Bleeding control improves after switching to emicizumab: Real-world experience of 177 children in the PedNet registry.

INTRODUCTION: Despite the rapid uptake of emicizumab in the paediatric haemophilia A (HA) population, real-world data on the safety and efficacy is limited. AIM: To report on bleeding and safety in paediatric patients receiving emicizumab prophylaxis. METHODS: Data were extracted from the multicentre prospective observational PedNet Registry (NCT02979119). Children with haemophilia A, and ≥50 FVIII exposures or inhibitors present receiving emicizumab maintenance therapy were analysed. Data were summarized as medians with interquartile range (IQR, P25-P75). Mean (95% confidence interval (CI)), annualized (joint) bleeding rate (A(J)BR) during emicizumab and ≤2 years before emicizumab prophylaxis were modelled and compared using negative binomial regression. RESULTS: Total of 177 patients started emicizumab at median 8.6 years (IQR 4.8-13.1), most had no FVIII inhibitors (64%). Follow up before emicizumab was median: 1.68 years (IQR: 1.24-1.90) and during emicizumab: 1.32 years (IQR: .94-2.11). In patients without inhibitors, mean ABR reduced after starting emicizumab from 2.41 (CI 1.98-2.95) to 1.11 (CI .90-1.36, p < .001), while AJBR reduced from.74 (CI .56-.98) to.31 (CI .21-.46, p < .001). Concordantly, in patients with inhibitors, mean ABR reduced from 5.08 (CI 4.08-6.38) to .75 (CI .56-1.01, p < .001), while AJBR reduced from 1.90 (CI 1.42-2.58) to .34 (CI .21-.56, p < .001). Five emicizumab-related adverse events were reported (3% of the cohort), including one patient with antidrug antibodies. CONCLUSION: This study showed improved bleeding control compared to previous treatment and a favourable safety profile during emicizumab therapy in paediatric haemophilia A patients.

Expert United Kingdom consensus on the preservation of joint health in people with moderate and severe haemophilia A: A modified Delphi panel.

AIM: For people with haemophilia A (PwHA), bleeding in the joints leads to joint damage and haemophilia-related arthropathy, impacting range of motion and life expectancy. Existing guidelines for managing haemophilia A support healthcare professionals (HCPs) and PwHA in their efforts to preserve joint health. However, such guidance should be reviewed, considering emerging evidence and consensus as presented in this manuscript. METHODS: Fifteen HCPs experienced in the management of PwHA in the UK participated in a three-round Delphi panel. Consensus was defined at ≥70% of panellists agreeing or disagreeing for Likert-scale questions, and ≥70% selecting the same option for multiple- or single-choice questions. Questions not reaching consensus were revised for the next round. RESULTS: 26.8% (11/41), 44.8% (13/29) and 93.3% (14/15) of statements reached consensus in Rounds 1, 2 and 3, respectively. HCPs agreed that prophylaxis should be offered to patients with a baseline factor VIII (FVIII) level of ≤5 IU/dL and that, where there is no treatment burden, the aim of prophylaxis should be to achieve a trough FVIII level ≥15 IU/dL and maintain a longer period with FVIII levels of ≥20-30 IU/dL to provide better bleed protection. The aspirational goal for PwHA is to prevent all joint bleeds, which may be achieved by maintaining normalised (50-150 IU/dL) FVIII levels. CONCLUSION: The panel of experts were largely aligned on approaches to preserving joint health in PwHA, and this consensus may help guide HCPs.

Single centre experience of the use of emicizumab in previously untreated and minimally treated patients under 18 months of age.

Emicizumab has revolutionised haemophilia A treatment landscape and significantly reduced treatment burden, particularly in the paediatric population. We conducted a retrospective study, focused on infants aged ≤18 months with severe haemophilia A. The study included 16 patients, with a median age of 8.2 months and median treatment duration of 61.6 weeks. Before commencing emicizumab, six patients were minimally treated with ≤5 exposure days while 10 were previously untreated patients. Notably, all patients had no inhibitors at baseline, and none developed new inhibitors during the study period. Emicizumab was well tolerated, with no observed side effects or major bleeding events.

Dilemmas on emicizumab in children with haemophilia A: A survey of strategies from PedNet centres.

