High Rate of Intramedullary Canal Culture Positivity in Total Knee Arthroplasty Resection for Prosthetic Joint Infection.

BACKGROUND: Periprosthetic infection is a devastating complication following total knee arthroplasty. A 2-stage protocol often includes an interim antibiotic spacer with intramedullary (IM) dowels. However, the necessity of IM dowels has recently been challenged. Specifically, the data supporting bacterial colonization of the IM canal are limited and controversial. The purpose of this study was to identify the rate of positive IM cultures during resection arthroplasty in periprosthetic knee infection. METHODS: A total of 66 IM diaphyseal cultures were taken during resection arthroplasty from 34 patients diagnosed with periprosthetic knee infection. These IM cultures were taken from the femoral and tibial canals using separate sterile instruments. All patients had infected primary total knee arthroplasty implants at the time of resection. RESULTS: Thirty one percent (n = 21) of IM canal cultures in this study were positive from either the tibial or the femoral diaphysis at the time of resection arthroplasty. There were 18 of 21 (86%) of the positive IM canal cultures with concordant intraoperative joint cultures where the IM cultures matched the intraarticular cultures. CONCLUSION: With a 31% positive IM canal culture rate, this study confirms the logic of using IM dowels with an antibiotic spacer to treat periprosthetic knee infection. Since the failure of a 2-stage reimplantation is catastrophic, any attempt to provide additional local antibiotic delivery seems warranted. Since nearly one-third of our patients had positive IM cultures, this simple addition to an antibiotic spacer has the potential to improve 2-stage results. Claims supporting the elimination of IM dowels during resection arthroplasty seem ill-advised.

Treatment Outcomes of Fungal Periprosthetic Joint Infection.

BACKGROUND: Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) continues to challenge surgeons and patients. The burden of fungal organisms may represent approximately 1% of all PJI. Additionally, fungal PJI is difficult to treat. Most available case series are small and report poor success rates. Fungi are opportunistic pathogens and patients who have fungal PJI are believed to be immunocompromised. Additionally, fungal biofilms are more complex than those formed by other pathogens and confer additional drug resistance. Due to these factors, treatment failure is common. METHODS: A retrospective review of our institutional registry was performed to identify patients treated for fungal PJI. There were 49 patients identified with 8 excluded for not having follow-up, which left 22 knees and 19 hips for analyses. Demographics, clinical characteristics, and surgical details were collected. The primary outcome was failure defined as reoperation for infection following the index surgery for fungal PJI within 1 year of the index surgery. RESULTS: Failure occurred in 10 of 19 knees and 11 of the 22 hips. A higher proportion of patients who have extremity grade C failed treatment, and every patient who failed was host grade 2 or 3. The average number of prior surgeries and time from resection to reimplantation were similar between groups. CONCLUSION: To our knowledge, this represents the largest cohort of fungal PJIs reported in the literature to date. This data supports other literature in that failure rates were high. More study is needed to further understand this entity and improve care for these patients.

Does Treatment at a Specialized Prosthetic Joint Infection Center Improve the Rate of Reimplantation.

BACKGROUND: Two-stage exchange arthroplasty is currently the preferred treatment method for periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). The effectiveness of this strategy in returning patients to premorbid function has recently been challenged. In a review of 18,535 PJI knee patients, 38% did not undergo reimplantation. In another review of 18,156 hip and knee PJI patients, 43% did not undergo reimplantation. These disturbing statistics led us to ask whether treatment at a specialized PJI center could improve the rate of reimplantation compared to the previously noted studies from large national administrative databases. METHODS: A retrospective review of our registry was performed to identify 390 patients who underwent a two-stage exchange after total knee arthroplasty and total hip arthroplasty who had a confirmed chronic bacterial PJI, defined by Musculoskeletal Infection Society criteria, from January 2010 through December 2019. Variables included number of joints resected, number reimplanted, and the number not reimplanted. RESULTS: Of the 390 patients undergoing 2-stage treatment, 386 of 390 (99%) were reimplanted and 4 of 390 (1%) were not reimplanted due to medical issues. CONCLUSION: We have shown that 2-stage treatment at a PJI center significantly improves the rate of reimplantation. A specialized PJI center with experienced revision surgeons doing high volume infection procedures complemented by infectious disease and medical consultants familiar with the special needs of PJI patients may be advantageous. A national network of such centers may have the ability to improve outcomes, standardize treatment protocols, and allow for collaborative research.

