 494 patients). However, these differences may not be clinically meaningful as the lower boundary for a clinically meaningful change in IBDQ is 16 points. A GRADE analysis indicated that the overall quality of the evidence supporting this outcome was moderate due to sparse data (< 400 events). Golimumab patients who received a dose of 200/100 mg (MD 12.20, 95% CI 6.52 to 17.88; 504 patients) or 400/200 mg (MD 12.10, 95% CI 6.40 to 17.80; 508 patients) had significantly higher mean IBDQ scores than placebo patients at week 6. Although a GRADE analysis indicated that the overall quality of the evidence supporting these outcomes was high, the difference in IBDQ scores may not be clinically meaningful. Infliximab patients had significantly higher mean IBDQ scores at week 6 or 8 than placebo patients (MD 18,58, 95% CI 13.19 to 23.97; 2 studies, 529 patients). This difference in HRQL is clinically meaningful. A GRADE analysis indicated that the overall quality of the evidence supporting this outcome was high. The proportion of patients with a clinically meaningful improvement in HRQL at eight weeks was significantly higher in infliximab patients compared to placebo. Sixty-nine per cent (333/484) of infliximab patients had an improvement in IBDQ score of > 16 points from baseline compared to 50% of placebo patients (RR 1.39, 95% CI 1.21 to 1.60; 1 study). A GRADE analysis indicated that the overall quality of the evidence supporting this outcome was high. Similar results were found between infliximab and placebo when HRQL was measured using the SF-36 instrument. One small study (n = 43) found no difference in HRQL between infliximab and placebo when measured by the EQ-5D. Pooled analyses of TNF-α antagonists showed a benefit in HRQL favouring TNF-α over placebo. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that biologics have the potential to improve HRQL in UC patients. High quality evidence suggests that infliximab provides a clinically meaningful improvement in HRQL in UC patients receiving induction therapy. Moderate quality evidence suggests that vedolizumab provides a clinically meaningful improvement in HRQL in UC patients receiving maintenance therapy. These findings are important since there is a paucity of effective drugs for the treatment of UC that have the potential to both decrease disease activity and improve HRQL. More research is needed to assess the long-term effect of biologic therapy on HRQL in patients with UC. More research is needed to assess the impact of golimumab and adalimumab on HRQL in UC patients. Trials involving direct head to head comparisons of biologics would help determine which biologics provide optimum benefit for HRQL.

Toward a personalized medicine approach to the management of inflammatory bowel disease.

The medical management of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is evolving toward a personalized medicine-based model. Modern therapeutic algorithms that feature use of tumor necrosis factor (TNF) antagonists in combination with immunosuppressive are highly effective when initiated in high-risk patients early in the course of disease. Defined targets that guide intensification of therapy are critical interventions. In this model, therapy is optimized through appropriate pretreatment testing, therapeutic drug monitoring, and patient-based monitoring strategies. This review discusses the current application of personalized medicine to the management of IBD.

Selecting first-line advanced therapy for ulcerative colitis: A clinical application of personalized medicine.

Ulcerative colitis (UC) is a chronic autoimmune inflammatory disease that affects the colon, leading to symptoms of bloody diarrhea, abdominal cramps, and urgency. The treatment of UC has evolved over the past few decades from locally active anti-inflammatory compounds to more selective therapies that target specific arrays of the immune system. The challenge of selecting the first advanced therapy became apparent in this rapidly expanding landscape of medications. No current investigational tools, such as genetic, immunologic, or biological markers, can guide the identification of the safest and most effective therapeutic option for each patient. Hence, physicians must carefully assess patient/disease characteristics and match them with the most suitable drug through a clinically driven assessment. In this paper, we outline patient and drug characteristics that play a role in selecting first-line advanced therapies for UC and propose an algorithm for selection.

Challenging question: is treating inflammatory bowel disease an art or strictly an evidence-based matter?

Although evidence-based medicine (EBM) is the gold standard for clinical practice, misconceptions among health care providers regarding EBM are common. The medical management of inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) has advanced substantially over the last 20 years as a direct result of the wealth of new evidence generated by randomized controlled trials. Integrating EBM and traditional clinical skills results in optimal care tailored to the individual patient. This article addresses the role of EBM in the management of IBD and dispels some of the common misconceptions about the use of EBM in practice.

Long-Term Improvement in the Patient-Reported Outcomes of Rectal Bleeding, Stool Frequency, and Health-Related Quality of Life with Tofacitinib in the Ulcerative Colitis OCTAVE Clinical Program.

