[Evaluation of interventions intended to reduce psychosocial work stress. Proposal for a classification scheme]. / Evaluation von Maßnahmen zur Verringerung psychosozialer Arbeitsbelastungen. Vorschlag eines Kategorisierungs- und Punkteschemas.

Evidence for the effectiveness of measures aiming to reduce psychosocial work stress is sporadic. This is contradictory to the requirement identified by the German Social Security Code (SGB VII) that interventions constitute the most important method of maintaining and improving employees' health. Reasons for this can be seen in the complexity of the subject and methodological issues concerning scientific standards. In addition, agreed quality standards are nonexistent for the evaluation of intervention measures. For this reason, a synopsis of existing audit and evaluation schemes was performed, thus, resulting in refined and adapted quality standards for intervention measures aiming to reduce psychosocial work stress. The quality criteria presented in this paper comprise aims, effectiveness, and facilitators, each being composed of several indicators. The criteria are designed as quality indicators which translate the outcome of an evaluation into quality figures. The process is transparent and offers a rational basis for communication, planning, and decision-making in health promotion.

Loss events preceding endogenous and neurotic depressions.

Ninety unipolar endogenous depressives and 38 neurotic depressives with distinct depressive episodes were questioned concerning deaths of parents, siblings, children or partners, and separation from children (leaving the parental home) or from important partners. The age of the patients at the time of the event was compared with their age during the depressive episodes. The results indicate that significantly more neurotic depressives than endogenous depressives had experienced the loss of a close person in the year before a depression. When the loss experiences were divided up, however, it became clear that the difference was due only to separations, and in particular to separations from an important partner.

[The Indicators of Rehab Status questionnaire version 3 (IRES-3) in 1818 rehabilitees with musculoskeletal Diseases]. / Der IRES-Fragebogen Version 3 (IRES-3) bei 1818 Rehabilitanden mit muskuloskelettalen Erkrankungen.

OBJECTIVES: The revised version 3 of the questionnaire "Indicators of Reha Status" (IRES-3) was recently tested and introduced to the scientific community. The IRES-3 differs considerably from the previous version. It now comprises 16 multi-item scales that are combined to 6 dimensions and 3 single items that are combined to a 7th dimension. The aim of the study was to receive a further impression of the psychometric properties of the IRES-3 in a clinical population. METHODS: 1818 patients with musculoskeletal diseases from 10 rehabilitation hospitals completed the questionnaire at admission and at discharge. In addition to descriptive statistics (scale properties, internal consistency, sensitivity to change) logistic regression models were used to analyse the characteristics of patients in comparison to a random sample drawn from the general population. RESULTS: From a psychometric point of view the scale properties are sound. The internal consistency of the multi-item scales ranges from Cronbach's alpha = 0.77 to 0.93. The sensitivity to change ranges from SRM = 0.03 to 1.00. All scales of the IRES-3 are able to discriminate between the clinical and the general population. In all scales the clinical population demonstrated a higher level of burden than the general population. CONCLUSIONS: In our clinical population we were able to reproduce the measurement properties as reported by the authors of the IRES-3. The scales of the IRES-3 demonstrate good internal consistency and respond to change. A high discriminative validity of the instrument could be demonstrated. To further test the instrument the formation of dimensions by the authors of the IRES-3 has to be awaited.

Meaningful improvement criteria sets in a rheumatoid arthritis clinical trial. MIRA Trial Group. Minocycline in Rheumatoid Arthritis.

OBJECTIVE: To compare 3 sets of criteria for meaningful improvement in a rheumatoid arthritis (RA) clinical trial, and to evaluate the implications of these criteria sets for RA trial design. METHODS: Data were obtained from the Minocycline in Rheumatoid Arthritis (MIRA) trial (primary outcome measures: 50% improvement in joint tenderness and 50% improvement in joint swelling, based on joint scores). These MIRA data were evaluated against 1) the Paulus criteria (20% improvement in 4 of 6 measures: joint tenderness scores, joint swelling scores, physician's and patient's global assessments, erythrocyte sedimentation rate [ESR], and morning stiffness); and 2) the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria (20% improvement in joint tenderness and joint swelling counts, and in 3 of 5 other measures: physician's and patient's global assessments, ESR, modified Health Assessment Questionnaire, and patient's pain assessment). The ACR criteria were modified using 3 of 4 remaining measures, since baseline pain assessment data were not available. RESULTS: Percentages of minocycline-treated patients versus placebo-treated patients showing meaningful improvement were as follows: by MIRA criteria, for joint tenderness, 56% versus 41% (P = 0.021), and for joint swelling, 54% versus 39% (P = 0.023); by Paulus criteria, 41% versus 28% (P = 0.040); and by ACR criteria, 44% versus 26% (P = 0.004). Both the modified ACR criteria and the Paulus criteria demonstrated a reduced placebo response rate. Compared with the MIRA criteria, the ACR criteria increased, and the Paulus criteria decreased, absolute between-group differences in improvement; however, both criteria sets increased relative percentages of patients showing improvement in the minocycline group versus the placebo group. Study design considerations indicated that application of the ACR criteria would reduce the required sample size. CONCLUSION: Different placebo response rates and treatment group differences were found using the 3 RA improvement criteria sets. These findings support the use of the ACR criteria for defining improvement in RA clinical trials.

