Tumor location, clinicopathological features, and perioperative and prognostic outcomes in patients who underwent pancreatic resection following neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for resectable pancreatic cancer: A retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: /Objective: Preoperative treatment of resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is gaining popularity worldwide. However, the characteristics of tumors located in the pancreatic head (Ph), or those in the body or tail (Pbt), after surgery following neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NACRT) remain unclear. This study aimed to evaluate and compare the clinicopathological features, perioperative outcomes, and prognosis of patients with resectable PDAC who underwent NACRT followed by curative pancreatic resection, focusing on distinguishing between Ph and Pbt PDACs. METHODS: We included 107 patients with resectable PDAC who underwent curative resection following NACRT between 2009 and 2023. Clinicopathological features, perioperative and prognostic outcomes, recurrence patterns, and prognoses were compared between Ph and Pbt PDAC groups. RESULTS: Tumors were found in the Ph and Pbt in 64 and 43 patients, respectively. Albumin levels and lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratios after NACRT were significantly lower in the Ph group than in the Pbt group. The Pbt group showed significantly higher rates of positive peritoneal lavage cytology and serosal, arterial, and portal vein invasion than the Ph group did. Overall and recurrence-free survival were similar between the two groups. The most common site of initial postoperative recurrence was the lung only in both groups; however, the rate of peritoneal dissemination only was significantly higher in the Pbt group than in the Ph group. CONCLUSIONS: The prognoses based on tumor locations in the Ph and Pbt after surgery following NACRT are similar. Following the resection of resectable Pbt PDAC, the possibility of peritoneal dissemination recurrence should be considered.

Clinical significance of circulating-tumour DNA analysis by metastatic sites in pancreatic cancer.

BACKGROUND: Liquid biopsy is an alternative to tissue specimens for tumour genotyping. However, the frequency of genomic alterations with low circulating-tumour DNA (ctDNA) shedding is shown in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). We, therefore, investigated the prevalence of KRAS mutations and ctDNA fraction by the metastatic site in patients with PDAC. METHODS: This study enrolled previously treated PDAC patients from a plasma genomic profiling study; ctDNA analysis was performed using Guardant360 at disease progression before initiating subsequent treatment. RESULTS: In 512 patients with PDAC, KRAS mutations were detected in 57%. The frequency of KRAS mutation in ctDNA differed depending on the metastatic organ; among patients with single-organ metastasis (n = 296), KRAS mutation detection rate was significantly higher in patients with metastasis to the liver (78%). In addition, the median maximum variant allele frequency (VAF) was higher with metastasis to the liver (1.9%) than with metastasis to the lungs, lymph nodes, peritoneum or with locally advanced disease (0.2%, 0.4%, 0.2% and 0.3%, respectively). CONCLUSION: The prevalence of KRAS mutations and maximum VAF were higher in patients with metastasis to the liver than in those with metastasis to other sites. This study indicated the clinical utility of ctDNA analysis, especially in PDAC with liver metastases.

Comprehensive review of undifferentiated carcinoma of the pancreas: from epidemiology to treatment.

Undifferentiated carcinoma (UC) of the pancreas is a rare subtype of pancreatic cancer displaying no definitive direction of differentiation. UC has been reported as a highly aggressive malignant neoplasm, with a median overall survival of <1 year, except for several surgical series. On the other hand, UC tissue sometimes contains non-neoplastic osteoclast-like giant cells (OGCs), and such cases have been reported to have relatively longer survival. Thus, the World Health Organization (WHO) classification histologically distinguishes UC with OGCs (UCOGCs) from UC, and UCs were subclassified into three subtypes: anaplastic UC, sarcomatoid UC and carcinosarcoma. However, still less is known about UC due to its rarity, and such situations lead to further difficulties in treatment for UC. To date, only surgical resection can offer curative treatment for patients with UC, and no clear evidence for chemotherapy exists for them. However, a retrospective cohort study and case reports showed that relatively promising results paclitaxel-containing regimens for treatment of patients with unresectable UC. Furthermore, high programmed cell death protein 1 expression has been reported in sarcomatoid UCs and UCOGCs, and promising responses to anti-programmed death-ligand 1 therapy have been described in case reports of UCOGCs. Recent advances in chemotherapeutic agents and molecular technologies are opening up the possibilities for expanded treatments.

