Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 66
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
País/Região como assunto
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother ; : e0106424, 2024 Aug 29.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39207153

RESUMO

We evaluated the efficacy of ensitrelvir for the treatment of cough due to coronavirus disease 2019 Omicron variant in medical healthcare workers. A total of 633 patients were registered in this study: 206 patients chose ensitrelvir and 427 patients chose symptomatic treatment. Difference in score changes using the Leicester Cough Questionnaire between groups was 3.17 on day 4, 3.24 on day 7, and 2.46 on day 14. The analysis demonstrated a significant difference at all time points.

2.
BMC Infect Dis ; 24(1): 223, 2024 Feb 20.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38374034

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: In November 2021, the B.1.1.529 (omicron) variant of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) was detected in South Africa and subsequently rapidly spread around the world. Despite the reduced severity of the omicron variants, many patients become severely ill after infection and undergo invasive mechanical ventilation, but there are few reports on their background and prognosis throughout all variant periods. This study aimed to evaluate risk factors affecting patients requiring invasive mechanical ventilation with each variant of COVID-19 pandemic in Japan from nonvariants to omicron variants. METHOD: This retrospective observational study was conducted at the Department of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Kansai Medical University Hospital and Kansai Medical University Medical Center, Osaka, Japan, from March 2020 to March 2023. Eligible patients were those who underwent invasive ventilation for COVID-19 pneumonia. We set the primary endpoint as in-hospital mortality. Multivariable logistic regression analysis adjusted for clinically important variables was performed to evaluate the clinical outcomes. RESULTS: We included 377 patients: 118 in the Nonvariant group, 154 in the Alpha group, 42 in the Delta group, and 63 patients in the Omicron group. Mortality rates for each group were 23.7% for the Nonvariant group, 12.3% for the Alpha group, 7.1% for the Delta group, and 30.5% for the Omicron group. Patient age was significantly associated with increased mortality (adjusted odds ratio [AOR]: 1.097; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.057-0.138, P < 0.001). Immunodeficiency (AOR: 3.388, 95% CI: 1.377-8.333, P = 0.008), initial SOFA score (AOR: 1.190, 95% CI: 1.056-1.341, P = 0.004), dialysis prior to COVID-19 (AOR: 3.695, 95% CI: 1.117-11.663, P = 0.026), and smoking history (AOR: 2.548, 95% CI: 1.153-5.628, P = 0.021) were significantly associated with increased mortality. Differences in variants were not significant factors associated with high mortality. CONCLUSION: We compared the background and prognosis of patients with COVID-19 pneumonia requiring invasive mechanical ventilation between SARS-CoV-2 variants. In these patients, differences in variants did not affect prognosis. Hospital mortality in critically ill COVID-19 patients was significantly higher in the older patients with bacterial coinfection, or patients with immunodeficiency, COPD, and chronic renal failure on dialysis.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Humanos , COVID-19/epidemiologia , COVID-19/terapia , Centros de Atenção Terciária , SARS-CoV-2 , Respiração Artificial , Japão/epidemiologia , Pandemias , Prognóstico , Hospitais Universitários
3.
BMC Infect Dis ; 24(1): 715, 2024 Jul 22.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39039440