A cross sectional assessment of health status instruments in patients with rheumatoid arthritis participating in a clinical trial. Minocycline in Rheumatoid Arthritis Trial Group.

OBJECTIVE: To (1) validate the Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) as a generic functional health status measure in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA); and (2) assess correlations between the SF-36 and other outcome measures used in the Minocycline in Rheumatoid Arthritis (MIRA) Trial. METHODS: We conducted a cross sectional analysis of the final visit outcome measures from the 48 week, multicenter, placebo controlled, double blind MIRA trial. Multitrait scaling analyses assessed convergent and discriminant validity and internal consistency reliability of the SF-36 in the study patients. Responses to comparable items on the SF-36 and modified Health Assessment Questionnaire (M-HAQ) regarding physical functioning were compared and questions from both instruments were also compared to other RA outcome measures. RESULTS: In patients with RA, the SF-36 had high internal consistency and reliability, high discriminant and high convergent validity. Moderate correlations were observed (r = -0.46 to -0.61, p < 0.01 in each case) for comparable items on the SF-36 and M-HAQ regarding dressing, walking, and bending. Joint tenderness score correlations with items on the M-HAQ and SF-36, and joint tenderness score correlations with the SF-36 scales were higher than for joint swelling scores. Physician and patient global assessments were most highly correlated (r = 0.58 and 0.66; p < 0.01, respectively) with the SF-36 bodily pain item. CONCLUSION: The SF-36 is a valid instrument for this RA population. The SF-36 correlates with the M-HAQ and the physician and patient global assessments. The usefulness of the SF-36 in measuring change in RA clinical trials requires testing in longitudinal studies.

Comparison of naproxen and acetaminophen in a two-year study of treatment of osteoarthritis of the knee.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the relative safety and efficacy of naproxen and acetaminophen in the treatment of osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee. The major outcome measures were radiographic progression and withdrawal from the trial due to lack of efficacy. METHODS: One hundred seventy-eight patients with OA of the knee were enrolled in a 2-year prospective, controlled, double-blind multicenter trial and were randomly assigned to receive acetaminophen (ACT) or naproxen (NPX) treatment. RESULTS: After 6 weeks of treatment, modest improvement in pain on motion and in physician's global assessment was seen in both the ACT and the NPX groups, and the NPX group also had modest improvement in pain at rest and in 50-foot walk time. Sixty-two patients completed the 2-year study. Among these patients, radiographic progression was similar in the 2 treatment groups. Withdrawal from the trial due to lack of drug efficacy was slightly more frequent among patients in the ACT group (22% versus 16%), but withdrawal due to adverse drug effects was slightly more common in the NPX group (23% versus 18%). CONCLUSION: The efficacy of ACT treatment and NPX treatment was similar, although it was slightly better for NPX. The toxicity rate was slightly lower with ACT. However, the high rate of withdrawal in both treatment groups suggests that neither is satisfactory for the treatment of OA.

Minocycline in rheumatoid arthritis. A 48-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. MIRA Trial Group.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the safety and efficacy of minocycline in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. DESIGN: A double-blind, randomized, multicenter, 48-week trial of oral minocycline (200 mg/d) or placebo. SETTING: 6 clinical centers in the United States. PATIENTS: 219 adults with active rheumatoid arthritis who had previous limited treatment with disease-modifying drugs. MEASUREMENTS: As the primary outcomes, 60 diarthrodial joints were examined for tenderness, and 58 joints were examined for swelling (hips excluded). Grip strength, evaluator's global assessment, morning stiffness, Modified Health Assessment Questionnaire, patient's global assessment, hematocrit, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, platelet count, and IgM rheumatoid factor levels were also assessed; radiographs of both hands and wrists were taken. RESULTS: 109 and 110 patients were randomly assigned to receive minocycline and placebo, respectively. At entry, demographic, clinical, and laboratory measurements were similar in both groups. Most patients had mild to moderate disease activity and some evidence of destructive disease. At the week 48 visit, 79% of the minocycline group and 78% of the placebo group continued to receive the study medication. At 48 weeks, more patients in the minocycline group than in the placebo group showed improvement in joint swelling (54% and 39%) and joint tenderness (56% and 41%) (P < 0.023 for both comparisons). The minocycline group also showed greater improvement in hematocrit, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, platelet count, and IgM rheumatoid factor levels (all P values < 0.001), and more patients receiving minocycline had laboratory values within normal ranges at 48 weeks. For the remaining outcomes, P values ranged from 0.04 to 0.76, all greater than the critical value of 0.005 (Bonferroni adjustment for multiple comparisons). The frequency of reported side effects was similar in both groups, and no serious toxicity occurred. CONCLUSIONS: Minocycline was safe and effective for patients with mild to moderate rheumatoid arthritis. Its mechanisms of action remain to be determined.