Endoscopic duodenal stent placement versus gastrojejunostomy for unresectable pancreatic cancer patients with duodenal stenosis before introduction of initial chemotherapy (GASPACHO study): a multicenter retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic duodenal stent placement is an alternative technique to gastrojejunostomy for gastric outlet obstruction due to pancreatic cancer. We compared the efficacy of endoscopic duodenal stent placement with that of gastrojejunostomy for treating patients with pancreatic cancer who are candidates for intensive combination chemotherapies as the first line of treatment. METHODS: This retrospective observational study included 100 patients from 18 institutions in Japan. Inclusion criteria were as follows: (1) cytologically or histologically confirmed adenocarcinoma of the pancreas, (2) good performance status, (3) gastric outlet obstruction scoring system score of 0-1 and (4) no history of treatment for pancreatic cancer. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in the background characteristics of patients in the endoscopic duodenal stent placement (n = 57) and gastrojejunostomy (n = 43) groups. The median overall survival in the endoscopic duodenal stent placement and gastrojejunostomy groups was 5.9 and 6.0 months, respectively. Clinical success was achieved in 93 cases; the median time to food intake resumption was significantly shorter in the endoscopic duodenal stent placement group (median: 3 days, n = 54) than in the gastrojejunostomy group (median: 5 days, n = 43). Chemotherapy was introduced in 63% of the patients in both groups after endoscopic duodenal stent placement or gastrojejunostomy. Chemotherapy was started earlier in the endoscopic duodenal stent placement group (median: 14 days) than in the gastrojejunostomy (median: 32 days) group. CONCLUSIONS: Endoscopic duodenal stent placement showed similar or better clinical outcomes than gastrojejunostomy. Thus, it might be a promising option in patients with good performance status.

Reproducibility and prognostic significance of area of residual tumor (ART) in post-neoadjuvant resections of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.

BACKGROUND: The pathologic assessments of tumor response after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NACRT) are critical to improving the prognostic stratification for patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). Here we clarified the utility of our new grading system based on the area of residual tumor (ART) as compared to existing systems, such as the College of American Pathologists (CAP) and MD Anderson (MDA) score. METHODS: Eight reviewers individually evaluated the tumor regression grade of 30 patients with PDAC based on three types of grading systems. The interobserver concordance and clinicopathological characteristics were compared between the three systems. RESULTS: The interobserver concordance (kappa value) of the ART, CAP, and MDA score were 0.61, 0.48, and 0.53, respectively. Discrepant cases, which were 27% of the cases, exhibited smaller tumor and tumor bed sizes than concordant cases. The reduction in tumor size evaluated by microscopy showed a correlation with the rate of change in carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) level, CA19-9 level, and tumor size on computed tomography (CT). The ART score was correlated with the tumor size on CT before and after NACRT and disease-free survival. The CAP and MDA scores were not associated with prognosis. CONCLUSION: The ART grading system may be the most practical system to assess the tumor response in post-NACRT resections of PDAC.

Gemcitabine Plus Nab-Paclitaxel as Second-Line Chemotherapy following FOLFIRINOX in Patients with Unresectable Pancreatic Cancer: A Single-Institution, Retrospective Analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Patients with advanced pancreatic cancer have a poor prognosis. FOLFIRINOX (FFX) and gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel (GnP) have been established as first-line treatment, but they have not been confirmed as second-line treatment after FFX. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of GnP as second-line therapy after FFX in patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer. METHODS: Twenty-five patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer were enrolled. The patients were treated with GnP after FFX between September 2015 and September 2019. Tumor response, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and incidence of adverse events were evaluated. RESULTS: The response rate, disease control rate, median PFS, and median OS were 12%, 96%, 5.3 months, and 15.6 months, respectively. The common grade 3 or 4 adverse events were neutropenia (76%) and anemia (16%). CONCLUSIONS: GnP after FOLFIRINOX is expected to be one of the second-line recommendations for patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer.

