Are hospitals delivering appropriate VTE prevention? The venous thromboembolism study to assess the rate of thromboprophylaxis (VTE start).

The 7th conference of the American College of Chest Physicians (ACCP7) provides recommendations on the type, dose, and duration of thromboprophylaxis in hospitalized patients at risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE), but the extent to which hospitals follow these criteria has not been well studied. Discharge and billing records for patients admitted to any of 16 acute-care hospitals from January 2005 to December 2006 were obtained. Patients 18 years or older who had an inpatient stay >or=2 days and no apparent contraindications for thromboprophylaxis were grouped into the categories of critical care, surgery and medically ill before being assessed for additional VTE risk factors based on the diagnostic criteria outlined in ACCP7. For patients at risk, the recommended type (mechanical or pharmacologic), dose, and duration of thromboprophylaxis was identified based on the guidelines and compared to the regimen actually received, if any. Among the 258,556 hospitalized patients, 68,278 (26.4%) were determined to be at risk of VTE without apparent contraindications for thromboprophylaxis. The proportions of patients who received the appropriate type, dose, and duration of thromboprophylaxis were 10.5, 9.8, and 17.9% for critical care, medical, and surgical patients, respectively. Of those at risk, 36.8% received no thromboprophylaxis and an additional 50.2% received thromboprophylaxis deemed inappropriate for one or more reasons. The implementation of ACCP7 guidelines for type, dosage, and duration of thromboprophylaxis is low in patients at risk of VTE. There is a need for physicians and health systems to improve awareness and implementation of recommended thromboprophylaxis.

Prevalence and treatment of hypertensive patients with multiple concomitant cardiovascular risk factors in The Netherlands and Italy.

The Anglo-Scandinavian Cardiac Outcomes Trial-Lipid-Lowering Arm (ASCOT-LLA) trial demonstrated the benefits of combined antihypertensive/lipid-lowering treatment over antihypertensive treatment alone in hypertensive patients with > or =3 additional cardiovascular (CV) risk factors. We assessed the prevalence and treatment of patients with hypertension and > or =3 additional CV risk factors in The Netherlands and Italy in a retrospective cohort study using the Integrated Primary Care Information (IPCI) database in The Netherlands and the Health Search/Thales Database (HSD) in Italy. Patients aged > or =16 years, with 1 year of valid database history, diagnosed and/or treated for hypertension (>140/90 mmHg) during 2000-2002 were included in the study. The IPCI and HSD populations consisted of approximately 175000 and approximately 325000 patients, respectively. The prevalence of hypertension increased from 20.3 to 22.3% in the IPCI, and from 19.0 to 21.8% in the HSD during 2000-2002. The prevalence of > or =3 concomitant risk factors among hypertensive patients increased from 31.2 and 31.1% in 2000 to 34.2 and 39.3% in 2002 in the IPCI and HSD, respectively. From 2000 to 2002, among hypertensive patients with > or =3 CV risk factors and no prior symptomatic CV disease (CVD) approximately 54-57% in the IPCI and 80-83% in the HSD received antihypertensive treatment. In these patients, the use of combined antihypertensive and lipid-lowering treatment increased from 14.2 to 17.6% in the IPCI and from 15.5 to 17.4% in the HSD from 2000 to 2002. This study shows that primary prevention of CVD in hypertensive patients in The Netherlands and Italy could be improved.

Treatment patterns of hypertension and dyslipidaemia in hypertensive patients at higher and lower risk of cardiovascular disease in primary care in the United Kingdom.

Few studies have investigated the presence of dyslipidaemia in hypertensive individuals. In addition, few data exist on the concurrent treatment of both conditions for the prevention of cardiovascular disease (CVD). This retrospective cohort study examined treatment patterns for hypertension and dyslipidaemia among hypertensive patients in UK primary care. We defined a population of patients aged > or =40 years from the UK General Practice Research Database. Hypertensive individuals with > or =3 additional cardiovascular risk factors (ARFs) were compared with a cohort comprising hypertensive patients with < or =2 ARFs. We analysed the prevalence of risk factors and the prevalence and incidence of treatment for hypertension, dyslipidaemia and for both conditions between January 1997 and December 2001. A total of 117 840 hypertensive patients were identified (23 655 with > or =3 ARFs, 94 185 with < or =2 ARFs) in 1997; in 2001, the number diagnosed as hypertensive was 133 683 (40 248 > or =3 ARFs, 93 435 < or =2 ARFs). The prevalence of antihypertensive treatment in the hypertensive patients with > or =3 ARFs increased during the study. In 2001, approximately one-third of hypertensive patients with > or =3 ARFs were not receiving antihypertensives. Among those patients who received such treatment, the majority received > or =2 separate agents in accordance with current guidelines. Treatment for concurrent hypertension and dyslipidaemia was initiated in <8% of patients with hypertension and > or =3 ARFs in each year. These findings demonstrate the under-recognition/undertreatment of cardiovascular risk factors in UK primary care among patients at risk of CVD.