Hypoalbuminemia Predicts Failure of Two-Stage Exchange for Chronic Periprosthetic Joint Infection of the Hip and Knee.

BACKGROUND: Nutritionally compromized patients, with preoperative serum albumin (SAB) < 3.5g/dL, are at higher risk for periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) in total joint arthroplasty. The relationship between nutritional and PJI treatment success is unknown. The purpose of this study was to examine the relationship between preresection nutrition and success after first-stage resection in planned two-stage exchange for PJI. METHODS: A retrospective review was performed on 418 patients who had first-stage resection of a planned two-stage exchange for chronic hip or knee PJI between 2014 and 2018. A total of 157 patients (58 hips and 99 knees) were included who completed first stage, had available preop SAB and had a 2-year follow-up. Failure was defined as persistent infection or repeat surgery for infection after resection. Demographic and surgical data were abstracted and analyzed. RESULTS: Among knee patients with preop SAB >3.5 g/dL, the failure rate was 32% (15 of 47) versus a 48% (25 of 40) failure rate when SAB <3.5 g/dL (P = .10). Similarly, the failure rate among hip patients with preop SAB >3.5 g/dL versus 12.5% (3 of 24) versus 44% (15 of 34) for hip patients with SAB <3.5 g/dL (P = .01). Multivariable regression results indicated that patients with SAB< 3.5 g/dL (P = .0143) and Musculoskeletal Infection Society host type C (P = .0316) were at an increased risk of failure. CONCLUSION: Low preoperative SAB and Musculoskeletal Infection Societyhost type-C are independent risk factors for failure following first-stage resection in planned two-stage exchange for PJI. Efforts to nutritionally optimize PJI patients, when possible, may improve the outcome of two-stage exchange.

Dual Mobility Articulation in Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty: An American Joint Replacement Registry Analysis of Patients Aged 65 Years and Older.

BACKGROUND: Increasingly, dual mobility (DM) articulations have been used in revision total hip arthroplasty (THA), which may prevent postoperative hip instability. The purpose of this study was to report on outcomes of DM implants used in revision THA from the American Joint Replacement Registry (AJRR). METHODS: Revision THA cases performed between 2012 and 2018 Medicare were eligible and categorized by 3 articulations: DM, ≤32 mm, and ≥36 mm femoral heads. The AJRR-sourced revision THA cases were linked to Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) claims data to supplement (re)revision cases not captured in the AJRR. Patient and hospital characteristics were described and modeled as covariates. Using multivariable Cox proportional hazard models, considering competing risk of mortalities, hazard ratios were estimated for all-cause re-revision and re-revision for instability. Of 20,728 revision THAs, 3,043 (14.7%) received a DM, 6,565 (31.7%) a ≤32 mm head, and 11,120 (53.6%) a ≥36 mm head. RESULTS: At 8-year follow-up, the cumulative all-cause re-revision rate for ≤32 mm heads was 21.9% (95%-confidence interval (CI) 20.2%-23.7%) and significantly (P < .0001) higher than DM (16.5%, 95%-CI 15.0%-18.2%) and ≥36 mm heads (15.2%, 95%-CI 14.2%-16.3%). At 8-year follow-up, ≥36 heads had significantly (P < .0001) lower hazard of re-revision for instability (3.3%, 95%-CI 2.9%-3.7%) while the DM (5.4%, 95%-CI 4.5%-6.5%) and ≤32 mm groups (8.6%, 95%-CI 7.7%-9.6%) had higher rates. CONCLUSION: The DM bearings are associated with lower rates of revision for instability compared to patients who had ≤32 mm heads and higher revision rates for ≥36 mm heads. These results may be biased due to unidentified covariates associated with implant selection.

