A comparison of pregnancy loss between transcervical and transabdominal chorionic villus sampling.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the comparative safety of transcervical and transabdominal chorionic villus sampling (CVS). METHODS: From May 1988 to January 1992, CVS was performed by two operators at 9-12 weeks' gestation in 1048 singleton pregnancies. The sampling method for each patient, transabdominal or transcervical, was chosen primarily based upon placental location; the transabdominal route was used for anterior or fundal location and the transcervical route for posterior placentation. Perinatal outcome was assessed by post-procedure patient telephone contact, mid-gestation ultrasound evaluation, postpartum questionnaire completed by the referring obstetrician, and telephone interview with each patient after delivery. RESULTS: Complete follow-up was available in 1012 cases (97%). Excluding 39 elective abortions, 35 of 973 euploid pregnancies aborted spontaneously. The difference in fetal loss rate between transcervical and transabdominal CVS approached statistical significance (5.2 versus 2.9%; P = .058). Bleeding before CVS (P = .006) and multiple placental aspirations (P = .022) were associated with fetal loss for the entire study group. An interaction between uterine position and sampling method was also indicated; an increased loss rate was associated with transcervical CVS in the presence of uterine retroversion (P = .0017). CONCLUSION: Despite choosing the preferred CVS method for each patient, an increased loss rate may be associated with transcervical sampling in the presence of uterine retroversion.

Congenital malformations subsequent to chorionic villus sampling: outcome analysis of 1048 consecutive procedures.

We wished to identify the types and frequencies of malformations among continuing pregnancies exposed to chorionic villus sampling (CVS) and to determine whether selected procedure-related variables differ between the normal and anomalous cohorts. CVS was performed in 1048 patients between May 1988 and January 1992. Prospective assessment of perinatal outcome was ascertained by (1) physician-patient phone contact within 1 week of sampling, (2) ultrasound evaluation of the fetal anatomy at mid-gestation, (3) a detailed post-partum questionnaire completed by the referring obstetrician, and (4) a telephone interview with each patient after the expected date of confinement. Twenty-seven major malformations were documented among 938 pregnancies (live born, n = 934; electively terminated, n = 4), and included cardiac malformations (5), hypospadias (5), craniosynostosis (2), pyloric stenosis (2), inguinal hernia (2), polydactyly (2), syndactyly, distal extremely hemimelia, anencephaly, hydrocephalus, cleft lip and palate, omphalocele, diaphragmatic hernia, thanatophoric dysplasia, and unilateral cataract. Normal and anomalous cohorts were similar with respect to sampling method (transabdominal/transcervical ratio), mean gestational age at CVS, single-pass success rate, and mean total sample weight. No relationship between any procedure-related variable and the risk of malformation was observed.