An economic evaluation of oral compared with intravenous ganciclovir for maintenance treatment of newly diagnosed cytomegalovirus retinitis in AIDS patients.

This prospective, clinical economic study was done to determine the cost impact of oral compared with intravenous (i.v.) ganciclovir for the maintenance treatment of newly diagnosed cytomegalovirus (CMV) retinitis in patients with acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS). Efficacy and safety data were extracted from a trial of oral and i.v. ganciclovir. Medical care utilization and reimbursement data were obtained from the clinical trial, a survey of home care and nursing companies, an 11-member physician panel, and a Medicaid cost database. The primary outcome measures were time to first retinitis progression and associated direct medical care expenditures. Nonmedical costs and quality-of-life benefits were not considered. Based on masked evaluation of retinal photographs, the Kaplan-Meier mean time to first progression was 62 days for i.v. ganciclovir and 57 days for oral ganciclovir (a nonsignificant difference). he expected mean cost of treatment for i.v. ganciclovir was significantly different at $8587.00 compared with $4938.00 for oral treatment. Sensitivity analysis using funduscopically determined mean time to first progression showed similar cost savings. We concluded that oral ganciclovir is a cost-saving alternative to i.v. ganciclovir for the maintenance treatment of AIDS patients with newly diagnosed CMV retinitis. Cost differences are attributable to reduced home care expenditures and lower incidence and costs of treating major adverse events in the oral treatment group.

A utility assessment of oral and intravenous ganciclovir for the maintenance treatment of AIDS-related cytomegalovirus retinitis.

The purpose of this study was to determine the magnitude of the difference in patient preference/utility for intravenous (i.v.) ganciclovir compared with oral ganciclovir for maintenance treatment of cytomegalovirus (CMV) retinitis. We used a cross-sectional, interviewer-administered time trade-off (TTO) exercise with hypothetical health state descriptions, based upon data from clinical trials and the published literature. The study was conducted in a private clinic in Sydney Australia, specialising in the care of people with HIV. A total of 80 individuals with HIV infection who had not developed AIDS were administered the TTO instrument. The main outcome measure was the difference between each respondent's utility score for oral and i.v. ganciclovir maintenance therapy. When the 80 HIV-positive patients were presented with information on drug efficacy, adverse effects and mode of administration, 60 (75%) preferred oral ganciclovir, 4 patients preferred i.v. ganciclovir, and 16 were indifferent. The median utilities were 0.837 (oral ganciclovir) and 0.475 (i.v. ganciclovir). The difference in rankings was statistically significant by Wilcoxon's signed-ranks test (Z = -6.69, p < 0.00005). The median utility scores suggest that, all other things being equal, individuals with HIV infection would prefer an oral formulation of ganciclovir to i.v. administration in the event of CMV retinitis infection.

Home care reimbursement for intravenous ganciclovir therapy.

Variability in reimbursement for home i.v. ganciclovir therapy among three types of payers was investigated. A survey was developed to estimate reimbursement for drug and medical supplies and nursing services associated with preparing i.v. ganciclovir and administering it to persons with cytomegalovirus (CMV)-associated retinitis in the home care setting. The questionnaire was mailed to 45 home health care agencies and 11 nursing agencies. Of the 56 surveys mailed, 26 (46%) were returned and considered usable. Of the 26 respondents, 22 were home health care companies, 4 were nursing agencies, 22 served patients covered by managed care or state assistance that reimbursed on a per diem basis, and 9 did not provide care to fee-for-service patients. The mean total daily reimbursement rate (for ganciclovir, supplies, and nursing services) from managed care per diem plans was $137.69 per patient, compared with $129.18 from fee-for-service plans and $72.68 from state assistance per diem plans. The dissimilarity may have been due to geographic variations in reimbursement and different mechanisms of reimbursement. Providers of home i.v. ganciclovir therapy for persons with CMV retinitis received the highest mean total daily reimbursement from managed care per diem plans, followed by fee-for-service plans and state assistance per diem plans.

Patient persistency with pharmacotherapy in the management of glaucoma.