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The global impact of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has resulted in significant morbidity and mortality. Immunocompromised patients, particularly those treated for B-cell lymphoma, have shown an increased risk of persistent infection with SARS-CoV-2 and severe outcomes and mortality. Multi-mutational SARS-CoV-2 variants can arise during the course of such persistent cases of COVID-19. No optimal, decisive strategy is currently available for patients with persistent infection that allows clinicians to sustain viral clearance, determine optimal timing to stop treatment, and prevent virus reactivation. We introduced a novel treatment combining antivirals, neutralizing antibodies, and genomic analysis with frequent monitoring of spike-specific antibody and viral load for immunocompromised patients with persistent COVID-19 infection. The aim of this retrospective study was to report and evaluate the efficacy of our novel treatment for immunocompromised B-cell lymphoma patients with persistent COVID-19 infection. METHODS: This retrospective descriptive analysis had no controls. Patients with B-cell lymphoma previously receiving immunotherapy including anti-CD20 antibodies, diagnosed as having COVID-19 infection, and treated in our hospital after January 2022 were included. We selected anti-SARS-CoV-2 monoclonal antibodies according to subvariants. Every 5 days, viral load was tested by RT-PCR, with antivirals continued until viral shedding was confirmed. Primary outcome was virus elimination. Independent predictors of prolonged viral shedding time were determined by multivariate Cox regression. RESULTS: Forty-four patients were included in this study. Thirty-five patients received rituximab, 19 obinutuzumab, and 26 bendamustine. Median treatment duration was 10 (IQR, 10-20) days; 22 patients received combination antiviral therapy. COVID-19 was severe in 16 patients, and critical in 2. All patients survived, with viral shedding confirmed at median 28 (IQR, 19-38) days. Bendamustine use or within 1 year of last treatment for B-cell lymphoma, and multiple treatment lines for B-cell lymphoma significantly prolonged time to viral shedding. CONCLUSIONS: Among 44 consecutive patients treated, anti-SARS-CoV-2 monoclonal antibodies and long-term administration of antiviral drugs, switching, and combination therapy resulted in virus elimination and 100% survival. Bendamustine use, within 1 year of last treatment for B-cell lymphoma, and multiple treatment lines for B-cell lymphoma were the significant independent predictors of prolonged viral shedding time.


Assuntos
Antivirais , COVID-19 , Linfoma de Células B , SARS-CoV-2 , Carga Viral , Eliminação de Partículas Virais , Humanos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Masculino , Feminino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Eliminação de Partículas Virais/efeitos dos fármacos , SARS-CoV-2/imunologia , SARS-CoV-2/efeitos dos fármacos , COVID-19/virologia , COVID-19/imunologia , Antivirais/uso terapêutico , Antivirais/administração & dosagem , Idoso , Linfoma de Células B/tratamento farmacológico , Linfoma de Células B/virologia , Linfoma de Células B/imunologia , Fatores de Risco , Carga Viral/efeitos dos fármacos , Tratamento Farmacológico da COVID-19 , Hospedeiro Imunocomprometido , Adulto , Anticorpos Monoclonais/uso terapêutico , Anticorpos Monoclonais/administração & dosagem , Anticorpos Antivirais/sangue , Anticorpos Antivirais/imunologia , Rituximab/uso terapêutico , Rituximab/administração & dosagem , Anticorpos Neutralizantes/imunologia , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais
4.
J Infect Chemother ; 30(5): 463-466, 2024 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37952841

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: We demonstrated that there was a significant relationship between the severity measured using the A-DROP scoring system and the mortality rate in patients with COVID-19 community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) in the ancestral strain, Alpha variant, and Delta variant. We investigated the usefulness of the A-DROP scoring system in SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant CAP and compared it with severity scores, the Pneumonia Severity Index (PSI) and CURB-65 score. METHODS: We analyzed a total of 547 patients with COVID-19 CAP Omicron variant; 198 cases were the BA.1 subvariant, 127 cases were the BA.2 subvariant, and 222 cases were the BA.5 subvariant, respectively. RESULTS: The mortality rates in patients with COVID-19 CAP among the three Omicron subvariants were identical in each pneumonia severity group. The mortality rate in patients with the Omicron variant was 0 % in patients classified with mild disease, 0.6 % in those with moderate disease, 10.4 % in those with severe disease, and 34.8 % in those with extremely severe disease. The mortality rate in patients with COVID-19 CAP increased depending on the severity classified according to the A-DROP system in each of the Omicron subvariants (Cochran-Armitage trend test; p < 0.001). The values of the area under the curve in Receiver Operating Characteristic analysis for prediction of 30-day mortality was 0.881, 0.879, and 0.863 for A-DROP, PSI, and CURB-65, respectively. There were no significant differences in the predictive ability of each pneumonia severity score. CONCLUSIONS: Our results demonstrated that the A-DROP scoring system is useful for predicting mortality in patients with COVID-19 CAP.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Infecções Comunitárias Adquiridas , Pneumonia , Humanos , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , SARS-CoV-2 , Pneumonia/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções Comunitárias Adquiridas/tratamento farmacológico
5.
BMC Gastroenterol ; 23(1): 43, 2023 Feb 19.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36800938

