Efficient and Accurate Computed Tomography-Based Stone Volume Determination: Development of an Automated Artificial Intelligence Algorithm.

PURPOSE: Given the shortcomings of current stone burden characterization (maximum diameter or ellipsoid formulas), we sought to investigate the diagnostic accuracy and precision of a University of California, Irvine-developed artificial intelligence (AI) algorithm for determining stone volume determination. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 322 noncontrast CT scans were retrospectively obtained from patients with a diagnosis of urolithiasis. The largest stone in each noncontrast CT scan was designated the "index stone." The 3D volume of the index stone using 3D Slicer technology was determined by a validated reviewer; this was considered the "ground truth" volume. The AI-calculated index stone volume was subsequently compared with ground truth volume as well with the scalene, prolate, and oblate ellipsoid formulas estimated volumes. RESULTS: There was a nearly perfect correlation between the AI-determined volume and the ground truth (R=0.98). While the AI algorithm was efficient for determining the stone volume for all sizes, its accuracy improved with larger stone size. Moreover, the AI stone volume produced an excellent 3D pixel overlap with the ground truth (Dice score=0.90). In comparison, the ellipsoid formula-based volumes performed less well (R range: 0.79-0.82) than the AI algorithm; for the ellipsoid formulas, the accuracy decreased as the stone size increased (mean overestimation: 27%-89%). Lastly, for all stone sizes, the maximum linear stone measurement had the poorest correlation with the ground truth (R range: 0.41-0.82). CONCLUSIONS: The University of California, Irvine AI algorithm is an accurate, precise, and time-efficient tool for determining stone volume. Expanding the clinical availability of this program could enable urologists to establish better guidelines for both the metabolic and surgical management of their urolithiasis patients.

Alkaline Water: Help or Hype for Uric Acid and Cystine Urolithiasis?

PURPOSE: The consumption of alkaline water, water with an average pH of 8 to 10, has been steadily increasing globally as proponents claim it to be a healthier alternative to regular water. Urinary alkalinization therapy is frequently prescribed in patients with uric acid and cystine urolithiasis, and as such we analyzed commercially available alkaline waters to assess their potential to increase urinary pH. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Five commercially available alkaline water brands (Essentia, Smart Water Alkaline, Great Value Hydrate Alkaline Water, Body Armor SportWater, and Perfect Hydration) underwent anion chromatography and direct chemical measurements to determine the mineral contents of each product. The alkaline content of each bottle of water was then compared to that of potassium citrate (the gold standard for urinary alkalinization) as well as to other beverages and supplements used to augment urinary citrate and/or the urine pH. RESULTS: The pH levels of the bottled alkaline water ranged from 9.69 to 10.15. Electrolyte content was minimal, and the physiologic alkali content was below 1 mEq/L for all brands of alkaline water. The alkali content of alkaline water is minimal when compared to common stone treatment alternatives such as potassium citrate. In addition, several organic beverages, synthetic beverages, and other supplements contain more alkali content than alkaline water, and can achieve the AUA and European Association of Urology alkali recommendation of 30 to 60 mEq per day with ≤ 3 servings/d. CONCLUSIONS: Commercially available alkaline water has negligible alkali content and thus provides no added benefit over tap water for patients with uric acid and cystine urolithiasis.

Qualitative Review of Clinical Guidelines for Medical and Surgical Management of Urolithiasis: Consensus and Controversy 2020.