Varus Collapse in Total Knee Arthroplasty: Does Fixation or Bone Fail First?

INTRODUCTION: Aseptic tibial loosening is now considered the most common reason that total knee arthroplasties (TKA) fail long term. There are unique subsets of patients that fail into varus alignment of the tibial tray with collapse of the medial proximal tibia. It is currently unknown if the implant fixation fails first or if the proximal medial tibia collapses first. MATERIALS: We performed a retrospective analysis of 88 patients that were revised at our institution secondary to aseptic varus collapse of the proximal tibia. Two fellowship-trained arthroplasty surgeons performed a retrospective analysis on sequential precollapse radiographs in each patient to determine which failed first: the implant fixation (implant-cement or cement-bone interface) or the medial proximal tibia. DISCUSSION: 36/88 (40.9%) patients had a series of precollapse radiographs that could be reviewed. Failure at the implant-cement interface before varus collapse in 23 vs 22 patients, failure at the implant-cement and cement-bone interface before varus collapse in two patients, and contemporaneous failure at the implant-cement interface and varus collapse in 11 vs 12 patients were identified by reviewers one and two, respectively. CONCLUSION: The most frequent mechanism of failure identified was failure of the implant-cement interface followed by subsequent medial tibial varus collapse. Improving implant fixation may decrease the incidence of this unique failure mechanism. We advocate the use of supplemental stem fixation in high-risk patients and optimal cement techniques for all patients as methods of potentially avoiding tibial varus collapse, one of the most frequent modes of long-term failure.

Survivorship and Radiographic Evaluation of Metaphyseal Cones With Short Cemented Stems in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the survivorship and radiographic outcomes of a single design of metaphyseal cone used in conjunction with short cemented stems. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted of revision total knee arthroplasty (rTKA) patients (June 2015 to December 2017) using porous titanium femoral or tibial cones in conjunction with short cemented stems (50-75 mm). Minimum follow-up was 2 years. Survivorship, complications, and a modified Knee Society Radiographic score were analyzed. RESULTS: Forty-nine rTKAs were included in the study (12 femoral cones, 48 tibial cones). Varus-valgus constraint was used in 28 (57%) and a hinged bearing was used in 3 (6%) of these constructs. The majority were index rTKAs of primary components (86%), performed for aseptic loosening (51%) and reimplantation following staged treatment for infection (37%). Median follow-up was 39 months (range 25-58). Using a modified Knee Society Radiographic score, all constructs were classified as stable. Postoperatively, 4 rTKAs were complicated by recurrent infection (8%), periprosthetic fracture 2 (4%), and superficial wound infection 1 (2%). Seven rTKAs (14%) required reoperation. The majority of reoperations (4 rTKAs) were debridement and irrigation with implant retention for infection. Metaphyseal cone constructs with short cemented stems demonstrated 100% survivorship free of revision for aseptic loosening without evidence of radiographic loosening in any case. CONCLUSION: Our results demonstrate excellent outcomes with the use of metaphyseal cones with short cemented stems at mid-term follow-up. This construct avoids the use of long-stem fixation with the associated extraction difficulty, end of stem pain, and potential for malposition at the joint line. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV, Case Series.

High-Dose Antibiotic Cement Spacers Independently Increase the Risk of Acute Kidney Injury in Revision for Periprosthetic Joint Infection: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.

BACKGROUND: Standard treatment for periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) involves 2-stage exchange with placement of an antibiotic-impregnated cement spacer (ACS). Conflicting evidence exists on the role of ACS in development of acute kidney injury (AKI) after first-stage surgery. In this randomized clinical trial, we aimed to compare the incidence of AKI between the first-stage of a planned 2-stage exchange vs 1-stage exchange. This study design isolates the effect of the ACS in otherwise identical treatment groups. METHODS: The primary outcome variable was AKI, defined as a creatinine ≥1.5 times baseline or an increase of ≥0.3 mg/dL. Risk factors for AKI were evaluated using bivariate statistical tests and multivariable logistic regression. RESULTS: Patients who underwent the first stage of a planned 2-stage exchange were significantly more likely to develop AKI compared with the 1-stage exchange group (15 [22.7%] vs 4 [6.6%], P = .011). On multivariable regression analysis, ACS placement (odds ratio 7.48, 95% confidence limit 1.77-31.56) and chronic kidney disease (odds ratio 3.84, 95% confidence limit 1.22-12.08) were independent risk factors for AKI. CONCLUSION: Our study provides evidence that high-dose antibiotic cement spacers for treatment of PJI are an independent risk factor for AKI. Therefore, efforts to minimize nephrotoxicity should be employed in revision for PJI when possible.

