Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty versus Ultrathin Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.

PURPOSE: To compare best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA), endothelial cell density (ECD), refractive astigmatism, and complications after Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) and ultrathin Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (UT-DSAEK). DESIGN: Prospective, multicenter randomized controlled trial. PARTICIPANTS: Fifty-four pseudophakic eyes of 54 patients with corneal endothelial dysfunction resulting from Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy were enrolled in 6 corneal centers in The Netherlands. METHODS: Participants were allocated to DMEK (n = 29) or UT-DSAEK (n = 25) using minimization randomization based on preoperative BSCVA, recipient central corneal thickness, gender, age, and institution. Donor corneas were prestripped and precut for DMEK and UT-DSAEK, respectively. Six corneal surgeons participated in this study. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome measure was BSCVA at 12 months after surgery. RESULTS: Central graft thickness of UT-DSAEK lamellae measured 101 µm (95% confidence interval [CI], 90-112 µm). Best spectacle-corrected visual acuity did not differ significantly between DMEK and UT-DSAEK groups at 3 months (0.15 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution [logMAR] [95% CI 0.08-0.22 logMAR] vs. 0.22 logMAR [95% CI 0.16-0.27 logMAR]; P = 0.15), 6 months (0.11 logMAR [95% CI 0.05-0.17 logMAR] vs. 0.16 logMAR [95% CI 0.12-0.21 logMAR]; P = 0.20), and 12 months (0.08 logMAR [95% CI 0.03-0.14 logMAR] vs. 0.15 logMAR [95% CI 0.10-0.19 logMAR]; P = 0.06). Twelve months after surgery, the percentage of eyes reaching 20/25 Snellen BSCVA was higher in DMEK compared with UT-DSAEK (66% vs. 33%; P = 0.02). Endothelial cell density did not differ significantly 12 months after DMEK and UT-DSAEK (1870 cells/mm2 [95% CI 1670-2069 cells/mm2] vs. 1612 cells/mm2 [95% CI 1326-1898 cells/mm2]; P = 0.12). Both techniques induced a mild hyperopic shift (12 months: +0.22 diopter [D; 95% CI -0.23 to 0.68 D] for DMEK vs. +0.58 D [95% CI 0.13-1.03 D] for UT-DSAEK; P = 0.34). CONCLUSIONS: Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty and UT-DSAEK did not differ significantly in mean BSCVA, but the percentage of eyes achieving 20/25 Snellen vision was significantly higher with DMEK. Endothelial cell loss did not differ significantly between the treatment groups, and both techniques induced a minimal hyperopic shift.

Quality of vision and vision-related quality of life after Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty: a randomized clinical trial.

PURPOSE: To compare quality of vision and vision-related quality of life (QOL) in patients undergoing Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) or ultrathin Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK). METHODS: Fifty-four eyes of 54 patients with Fuchs' dystrophy from six corneal clinics in the Netherlands were randomized to DMEK or ultrathin DSAEK and examined preoperatively, and 3, 6 and 12 months postoperatively. Main outcome measures were corneal higher-order aberrations (HOAs), contrast sensitivity, straylight and vision-related QOL. RESULTS: Posterior corneal HOAs decreased after DMEK and increased after ultrathin DSAEK (p ≤ 0.001) 3 months after surgery and correlated positively with best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (12 months: r = 0.29, p = 0.04). Anterior and total corneal HOAs did not differ significantly between both techniques at any time point. Contrast sensitivity was better (p = 0.01), and straylight was lower (p = 0.01) 3 months after DMEK compared with ultrathin DSAEK; 95% confidence interval [CI] of log(cs) 1.10-1.35 versus 95% CI: 0.84 to 1.12, and 95% CI: log(s) 1.18 to 1.43 versus 95% CI: 1.41 to 1.66, respectively. Both were comparable at later time points. Vision-related QOL (scale 0-100) did not differ significantly between both groups at any time point and improved significantly at 3 months (ß = 12 [95% CI: 7 to 16]; p < 0.001), and subsequently between 3 and 12 months (ß = 5 [95% CI: 0 to 9]; p = 0.06). CONCLUSIONS: Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) results in lower posterior corneal HOAs compared with ultrathin DSAEK. Contrast sensitivity and straylight recover faster after DMEK but reach similar levels with both techniques at 1 year. Vision-related QOL improved significantly after surgery, but did not differ between both techniques.