INTRODUCTION: Haemophilia A care has changed with the introduction of emicizumab. Experience on the youngest children is still scarce and clinical practice varies between haemophilia treatment centres. AIM: We aimed to assess the current clinical practice on emicizumab prophylaxis within PedNet, a collaborative research platform for paediatricians treating children with haemophilia. METHODS: An electronic survey was sent to all PedNet members (n = 32) between October 2022 and February 2023. The survey included questions on the availability of emicizumab, on the practice of initiating prophylaxis in previously untreated or minimally treated patients (PUPs or MTPs) and emicizumab use in patients with or without inhibitors. RESULTS: All but four centres (28/32; 88%) responded. Emicizumab was available in clinical practice in 25/28 centres (89%), and in 3/28 for selected patients only (e.g. with inhibitors). Emicizumab was the preferred choice for prophylaxis in PUPs or MTPs in 20/25 centres; most (85%) started emicizumab prophylaxis before 1 year of age (30% before 6 months of age) and without concomitant FVIII (16/20; 80%). After the loading dose, 13/28 centres administered the recommended dosing, while the others adjusted the interval of injections to give whole vials. In inhibitor patients, the use of emicizumab during ITI was common, with low-dose ITI being the preferred protocol. CONCLUSION: Most centres choose to initiate prophylaxis with emicizumab before 12 months of age and without concomitant FVIII. In inhibitor patients, ITI is mostly given in addition to emicizumab, but there was no common practice on how to proceed after successful ITI.

Long-term joint outcomes in adolescents with moderate or severe haemophilia A.

INTRODUCTION: Favourable joint outcomes are expected with modern haemophilia A (HA) management. Evaluation of long-term treatment outcomes is hampered by the delay between bleeding episodes during childhood and resulting joint outcomes in adulthood. AIM: To measure the long-term joint health of adolescents with moderate and severe HA, according to severity and inhibitor status. METHODS: Pilot cross-sectional study of five European PedNet centres in moderate and severe HA patients aged 10-19 years. Structured assessment of joint status by physical examination (HJHS) and ultrasound (HEAD-US). RESULTS: In total, 141 HA patients were evaluable, 100 without inhibitors (81 severe, 19 moderate HA), and 41 severe HA with current/past inhibitors. On physical examination, 12/81 (15%) of severe HA without inhibitors, 3/19 (16%) of moderate HA, and 13/41 (32%) of severe HA patients with inhibitors exhibited joint abnormalities. Inhibitor persistence, longer inhibitor duration, and a high peak inhibitor level were associated with impaired joint health. Ultrasound showed joint damage (bone or cartilage) in 13/49 (27%) of severe HA without inhibitors, 1/12 (8%) of moderate HA, and 10/28 (36%) of severe HA patients with inhibitors. A discordant ankle evaluation by ultrasound versus physical examination was present in 53/169 joints (31%). CONCLUSIONS: Most adolescents with severe or moderate HA show favourable joint health. Future research with combined ultrasound and/or MRI is needed to better understand joint outcomes in the remaining patients. Patents with inhibitors showed a two-fold increased proportion with joint deterioration. Ultrasound paired with physical examination increases sensitivity for detection of joint damage.

Breakthrough bleeding episodes in pediatric severe hemophilia a patients with and without inhibitors receiving emicizumab prophylaxis: a single-center retrospective review.

Emicizumab has been widely used for prophylaxis in patients with hemophilia A (HA) of all ages, with or without factor VIII inhibitors. Data on emicizumab efficacy are certainly significant; however, protection against bleeding is not absolute, and the breakthrough bleeding risk can be approximately equivalent to that of patients with mild HA. This single-center retrospective review aimed to present the rate and management of breakthrough bleeding events in pediatric HA patients with and without inhibitors who are on emicizumab prophylaxis. Fifty-one pediatric patients on emicizumab prophylaxis that were followed up at Birmingham Children's Hospital between March 1, 2018, and May 15, 2021, were included in the current study. Our results showed that 56.8% (29/51) experienced no bleeding events, and 80.3% (41/51) had no major treated bleeds during the follow-up period. A total of 29.4% (15/51) had minor bleeds that resolved spontaneously or with antifibrinolytics. Overall, 19.6% (10/51) of the patients received additional FVIII to prevent or treat breakthrough bleeding. One patient had a major bleeding event in the form of hematuria. However, it resolved without treatment. Both major and minor bleeding episodes occurred in 7.8% (4/51) of patients. None of the patients with inhibitors (5/51) developed breakthrough bleeding. Only a few, mostly minor, breakthrough bleeding episodes were reported in our cohort. The balance between bleeding control and the risk of inhibitor development after episodic factor administration should be considered. Therefore, careful decisions should be made in managing bleeding events.Supplemental data for this article is available online at.