PURPOSE: Many major guidelines across the globe address the medical and surgical management of urolithiasis. We elected to compare and contrast the recommendations among the 5 most highly cited guidelines on stone disease to offer insights on where evidence has created a consensus and where there remains ongoing controversy and hence a need for the pursuit of studies that will provide a higher level of evidence. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We reviewed the American Urological Association 2019 medical and 2016 surgical guidelines, the 2016 Canadian Urological Association guidelines, the 2020 European Association of Urology guidelines, the 2019 National Institute for Health and Care Excellence and the 2019 Urological Association of Asia guidelines. Tables correlating guideline statements by topic were created, and a comparative analysis was conducted to ascertain consensus and discordance. RESULTS: Comparative analysis of recommendations from the American Urological Association guidelines to the Canadian Urological Association, European Association of Urology, National Institute for Health and Care Excellence guidelines and Urological Association of Asia revealed a high consensus surrounding the medical management of stones. In terms of the surgical management of stones, there is high consensus regarding the treatment of ureteral stones including medical expulsive therapy using alpha blockers, not prestenting for uncomplicated ureteroscopy and employment of either ureteroscopy or shockwave lithotripsy as first line treatment. There is high consensus among the American Urological Association, European Association of Urology, National Institute for Health and Care Excellence and Urological Association of Asia guidelines regarding renal stone treatment. The Canadian Urological Association does not have guidelines on the management of renal stones. Unlike the American Urological Association and National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, the Canadian Urological Association and European Association of Urology make specific recommendations regarding selection of patients for shockwave lithotripsy procedures, including stone density, skin-to-stone distance, treatment rate, acoustic coupling and postshockwave lithotripsy use of medical expulsive therapy. CONCLUSIONS: There are many areas of consensus and only minor areas of conflict among the most up-to-date American Urological Association, Canadian Urological Association, European Association of Urology, National Institute for Health and Care Excellence and Urological Association of Asia guidelines on the medical and surgical management of stone disease. Conflicts among guidelines and areas of low evidence, such as followup imaging strategies and stone surveillance, the use of a ureteral access sheath in ureteroscopy and guidance on the use of miniaturized percutaneous nephrolithotomy, are opportunities for novel, impactful high grade clinical studies.

Determining the Safety Threshold for the Passage of a Ureteral Access Sheath in Clinical Practice Using a Purpose-Built Force Sensor.

PURPOSE: Ureteral injury is a frequent complication of ureteral access sheath deployment. We sought to define the safe threshold of force for the passage of a ureteral access sheath using a novel ureteral access sheath force sensor. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ureteral access sheath-force sensor measurements were recorded in 210 renal units. A 16Fr ureteral access sheath was deployed initially based on a prior porcine study. If 6 N was reached, the surgeon was advised to downsize the 16Fr ureteral access sheath. In each case, a post-ureteroscopic lesion scale was recorded. Regression models were used to estimate the impact of adjusted variables on post-ureteroscopic lesion scale grade, 16Fr ureteral access sheath deployment, and peak force. RESULTS: A 16Fr ureteral access sheath was deployed in 127 (61%) renal units with a mean peak force of 5.7 N. Two high-grade ureteral injuries occurred; in both cases >6 N of force was recorded. Post-ureteroscopic lesion scale grade correlated directly with peak insertion force (p <0.01). Bacteriuria within 60 days of the procedure (OR 2.009, p=0.034), combination of preoperative stent plus oral tamsulosin (OR 2.998, p=0.045), and prior ipsilateral stone surgery (OR 2.13, p=0.01) were independent predictors of successful 16Fr ureteral access sheath deployment. Among patients with neither prior ipsilateral stone surgery nor preoperative stent, preoperative tamsulosin facilitated passage of a 16Fr ureteral access sheath (OR 2.750, p=0.034). CONCLUSIONS: Ureteral access sheath associated ureteral injury can be averted by limiting the insertion force to ≤6 N. Prior stone surgery, preoperative indwelling ureteral stent plus oral tamsulosin, and recently treated bacteriuria favored passage of a 16Fr ureteral access sheath. In the naïve, unstented patient, preoperative tamsulosin favored deployment of a 16Fr ureteral access sheath.