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: COVID-19 is widely known to induce a variety of extrapulmonary manifestations. Gastrointestinal symptoms have been identified as the most common extra-pulmonary manifestations of COVID-19, with an incidence reported to range from 3 to 61%. Although previous reports have addressed abdominal complications with COVID-19, these have not been adequately elucidated for the omicron variant. The aim of our study was to clarify the diagnosis of concomitant abdominal diseases in patients with mild COVID-19 who presented to hospital with abdominal symptoms during the sixth and seventh waves of the pandemic of the omicron variant in Japan. METHODS: This study was a retrospective, single-center, descriptive study. In total, 2291 consecutive patients with COVID-19 who visited the Department of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Kansai Medical University Medical Center, Osaka, Japan, between January 2022 and September 2022 were potentially eligible for the study. Patients delivered by ambulance or transferred from other hospitals were not included. We collected and described physical examination results, medical history, laboratory data, computed tomography findings and treatments. Data collected included diagnostic characteristics, abdominal symptoms, extra-abdominal symptoms and complicated diagnosis other than that of COVID-19 for abdominal symptoms. RESULTS: Abdominal symptoms were present in 183 patients with COVID-19. The number of patients with each abdominal symptom were as follows: nausea and vomiting (86/183, 47%), abdominal pain (63/183, 34%), diarrhea (61/183, 33%), gastrointestinal bleeding (20/183, 11%) and anorexia (6/183, 3.3%). Of these patients, 17 were diagnosed as having acute hemorrhagic colitis, five had drug-induced adverse events, two had retroperitoneal hemorrhage, two had appendicitis, two had choledocholithiasis, two had constipation, and two had anuresis, among others. The localization of acute hemorrhagic colitis was the left-sided colon in all cases. CONCLUSIONS: Our study showed that acute hemorrhagic colitis was characteristic in mild cases of the omicron variant of COVID-19 with gastrointestinal bleeding. When examining patients with mild COVID-19 with gastrointestinal bleeding, the potential for acute hemorrhagic colitis should be kept in mind.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Colite , Gastroenteropatias , Humanos , COVID-19/complicações , SARS-CoV-2 , Estudos Retrospectivos , Japão/epidemiologia , Gastroenteropatias/diagnóstico , Gastroenteropatias/epidemiologia , Gastroenteropatias/etiologia , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/complicações , Colite/complicações , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência
6.
BMC Infect Dis ; 23(1): 780, 2023 Nov 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37946111

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The efficacy of antiviral drugs that neutralize antibody drugs and fight against SARS-COV-2 is reported to be attenuated by genetic mutations of the virus in vitro. When B-cell immunocompromised patients are infected with SARS-COV-2, the infection can be prolonged, and genetic mutations can occur during the course of treatment. Therefore, for refractory patients with persistent COVID-19 infection, genomic analysis was performed to obtain data on drug resistance mutations as a reference to determine which antiviral drugs and antibody therapies might be effective in their treatment. METHODS: This was a descriptive analysis with no controls. Patients were diagnosed as having COVID-19, examined, and treated in the Kansai Medical University General Medical Center between January 2022 and January 2023. The subjects of the study were B-cell immunocompromised patients in whom genome analysis of SARS-CoV-2 was performed. RESULTS: During the study period, 984 patients with COVID-19 were treated at our hospital. Of those, 17 refractory cases underwent genomic analysis. All 17 patients had factors related to immunodeficiency, such as malignant lymphoma or post-organ transplantation. Eleven patients started initial treatment for COVID-19 at our hospital, developed persistent infection, and underwent genomic analysis. Six patients who were initially treated for COVID-19 at other hospitals became persistently infected and were transferred to our hospital. Before COVID-19 treatment, genomic analysis showed no intrahost mutations in the NSP5, the NSP12, and the RBD regions. After COVID-19 treatment, mutations in these regions were found in 12 of 17 cases (71%). Sixteen patients survived the quarantine, but one died of sepsis. CONCLUSIONS: In genomic analysis, more mutations were found to be drug-resistant after COVID-19 treatment than before COVID-19 treatment. Although it was not possible to demonstrate the usefulness of genome analysis for clinical application, the change of the treatment drug with reference to drug resistance indicated by genomic analysis may lead to good outcome of immunocompromised COVID-19 patients.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Humanos , SARS-CoV-2/genética , Tratamento Farmacológico da COVID-19 , Genômica , Hospedeiro Imunocomprometido , Antivirais/uso terapêutico , Mutação
7.
J Infect Chemother ; 29(9): 863-868, 2023 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37207957