Characterization and treatment of congenital thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura.

Congenital thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (cTTP) is an ultra-rare thrombomicroangiopathy caused by an inherited deficiency of a disintegrin and metalloproteinase with a thrombospondin type 1 motif, member 13 (ADAMTS13). There are limited data on genotype-phenotype correlation; there is no consensus on treatment. We reviewed the largest cohort of cTTP cases, diagnosed in the United Kingdom, over the past 15 years. Seventy-three cases of cTTP were diagnosed, confirmed by genetic analysis. Ninety-three percent were alive at the time of review. Thirty-six percent had homozygous mutations; 64% had compound heterozygous mutations. Two presentation peaks were seen: childhood (median diagnosis age, 3.5 years) and adulthood, typically related to pregnancy (median diagnosis age, 31 years). Genetic mutations differed by age of onset with prespacer mutations more likely to be associated with childhood onset (P = .0011). Sixty-nine percent of adult presentations were associated with pregnancy. Fresh-frozen plasma (FFP) and intermediate purity factor VIII concentrate were used as treatment. Eighty-eight percent of patients with normal blood counts, but with headaches, lethargy, or abdominal pain, reported symptom resolution with prophylactic therapy. The most common currently used regimen of 3-weekly FFP proved insufficient for 70% of patients and weekly or fortnightly infusions were required. Stroke incidence was significantly reduced in patients receiving prophylactic therapy (2% vs 17%; P = .04). Long-term, there is a risk of end-organ damage, seen in 75% of patients with late diagnosis of cTTP. In conclusion, prespacer mutations are associated with earlier development of cTTP symptoms. Prophylactic ADAMTS13 replacement decreases the risk of end-organ damage such as ischemic stroke and resolved previously unrecognized symptoms in patients with nonovert disease.

Immune tolerance induction in severe haemophilia A: A UKHCDO inhibitor and paediatric working party consensus update.

INTRODUCTION: In good risk patients (historic inhibitor peak < 200BU), the International Immune Tolerance Study demonstrated equal efficacy to induce tolerance between high (200iu/kg/day) and low dose (50iu/kg ×3 times/week) immune tolerance induction (ITI) regimens. However, the trial stopped early on account of the excessive bleed rate in the low dose ITI arm. METHODS: United Kingdom Haemophilia Centre Doctors' Organization (UKHCDO) Paediatric and Inhibitor working parties considered available ITI data alongside the bi-phenotypic antibody emicizumab (Hemlibra®) efficacy and safety data to develop a consensus guideline for the future UK ITI guideline. RESULTS: This revision of UKHCDO ITI guidance incorporates the recommendation to use emicizumab as a prophylaxis haemostatic agent to reduce bleeding rates and to facilitate low dose and reduced frequency of FVIII CFC for ITI in the majority of children. CONCLUSION: This consensus protocol will facilitate future evaluation of ITI outcomes in the evolving landscape of haemophilia therapeutics and ITI strategies.

Adjuvant tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy improves outcome for children and adolescents with acute lymphoblastic leukaemia who have an ABL-class fusion.

Patients with an ABL-class fusion have a high risk of relapse on standard chemotherapy but are sensitive to tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI). In UKALL2011, we screened patients with post-induction MRD ≥1% and positive patients (12%) received adjuvant TKI. As the intervention started during UKALL2011, not all eligible patients were screened prospectively. Retrospective screening of eligible patients allowed the outcome of equivalent ABL-class patients who did and did not receive a TKI in first remission to be compared. ABL-class patients who received a TKI in first remission had a reduced risk of relapse/refractory disease: 0% vs. 63% at four years (P = 0·009).

Postauthorization safety surveillance study of antihaemophilic factor (recombinant) reconstituted in 2 mL sterile water for injection in children with haemophilia A.