Comparison of Conventional and Triple Bolus Computerized Tomographic Urography Protocols for Radiation Dose Reduction in Hematuria Evaluation: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

PURPOSE: Computerized tomographic urography is the diagnostic tool of choice for evaluating hematuria. In keeping with the ALARA (As Low As Reasonably Achievable) principle, we evaluated a triple bolus computerized tomography protocol designed to reduce radiation exposure. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with macroscopic or microscopic hematuria were prospectively randomized to conventional computerized tomography (100) or triple bolus computerized tomography (100). The triple bolus computerized tomography protocol entails 2 scans: pre-contrast scan followed by 3 contrast injections at 40 seconds, 60 seconds and 20 minutes prior to the second scan to capture all 3 phases. The conventional computerized tomography protocol requires 4 scans: pre-contrast scan, and 3 post-contrast scans at the corticomedullary, nephrographic and excretory phases. Radiation exposure and the detection of urological pathology were recorded based on radiology reports. RESULTS: There were no differences in patient demographics or body mass index between the 2 groups. Triple bolus computerized tomography exposed patients to 33% less radiation (1,715 vs 1,145 mGy*cm for conventional vs triple bolus computerized tomography; p <0.001). For macroscopic hematuria, the pathology detection rates were 70% for triple bolus and 73% for conventional computerized tomography (p=0.72). For microscopic hematuria, the detection rates were 59% for triple bolus and 50% for conventional computerized tomography (p=0.68). In both groups, the rates of detection of urolithiasis, renal cysts, urological masses, bladder pathology and prostate pathology were no different between triple bolus and conventional computerized tomography. CONCLUSIONS: In both the settings of macroscopic and microscopic hematuria evaluation, triple bolus computerized tomography significantly reduces radiation exposure while providing equivalent detection of genitourinary pathology compared to conventional computerized tomography. The ability to detect upper tract filling defects was not specifically tested.

Characterization of intracalyceal pressure during ureteroscopy.

PURPOSE: To provide the first report of measuring intracalyceal pressures during ureteroscopy (URS). METHODS: A prospective single-center clinical study using a cardiac pressure guidewire to measure intracalyceal pressure during flexible URS was performed. Eight patients (45 calyces) undergoing URS for nephrolithiasis were included. A Verrata® pressure guide wire was passed through the working channel of a dual lumen flexible ureteroscope and into the calyces while irrigation was maintained at 150 mmHg. Pressure was measured in the renal pelvis, upper pole, interpolar, and lower pole calyces both with and without a ureteral access sheath (UAS). The pressure in each location with and without a UAS was compared. The correlation between calyceal pressure and infundibular dimensions (width, length) was determined. RESULTS: Intracalyceal pressure was significantly lower in each region when a UAS was used. Compared to patients with a 12/14Fr UAS, those with a 14/16Fr UAS had significantly lower pressure in the interpolar (25.3 ± 13.1 vs. 44.0 ± 27.5 mmHg, p = 0.03) and lower pole (16.2 ± 3.5 vs. 49.2 ± 40.3 mmHg, p = 0.004) calyces. Interpolar calyceal pressure in the presence of a UAS was significantly higher than the renal pelvis pressure (RPP) (30.8 ± 19.6 vs. 17.9 ± 11.0 mmHg, p = 0.004). CONCLUSIONS: During flexible URS, RPP strongly correlates with, but does not uniformly represent, the intracalyceal pressure. With a 14/16Fr UAS and an inflow pressure of 150 mmHg, RPP and intracalyceal pressure never exceed the threshold for renal backflow.

Office-Based Renal Tumor Biopsy: a Paradigm Change in the Management of a Small Renal Mass?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The goal of this paper is to evaluate the use of an office-based renal mass biopsy (RMB), whose feasibility could represent a paradigm shift in clinical practice. RECENT FINDINGS: Despite the earlier diagnosis of patients with renal masses, the lack of evidence showing a reduction in cancer-specific mortality warrants an examination in treatment practices. RMB is underutilized when compared to biopsy practice for all other neoplasms in every other solid organ (except testis), and the majority of RMB performed are outsourced to interventional radiologists. Performing an ultrasound-guided, office-based RMB is safe, reproducible, and has a meaningful impact on management decisions. The use of percutaneous RMB in clinical practice is growing, and the use of RMB has meaningful impact on management decisions for renal masses. Incorporating ultrasound-guided biopsy of a renal mass into clinical practice is feasible, and in contemporary practice, the urologist has the skill set to perform the procedure reliably, with low morbidity, and with minimal patient discomfort.