Radiographic results from the Minocycline in Rheumatoid Arthritis (MIRA) Trial.

OBJECTIVE: To assess radiographically determined disease progression in patients in the Minocycline in Rheumatoid Arthritis (MIRA) Trial. METHODS: A double blind, randomized, multicenter, 48 week trial of oral minocycline (200 mg/day) or placebo in 6 clinical centers in the United States. Patients include 219 adults with active RA previously receiving limited treatment with disease modifying drugs. Posteroanterior films of the hands from baseline and final visits, blinded for sequence, were read for erosions and joint space narrowing by trained observers. Outcomes included rate of disease progression (change/month) and percentage of patients with progression from baseline, newly involved joints, and newly erosive disease. RESULTS: Using intent-to-treat analyses, progression rates for erosions (0.11 +/- 0.42 minocycline, 0.17 +/- 0.41 placebo; p = 0.47) and joint space narrowing (0.16 +/- 0.55 minocycline and 0.23 +/- 0.71 placebo; p = 0.14) were similar. (Power 43% to detect a 50% difference.) Newly erosive joints occurred more frequently in the placebo group (44 vs 32%; p = 0.08), not a statistically significant difference. CONCLUSION: Radiographic measurement of disease progression using 4 measures failed to show a significant difference between minocycline and placebo treatment, although for all methods there was a trend toward treatment benefit, consistent with reported clinical results. A one year trial duration, high measurement variability, and slow rate of radiographic progression in this cohort may explain the low power to detect a treatment effect. The measurement that denoted "newly involved" joints was most sensitive in detecting change. In future trials longer term assessment (minimum 2 years) of radiographic changes and further comparison of measures of disease progression are warranted.

Early undifferentiated connective tissue disease. V. An inception cohort 5 years later: disease remissions and changes in diagnoses in well established and undifferentiated connective tissue diseases.

OBJECTIVE: To review the diagnoses after 5 years in patients who were identified within 12 months of the onset of well established and undifferentiated connective tissue diseases (CTD); to examine death rates and disease remissions in these patients. METHODS: This inception cohort of 410 patients was identified in 10 academic rheumatology practices. They had less than one year of signs and/or symptoms of CTD. Diagnoses of specific well established CTD were made using accepted diagnostic and classification criteria. The diagnoses after 5 years were determined. RESULTS: Patients with well established CTD tended to remain with the original diagnosis. The progression of unexplained polyarthritis to rheumatoid arthritis occurred infrequently. Ten percent of patients with isolated Raynaud's phenomenon progressed to systemic sclerosis (SSc). The 5 year survival was over 90% in all diagnostic categories, with the exception of SSc, in which it was 64%. CONCLUSION: Patients with a well established CTD usually continued with the same diagnosis. Patients with undifferentiated CTD tended to remain undifferentiated or to remit.

HLA-DRB1 genes and disease severity in rheumatoid arthritis. The MIRA Trial Group. Minocycline in Rheumatoid Arthritis.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the effect of alleles encoding the "shared"/"rheumatoid" epitope on rheumatoid arthritis (RA) disease severity in patients who participated in the minocycline in RA (MIRA) trial. METHODS: Of 205 patients with a week-48 visit, blood was available for typing of HLA-DRB1 and HLA-DQB1 in 174 (85%) and successfully completed in 169 (82%). Baseline erosions were used to assess disease severity and new erosions at the last visit served as a proxy for progression. RESULTS: At baseline, there was no association between the presence of erosive disease or rheumatoid factor status and the dose of rheumatoid epitope (homozygous, heterozygous, none) or the specific alleles identified. At the final visit, a gradient was observed for the 3 allelic subgroups (and their gene doses) in the occurrence of new erosions among the Caucasian placebo-treated, but not the minocycline-treated, patients. A treatment group/HLA-DR4 epitope interaction was demonstrated in multivariate analyses. Approximately two-thirds of African-American patients did not have the rheumatoid epitope. CONCLUSION: HLA-DRB1 oligotyping may be useful in predicting the progression of disease in some Caucasian patients. Our study corroborates the infrequency of the epitope among African-American patients with RA.