Periprosthetic joint infection rates across primary total hip arthroplasty surgical approaches: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 653,633 procedures.

INTRODUCTION: Evidence demonstrates comparable clinical outcomes across the various surgical approaches to primary total hip arthroplasty (THA). However, high-quality contemporary data regarding periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) risk between direct anterior approach (DAA) and other (THA) approaches is lacking. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated PJI rates reported in the literature between the DAA and other approaches. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Five online databases were queried for all studies published from January 1st, 2000 through February 17th, 2021 that reported PJI rates between DAA and other surgical approaches. Studies reporting on primary THAs for osteoarthritis (OA) and that included PJI rates segregated by surgical approach were included. Articles reporting on revision THA, alternative THA etiologies, or minimally invasive techniques were excluded. Mantel-Haenszel (M-H) models were utilized to evaluate the pooled effect of surgical approach on infection rates. Validated risk of bias and methodological quality assessment tools were applied to each study. Multiple sensitivity analyses were conducted to evaluate the robustness of analyses. RESULTS: 28 articles reporting on 653,633 primary THAs were included. No differences were found between DAA cohorts and combined other approaches (OR: 0.95; 95% CI 0.74-1.21; p = 0.67) as well as segregated anterolateral approach cohorts (OR: 0.82, 95% CI 0.64-1.06; p = 0.13). However, DAA patients had a significantly reduced risk of infection compared to those undergoing posterior (OR: 0.66, 95% CI 0.58-0.74; p < 0.0001) and direct lateral (OR: 0.56, 95% CI 0.48-0.65; p < 0.00001) approaches. CONCLUSION: The DAA to primary THA had comparable or lower PJI risk when compared to other contemporary approaches. The results of the most up-to-date evidence available serve to encourage adult reconstruction surgeons who have already adopted the DAA. Additionally, orthopaedic surgeons considering adoption or use of the direct anterior approach for other reasons should not be dissuaded over theoretical concern for a general increase in the risk of PJI. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Where Is the "Weak Link" of Fixation in Contemporary Cemented Total Knee Replacements?

BACKGROUND: Aseptic tibial loosening is a frequent cause of long-term failure following primary cemented total knee replacement. Failure of the tibial implant can occur at the implant-cement interface or at the cement-bone interface. Currently, it is unknown at which interface failure occurs in cases of aseptic tibial loosening. The following study was designed to determine which interface represents the "weak link" for tibial implant fixation. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of 149 patients who were revised secondary to aseptic tibial loosening at our institution from 2005 to 2017. Operative reports and radiographs were reviewed on each patient to determine the location and pattern of fixation failure. RESULTS: Implant failure was more prevalent at the implant-cement than cement-bone interface, 140/149 (94.0%) vs 9/149 (6.0%). Additionally, we noted 2 distinct patterns of failure in patients that loosened at the implant-cement interface. Ninety of 140 (64.3%) patients developed varus collapse pattern of failure. Forty-nine of 140 (35.0%) patients developed failure between the implant-cement interface without angulation. All 149 patients had heterotopic bone formation anterior to the tibial baseplate, which was consistent regardless of which interface failed. CONCLUSION: The most frequent interface failure identified in our study was at the implant-cement interface, 140/149 (94.0%). This finding has substantial clinical ramifications. Because failure was predominantly at the implant-cement interface there may be design opportunities for increasing implant fixation to cement. Implants with improved undersurface tibial tray features may be necessary to mitigate the risk of failure at this interface, especially in overly active patients or those with elevated body mass indices.