Smartphone technology and its applications in urology: a review of the literature.

PURPOSE: Smartphone technology has propelled the evolution of health-related mobile technology, referred to as mobile health (mHealth). With the rise of smartphone ownership and the growing popularity of health-related smartphone usage, mHealth offers potential benefits for both patients and health care providers. The objective of this review is to assess the current state of smartphone technology in urology. METHODS: A literature search of PubMed database was conducted to identify articles reporting on smartphone technology in urology. Publications were included if they focused on smartphone mHealth technology pertinent to the field of urology or included an evaluation of urological applications in digital stores. RESULTS: We identified 50 publications focused on the use of smartphones in urology. Studies were then grouped into the following categories: smartphones employing the built-in camera and light source, applications specific to prostate cancer, urolithiasis, pediatric urology, and as educational tools for urologists. In 23/50 (46%) studies, smartphone technology/intervention was compared to a control group or to standard of care. In this regard, smartphone technology did not demonstrate benefit over standard of care in 13 studies. In contrast, in 10 studies, smartphone interventions were proven beneficial over current practice. CONCLUSIONS: Smartphone technology is constantly evolving and has the potential to improve urological care and education. Of concern to consumer and urologist alike is that these downloadable programs are limited due to the accuracy of their content, risk of confidentiality breach, and the lack of central regulation and professional involvement in their development.

Effect of positioning on ureteric stone retropulsion: 'gravity works'.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the potential impact of alterations in 'patient' position on laser-induced ureteric stone retropulsion in an in vitro model. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A ceramic (phantom) stone was placed in a water-filled clear polymer tube and subjected to continuous laser energy until the stone had retropulsed a distance of 10 cm. The trial was stopped after 60 s if the stone had not reached 10 cm. The time and total energy needed to cause 10 cm of retropulsion were recorded at incline angles of 0°, 10°, 20°, and 40°; 10 trials at each angle were completed. The study was then repeated with pure calcium phosphate brushite stones. RESULTS: Retropulsion decreased with increasing incline angle of the saline-filled clear polymer tube. At 0° of incline the phantom stone reached a distance of 10 cm after 7.4 s. At 10°, 20° and 40°, the phantom stone migrated a mean maximum distance of 3.1, 1.2 and 0.7 cm, respectively, and the trial was stopped after 60 s. For the calcium phosphate stone, at 0° and 10° of incline, the stone reached 10 cm after 6.9 and 42.8 s, respectively (P < 0.05). At 20° and 40°, the calcium phosphate stone moved a mean maximum distance of 2.4 and 1 cm, and the trial was stopped after 60 s. CONCLUSION: Alterations in the angle of inclination reduced stone retropulsion during ureteroscopic lithotripsy in an in vitro model to <1 cm. Increasing the incline angle of a patient may effectively preclude retropulsion when performing laser lithotripsy of ureteric stones.

