Needs and readiness to use tele-practice for identification and rehabilitation of children with hearing and speech-language disorders: perceptions of public sector care providers in South India.

The current study was a first step towards planning the implementation of tele-practice in a South Indian state's public-sector services for childhood hearing and speech, language disorders. The aim was to understand the perceptions of public-sector health care providers (HCPs) regarding their need and readiness to accept and implement tele-practice-based diagnostics and rehabilitation services. A cross-sectional study design was used, which included focus group discussions (FGDs), semi-structured interviews (SSIs) and geo-spatial analysis. Participants in the qualitative component included various cadres of health HCPs in public-sector services. Theoretical saturation and cross-case variance were used to assess the data's sufficiency. A hybrid deductive-inductive thematic analytical approach was used to analyse the data. Geo-tags and geo-locations of addresses of all children with disabilities and all the public-sector service providers were used to generate geospatial maps. The HCPs considered the currently available services for childhood hearing and speech-language disorders to be insufficient and reported shortage of professionals to meet current demands. There was inconsistent availability of suitable equipment and professionals in the existing district-level facilities. HCPs were comfortable using technology, and were willing to investigate tele-practice, but they required training in tele-practice [Q2].

Parents' perceptions of tele-audiological testing in a rural hearing screening program in South India.

INTRODUCTION: Tele-diagnostic audiological testing in a hearing screening program for infants and young children is a novel practice, and this study is the first to explore its application in a rural community. It is important to understand parental perceptions and confidence when introducing a new process such as tele-audiological diagnostic testing in rural areas. METHOD: A questionnaire with 17 rater-administered items was designed to elicit comments concerning the quality of tele-hearing testing and video-conferencing, access to tele-hearing testing, and parents' attitudes regarding tele-hearing testing in the village. The questionnaire was administered by an audiologist not involved in tele-diagnostic testing to avoid bias. RESULTS: Parents perceived tele-hearing testing as equal in quality to in-person testing. Technical factors such as good video-conferencing quality and logistical factors such as ease of access due to reasonable travel time to testing facility could have influenced these perceptions. CONCLUSIONS: While these results show tele-hearing testing is an acceptable alternative, occasional poor signal quality should be addressed prior to large-scale implementation.