Failure to Optimize Before Total Knee Arthroplasty: Which Modifiable Risk Factor is the Most Dangerous?

BACKGROUND: Complications after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) are devastating for patients, and surgeons are held accountable in alternative payment models. Optimization of modifiable risk factors has become a mainstay in the preoperative period. We sought to evaluate the consequence of failure to optimize key risk factors in a modern cohort of patients who underwent TKA. METHODS: The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database was searched to identify patients who underwent TKA in 2017-2018. Patients were considered optimized if they had a body mass index <40kg/m2, had albumin >3.5g/dL, were nonsmokers, and were nondiabetic. Patients were then grouped based on the previous 4 risk factors. Thirty-day readmission, infection, general complications, and mortality were analyzed and compared between the groups. RESULTS: Overall, 84,315 patients were included in the study. A total of 31.6% of patients were not considered optimized. Body mass index >40kg/m2, albumin <3.5, smoking, and insulin-dependent diabetes were all found to be associated with postoperative infection, readmission, mortality, and complication in general (P < .05). When compared, the nonoptimized group was found to have significantly higher risk of readmission (5 vs 3%), infection (2 vs 1%), general complications (8 vs 5%), and mortality (0.35 vs 0.1%) (all P < .001). Logistic regression showed that those with albumin less than 3.5g/dL had 3.7-fold higher odds of infection and 7.2-fold higher odds of 30-day mortality. CONCLUSION: Despite knowledge that modifiable risk factors significantly influence postoperative outcomes, surgeons continue to operate on patients who are not optimized. Among the modifiable risk factors analyzed, hypoalbuminemia appears to be the strongest risk factor for all complications evaluated. Special attention should be paid to preoperative nutritional optimization. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Retrospective cohort study, level IV.

Early Emergency Department Visits Following Primary Hip and Knee Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Postoperative emergency department (ED) utilization remains an understudied aspect of total joint arthroplasty (TJA). The purpose of this study is to characterize 30-day ED visits following TJA. METHODS: We reviewed 4061 primary unilateral total hip and knee arthroplasty cases performed at our hospital from 2013 to 2017. The primary outcome was presentation to our institution's ED within 30 days of surgery. Chief complaints and their association to the TJA encounter, as well as readmissions and reoperations, were recorded. One-to-three propensity score matched analysis was used to identify index admission variables associated with early ED visits. RESULTS: There were 253 recorded ED visits within 30 days of TJA (218 cases, 5.4%). Nearly 60% of ED visits were directly related to the TJA encounter. The remainder were medically related, most commonly for gastrointestinal complaints. The most common TJA-related complaints were surgical limb pain (28%), wound concerns (20%), and swelling (20%). These complaints comprised two-thirds of TJA-related ED visits, though accounted for only 19.4% and 9.5% of readmissions and reoperations observed in this cohort, respectively. Perioperative transfusion, length of stay, primary insurer, and discharge disposition were not associated with an ED visit. CONCLUSION: ED visits within 30 days of TJA were common (5.4%). Most visits related to the index procedure were due to surgical limb pain, wound concerns, and swelling. These complaints accounted for a minority of readmissions and reoperations. This study suggests that perioperative strategies addressing common postoperative concerns are warranted to mitigate acute care use after TJA.

Resilience and Depression Influence Clinical Outcomes Following Primary Total Joint Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Resilience and depression may impact clinical outcomes following primary total joint arthroplasty (TJA). This study aimed to quantify baseline resilience and depression prevalence in patients undergoing primary TJA and evaluate their influence on patient-reported clinical outcomes. METHODS: We prospectively enrolled 98 patients undergoing primary TJA. Exclusion criteria included patients under 18 years of age, undergoing surgery for fracture, or who underwent additional surgery during the study period. Patients completed the Brief Resilience Scale to measure resilience, Patient Health Questionnaire-9 to measure depression, and Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System-10 to measure global physical and mental health preoperatively and 1 year postoperatively. RESULTS: Preoperatively, 22% and 15% of patients demonstrated major and mild depression, respectively. High resilience was identified in 34% of patients, normal resilience in 55%, and low resilience in 11%. Preoperative depression correlated with lower resilience, global physical health, and global mental health scores preoperatively as well as at 1 year after surgery (P < .001). Higher levels of preoperative resilience correlated with higher global physical and mental health scores preoperatively and at 1 year postoperatively (P < .001). CONCLUSION: Depression symptoms are common among patients undergoing primary TJA and are associated with worse patient-reported outcomes. Patients with higher levels of resilience have higher global physical and mental health scores before and after TJA. Psychological traits and depression impact clinical outcomes following TJA.