INTRODUCTION: Antihaemophilic factor (recombinant) (rAHF; ADVATE® ) is approved for prophylaxis and treatment of bleeding in children and adults with haemophilia A. Reconstitution in 2 mL sterile water for injection instead of 5 mL allows for a 60% reduction in infusion volume and administration time, but could increase the likelihood of hypersensitivity and infusion-related reactions, especially in children. AIM: To assess local tolerability, safety and effectiveness of rAHF 2 mL during routine clinical practice factor VIII (FVIII) replacement (on-demand and prophylaxis) in children with severe (FVIII < 1%) or moderately severe (FVIII 1%-2%) haemophilia A. METHODS: This was a prospective, non-interventional, postauthorization safety surveillance study (NCT02093741). Eligible patients were previously treated with rAHF and had a negative inhibitor test result during ≤10 exposure days prior to study entry. RESULTS: Of 65 patients enrolled (0-11 years of age), 54 and 11 had severe and moderately severe haemophilia A, respectively; 56 patients received prophylaxis, and 11 had ≤50 exposure days, of which 4 had ≤4 exposure days. No patients reported local hypersensitivity reactions, treatment-related adverse events or developed inhibitors. Investigators rated overall effectiveness of rAHF 2 mL prophylaxis as excellent or good. Ninety-four bleeding events in 34 patients were treated. Haemostatic effectiveness was rated as excellent or good for 75.8% of bleeds; 86.2% of bleeds required 1 or 2 infusions. CONCLUSION: In children with severe/moderately severe haemophilia A, no hypersensitivity reactions were reported with rAHF 2 mL treatment, and the safety and effectiveness are consistent with data previously reported for rAHF 5 mL.

Whole exome sequencing identifies genetic variants in inherited thrombocytopenia with secondary qualitative function defects.

Inherited thrombocytopenias are a heterogeneous group of disorders characterized by abnormally low platelet counts which can be associated with abnormal bleeding. Next-generation sequencing has previously been employed in these disorders for the confirmation of suspected genetic abnormalities, and more recently in the discovery of novel disease-causing genes. However its full potential has not yet been exploited. Over the past 6 years we have sequenced the exomes from 55 patients, including 37 index cases and 18 additional family members, all of whom were recruited to the UK Genotyping and Phenotyping of Platelets study. All patients had inherited or sustained thrombocytopenia of unknown etiology with platelet counts varying from 11×109/L to 186×109/L. Of the 51 patients phenotypically tested, 37 (73%), had an additional secondary qualitative platelet defect. Using whole exome sequencing analysis we have identified "pathogenic" or "likely pathogenic" variants in 46% (17/37) of our index patients with thrombocytopenia. In addition, we report variants of uncertain significance in 12 index cases, including novel candidate genetic variants in previously unreported genes in four index cases. These results demonstrate that whole exome sequencing is an efficient method for elucidating potential pathogenic genetic variants in inherited thrombocytopenia. Whole exome sequencing also has the added benefit of discovering potentially pathogenic genetic variants for further study in novel genes not previously implicated in inherited thrombocytopenia.

Enrichment of FLI1 and RUNX1 mutations in families with excessive bleeding and platelet dense granule secretion defects.

We analyzed candidate platelet function disorder genes in 13 index cases with a history of excessive bleeding in association with a significant reduction in dense granule secretion and impaired aggregation to a panel of platelet agonists. Five of the index cases also had mild thrombocytopenia. Heterozygous alterations in FLI1 and RUNX1, encoding Friend leukemia integration 1 and RUNT-related transcription factor 1, respectively, which have a fundamental role in megakaryocytopoeisis, were identified in 6 patients, 4 of whom had mild thrombocytopenia. Two FLI1 alterations predicting p.Arg337Trp and p.Tyr343Cys substitutions in the FLI1 DNA-binding domain abolished transcriptional activity of FLI1. A 4-bp deletion in FLI1, and 2 splicing alterations and a nonsense variation in RUNX1, which were predicted to cause haploinsufficiency of either FLI1 or RUNX1, were also identified. Our findings suggest that alterations in FLI1 and RUNX1 may be common in patients with platelet dense granule secretion defects and mild thrombocytopenia.

Blinatumomab for First-Line Treatment of Children and Young Persons With B-ALL.

PURPOSE: We tested whether blinatumomab (Blina) is effective as a toxicity-sparing alternative to first-line intensive chemotherapy in children and young persons (CYP) with B-ALL who were chemotherapy-intolerant or chemotherapy-resistant. METHODS: Data were collected for consecutive CYP (age 1-24 years) with Philadelphia chromosome-positive or Philadelphia chromosome-negative B-ALL who received Blina as first-line therapy. Blina was given as replacement for postremission intensive chemotherapy to patients with chemotherapy intolerance or resistance. Blina responders received further chemotherapy (Blin-CT) or first remission hematopoietic stem-cell transplant (Blin-HSCT) if indicated. Event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) of the Blin-CT group were compared with those of matched controls treated with standard chemotherapy in the UKALL 2003 trial. Events were defined as death, relapse, or secondary cancer. RESULTS: From February 2018 to February 2023, 105 patients were treated, of whom 85 were in the Blin-CT group and 20 were in the Blin-HSCT group. A majority of Blin-CT patients received Blina for chemotherapy intolerance (70 of 85, 82%), and the group had a higher-risk profile than unselected patients with B-ALL. Blina was well tolerated with only one patient having a grade 3/4-related toxicity event, and of the 60 patients who were minimal residual disease-positive pre-Blina, 58 of 60 (97%) responded. At a median follow-up of 22 months, the 2-year outcomes of the 80 matched Blin-CT group patients were similar to those of 192 controls (EFS, 95% [95% CI, 85 to 98] v 90% [95% CI, 65 to 93] and OS, 97% [95% CI, 86 to 99] v 94% [95% CI, 89 to 96]). Of the 20 in the HSCT group, three died because of transplant complications and two relapsed. CONCLUSION: Blina is safe and effective in first-line treatment of chemotherapy-intolerant CYP with ALL.