Infusion-related reaction to ramucirumab plus FOLFIRI in patients with advanced colorectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: An infusion-related reaction (IRR) is a well-known adverse event related to monoclonal antibodies, and antihistamine premedication is recommended to prevent IRRs. Ramucirumab plus FOLFIRI therapy is the standard second-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC). Ramucirumab is a fully human antibody, suggesting that the incidence of IRRs is lower, however, the current recommendation for the proper use of ramucirumab is antihistamine premedication, but the incidence and severity of ramucirumab-induced IRR without antihistamine premedication have not been elucidated. METHODS: A retrospective study to evaluate the incidence of ramucirumab-induced IRRs in unresectable CRC patients treated by ramucirumab plus FOLFIRI therapy. If the incidence of IRR without antihistamine premedication was not higher than that of cetuximab in a previous report (5.7%), planning a prospective study was considered. RESULTS: A total of 147 patients with unresectable CRC who had been treated by ramucirumab plus FOLFIRI therapy were identified. Of them, 106 (72%) patients received intravenous antihistamine premedication. An IRR occurred in 2 patients (1.4%), 1 grade 2 and 1 grade 3. They received antihistamine and steroid premedication. On the other hand, IRRs were not observed in 41 patients without antihistamine premedication, and the incidence of IRRs was significantly lower compared with the previous report of cetuximab (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The incidence of ramucirumab-induced IRRs without antihistamine premedication is low. Not using antihistamine premedication can decrease medical costs. These findings warrant further investigation in large-scale cohorts to clarify the incidence and severity of ramucirumab-induced IRRs and further clarify the proper use of ramucirumab.

A Phase II Trial of Everolimus in Patients with Advanced Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Carcinoma Refractory or Intolerant to Platinum-Containing Chemotherapy (NECTOR Trial).

BACKGROUND: Platinum-containing regimens are widely used as first-line chemotherapy for unresectable pancreatic neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC), but second-line chemotherapies have yet to be established. OBJECTIVES: We evaluated the safety and efficacy of everolimus in patients with pancreatic NEC refractory or intolerant to platinum-containing chemotherapy. METHODS: This study was a prospective, multicenter, phase II trial in patients with pancreatic NEC after platinum-containing chemotherapy. Everolimus treatment was continued until disease progression or intolerable toxicity was observed. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). RESULTS: Participants comprised 25 patients. Median age was 63 years, median PFS was 1.2 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.9-3.1 months), median overall survival was 7.5 months (95% CI 3.1-13.5 months), overall response rate was 0%, and disease control rate was 39.1%. Common grade 3/4 adverse events were hyperglycemia (20%), thrombocytopenia (16%), and anemia (16%). CONCLUSION: The efficacy of everolimus was limited in patients with unresectable pancreatic NEC.

Therapeutic drug monitoring of regorafenib and its metabolite M5 can predict treatment efficacy and the occurrence of skin toxicities.

BACKGROUND: Regorafenib is a multiple tyrosine kinase inhibitor, and the use of this drug is approved for the treatment of cancers that are resistant to chemotherapy, which include advanced colorectal cancer, gastrointestinal stromal tumor, and hepatocellular carcinoma. However, the drug causes adverse events, including skin toxicities that require dose modification in approximately 75% of cases. At present, the blood concentration of regorafenib is not assessed in clinical settings; thus, we recently developed a method that can assess the blood concentration of the drug using high-performance liquid chromatography. METHODS: We measured the trough blood concentrations (Ctrough) of regorafenib and its metabolites (M2 and M5) in 14 and 4 patients with advanced colorectal cancer and gastrointestinal stromal tumor, respectively, using high-performance liquid chromatography. Then, the correlation between the Ctrough and therapeutic outcomes of regorafenib was analyzed. RESULTS: In patients who were receiving regorafenib 40-160 mg/day, the Ctrough values of regorafenib, M2, and M5 were 318-9467, 34-3594, and 38-3796 ng/mL, respectively. The difference in the values was significant. Although the specific factors influencing this difference were not elucidated, the Ctrough of regorafenib was extremely lower in some patients, even though the drug was administered at a standard dose, which may explain the lower response rate. Moreover, the Ctrough value of M5 was significantly correlated to the incidence of skin toxicities, which is the most frequent cause of dose modification. CONCLUSIONS: The use of regorafenib may not be suitable in patients with a low Ctrough value. To prevent skin toxicities, the Ctrough value of M5 should be monitored.