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: The Japanese Respiratory Society (JRS) atypical pneumonia score is a useful tool for the rapid presumptive diagnosis of atypical pneumonia. We investigated the clinical features of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) due to Chlamydia psittaci and validated the JRS atypical pneumonia score in patients with C. psittaci CAP. METHODS: This study was conducted at 30 institutions and assessed a total of 72 sporadic cases with C. psittaci CAP, 412 cases with Mycoplasma pneumoniae CAP, and 576 cases with Streptococcus pneumoniae CAP. RESULTS: Sixty-two of 72 patients with C. psittaci CAP had a history of avian exposure. Among the six parameters of the JRS score, matching rates of four parameters were significantly lower in the C. psittaci CAP than the M. pneumoniae CAP in the following parameters: age <60 years, no or minor comorbid illness, stubborn or paroxysmal cough, and absence of chest adventitious sounds. The sensitivity of the diagnosis of atypical pneumonia in patients with C. psittaci CAP was significantly lower than the M. pneumoniae CAP (65.3% and 87.4%, p < 0.0001). When the diagnostic sensitivity was analyzed for different ages, the diagnostic sensitivities for the C. psittaci CAP were 90.5% for non-elderly patients and 30.0% for elderly patients. CONCLUSIONS: The JRS atypical pneumonia score is a useful tool for distinguishing between C. psittaci CAP and bacterial CAP in patients aged <60 years, but not in patients aged ≥60 years. A history of avian exposure in middle-aged patients with normal white blood cell count may be suggestive of C. psittaci pneumonia.


Assuntos
Chlamydophila psittaci , Infecções Comunitárias Adquiridas , Influenza Humana , Doenças Pulmonares Intersticiais , Pneumonia Bacteriana , Pneumonia por Mycoplasma , Pneumonia , Idoso , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Humanos , Pneumonia Bacteriana/diagnóstico , Pneumonia Bacteriana/microbiologia , Pneumonia por Mycoplasma/diagnóstico , Pneumonia/diagnóstico , Mycoplasma pneumoniae , Bactérias , Infecções Comunitárias Adquiridas/diagnóstico , Infecções Comunitárias Adquiridas/microbiologia
8.
J Infect Chemother ; 29(5): 437-442, 2023 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36567049

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: The Japanese Respiratory Society (JRS) pneumonia guidelines recommend simple predictive rules, the A-DROP scoring system, for assessment of the severity of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) and nursing and healthcare-associated pneumonia (NHCAP). We evaluated whether the A-DROP system can be adapted for assessment of the severity of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pneumonia. METHODS: Data from 1141 patients with COVID-19 pneumonia were analyzed, comprising 502 patients observed in the 1st to 3rd wave period, 338 patients in the 4th wave and 301 patients in the 5th wave in Japan. RESULTS: The mortality rate and mechanical ventilation rate were 0% and 1.4% in patients classified with mild disease (A-DROP score, 0 point), 3.2% and 46.7% in those with moderate disease (1 or 2 points), 20.8% and 78.3% with severe disease (3 points), and 55.0% and 100% with extremely severe disease (4 or 5 points), indicating an increase in the mortality and mechanical ventilation rates in accordance with severity (Cochran-Armitage trend test; p = <0.001). This significant relationship between the severity in the A-DROP scoring system and either the mortality rate or mechanical ventilation rate was observed in patients with COVID-19 CAP and NHCAP. In each of the five COVID-19 waves, the same significant relationship was observed. CONCLUSIONS: The mortality rate and mechanical ventilation rate in patients with COVID-19 pneumonia increased depending on severity classified according to the A-DROP scoring system. Our results suggest that the A-DROP scoring system can be adapted for the assessment of severity of COVID-19 CAP and NHCAP.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Infecções Comunitárias Adquiridas , Infecção Hospitalar , Pneumonia Associada a Assistência à Saúde , Pneumonia , Humanos , Infecção Hospitalar/tratamento farmacológico , Pneumonia/diagnóstico , Infecções Comunitárias Adquiridas/tratamento farmacológico , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Estudos Retrospectivos
9.
J Infect Chemother ; 28(9): 1344-1346, 2022 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35637130