Bosutinib in Resistant and Intolerant Pediatric Patients With Chronic Phase Chronic Myeloid Leukemia: Results From the Phase I Part of Study ITCC054/COG AAML1921.

PURPOSE: Bosutinib is approved for adults with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML): 400 mg once daily in newly diagnosed (ND); 500 mg once daily in resistant/intolerant (R/I) patients. Bosutinib has a different tolerability profile than other tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and potentially less impact on growth (preclinical data). The primary objective of this first-in-child trial was to determine the recommended phase II dose (RP2D) for pediatric R/I and ND patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In the phase I part of this international, open-label trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04258943), children age 1-18 years with R/I (per European LeukemiaNet 2013) Ph+ CML were enrolled using a 6 + 4 design, testing 300, 350, and 400 mg/m2 once daily with food. The RP2D was the dose resulting in 0/6 or 1/10 dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) during the first cycle and achieving adult target AUC levels for the respective indication. As ND participants were only enrolled in phase II, the ND RP2D was selected based on data from R/I patients. RESULTS: Thirty patients were enrolled; 27 were evaluable for DLT: six at 300 mg/m2, 11 at 350 mg/m2 (one DLT), and 10 at 400 mg/m2 (one DLT). The mean AUCs at 300 mg/m2, 350 mg/m2, and 400 mg/m2 were 2.20 µg h/mL, 2.52 µg h/mL, and 2.66 µg h/mL, respectively. The most common adverse event was diarrhea (93%; ≥grade 3: 11%). Seven patients stopped because of intolerance and eight because of insufficient response. Complete cytogenetic and major molecular response to bosutinib appeared comparable with other published phase I/II trials with second-generation TKIs in children. CONCLUSION: Bosutinib was safe and effective. The pediatric RP2D was 400 mg/m2 once daily (max 600 mg/d) with food in R/I patients and 300 mg/m2 once daily (max 500 mg/d) with food in ND patients, which achieved targeted exposures as per adult experience.

Real world experience of efficacy and safety of rivaroxaban in paediatric venous thromboembolism.

INTRODUCTION: Paediatric clinical practice for treatment of venous thromboembolism (VTE) is based on extrapolation from adult trials with minimal data on anticoagulation efficacy and safety in children. Based on EINSTEIN-Jr clinical trial data, rivaroxaban was approved to treat VTE and prevent its recurrence in children of all ages. AIM: To report the safety and efficacy of rivaroxaban use in paediatric VTE and to present real-world data, specifically about very young children. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective observational study at Birmingham Children's Hospital. Data were collected from patients <16 years old who received rivaroxaban after its licensure in the period between March 2021 and June 2022. RESULTS: Rivaroxaban was used for treatment of acute VTE in 64 patients. Thrombosis was CVC-related in 26 patients, unprovoked in 3, while the rest had one or more risk factors for VTE. Safety and efficacy of rivaroxaban were assessed in 52 patients after excluding patients who were on current rivaroxaban treatment and those who were lost to follow up or stopped rivaroxaban due to intolerance. No bleeding events were reported, and recurrence of thrombosis occurred in only 3.6 %. About 35 % had normalised re-imaging, 40.3 % improved, 9.6 % were unchanged and 11.5 % stopped rivaroxaban without re-imaging. Rivaroxaban was used for secondary VTE prophylaxis in 6 patients in our cohort with no recurrence of thrombosis or bleeding reports. CONCLUSIONS: Our real-world experience confirmed that rivaroxaban was well tolerated, effective and safe. Further real-world data and observational studies are essential to investigate the use of rivaroxaban among different risk groups.