A randomized phase II study of nutritional and exercise treatment for elderly patients with advanced non-small cell lung or pancreatic cancer: the NEXTAC-TWO study protocol.

BACKGROUND: Most advanced elderly cancer patients experience fatigue, anorexia, and declining physical function due to cancer cachexia, for which effective interventions have not been established. We performed a phase I study of a new nonpharmacological multimodal intervention called the nutritional and exercise treatment for advanced cancer (NEXTAC) program and reported the excellent feasibility of and compliance with this program in elderly patients with advanced cancer who were at risk for cancer cachexia. We report here the background, hypothesis, and design of the next-step multicenter, randomized phase II study to evaluate the efficacy of the program, the NEXTAC-TWO study. METHODS: Patients with chemo-naïve advanced non-small cell lung cancer or pancreatic cancer, age ≥ 70 years, performance status ≤2, with adequate organ function and without disability according to the modified Katz index will be eligible. In total, 130 participants will be recruited from 15 Japanese institutions and will be randomized into either the intervention group or a control group. Computer-generated random numbers are allocated to each participant. Stratification factors include performance status (0 to 1 vs. 2), site of primary cancer (lung vs. pancreas), stage (III vs. IV), and type of chemotherapy (cytotoxic vs. others). Interventions and assessment will be performed 4 times every 4 ± 2 weeks from the date of randomization. Interventions will consist of nutritional counseling, nutritional supplements (rich in branched-chain amino acids), and a home-based exercise program. The exercise program will include low-intensity daily muscle training and lifestyle education to promote physical activity. The primary endpoint is disability-free survival. It is defined as the period from the date of randomization to the date of developing disability or death due to any cause. This trial also plans to evaluate the improvements in nutritional status, physical condition, quality of life, activities of daily living, overall survival, and safety as secondary endpoints. Enrollment began in August 2017. The study results will demonstrate the efficacy of multimodal interventions for elderly cancer patients and their application for the maintenance of physical and nutritional conditions in patients with cancer cachexia. This work is supported by a grant-in-aid from the Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development. DISCUSSION: This is the first randomized trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a multimodal intervention specific for elderly patients with advanced cancer. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Registered at August 23, 2017. Registry number: UMIN000028801 .

Propensity Score Analysis of Regorafenib Versus Trifluridine/Tipiracil in Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Refractory to Standard Chemotherapy (REGOTAS): A Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum Multicenter Observational Study.