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Casirivimab-imdevimab, an antibody cocktail containing two severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 neutralizing antibodies, reduces the viral load and the risk of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)-related hospitalization or death. The objective of this study was to evaluate the clinical efficacy of casirivimab-imdevimab in patients with COVID-19 Delta variant in Japan. METHODS: This study was conducted at five institutions and assessed a total of 461 patients with COVID-19 who met the inclusion criteria. The treatment group received a dose of casirivimab-imdevimab consisting of a cocktail of two monoclonal antibodies, (casirivimab 600 mg and imdevimab 600 mg intravenously). The control consisted of age- and sex-matched COVID-19 patients (n = 461) who sufficed the inclusion criteria but did not receive casirivimab-imdevimab. The outcome was the requirement of oxygen therapy. RESULTS: In the treatment group, patients received oxygen therapy (n = 30), nasal canula (n = 23), high flow nasal cannula (n = 5), and mechanical ventilation (n = 2). In the control group, patients received oxygen therapy (n = 56), nasal canula (n = 45), high flow nasal cannula (n = 8), and mechanical ventilation (n = 3). The administration of oxygen therapy was significantly lower in the treatment group than the control group (6.5% vs. 12.1%, P = 0.0044). All these patients admitted to our hospitals and received additional therapy and recovered. CONCLUSIONS: Our results demonstrate that the casirivimab-imdevimab combination antibody treatment is associated with reduced rates of requiring oxygen therapy among high-risk patients with COVID-19 Delta variant.


Assuntos
Tratamento Farmacológico da COVID-19 , Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados , Humanos , Oxigênio , SARS-CoV-2 , Resultado do Tratamento
10.
J Infect Chemother ; 28(7): 902-906, 2022 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35317976

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: The objective of this study was to clarify the clinical differences between nursing and healthcare-associated pneumonia (NHCAP) and community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) due to COVID-19. We also investigated the clinical characteristics to determine whether there is a difference between the variant and non-variant strain in patients with NHCAP due to COVID-19. In addition, we analyzed the clinical outcomes in NHCAP patients with mental disorders who were hospitalized in a medical institution for treatment of mental illness. METHODS: This study was conducted at five institutions and assessed a total of 836 patients with COVID-19 pneumonia (154 cases were classified as NHCAP and 335 had lineage B.1.1.7.). RESULTS: No differences in patient background, clinical findings, disease severity, or outcomes were observed in patients with NHCAP between the non-B.1.1.7 group and B.1.1.7 group. The median age, frequency of comorbid illness, rates of intensive care unit stay, and mortality rate were significantly higher in patients with NHCAP than in those with CAP. Among the patients with NHCAP, the mortality rate was highest at 37.5% in patients with recent cancer treatment, followed by elderly or disabled patients receiving nursing care (24.3%), residents of care facilities (23.0%), patients receiving dialysis (13.6%), and patients in mental hospitals (9.4%). CONCLUSIONS: Our results demonstrated that there were many differences in the clinical characteristics between NHCAP patients and CAP patients due to COVID-19. It is necessary to consider the prevention and treatment content depending on the presence or absence of applicable criteria for NHCAP.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Infecções Comunitárias Adquiridas , Infecção Hospitalar , Pneumonia Associada a Assistência à Saúde , Pneumonia , Idoso , Infecções Comunitárias Adquiridas/tratamento farmacológico , Infecção Hospitalar/tratamento farmacológico , Humanos , SARS-CoV-2
11.
J Infect Chemother ; 28(5): 718-721, 2022 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35190258