Ureteroscopic holmium laser-assisted retrograde nephrostomy access: a novel approach to percutaneous stone removal.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Percutaneous nephrolithotomy remains a challenging procedure primarily due to difficulties obtaining access. Indeed, few urologists obtain their own access due to difficulties using a fluoroscopic or ultrasonic based antegrade puncture technique. Herein we report the first experience using holmium laser energy to obtain access in a retrograde fashion. METHODS: After a pretreatment week of tamsulosin 0.4 mg/day (one center only) and following a documented sterile urine, a total of ten patients underwent retrograde holmium laser-assisted endoscopic-guided nephrostomy access in a prone split leg position. RESULTS: In nine of ten patients, ureteroscopic guided, holmium laser access via an upper pole posterior calyx was achieved. In one patient, the laser tract could not be safely dilated and antegrade endoscopic and fluoroscopic guided access was performed. The mean operative time was 202 min; the mean fluoroscopy time was 32 s (6/9 cases). The mean pre-operative stone volume was 14,420 mm3. CT imaging on post-operative day 1 revealed 6/6 patients had residual stone fragments with total mean volume of 250 mm3 (96% reduction); there were no residual fragments in three patients who were evaluated with non-CT radiographic imaging (KUB). There was a single complication requiring angioembolization due to a subcapsular hematoma with associated secondary tearing of an inter-polar vessel remote from the nephrostomy site. CONCLUSIONS: Holmium laser-assisted endoscopic-guided retrograde access in a prone split-leg position was successfully performed at two institutions. The accuracy of nephrostomy placement and lessening of fluoroscopy time are two potential benefits of this approach.

Medical impulsive therapy (MIT): the impact of 1 week of preoperative tamsulosin on deployment of 16-French ureteral access sheaths without preoperative ureteral stent placement.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Medical expulsive therapy is based on pharmacologic ureteral relaxation. We hypothesized this concept may facilitate the deployment of the large 16 French (F) ureteral access sheath (UAS) when patients are intentionally pre-treated with oral tamsulosin, i.e., medical impulsive therapy. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed our experience with UAS deployment during endoscopic-guided percutaneous nephrolithotomy in prone position in patients pre-treated for 1 week with oral tamsulosin with a contemporary untreated cohort. Between January 2015 and September 2016, seventy-seven patients without a pre-existing ureteral stent met inclusion criteria. Demographic data, tamsulosin usage, UAS size, deployment failure, ureteral injuries, stone-free rates, and complications were recorded. Univariate and multivariate analysis was conducted to assess the impact of tamsulosin on deployment of the 16F UAS. RESULTS: There was no statistical difference between the tamsulosin (n = 40) group and non-tamsulosin (n = 37) group in regard to demographic data. The tamsulosin group had a significantly higher percentage of 16F UAS deployment, 87 vs. 43% (p < 0.001), and no significant difference in ureteral injuries (p = 0.228). Univariate and multivariate analysis revealed that tamsulosin significantly increased the odds ratio (9.3 and 19.4, respectively) for successful passage of a 16F UAS. Despite a larger stone volume, there was no significant difference in computed tomography scan complete stone-free rates (29 vs. 42%; p = 0.277) at median post-operative time of only 3 days. CONCLUSIONS: In this retrospective study, 1 week of preoperative tamsulosin was associated with an increase in the deployment of a 16F UAS in patients without preoperative ureteral stent placement.

Percutaneous renal biopsy: approach, diagnostic accuracy and risks.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This article provides a review of recent advances and issues regarding the controversial topic of renal mass biopsy (RMB). The purpose of this review is to provide an update on the current status of renal biopsy based on recently published literature. Here, we particularly focus on articles that have been published within the last 12 months. RECENT FINDINGS: The main topics covered in this review are the approach, diagnostic accuracy and risks related to RMB. SUMMARY: Current literature suggests that improvements in both technique and technological advancements of RMB have led to greater diagnostic accuracy and low risks to the patient. Newer technologies are leading toward innovative and harmless ways to diagnose kidney cancer, including liquid and image-based biopsy. However, it appears that the question of whether or not to instate renal biopsy as standard clinical practice has remained a highly debated controversy.