Recurrence of paraproteinemic crystalline keratopathy after corneal transplantation: A case of monoclonal gammopathy of ocular significance.

PURPOSE: To report the long-term follow-up (12 years) of a 36-year-old male patient with crystalline keratopathy of both eyes, diagnosed with monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS). Complete ophthalmic, systemic, and corneal immunohistochemical evaluations were performed. OBSERVATIONS: Slit-lamp examination revealed bilateral fine iridescent confluent crystalline deposits in all layers of the cornea, both peripherally and centrally. Systemic evaluation revealed abnormal M protein, IgG-kappa type, in blood and urine. Bone marrow aspiration showed a monoclonal plasma cell concentration of 2%. Consequently, the patient was diagnosed with MGUS. Because of progressive bilateral visual loss in the following 10 years, a perforating keratoplasty was performed on the left eye. Immunohistochemical analysis of the native cornea (the corneal button) revealed depositions of the same M protein type as detected in plasma and urine. Electron microscopy showed rhomboid-shaped corneal deposits of various sizes up to 4 µm. Recurrence of crystalline keratopathy was observed 9 months after keratoplasty. The monoclonal protein remained stable and the MGUS did not progress to multiple myeloma nor a related disorder. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPORTANCE: Crystalline keratopathy may be associated with MGUS in otherwise healthy individuals. If the keratopathy causes binocular visual loss, a corneal transplantation may be required. Unfortunately, recurrence of crystalline deposits in the corneal graft may occur within one year. This suggests that patients with vision impairment due to paraproteinemic keratopathy who are diagnosed as MGUS, in fact, have a monoclonal gammopathy of ocular significance (MGOS).

Postoperative Repositioning of Inverted Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty Grafts.

PURPOSE: To present 4 cases of postoperative repositioning of inverted grafts after Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK). METHODS: Retrospective case reports of 4 patients presenting with subtotal to total graft detachment after DMEK, most probably owing to upside-down graft positioning. Graft repositioning was performed 1 to 14 days after initial DMEK surgery. In 3 cases (cases 1, 3, and 4), repositioning was performed without removing the graft from the anterior chamber (AC), whereas for case 2, the graft had to be removed from the AC to attain correct graft orientation. RESULTS: In all 4 cases, the initially upside-down DMEK grafts could be successfully repositioned postoperatively. Three cases showed complete graft attachment after graft repositioning with clear corneas until the last available follow-up. One case manifested a persistent central detachment with central corneal edema, eventually requiring re-DMEK. Endothelial cell density decreased from 2800 cells/mm preoperatively to 2373 cells/mm at 2 years postoperatively for case 1 and from 2600 to 600 cells/mm at 6 months postoperatively for case 2. Case 3 showed a clear cornea until the last available follow-up at 1 year postoperatively. CONCLUSIONS: In cases of upside-down grafts after DMEK, attempting to reposition the graft, with or without removing the graft from the AC, may be a cost- and tissue-efficient alternative before converting to re-DMEK.

Peripheral retinal nonperfusion associated with chronic myeloid leukemia.

PURPOSE: To report a case of peripheral retinal nonperfusion and chronic myeloid leukemia in a 23-year-old woman. DESIGN: Observational case report. METHODS: A complete ophthalmic and systemic evaluation was performed. RESULTS: Ophthalmic examination revealed peripheral retinal nonperfusion with retinal neovascularization in both eyes. Fluorescein angiography of both eyes showed a marked midperipheral and peripheral avascular retina temporally with arteriovenous anastomosis and seafan neovascularizations. Blood work showed no abnormalities, although marked leucocytosis (up to 750 x 10(9)/l) and thrombocytosis (646 x 10(9)/l) were present in 1998 when the patient was diagnosed with leukemia. Following treatment, the patient has been in remission. CONCLUSIONS: Peripheral retinal nonperfusion with retinal neovascularization may occur as a complication of chronic myeloid leukemia. In contrast to other studies describing this association, our patient had a bilateral peripheral retinal nonperfusion with seafan neovascularizations without relapse of the myeloid leukemia and without any of the other retinal signs associated with chronic myeloid leukemia, such as tortuosity of veins, intraretinal or preretinal hemorrhages, and cotton-wool exudates.