BACKGROUND: This study compared the efficacy of regorafenib and trifluridine/tipiracil (TFTD) in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) who are refractory to standard chemotherapy, because despite their clinical approval, it still remains unclear which of these two drugs should be used as initial treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The clinical data of patients with mCRC who were treated with regorafenib or TFTD and those of drug-naive patients, between June 2014 and September 2015, were retrospectively collected from 24 institutions in Japan. Overall survival (OS) was evaluated using the Cox's proportional hazard models based on propensity score adjustment for baseline characteristics. RESULTS: A total of 550 patients (223 patients in the regorafenib group and 327 patients in the TFTD group) met all criteria. The median OS was 7.9 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 6.8-9.2) in the regorafenib group and 7.4 months (95% CI, 6.6-8.3) in the TFTD group. The propensity score adjusted analysis showed that OS was similar between the two groups (adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 0.96; 95% CI, 0.78-1.18). In the subgroup analysis, a significant interaction with age was observed. Regorafenib showed favorable survival in patients aged <65 years (HR, 1.29; 95% CI, 0.98-1.69), whereas TFTD was favored in patients aged ≥65 years (HR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.59-1.03). CONCLUSION: No significant difference in OS between regorafenib and TFTD was observed in patients with mCRC. Although the choice of the drug by age might affect survival, a clearly predictive biomarker to distinguish the two drugs should be identified in further studies. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Previous studies of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer refractory to standard chemotherapy had demonstrated that both regorafenib and trifluridine/tipiracil could result in increased overall survival compared with placebo, but there are no head-to-head trials. This large, multicenter, observational study retrospectively compared the efficacy of regorafenib and trifluridine/tipiracil in 550 patients with metastatic colorectal cancer refractory to standard chemotherapy who had access to both drugs. Although no difference in overall survival was found between the two drugs in adjusted analysis using propensity score, regorafenib showed favorable survival in patients aged <65 years, whereas trifluridine/tipiracil was favored in patients aged ≥65 years in the subgroup analysis.

18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography to indicate conversion surgery in patients with initially unresectable locally advanced pancreatic cancer.

OBJECTIVE: Advances in chemotherapy and chemoradiotherapy have enabled conversion of initially unresectable locally advanced (UR-LA) pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PDAC) to a resectable disease. However, definitive criteria for conversion surgery have not been established. We evaluated the potential of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) to indicate conversion surgery in patients with primary UR-LA PDAC. METHODS: Twenty consecutive patients with UR-LA PDAC underwent chemoradiation or chemotherapy followed by assessment with FDG-PET. We defined PET responders (standardized uptake value <3.0) with marked reduction (>80%) of carbohydrate antigen 19-9 as potential candidates for conversion surgery. Outcomes were compared with those of the patients with resectable (R; n = 94) and borderline resectable (BR; n = 37) PDAC. RESULTS: Eight of the 20 patients (40%) were considered PET responders with marked reduction of CA19-9 and received conversion surgery (UR-LAR) 3-9 months (median, 5 months) after the initiation of therapy. Complete resection (R0) was achieved in 7 of 8 patients (87.5%) with UR-LAR. There was no significant difference in R0 rates, morbidity, or mortality among the UR-LAR, R and BR groups. The overall survival (OS) curve was better in the UR-LAR group than in the group that did not receive surgery. There was no significant difference in OS between the UR-LAR and the R or BR groups. CONCLUSIONS: FDG-PET could be a potential indicator for conversion surgery in patients with primary UR-LA PDAC and may help in selecting patients who qualify for complete surgical resection and have a promising prognosis.

Transarterial (Chemo)Embolization for Liver Metastases in Patients with Neuroendocrine Tumors.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of transarterial (chemo)embolization [TA(C)E] for the control of liver metastasis in patients with neuroendocrine tumors (NETs). METHODS: In this retrospective study, we enrolled 43 patients with metastatic NETs who had been treated with TA(C)E between December 1999 and June 2013 at the National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo or the National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa. We assessed tumor response, time to treatment failure (TTF), overall survival (OS), and frequency of adverse events in these patients, and attempted to identify predictors of TTF. RESULTS: The site of the primary tumor was the pancreas in 29 patients (67%), the gastrointestinal tract in 11 patients (26%), and unknown in 3 patients (7%). Response rate, disease control rate, median TTF, and median OS were 56%, 96%, 24.7 months, and 86.1 months, respectively. No significant predictors of TTF could be identified. While 3 patients developed serious adverse events (including liver abscess in 2 patients and acute renal failure in 1 patient), the adverse events were well tolerated in all other patients. CONCLUSION: TA(C)E appears to be effective and feasible for controlling the liver metastases in patients with NETs.