Renal mass biopsy: an oncological conundrum.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: We evaluate the reasons that the majority of urologists infrequently biopsy a T1a small renal mass (SRM). RECENT FINDINGS: The majority of urologists report that a renal mass biopsy will not change their management in patients with a SRM given concerns of safety and efficacy of the biopsy. However, when comparing the safety and efficacy of SRM biopsy with neoplasms in all other major organ systems (all of which require biopsy prior to treatment), renal mass biopsy results are favorable. In addition to being safe and effective, renal mass biopsy should be more cost-effective for the healthcare system. Finally, in properly selected patients, renal mass biopsy can be performed in the urologist's office, thereby further decreasing cost. SUMMARY: Renal mass biopsy is an essential clinical tool that needs to be incorporated into the decision-making process among patients with a T1a SRM. A biopsy-driven, tissue-specific diagnosis of SRMes should become the standard of care in urology to bring us to parity with standard practice to management of lesions identified in every other organ system.

Prone Versus Supine Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: What Is Your Position?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) is the gold standard surgical procedure for treating large, complex renal stones. Due to its challenging nature, PCNL has undergone many modifications in surgical technique, instruments, and also in patient positioning. Since the first inception of PCNL, prone position has been traditionally used. However, alternative positions have been proposed and assessed over the years. This is a comprehensive review on the latest developments related to positioning in the practice of PCNL. RECENT FINDINGS: The prone position and its modifications are the most widely used positions for PCNL, but with the introduction of various supine positions, the optimal position has been up for debate. Recent meta-analysis has shown a superior stone-free rate in the prone position and comparable complication rates to the supine position. The advantage of ease of access to the urethra for simultaneous retrograde techniques in the supine position is also possible with modifications in the prone position such as the split-leg technique. Modern-day PCNL has transformed from an operation traditionally undertaken in the prone position to a procedure in which a prone or supine position may be employed; however, published data have not shown significant superiority of either approach.

Predictability and Practicality of Image-Based Scoring Systems for Patient Assessment and Outcome Stratification During Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: a Contemporary Update.

Preoperative nomograms offer systematic and quantitative methods to assess patient- and stone-related characteristics and their impact on successful treatment and potential risk of complication. Discrepancies in the correlation of perioperative variables to patient outcomes have led to the individual development, validation, and application of four independent scoring systems for the percutaneous nephrolithotomy: Guy's stone score, S.T.O.N.E. nephrolithometry, Clinical Research Office of the Endourology Society nomogram, and Seoul National University Renal Stone Complexity. The optimal nomogram should have high predictive ability, be practically integrated into clinical use, and be widely applicable to urinary stone disease. Herein, we seek to provide a contemporary evaluation of the advantages, disadvantages, and commonalities of each scoring system. While the current data is insufficient to conclude which scoring system is destined to become the gold standard, it is crucial that a nephrolithometric scoring system be incorporated into common practice to improve surgical planning, patient counseling, and outcome assessment.

Electromotive Drug Administration in the Porcine Renal Pelvis: First Report.

Introduction: Electromotive Drug Administration (EMDA) amplifies drug delivery deep into targeted tissues. We tested, for the first time, the ability of EMDA to deliver methylene blue into the urothelium of the renal pelvis. Materials and Methods: In an anesthetized female pig, both proximal ureters were transected two inches distal to the ureteropelvic junction. An 8F dual lumen catheter and a 5F fenestrated catheter with an indwelling silver wire were inserted into both renal pelvises following which methylene blue (0.1%) was infused at a rate of 5 mL/min for 20 minutes. In one pelvis, a 4 mA positive pulsed electrical current was applied to the silver wire. Results: In contrast to the control pelvis, the EMDA side macroscopically exhibited dense homogeneous staining; microscopy revealed penetration of methylene blue into the urothelium/lamina propria. Conclusion: In the porcine renal pelvis, application of EMDA increased the penetration of a charged molecule into the urothelium/lamina propria.

Development and Initial Evaluation of a Cost-Effective Force Sensor for Ureteroscopic Application.