Radiographic Evaluation of Proximal Femoral Nutrient Arteries After Total Hip Arthroplasty With a Short Femoral Stem.

BACKGROUND: The use of less invasive approaches and broach only press-fit femoral stems in total hip arthroplasty (THA) may increase the risk for periprosthetic fracture. Proximal femoral nutrient arteries (FNAs) can be mistaken for fractures after THA. Description of FNAs in relation to THA implants is important to better distinguish between FNAs and periprosthetic fractures. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the frequency, location, and morphology of FNAs visible on radiographs after primary THA with a broach-only stem design. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was performed. Patients ≥18 years who underwent primary THA with a cementless, broach-only stem, and had 6-week follow-up radiographs were included. Patient demographics were recorded. Anteroposterior and lateral radiographs at 6 weeks postoperatively were assessed for the presence of FNA; if present, measurements of vessel location and morphology were obtained. Descriptive statistics were reported. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify patient characteristics associated with the radiographic presence of perforating vessel. RESULTS: A total of 378 hips were evaluated (332 patients). FNAs were identified radiographically in 46.3% (175 hips/378 hips). All FNAs were found to be unicortical, most observed in the posterior and lateral cortices. Gender, age, BMI, stem position, and surgical approach did not correlate with a presence of FNA on radiograph. CONCLUSION: FNA was seen on postoperative radiographs in 46% of patients after THA with one broach-only stem design. The FNA was unicortical and present on preoperative radiographs. Surgeons should consider this when evaluating postoperative radiographs.

What is the Clinical Utility of Synovial Alpha Defensin Testing of Antibiotic Spacers Before Reimplantation?

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic performance of standalone alpha defensin (AD) testing of antibiotic spacers during two stage exchange and to determine if the addition of AD testing to other commonly used laboratory tests improves the ability to detect persistent infection in an antibiotic spacer. METHODS: Cases of two-stage exchange for periprosthetic joint infection from 2016 to 2019 at a single institution were retrospectively reviewed. Cases were classified as persistently infected or not infected in accordance with 2014 and 2018 Musculoskeletal Infection Society criteria to determine if AD provided any clinical utility beyond the other commonly used tests that make up both criteria. Delphi Consensus criteria at 1 year were used as the gold standard for determining recurrent periprosthetic joint infection. RESULTS: Fifty-two spacers (25 hips and 27 knees) in 51 patients were included for analysis. Five spacers were persistently infected based on Musculoskeletal Infection Society criteria. One spacer underwent reresection and the remaining 4 underwent reimplantation with no subsequent infectious complications. All 48 patients who were categorized as not infected underwent reimplantation; at 1 year postoperatively, 7 (13%) had failed due to infection. Three spacers (6%) had a positive AD test. Two spacers with positive AD tests underwent reimplantation, neither had failed at 1 year postoperatively. Sensitivity of standalone AD testing was 0%, and specificity was 96%. CONCLUSION: Standalone AD testing for the purpose of predicting repeat infection after two-stage exchange arthroplasty exhibits sensitivity of 0% and low predictive value. Addition of synovial AD testing did not increase the diagnostic performance of commonly used synovial and serologic markers of infection. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV-retrospective cohort study.

Prevention of Periprosthetic Joint Infection of the Hip and Knee: Modern Techniques and Strategies.

