Diagnostic Performance of the Simultaneous Acquisition Rest 99 mTc-Tetrofosmin/Stress 201Tl Dual-Isotope Protocol With a Semiconductor Camera　- Comparison With the Rest-Stress 99 mTc-Tetrofosmin Protocol.

BACKGROUND: This study compared the diagnostic value of myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) between the rest-stress 99 mTc-tetrofosmin protocol (Tc/Tc protocol) and simultaneous acquisition rest 99 mTc-tetrofosmin/stress 201Tl dual-isotope protocol (SDI protocol) with a semiconductor camera.Methods and Results: We retrospectively studied 147 patients who underwent stress MPI using a cadmium-zinc-telluride camera and invasive coronary angiography within a 3-month interval. The Tc/Tc and SDI protocols were used in 59 and 88 patients, respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of the summed difference score in per-patient analysis were 56%, 85%, and 69%, respectively, for the Tc/Tc protocol and 89%, 82%, and 85%, respectively, for the SDI protocol. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was significantly better for the SDI than Tc/Tc protocol for the left anterior descending artery (0.836 vs. 0.674; P=0.0380), the left circumflex artery (0.754 vs. 0.599; P=0.0441), and in per-patient analysis (0.875 vs. 0.707; P=0.0135). There was no significant difference in the diagnostic accuracy of the summed stress score for any vessel or in per-patient analysis between the 2 protocols. CONCLUSIONS: The SDI protocol had a higher diagnostic accuracy for the detection of coronary ischemia than the Tc/Tc protocol.

RGS1 and CREB5 are direct and common transcriptional targets of ZNF384-fusion proteins.

BACKGROUND: ZNF384-fusion (Z-fusion) genes were recently identified in B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL) and are frequent in Japanese adult patients. The frequency is about 20% in those with Philadelphia chromosome-negative B-ALL. ZNF384 is a transcription factor and Z-fusion proteins have increased transcriptional activity; however, the detailed mechanisms of leukemogenesis of Z-fusion proteins have yet to be clarified. METHODS: We established three transfectants of cell lines expressing different types of Z-fusion proteins, and analyzed their gene expression profile (GEP) by RNA-seq. We also analyzed the GEP of clinical ALL samples using our previous RNA-seq data of 323 Japanese ALL patients. We selected upregulated genes in both Z-fusion gene-expressing transfectants and Z-fusion gene-positive ALL samples, and investigated the binding of Z-fusion proteins to regulatory regions of the candidate genes by ChIP-qPCR. RESULTS: We selected six commonly upregulated genes. After the investigation by ChIP-qPCR, we finally identified CREB5 and RGS1 as direct and common target genes. RGS1 is an inhibitor of CXCL12-CXCR4 signaling that is required for the homing of hematopoietic progenitor cells to the bone marrow microenvironment and development of B cells. Consistent with this, Z-fusion gene transfectants showed impaired migration toward CXCL12. CONCLUSIONS: We identified CREB5 and RGS1 as direct and common transcriptional targets of Z-fusion proteins. The present results provide novel insight into the aberrant transcriptional regulation by Z-fusion proteins.