Prognostic factors in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma refractory or intolerant to sorafenib.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to identify the prognostic factors in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) who are refractory or intolerant to sorafenib and to exclude unsuitable candidates from subsequent therapy. METHODS: The study cohort consisted of 111 patients who had discontinued sorafenib therapy. Uni- and multivariate analyses were conducted to identify the prognostic factors for survival after discontinuation of sorafenib therapy. RESULTS: The median age of the patients was 70 years, and 96 of them (86%) were male. The Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status was 0-1 in 94 patients (85%). Forty patients (36%) were classified as Child-Pugh class A and 57 (51%) as Child-Pugh class B. The median survival time after discontinuation of sorafenib therapy was 146 days. Hepatitis C viral antibody negativity, presence of ascites, absence of a history of previous treatment excluding sorafenib, elevated serum total bilirubin level, and elevated serum α-fetoprotein level were identified as the independent unfavorable prognostic factors by multivariate analysis. The median survival time of the patients with 4 or 5 unfavorable prognostic factors was 59 days. CONCLUSIONS: We should judge the indication of any subsequent therapy carefully in patients with 4 or 5 of the aforementioned factors.

[A three-week regimen of S-1 monotherapy reduced gastrointestinal toxicity and maintained efficacy in patients with gemcitabine-refractory advanced pancreatic cancer].

S-1 administration for 28 consecutive days followed by 14 days of rest (6-week cycle) is often chosen as second-line chemotherapy for advanced pancreatic cancer (PC), but it causes gastrointestinal toxicity. In comparison, in gastric cancer or head and neck cancer, S-1 administration for 14 consecutive days followed by a 7-day rest period (3-week cycle) reduced gastrointestinal toxicity. This study retrospectively evaluated the efficacy and safety of a 3-week S-1 schedule compared to a 6-week schedule in patients with gemcitabine (GEM)-refractory advanced PC. Fifty-seven patients were treated with the 6- week S-1 schedule and 68 patients were treated with the 3-week S-1 schedule. There were no statistical differences in overall survival (p=0.13) and progression-free survival (p=0.190). With regard to adverse events, the rates of nausea (p<0.01) and vomiting (p=0.04) were lower with the 3-week schedule than with the 6-week schedule. Thus, S-1 therapy with a 3- week schedule as second-line chemotherapy in patients with GEM-refractory advanced PC was associated with reduced gastrointestinal toxicity and similar efficacy, when compared to a 6-week schedule.

Short- and Long-Term Outcomes of Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy Followed by Pancreatoduodenectomy in Elderly Patients with Resectable and Borderline Resectable Pancreatic Cancer: A Retrospective Study.

Background: The efficacy of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NACRT) followed by pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) in elderly patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) remains unclear. Methods: This retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data examined the effect of NACRT followed by PD in elderly patients with PDAC. A total of 112 patients with resectable (R-) and borderline resectable (BR-) PDAC, who were planned for PD and received NACRT between 2009 and 2022, were assessed. Changes induced by NACRT, surgical outcomes, nutritional status, renal and endocrine functions, and prognosis were compared between elderly (≥75 years, n = 43) and non-elderly (<75 years, n = 69) patients over two years following PD. Results: Completion and adverse event rates during NACRT, nutritional status, renal function, endocrine function over two years postoperatively, and prognosis did not significantly differ between the two groups. Low prognostic index after NACRT and the absence of postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy may be adverse prognostic indicators for elderly patients undergoing NACRT for R- and BR-PDAC. Conclusions: Despite a higher incidence of postoperative complications, NACRT followed by PD can be safely performed in elderly patients, resulting in a prognosis similar to that in non-elderly patients.

Successful everolimus treatment in a patient with advanced pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor who developed everolimus-induced interstitial lung disease on two occasions: a case report.

Chemotherapy-associated interstitial lung disease (ILD) is often fatal, and the chemotherapeutic regimen generally cannot be resumed. ILD associated with the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitor everolimus has many features distinct from chemotherapy-associated ILD. We present the case of a 58-year-old woman with an advanced pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor with liver metastases, in whom everolimus treatment was maintained and resulted in a partial response despite two occurrences of everolimus-induced ILD during a 31-month treatment period until disease progression. Physicians treating with everolimus should monitor patients closely for ILD and should apply appropriate management strategies to optimize the possibility of maintaining everolimus therapy.