Prosthetic joint infection is a feared complication following elective total joint arthroplasty of the hip and knee. Infection following arthroplasty leads to high morbidity and even mortality and is a major burden to the health care system. Although many advances are being made in the treatment of prosthetic joint infection, with the increasing volume of total joint arthroplasty anticipated over the next decade, a significant emphasis should be placed on prevention. Several preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative strategies may be employed to help reduce the risk. (Journal of Surgical Orthopaedic Advances 30(4):202-206, 2021).

Total Joint Arthroplasty in the Morbidly Obese: How Body Mass Index ≥40 Influences Patient Retention, Treatment Decisions, and Treatment Outcomes.

BACKGROUND: The United States is in an obesity epidemic. Obesity has multiple common comorbid conditions, including lower extremity arthritis. We sought to examine the course of treatment for a population with body mass index (BMI) ≥40 kg/m2 and osteoarthritis (OA) of the hip or knee. We investigated decision criteria that influenced arthroplasty surgeons to recommend nonoperative management vs total joint arthroplasty (TJA). For those patients who ultimately received TJA, we compared outcomes in this population to those with BMI <40 kg/m2. METHODS: This study retrospectively reviewed 158 new patients with BMI ≥40 kg/m2 and moderate/severe OA of the hip or knee. Demographics, comorbidity profiles, and weight loss were compared between groups that underwent TJA and those that did not. The arthroplasty database was used to identify patients who underwent TJA during 2016-2018 (N = 1473). Comorbidities, readmissions, surgical site infections, and overall complications were compared between those with BMI ≥40 kg/m2 and BMI <40 kg/m2. RESULTS: About 51.3% of new patients with BMI ≥40 kg/m2 and moderate/severe OA did not return for a second clinic visit. Of those who did return, 42.9% eventually underwent surgery. BMI was higher in single visit patients vs those with multiple visits (49.5 vs 46.3 kg/m2, P < .001), no difference in those scheduled on an "as-needed" basis vs a specific return date (P = .18), and did not change significantly during the 2-year follow-up (P = .41). Patients who underwent TJA had a lower mean BMI at presentation than their nonoperative counterparts (44.5 vs 47.6 kg/m2, P < .01) and demonstrated significant weight loss prior to surgery (44.5 vs 42.6 kg/m2, P < .05). When comparing patients with BMI ≥40 kg/m2 vs BMI <40 kg/m2, overall complications were not higher in the BMI ≥40 kg/m2 group, although surgical site infections were higher in those undergoing total hip arthroplasty with BMI ≥40 kg/m2 (0.3% vs 3.1%, P < .05). CONCLUSION: A majority of patients with BMI ≥40 kg/m2 and moderate/advanced OA will be lost to orthopedic follow-up. A relatively lower BMI indicates a greater chance of retention in care, and ultimately surgery, but does not influence surgeons' recommendations to continue orthopedic management. Patients who persist in seeking treatment, lose significant weight, and exhaust nonoperative alternatives may be suitable for TJA despite a BMI ≥40 kg/m2, with an overall complication rate of 4.3%. However, only 9% of patients at 2-year follow-up achieved BMI <40 kg/m2 and only 20% of surgeries were performed on patients who had achieved this proposed cutoff.

Radiographic and Clinical Outcomes of Modular Tapered Fluted Stems for Femoral Revision for Paprosky III and IV Femoral Defects or Vancouver B2 and B3 Femoral Fractures.