Purpose: Retrograde intrarenal surgery is the gold-standard treatment for most kidney stones. During ureteroscopy, ureteral access sheath insertion at forces greater than 8.0 Newtons (N) risks high-grade ureteral injury. To monitor force, our institution utilizes a unique, Bluetooth-equipped device (i.e., the University of California-Irvine Force Sensor). Given the unique nature of the force sensor, we sought to develop an inexpensive and accessible force sensor based on Boyle's law and the specific amount of force required to compress an occluded 1.0 mL syringe. Materials and Methods: We evaluated three brands of 1.0 mL syringes. After setting the plunger at 1.0 mL, the syringe was occluded, and the syringe plunger was compressed. The syringe volume was recorded when the applied force on the plunger reached 4.0 N, 6.0 N, and 8.0 N. Multiple trials were performed to assess reliability and reproducibility. A method for applying this clinically was also developed. Results: The precise force thresholds identified for a 1.0 mL Luer-Lok™ Syringe (Becton Dickinson, Franklin Lakes, NJ) were 0.30 mL for 4.00 N, 0.20 mL for 6.00 N, and 0.15 mL for 8.00 N. The 1.0 mL Tuberculin Syringe and 1.0 mL Luer Slip Syringe were less precise, but compression from 1.0 to 0.40 mL, 0.25 mL, and 0.20 mL corresponded to force sensor readings that did not exceed 4.00 N, 6.00 N, and 8.00 N, respectively. Conclusions: Based on volume changes, 4.00 N, 6.00 N, and 8.00 N of force can be reliably and reproducibly achieved using an occluded 1.0 mL syringe.

Avoiding "Needless" nephrectomy: What is the role of small renal mass biopsy in 2024?

Current guidelines do not mandate routine preoperative renal mass biopsy (RMB) for small renal masses (SRMs), which results in a considerable rate (18%-26%) of needless nephrectomy/partial nephrectomy for benign renal tumors. In light of this ongoing practice, a narrative review was conducted to examine the role of routine RMB for SRM. First, arguments justifying the current non-biopsy approach to SRM are critically reviewed and contested. Second, as a standalone procedure, RMB is critically assessed; RMB was found to have higher sensitivity, specificity, and an equal or lower complication rate when compared with other commonly preoperatively biopsied solid organ tumors (e.g., breast, prostate, lung, pancreas, thyroid, and liver). Based on the foregoing information, we propose a paradigm shift in SRM management, advocating for an updated policy in which partial nephrectomy or nephrectomy for SRM invariably occurs only after a preoperative biopsy confirms that a SRM is indeed malignant.

Surgical Force: Initial Study and Clinical Implications in the Assessment of Ureteral Access Sheath Induced Injury.

Purpose: Ureteral access sheaths (UAS) pose the risk of severe ureteral injury. Our prior studies revealed forces ≤6 Newtons (N) prevent ureteral injury. Accordingly, we sought to define the force urologists and residents in training typically use when placing a UAS. Materials and Methods: Among urologists and urology residents attending two annual urological conferences in 2022, 121 individuals were recruited for the study. Participants inserted 12F, 14F, and 16F UAS into a male genitourinary model containing a concealed force sensor; they also provided demographic information. Analysis was completed using t-tests and Chi-square tests to identify group differences when passing a 16F sheath UAS. Participant traits associated with surpassing or remaining below a minimal force threshold were also explored through polychotomous logistic regression. Results: Participant force distributions were as follows: ≤4N (29%), >6N (45%), and >8N (32%). More years of practice were significantly associated with exerting >6N relative to forces between 4N and 6N; results for >8N relative to 4N and 8N were similar. Compared to high-volume ureteroscopists (those performing >20 ureteroscopies/month), physicians performing ≤20 ureteroscopies/month were significantly less likely to exert forces ≤4N (p = 0.017 and p = 0.041). Of those surpassing 6N and 8N, 15% and 18%, respectively, were high-volume ureteroscopists. Conclusions: Despite years of practice or volume of monthly ureteroscopic cases performed, most urologists failed to pass 16F access sheaths within the ideal range of 4N to 6N (74% of participants) or within a predefined safe range of 4N to 8N (61% of participants).