Comparing the success rates of standard and modified Valsalva maneuvers to terminate PSVT: A randomized controlled trial.

PURPOSE: The study aimed to detect whether modified Valsalva maneuver (VM) is more effective than the standard VM in terminating paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia (PSVT). METHODOLOGY: This randomized controlled trial was conducted in the emergency department of a training and research hospital between Dec. 1, 2015 and Dec. 31, 2016. Participants were divided into two groups, randomly assigned standard VM or modified VM, as the first treatment with two-dimensional permutation blocks; in the order of arrival of the patients. In both groups; the determined procedure for standard or modified VM was repeated up to three times in patients whose PSVT did not convert to sinus rhythm. In both groups; if the maneuver was unsuccessful after three attempts, anti-arrhythmic medication was administered. The primary outcome was defined to compare the success rate of achieving sinus rhythm after standard VM or modified VM. RESULTS: Fifty-six patients were randomized to modified or standard VM with 28 patients in each treatment arm. Three of 28 patients (10.7%) in VM group and 12 of 28 patients (42.9%) in modified VM group were returned to sinus rhythm after intervention (p=0.007). The number of patients who needed rescue treatment was lower in the modified VM group - 16 (57.1%) of 28 versus 25 (89.3%) of 28 in the standard VM group (p=0.007). CONCLUSION: This study suggests that modified VM therapy was more effective than standard VM for terminating PSVT. The modified VM therapy also indirectly reduced the need for anti-arrhythmic medication and indirectly caused fewer side effects.

The evaluation of the audit of Fresh-Frozen Plasma (FFP) usage in emergency department.

OBJECTIVES: In our study, the aim is to evaluate the use of Fresh-Frozen Plasma (FFP) in our emergency department and to assess its audit for transfusion. METHODS: All the patients aged 18 and over who received FFP transfusion in the emergency department between March 1, 2013 and March 1, 2016 were included into the study. The audit of FFP use was evaluated by according to 'British Committee for Standards in Hematology Guideline-2004'. RESULTS: Total 141 patients were identified to receive FFP transfusion in our emergency department. When the audit of FFP use was evaluated, 59.6% of all the practices were regarded as improper use. We identified that while the rate of improper use was 40.2% in patients with bleeding, it rose to 90.7% in patients without active bleeding or in those who used FFP with the aim of bleeding prophylaxis. CONCLUSION: We have determined that FFP transfusions were conducted with improper indications at high rate in our emergency department. Preparing an up-to-date transfusion guideline for the practices in emergency departments in our country and training and supervising the medical staff at regular intervals may help prevent the shortcomings in FFP practices.