Postoperative Treatment of Resectable Pancreatic Cancer With Positive Peritoneal Lavage Cytology: A Multicentre Retrospective Study.

BACKGROUND/AIM: We aimed to evaluate pancreatic cancer (PC) with positive peritoneal lavage cytology (CY1) outcomes following a change in adjuvant therapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The clinicopathological data of patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma with CY1 at 14 institutions, between 2007 and 2015, were collected and analyzed. RESULTS: Of the 124 eligible patients, 114 underwent macroscopically curative resection. Of the 114 patients, 80 (70%) did not have early recurrence and received postoperative chemotherapy that was S-1 in 43 (54%), gemcitabine in 31 (39%), and others in six (7%). The median overall survival was 21.0 months in S-1 and 19.2 in gemcitabine therapy (p=0.23), whereas the median relapse-free survival was 10.2 and 7.1 months (p=0.03), respectively. CONCLUSION: Following the change in adjuvant therapy, most PC patients with CY1 who underwent macroscopically curative resection received S-1; however, it was insufficient. Further development of postoperative chemotherapy is required.

NOTCH gene alterations in metastatic colorectal cancer in the Nationwide Cancer Genome Screening Project in Japan (SCRUM-Japan GI-SCREEN).

PURPOSE: Activated Notch receptor signaling has been implicated in tumor growth and progression in colorectal cancer (CRC). However, the pathogenic relevance of NOTCH gene alterations remains unclear. The aim of this study was to clarify mutational landscapes and assess their clinical significance in patients with metastatic CRC. METHODS: Pre-chemotherapy tumor tissues obtained from 1154 metastatic CRC patients in the Nationwide Cancer Genome Screening Project in Japan between April 2017 and March 2019 were studied using the Oncomine Comprehensive Assay. RESULTS: The frequencies of NOTCH1, NOTCH2, and NOTCH3 nonsynonymous sequence variants were 11.5%, 4.4%, and 10.4%, respectively. The majority of variants were missense of unknown significance that were distributed across all domains of all three NOTCH genes. The gain-of-function mutations in NOTCH reported in multiple malignancies were not identified. The NOTCH amplification rate was less than 1%. No NOTCH fusions were detected. In patients who were registered before, or within 1 year of, first-line chemotherapy, overall survival for 51 patients with only NOTCH3 variants was significantly longer than for 540 patients with no NOTCH variants (median, 40.2 months vs 27.7 months; P = 0.04). Multivariate analysis revealed that variant NOTCH3 was an independent prognostic factor for increased survival (hazard ratio 0.61, 95% confidence interval, 0.39-0.94; P = 0.03) besides poor prognostic factors associated with mutant TP53, KRAS, and BRAF, as well as amplified MYC. CONCLUSION: NOTCH genes are unlikely to harbor driver mutations and amplifications in patients with metastatic CRC. NOTCH3 variant should be further investigated as a favorable prognostic marker.

Association between echocardiographic parameters and brain natriuretic peptide levels in treated hypertensive patients.

We examined which echocardiographic parameter correlated best with plasma brain natriuteric peptide (BNP) levels in treated hypertensive patients. Enrolled in the study were 122 treated hypertensive patients (70 ± 9 y). The left ventricular mass index and left atrial dimension (LAD) were measured using echocardiography as indexes of left ventricular hypertrophy and left atrial enlargement, respectively. Among all the echocardiographic parameters, LAD correlated best with BNP (r = 0.343, p < 0.001). Stepwise regression analysis showed that LAD (ß coefficient = 0.513, p < 0.001) was independently associated with BNP. Left atrial enlargement, rather than left ventricular hypertrophy, may be clinically useful for predicting elevated BNP levels in treated hypertensive patients.