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: The Japanese Respiratory Society (JRS) scoring system is a useful tool for identifying Mycoplasma pneumoniae pneumonia. Most COVID-19 pneumonia in non-elderly patients (aged <60 years) are classified as atypical pneumonia using the JRS scoring system. We evaluated whether physicians could distinguish between COVID-19 pneumonia and M. pneumoniae pneumonia using chest computed tomography (CT) findings. In addition, we investigated chest CT findings if there is a difference between the variant and non-variant strain. METHODS: This study was conducted at five institutions and assessed a total of 823 patients with COVID-19 pneumonia (335 had lineage B.1.1.7.) and 100 patients with M. pneumoniae pneumonia. RESULTS: In COVID-19 pneumonia, at the first CT examination, peripheral, bilateral ground-glass opacity (GGO) with or without consolidation or crazy-paving pattern was observed frequently. GGO frequently had a round morphology (39.2%). No differences were observed in the radiological findings between the non-B.1.1.7 groups and B.1.1.7 groups. The frequency of pleural effusion, lymphadenopathy, bronchial wall thickening and nodules (tree-in-bud and centrilobular) was low. In contrast to COVID-19 pneumonia, bronchial wall thickening (84%) was observed most frequently, followed by nodules (81%) in M. pneumoniae pneumonia. These findings were significantly higher in M. pneumoniae pneumonia than COVID-19 pneumonia. CONCLUSIONS: Our results demonstrated that a combination of the JRS scoring system and chest CT findings is useful for the rapid presumptive diagnosis of COVID-19 pneumonia in patients aged <60 years. However, this clinical and radiographic diagnosis is not adapted to elderly people.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Influenza Humana , Idoso , COVID-19/diagnóstico por imagem , Humanos , Pulmão/diagnóstico por imagem , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , SARS-CoV-2 , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X/métodos
12.
J Infect Chemother ; 28(10): 1375-1379, 2022 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35718262

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: The Japanese Respiratory Society (JRS) scoring system is a useful tool for the rapid presumptive diagnosis of atypical pneumonia in non-elderly (aged <60 years) patients. As SARS-CoV-2 vaccination progresses, COVID-19 in elderly people has markedly reduced. We investigated changes in diagnostic usefulness of the JRS scoring system in COVID-19 pneumonia between the Delta variant group (vaccination period) and non-Delta variant group (before the vaccination period). METHODS: This study was conducted at five institutions and assessed a total of 1121 patients with COVID-19 pneumonia (298 had the Delta variant). During the vaccination period, the Delta variant has spread and replaced the Alfa variant. We evaluated the vaccination period as the Delta variant group. RESULTS: Among the six parameters of the JRS scoring system, matching rates of two parameters were higher in the Delta variant group than the non-Delta variant group (pre-vaccination period): age <60 years (77.5% vs 42.2%, P < 0.0001) and no or minor comorbid illness (69.1% vs 57.8%, p = 0.0007). The sensitivity of the diagnosis of atypical pneumonia in patients with COVID-19 pneumonia was significantly higher in the Delta variant group compared with the non-Delta variant group (80.2% vs 58.3%, p < 0.0001). When the diagnostic sensitivity was analyzed for different ages, the diagnostic sensitivities for the Delta variant and non-Delta variant groups were 92.6% and 95.5% for non-elderly patients and 39.1% and 32.5% for elderly patients, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Our results demonstrated that the JRS scoring system is a useful tool for distinguishing between COVID-19 pneumonia and bacterial pneumonia in the COVID-19 vaccination period, but not before the vaccination period.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Infecções Comunitárias Adquiridas , Pneumonia por Mycoplasma , Idoso , COVID-19/diagnóstico , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , Teste para COVID-19 , Vacinas contra COVID-19 , Infecções Comunitárias Adquiridas/microbiologia , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Pneumonia por Mycoplasma/diagnóstico , SARS-CoV-2 , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Vacinação
13.
BMC Surg ; 21(1): 219, 2021 Apr 27.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33906660

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: A novel trauma workflow system called the hybrid emergency room (Hybrid ER), which combines a sliding CT scanner system with interventional radiology features (IVR-CT), was initially instituted in our emergency department in 2011. Use of the Hybrid ER enables CT diagnosis and emergency therapeutic interventions without transferring the patient to another room. We describe an illustrative case of severe multiple blunt trauma that included injuries to the brain and torso to highlight the ability to perform multiple procedures in the Hybrid ER. CASE PRESENTATION: A 46-year-old man sustained multiple injuries after falling from height. An early CT scan performed in the Hybrid ER revealed grade IIIa thoracic aortic injury, left lung contusion, and right subdural haematoma and subarachnoid haemorrhage. Without relocating the patient, all definitive procedures, including trepanation, total pneumonectomy, and thoracic endovascular aneurysm repair were performed in the Hybrid ER. At 5.72 h after definitive surgery was begun, the patient was transferred to the intensive care unit. CONCLUSIONS: The Hybrid ER has the potential to facilitate the performance of multiple definitive procedures in combination to treat severe multiple blunt trauma including injuries to the brain and torso. Emergency departments with more than one resuscitation room would benefit from a Hybrid ER to treat complex emergency cases.