BACKGROUND: Extensive femoral bone loss poses a challenge in revision total hip arthroplasty (rTHA). Many techniques have been developed to address this problem including fully porous cylindrical stems, impaction bone grafting, and cementation of long stems, which have had varied success. Modular tapered fluted femoral stems (MTFS) show favorable results. We sought to determine the minimum 2-year radiographic and clinical performance of MTFS in rTHA in a population with extensive proximal femoral bone loss. METHODS: Our clinical database was queried retrospectively for all patients who underwent rTHA with an MTFS. We included patients with Paprosky 3 and 4 femoral bone loss and patients with Vancouver B2 and B3 periprosthetic femur fractures. Patients without 2-year follow-up were invited to return to clinic for X-ray evaluation and to complete clinical questionnaires. We assessed distance of stem subsidence and presence of stem fixation on final X-ray. We recorded all-cause revision and survival of the stem at final follow-up. RESULTS: One hundred twenty-nine patients were available for follow-up. Average follow-up time was 3.75 years. One hundred twenty-two stems (95%) remained in place at final follow-up. Median subsidence was 1.4 mm (range 0-21). All-cause revision rate was 16.3% (21 patients). Of the hips revised, 10 were for instability, 6 for infection, 1 for aseptic loosening, and 1 for periprosthetic femur fracture. Three were revised for other reasons. The stem was revised in 7 patients (5.4%), and the most common reason for stem revision was infection (5 patients). The other 2 stems were revised for aseptic loosening in a Paprosky 4 femur and periprosthetic femur fracture. Survival of tapered modular fluted stems with aseptic failure as an endpoint was 98.4%. The mean Hip disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, Joint Replacement score at final follow-up was 73, and mean Veterans Rand 12 item health survey physical and mental scores were 32.8 and 52.2, respectively. CONCLUSION: In patients with Paprosky 3, 4 femoral defects or Vancouver type B2, B3 fractures, modular tapered fluted stems for femoral revision show excellent outcomes at minimum 2-year follow-up.

Two-Stage Exchange Arthroplasty for Periprosthetic Joint Infection Following Total Hip or Knee Arthroplasty Is Associated With High Attrition Rate and Mortality.

BACKGROUND: We sought to determine the ultimate fate of patients undergoing resection arthroplasty as a first stage in the process of 2-stage exchange and evaluate risk factors for modes of failure. METHODS: A retrospective case study was performed including all patients with minimum 2-year follow-up who underwent first-stage resection of a hip or knee periprosthetic joint infection from 2008 to 2015. Patient demographics, laboratory, and health status variables were collected. The primary outcome analyzed was defined as failure to achieve an infection-free 2-stage revision. Univariate pairwise comparison followed by multivariate regression analysis was used to determine risk factors for failure outcomes. RESULTS: Eighty-nine patients underwent resection arthroplasty in a planned 2-stage exchange protocol (27 hips, 62 knees). Mean age was 64 years (range, 43-84), 56.2% were males, and mean follow-up was 56.3 months. Also, 68.5% (61/89) of patients underwent second-stage revision. Of the 61 patients who complete a 2-stage protocol, 14.8% (9/61) of patients failed with diagnosis of repeat or recurrent infection. Mortality rate was 23.6%. Multivariate analysis identified risk factors for failure to achieve an infection-free 2-stage revision as polymicrobial infection (P < .004; adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 7.8; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.1-29.0), McPherson extremity grade 3 (P < .024; AOR, 4.1; 95% CI, 1.2-14.3), and history of prior resection (P < .013; AOR, 4.7; 95% CI, 1.4-16.4). CONCLUSION: Patients undergoing resection arthroplasty for periprosthetic joint infection are at high risk of death (24%) and failure to complete the 2-stage protocol (32%). Those who complete the 2-stage protocol have a 15% rate of reinfection at 4.5-year follow-up.

Restrictive Opioid Prescribing Protocols Following Total Hip Arthroplasty and Total Knee Arthroplasty Are Safe and Effective.

BACKGROUND: Orthopedic surgeons may overprescribe opioids postoperatively. Literature examining opioid prescribing guidelines following total joint arthroplasty (TJA) is limited. METHODS: Retrospective review was conducted of primary TJAs from June 2017 to February 2018, with 3-month follow-up. Patients were divided into those who underwent surgery before (historical cohort) and after (restrictive cohort) implementation of a strict postoperative opioid prescribing protocol. RESULTS: Three hundred ninety-nine total patients were included (282 in historical cohort, 117 in restrictive cohort). There was no significant difference in preoperative, perioperative, and postoperative inpatient opioid use. Historical cohort was given significantly larger initial prescriptions, received significantly more refills, and received significantly greater total quantity of opioids per patient. There were significantly fewer call-ins in the restrictive cohort. Clinical outcomes were not significantly different. CONCLUSION: Drastic reductions in opioid prescriptions following TJA are possible without an increase in refills, call-ins, or adverse clinical effects.