BACKGROUND: Tofacitinib is an oral small molecule Janus kinase inhibitor for the treatment of ulcerative colitis (UC). The tofacitinib OCTAVE clinical program included phase III induction (OCTAVE Induction 1 and 2) and maintenance (OCTAVE Sustain) studies, and an open-label, long-term extension study (OCTAVE Open). OBJECTIVE: This post hoc analysis assessed selected long-term, disease-specific patient-reported outcome (PRO) and health-related quality-of-life (HRQoL) measurements in patients with UC receiving tofacitinib in the OCTAVE clinical program. METHODS: Analyses included patients from OCTAVE Open assigned to tofacitinib 5 mg twice daily (subpopulation in remission at Week 52 of OCTAVE Sustain). OCTAVE Open data from the final analyses are shown to Month 48. Endpoints included rectal bleeding subscore (RBS) = 0, stool frequency subscore (SFS) ≤ 1, and HRQoL measure, Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ) remission (IBDQ total score ≥ 170); with non-responder imputation for missing data at all visits, and last observation carried forward for visits after a patient advanced to the next study (NRI-LOCF). Observed cases were also assessed. RESULTS: At Month 48, of 175 patients, 95 (54.3%) and 96 (54.9%) achieved/maintained RBS = 0 and SFS ≤ 1, respectively (NRI-LOCF). Additionally, 93 (53.1%) patients achieved/maintained IBDQ remission at Month 48 (NRI-LOCF). CONCLUSIONS: Among patients who entered OCTAVE Open in remission, most maintained normalization of rectal bleeding and improvement in stool frequency for ≤ 4 years of follow-up in OCTAVE Open. IBDQ remission was also generally maintained in OCTAVE Open. These data show robust maintenance of key UC PROs and durability of response with tofacitinib 5 mg twice daily. TRIAL REGISTRATION: http://www. CLINICALTRIALS: gov (NCT01465763 [21/10/2011]; NCT01458951 [21/10/2011]; NCT01458574 [21/10/2011]; NCT01470612 [21/10/2011]).

Inflammatory bowel disease in the elderly: A focus on disease characteristics and treatment patterns.

Background: As the population ages, the number of elderly inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients is expected to increase. The clinical features and therapeutic options for young and old patients may differ, as elderly IBD patients are likely to have different comorbidities and disease characteristics. The goal of this study was to examine the clinical aspects and therapeutic choices for elderly Saudi IBD patients. Methods: We conducted a retrospective study aimed at describing the demographic, clinical, and management characteristics of IBD in elderly patients (≥60 years) who followed up at King Abdulaziz University Hospital (KAUH), Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. The data was extracted from the KAUH inflammatory bowel disease information system (IBDIS) registry. The primary outcome was to describe disease characteristics in accordance with the Montréal classification and the secondary outcomes were to describe treatment patterns and identify significant clinical associations. Results: Our data were collected from 76 patients who fulfilled the study inclusion criteria. Females outnumbered males (53.9% vs 46.1%) and the mean age was 51.5 ± 9.7 years. Essential hypertension (26.3%) was the most common comorbidity followed by diabetes mellitus (23.6%), and malignant neoplasms (9.21%). More than half of the patients with Crohn's disease (CD) had disease onset after forty years of age. The most common form of disease distribution was ileocolonic disease (64.7%). Less than 17% of patients had a penetrating disease phenotype. About 88 percent of patients with UC presented >40 years of age. Approximately, half of the cohort had left-sided ulcerative colitis (UC) (48%), followed by pancolitis (40%). The most prescribed medication class for IBD was 5-aminosalicylic acid (5-ASA) derivatives (56.58%) followed by corticosteroids and immunosuppressive drugs. Conclusions: In Saudi Arabia, age-specific concerns including comorbidities and polypharmacy remain the major challenges in the management of elderly IBD patients.

The prevalence and risk factors for hiatal hernia among patients undergoing endoscopy: A retrospective analysis.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the prevalence of hiatal hernia (HH) and its association with age, gender, and body mass index (BMI). METHODS: We retrospectively included patients who underwent esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) at an academic tertiary care hospital. Data were collected on the presence of HH as well as patient demographics including age, gender, and BMI. Univariate and multivariate analysis were done to determine risk factors for HH. RESULTS: A total of 2805 patients were included in this study. The mean age was 48.6 (±18.6) years and males constituted 28.8% of the study population. The mean BMI was 29.7 (±8.6) kg/m². The prevalence of HH was 29.8% among all patients and 48.6% among those who underwent EGD for gastroesophageal reflux disease-related indications. There was no significant association between HH and female gender (OR 1.04, 95%CI: 0.88 -1.26, p=0.53), older age (OR 0.77, 95%CI: 0.72 - 1.06, p=0.19) or BMI (OR 1.07, 95%CI: 0.9 - 1.2, p=0.39). CONCLUSION: The prevalence of HH was 28.9% based on this large endoscopy-based population. We found no association between HH and gender, age, or BMI.

Saudi consensus guidance for the management of inflammatory bowel disease during pregnancy.

ABSTRACT: The management of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) in pregnant women is challenging and must be addressed on a patient-by-patient basis. Optimal patient management requires a multidisciplinary team and clear evidence-based recommendations that cater to this subset of patients. In this article, we provide concise guidelines and clinical care pathway for the management of IBD in pregnant women. Our recommendations were developed by a multidisciplinary working group that includes experts from the Saudi Ministry of Health in collaboration with the Saudi Gastroenterology Association and the Saudi Society of Clinical Pharmacology. All recommendations are based on up-to-date information following an extensive literature review. A total of 23 evidence-based expert opinion recommendations for the management of IBD in pregnant women are herein provided.