Assuntos
Aneurisma da Aorta Abdominal , Implante de Prótese Vascular , Procedimentos Endovasculares , Ferimentos não Penetrantes , Encéfalo , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Ferimentos não Penetrantes/diagnóstico por imagem , Ferimentos não Penetrantes/cirurgia
14.
Am J Emerg Med ; 38(7): 1540.e5-1540.e8, 2020 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32197716

RESUMO

Capnocytophaga canimorsus, commonly transmitted by dog bites, can cause severe sepsis, and the mortality rate is very high. We experienced a case of hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH) complicated by severe sepsis caused by C. canimorsus. A 58-year-old man with no remarkable medical history was admitted to another hospital with fever and mild consciousness disorder developed 3 days after being bitten by his dog. The next day, the patient developed disseminated intravascular coagulation and shock and was transferred to our emergency medical center. Blood tests showed hyperferritinemia and cytopenia, and bone marrow aspiration was performed. As a result, we diagnosed severe sepsis and HLH. Once antibiotic and steroid therapy was started, the patient's infection and cytopenia improved. Unfortunately, the patient's fingers and toes required amputation, but his life was saved, and he was discharged from hospital. Because HLH may be hidden in such cases, it may be necessary to measure serum ferritin and perform bone marrow aspiration if hyperferritinemia is suspected.


Assuntos
Capnocytophaga , Infecções por Bactérias Gram-Negativas/complicações , Linfo-Histiocitose Hemofagocítica/microbiologia , Sepse/microbiologia , Amputação Cirúrgica , Animais , Mordeduras e Picadas/complicações , Coagulação Intravascular Disseminada/etiologia , Cães , Ferritinas/sangue , Pé/patologia , Pé/cirurgia , Infecções por Bactérias Gram-Negativas/diagnóstico , Mãos/patologia , Mãos/cirurgia , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Necrose/etiologia , Necrose/cirurgia
15.
Ann Surg ; 269(2): 370-376, 2019 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28953551

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of a novel trauma workflow, using an interventional radiology (IVR)-computed tomography (CT) system in severe trauma. BACKGROUND: In August 2011, we installed an IVR-CT system in our trauma resuscitation room. We named it the Hybrid emergency room (ER), as it enabled us to perform all examinations and treatments required for trauma in a single place. METHODS: This retrospective historical control study conducted in Japan included consecutive severe (injury severity score ≥16) blunt trauma patients. Patients were divided into 2 groups: Conventional (from August 2007 to July 2011) or Hybrid ER (from August 2011 to July 2015). We set the primary endpoint as 28-day mortality. The secondary endpoints included cause of death and time course from arrival to start of CT and surgery. Multivariable logistic regression analysis adjusted for clinically important variables was performed to evaluate the clinical outcomes. RESULTS: We included 696 patients: 360 in the Conventional group and 336 in the Hybrid ER group. The Hybrid ER group was significantly associated with decreased mortality [adjusted odds ratio (OR), 0.50 (95% confidence interval, 95% CI, 0.29-0.85); P = 0.011] and reduced deaths from exsanguination [0.17 (0.06-0.47); P = 0.001]. The time to CT initiation [Conventional 26 (21 to 32) minutes vs Hybrid ER 11 (8 to 16) minutes; P < 0.0001] and emergency procedure [68 (51 to 85) minutes vs 47 (37 to 57) minutes; P < 0.0001] were both shorter in the Hybrid ER group. CONCLUSION: This novel trauma workflow, comprising immediate CT diagnosis and rapid bleeding control without patient transfer, as realized in the Hybrid ER, may improve mortality in severe trauma.