PURPOSE: To evaluate persistency with monotherapy in the treatment of glaucoma in patients new to pharmacological management. METHODS: This population-based, retrospective cohort study, using managed care administrative claims data, included patients who were 20 years of age and older and who initiated monotherapy with betaxolol, brimonidine, dorzolamide, latanoprost, or timolol between May 1999 and January 2001. Follow-up continued through January 31, 2001, and prescription refill records for all ocular hypotensive medications were extracted for the full 21-month study period. The primary outcome measures were discontinuation and change (switching/adding on) of the index ocular hypotensive medication. Rates of discontinuation and discontinuation/change were compared using Cox regression methods; survival curves were generated. RESULTS: In all, 14,539 patients were prescribed any ocular hypotensive drug during the study period, and 2850 patients met all inclusion criteria. Patients treated with betaxolol, brimonidine, dorzolamide, or timolol were significantly (p < 0.05) more likely to discontinue and to discontinue/change the index therapy than were those treated with latanoprost. Results were confirmed in analyses adjusted for age and sex. CONCLUSIONS: Patients initially treated with latanoprost monotherapy are more persistent than those who begin treatment with beta-blockers, brimonidine, or the carbonic anhydrase inhibitor dorzolamide. Greater persistency with an initial ocular hypotensive therapy may improve health outcomes and reduce long-term costs to patients and health plans by limiting the increased resource use associated with discontinuations or changes in therapy.

Persistency and clinical outcomes associated with latanoprost and beta-blocker monotherapy: evidence from a European retrospective cohort study.

PURPOSE: To evaluate persistency (time on initial therapy) and the clinical impact of latanoprost versus beta-blocker monotherapy in treating glaucoma. METHODS: This observational, multicenter, retrospective medical chart review study conducted in four European countries included patients with primary open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension who began their first glaucoma treatment with latanoprost or a beta-blocker between November 1996 and November 1998. Persistency and glaucoma-related clinical outcomes data were abstracted for the 2 years following treatment initiation. RESULTS: In all, 260 patient charts were analyzed (94 latanoprost, 166 beta-blocker). Patients in the latanoprost group stayed on therapy twice as long as those who received a beta-blocker (p < 0.0001). After adjusting for baseline characteristics, patients receiving a beta-blocker as initial therapy were 3.8 times more likely to change therapy than those initially treated with latanoprost (p < 0.0001). Patients in the latanoprost group also experienced greater mean decreases in intraocular pressure (IOP) than those receiving a beta-blocker (7.4 mmHg versus 4.6 mmHg, respectively; p < 0.0001), and fewer had worsened optic nerve head excavation (1.7% versus 14.2%, respectively; p < 0.05) by the time of their first therapy change or last study visit, whichever came first. CONCLUSIONS: Over a 2-year period, latanoprost was associated with significantly greater persistency and better clinical IOP outcomes compared with beta-blocker therapy.

Bilateral calcifications secondary to synthetic soft tissue augmentation of the cheeks: report of a case.

Although esthetic soft tissue augmentation of the cheeks has been in practice for over a century, calcifications associated with the soft tissue substitutes were rarely reported. A case demonstrating bilateral concentric opacities in the soft tissues of the cheek secondary to cheek augmentation is presented. The opacities were detected accidentally during routine intraoral radiographic examination. This condition initially posed a challenge in radiographic diagnosis in the absence of adequate history and clinical information. In this report we have briefly reviewed different types of implant materials used for soft tissue augmentation. We believe that inflammation of the tissues adjacent to the implant material is possibly responsible for the development of calcifications associated with esthetic soft tissue augmentations.

Radiographic diagnosis of Limbus vertebra on a lateral cephalometric film: report of a case.

Although Limbus vertebra is not an uncommon radiological finding in an adult, it is a rare finding in the child or adolescent. The most common site for the presence of Limbus vertebra is the mid-lumbar region and less commonly occurs in the mid cervical region. It is a defect (tiny unfused apophyseal fragment) in the anterior margin of the vertebral body usually at the superior anterior margin in the lumbar vertebrae and at the anteroinferior margin in the cervical vertebrae. These margins are the sites of epiphyseal centers on vertebrae. A case of Limbus vertebra seen on a routine lateral cephalometric radiograph taken prior to Orthodontic treatment is reported and the literature is reviewed. The Limbus vertebra is thought to result from herniation of the nucleus pulposus through the ring apophysis prior to fusion isolating a small segment of the vertebral rim. This could be mistaken for a fracture, infection or tumor resulting in further invasive diagnostic procedures. It is important to recognize that this represents the sequela of a remote injury in an immature skeleton. A sound knowledge of this anomaly is essential for all clinicians so that appropriate measures can be taken without unduly alarming patients.