Assuntos
Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X , Imagem Corporal Total , Ferimentos e Lesões/diagnóstico por imagem , Ferimentos e Lesões/cirurgia , Adulto , Estudos de Coortes , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência , Feminino , Estudo Historicamente Controlado , Humanos , Escala de Gravidade do Ferimento , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Radiografia Intervencionista , Estudos Retrospectivos , Taxa de Sobrevida , Fatores de Tempo , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X/métodos , Fluxo de Trabalho , Ferimentos e Lesões/mortalidade
16.
Gan To Kagaku Ryoho ; 46(1): 157-159, 2019 Jan.
Artigo em Japonês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30765673

RESUMO

A70 -year-old man with a diagnosis of panperitonitis caused by colon perforation due to invasion of gallbladder cancer was transferred to our hospital. The next day, an emergency operation was performed. During laparotomy, the ascending colon was perforated; therefore, ileocecal resection was performed. Six hours after the operation, the stoma became ischemic with marked abdominal distention. The intra-abdominal pressure increased to 28 mmHg, and the patient was diagnosed as having abdominal compartment syndrome(ACS). He immediately underwent decompressive laparotomy at bedside. Multiple organ failure was avoided and he recovered, but he died of advanced gallbladder cancer 4 months after the surgery. This case suggests that immediate surgical decompressive laparotomy for ACS can prevent multiple organ failure.


Assuntos
Neoplasias da Vesícula Biliar , Perfuração Intestinal , Hipertensão Intra-Abdominal , Peritonite , Idoso , Neoplasias da Vesícula Biliar/complicações , Humanos , Perfuração Intestinal/etiologia , Hipertensão Intra-Abdominal/etiologia , Laparotomia/efeitos adversos , Masculino , Peritonite/etiologia
19.
Chudoku Kenkyu ; 29(4): 360-362, 2016 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês, Japonês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30461233

RESUMO

The 42-year-old woman who had been taking 300 mg phenytoin and 2,000 mg levetiracetam daily took 28.6 g of phenytoin and was transferred to our critical care center. The blood phenytoin concentration was 67.9 µg/mL on admission and decreased to 53.4 µg/mL on hospital day 2. Tonic seizures occurred several times on hospital day 2; thus, we resumed levetiracetam via a nasogastric tube. Thereafter, no further seizures were observed. We thought the seizure to have been caused by temporary withdrawal of levetiracetam because it did not occur on the day when the blood phenytoin concentration peaked and stopped altogether after resumption of levetiracetam. We considered that to treat the convulsion attack resulting from an overdose of the other antiepileptic drug with a different action mechanism, it was necessary to promptly restart the administration of the antiepileptic drug, which the patient was usually administered.


Assuntos
Anticonvulsivantes/intoxicação , Overdose de Drogas , Fenitoína/intoxicação , Convulsões/induzido quimicamente , Doença Aguda , Adulto , Combinação de Medicamentos , Feminino , Humanos , Levetiracetam/uso terapêutico
20.
J Med Microbiol ; 73(8)2024 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39207830

RESUMO

Introduction. Nursing and healthcare-associated pneumonia (NHCAP) mainly occurs in older people whose physical functions have declined, and it is the most common type of pneumonia in Japan, a super-ageing society. In older people who meet NHCAP criteria, respiratory tract infections are often accompanied by aspiration pneumonia.Gap statement. The SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant frequently causes aspiration pneumonia and has induced a decline in physical function.Aim. To clarify functional outcomes at 1 year after hospital discharge in SARS-CoV-2 Omicron-related NHCAP cases.Methodology. We compared the functional outcomes between 259 patients with primary SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia and 223 patients with aspiration pneumonia.Results. Functional decline rates for calculating the Barthel index at the time of hospital discharge were higher in the aspiration pneumonia group than the primary SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia group [114 patients (51.6%) vs 70 patients (27.0%), P<0.0001]. Of 114 patients with aspiration pneumonia who had a decline in physical function at the time of hospital discharge, 91 (79.8%) still showed functional decline 1 year later. In contrast, 9.3% of patients had functional decline at 1 year after hospital discharge in the primary SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia group, which was significantly lower than in the aspiration pneumonia group.Conclusions. The Omicron variant showed decreased infectivity in the lungs and was less pathogenic compared with the Delta and former variants. However, physicians should recommend SARS-CoV-2 vaccination and non-pharmaceutical interventions, depending on the presence or absence of applicable criteria for NHCAP, even when the predominant strain is the Omicron variant.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Pneumonia Aspirativa , SARS-CoV-2 , Humanos , COVID-19/epidemiologia , COVID-19/complicações , Japão/epidemiologia , Masculino , Feminino , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Pneumonia Aspirativa/epidemiologia , Pneumonia Aspirativa/virologia , Pneumonia Aspirativa/etiologia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA