Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 10 de 10
Filtrar
1.
J Urol ; 205(5): 1286-1293, 2021 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33356478

RESUMO

PURPOSE: A paradigm shift in the management of small renal masses has increased utilization of active surveillance. However, questions remain regarding safety and durability in younger patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients aged 60 or younger at diagnosis were identified from the Delayed Intervention and Surveillance for Small Renal Masses registry. The active surveillance, primary intervention, and delayed intervention groups were evaluated using ANOVA with Bonferroni correction, χ2 and Fisher's exact tests, and Kruskal-Wallis and Wilcoxon signed-rank tests. Survival outcomes were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared with the log-rank test. RESULTS: Of 224 patients with median followup of 4.9 years 30.4% chose surveillance. There were 20 (29.4%) surveillance progression events, including 4 elective crossovers, and 13 (19.1%) patients underwent delayed intervention. Among patients with initial tumor size ≤2 cm, 15.1% crossed over, compared to 33.3% with initial tumor size 2-4 cm. Overall survival was similar in primary intervention and surveillance at 7 years (94.0% vs 90.8%, log-rank p=0.2). Cancer-specific survival remained at 100% for both groups. There were no significant differences between primary and delayed intervention with respect to minimally invasive or nephron-sparing interventions. Recurrence-free survival at 5 years was 96.0% and 100% for primary and delayed intervention, respectively (log-rank p=0.6). CONCLUSIONS: Active surveillance is a safe initial strategy in younger patients and can avoid unnecessary intervention in a subset for whom it is durable. Crucially, no patient developed metastatic disease on surveillance or recurrence after delayed intervention. This study confirms active surveillance principles can effectively be applied to younger patients.


Assuntos
Neoplasias Renais/terapia , Conduta Expectante , Adulto , Fatores Etários , Feminino , Humanos , Neoplasias Renais/patologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos , Sistema de Registros , Resultado do Tratamento , Carga Tumoral , Adulto Jovem
4.
Urology ; 165: 89-97, 2022 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34808140

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate racial, gender, and socioeconomic differences in the treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) and their impact on survival. METHODS: Patients aged ≥18 years diagnosed with mRCC in the National Cancer Database (2004-2015) were analyzed. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to evaluate factors associated with systemic therapy and cytoreductive nephrectomy (CN) utilization. Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to evaluate overall survival. RESULTS: In total, 31,989 patients with mRCC were identified with 30.2% receiving CN, 51.6% receiving systemic therapy, and 25.8% receiving no treatment. Females were at lower odds of receiving systemic therapy (OR 0.91, P <.01) and increased odds of no treatment (OR 1.14, P <.01). Non-Hispanic Black and Hispanic patients were at decreased odds of receiving CN (OR 0.75, P <.01 and OR 0.86, P = .01, respectively). Black patients were at decreased odds of receiving systemic therapy (OR 0.85, P <.01) and increased odds of no treatment (OR 1.41, P <.01). Adjusting for demographic and disease variables, Black patients were at increased risk of death (HR 1.06, P = .03), largely due to less use of systemic therapy and CN; survival differences disappeared after accounting for receipt of therapy (HR 0.99, P = .66). CONCLUSION: There are racial, gender, and socioeconomic differences in the treatment of mRCC which are associated with a disparity in overall survival. Dismantling systemic barriers and improving access to care may lead to reduced disparities and improved outcomes for mRCC.


Assuntos
Carcinoma de Células Renais , Neoplasias Renais , Adolescente , Adulto , Carcinoma de Células Renais/patologia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos de Citorredução , Feminino , Humanos , Neoplasias Renais/cirurgia , Nefrectomia , Modelos de Riscos Proporcionais , Estudos Retrospectivos
5.
Drugs Aging ; 38(10): 845-886, 2021 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34586623

RESUMO

Chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome (CP/CPPS) is a common and often heterogenous condition that can have severe consequences on patient quality of life. In this review, we describe the pathophysiology, diagnostic work-up, and treatment of patients with CP/CPPS incorporating the most recent literature. Studies have demonstrated that CP/CPPS involves a complex pathophysiology, including infectious, immunologic, neurologic, endocrinologic, and psychologic etiologies, with frequent intersections between the different entities. Despite robust research assessing a variety of therapeutics targeting these etiologies, clinical trials have failed to identify an empiric treatment strategy applicable specifically to older adult male patients with CP/CPPS. As such, it can be challenging to manage older male patients with this condition. The advent of clinical phenotyping of patients with CP/CPPS has led to advances in tailored management strategies. Monomodal therapy has been largely unsuccessful because of the unclear and complex etiology of CPPS. As a result, CP/CPPS therapy has transitioned to a multimodal approach, including both pharmacologic and non-pharmacologic therapies. The best studied pharmacologic therapies include antibiotics, alpha-blockers, anti-inflammatory and immunomodulatory agents, phytotherapies, phosphodiesterase inhibitors, hormonal agents, neuromodulatory agents, and antidepressants. The best studied non-pharmacological therapies include pelvic floor physical therapy, myofascial trigger point release, acupuncture and electroacupuncture, psychological support and biofeedback, and electrocorporeal shockwave therapy and local thermotherapy.


Assuntos
Dor Crônica , Prostatite , Idoso , Doença Crônica , Humanos , Masculino , Dor Pélvica/diagnóstico , Dor Pélvica/etiologia , Dor Pélvica/terapia , Prostatite/diagnóstico , Prostatite/terapia , Qualidade de Vida
6.
Urology ; 154: 237-242, 2021 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33493510

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To examine the long-term efficacy of prostatic urethral lift (PUL) for treating men, with or without an obstructive median lobe (OML), who suffer from lower urinary tract symptoms attributed to benign prostatic hyperplasia. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective review was performed on all consecutive PUL cases with or without OML from October 2017 to November 2019 by a single academic surgeon. Outcomes were measured using the International Prostate Symptoms Survey (IPSS) with quality of life (QoL) scores. Comparative testing and mixed-effects linear regression analysis were utilized with significance set at α = 0.05 and performed with Stata (College Station, TX). RESULTS: A total of 110 PUL procedures were performed on 106 patients (4 repeat surgeries) with a median age of 66.5 (interquartile range: 60.4-73.7). Twenty-three patients (21.7%) had an OML. Following PUL, patients in both groups showed significant improvements in IPSS (P <.001) and QoL (P <.001) scores. When stratifying by OML and controlling for confounding, IPSS scores in both groups displayed statistically significant improvement at follow-up visits, with no statistically significant intergroup difference (P = .32). The same held true for QoL improvements, with no statistically significant difference between groups (P = .18). The presence of an OML resulted in minimal effects on perioperative outcomes and complications but required significantly more implants (P = .008). CONCLUSION: PUL is a minimally invasive procedure effective at reducing lower urinary tract symptoms and improving the lives of men with benign prostatic hyperplasia without incurring risks of serious complications. These improvements were equivalent and upheld in patients who presented with OML.


Assuntos
Sintomas do Trato Urinário Inferior/cirurgia , Uretra/cirurgia , Idoso , Humanos , Sintomas do Trato Urinário Inferior/etiologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Hiperplasia Prostática/complicações , Qualidade de Vida , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento
7.
Urology ; 151: 129-137, 2021 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32890618

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate gender differences in the management of clinical T1a (cT1a) renal cell carcinoma (RCC) before and after release of the AUA guidelines for management in 2009, which prioritized nephron-sparing approaches. METHODS: Patients aged ≥66 years diagnosed with cT1a RCC from 2004 to 2013 in Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-Medicare were analyzed. Multivariable mixed-effects logistic regression models were used to evaluate factors associated with radical nephrectomy (RN) for cT1a RCC before (2004 to 2009) and after (2010 to 2013) guidelines release. Predictors of pathologic T3 upstaging and high grade pathology in the postguidelines period were examined using multivariable logistic regression among patients who underwent RN or partial nephrectomy. RESULTS: Twelve thousand four hundred and two patients with cT1a RCC were identified, 42% of whom were women. Overall, the likelihood of RN decreased postguidelines (odds ratio [OR] = 0.44, P <.001), but women were at increased odds of undergoing RN both before and after guideline release (OR = 1.27, P <.001 and OR = 1.37, P <.001, respectively) upon multivariable mixed-effects logistic regression. Tumor size >2 cm was also associated with increased likelihood of RN before and after guidelines (OR = 2.61, P <.001 and OR = 2.51, P <.001, respectively). In the postguidelines period, women had significantly lower odds of pathologic upstaging (OR = 0.75, P = .024) and harboring high grade pathology (OR = 0.71, P <.001) compared to men. CONCLUSION: Gender differences persist in the management of cT1a RCC, with women having higher odds of undergoing RN, even after release of AUA guidelines and despite having lower odds of pathologic upstaging and high-grade disease.


Assuntos
Carcinoma de Células Renais/cirurgia , Neoplasias Renais/cirurgia , Nefrectomia/estatística & dados numéricos , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Carcinoma de Células Renais/epidemiologia , Carcinoma de Células Renais/patologia , Feminino , Humanos , Neoplasias Renais/epidemiologia , Neoplasias Renais/patologia , Masculino , Programa de SEER , Fatores Sexuais , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
8.
Asian J Androl ; 23(6): 616-620, 2021.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33885003

RESUMO

Adoption of the prostatic urethral lift (PUL) as a treatment for benign prostatic hyperplasia highlights the importance of training residents with novel technology without compromising patient care. This study examines the effect of resident involvement during PUL on patient and procedural outcomes. Retrospective chart review was conducted on all consecutive PUL cases performed by a single academic urologist between October 2017 and November 2019. Trainees in post-graduate year (PGY) 1-3 are considered junior residents, while those in PGY 4-6 are senior residents. The International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) and quality of life (QOL) scores were used to measure outcomes. Simple and mixed-effects linear regression models were used to compare differences. There were 110 patients with a median age of 66.4 years. Residents were involved in 73 cases (66.4%), and senior residents were involved in 31 of those cases. Resident involvement was not associated with adverse perioperative outcomes with respect to the number of implants fired, the percentage of implants successfully placed, or the postoperative catheterization rate. After adjustment for confounding factors, junior residents were associated with significantly longer case length compared to the attending alone (+12.6 min, P = 0.003) but senior residents were not (+2.4 min, P = 0.59). IPSS and QOL scores were not significantly affected by resident involvement (P = 0.12 and P = 0.21, respectively). The presence of surgeons-in-training, particularly those in the early stages, prolongs PUL case length but does not appear to have an adverse impact on patient outcomes.


Assuntos
Hiperplasia Prostática/cirurgia , Qualidade de Vida/psicologia , Ureteroscopia/estatística & dados numéricos , Idoso , Humanos , Internato e Residência/métodos , Internato e Residência/estatística & dados numéricos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Próstata/cirurgia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento , Ureteroscopia/métodos
9.
Urol Case Rep ; 34: 101488, 2021 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33299797

RESUMO

Azoospermia is classified as the complete absence of sperm in ejaculate and accounts for 10-15% of male infertility. Many anticancer drugs are known to cause defects in spermatogenesis, but the effects of immune checkpoint inhibitor cancer therapy on spermatogenesis remains largely unknown. Presented here is a normozoospermic man (60 million sperm/cc of ejaculate) who received a trial combination treatment of Ipilimumab/Nivolumab to treat BRAF negative, stage IV metastatic melanoma. Two years after the treatment, the patient presented as completely azoospermic. The patient subsequently underwent microdissection testicular sperm extraction, during which no sperm was retrieved, and sertoli-only pathology was elucidated.

10.
Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab ; 34(6): 101479, 2020 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33390350

RESUMO

Non-obstructive azoospermia is a distinct diagnosis within male infertility in which no sperm is found in the ejaculate as a result of spermatogenesis failure. Because of the increased prevalence of genetic abnormalities in men with non-obstructive azoospermia, male infertility guidelines recommend screening for karyotype abnormalities and Y chromosome microdeletions in this population. Numerous karyotype abnormalities may be present resulting in impaired spermatogenesis, including: Klinefelter syndrome, translocations, and deletions. Y chromosome microdeletions of the AZFa, AZFb, AZFc subregions all can also result in non-obstructive azoospermia with the possibility of sperm being present if only the AZFc subregion is deleted. While these are the two genetic tests recommended by the guidelines, nearly 50%-80% of non-obstructive azoospermia has no identifiable cause and is deemed idiopathic. Several other genetic defects can lead to non-obstructive azoospermia including Kallmann syndrome, mild androgen insensitivity syndrome, and TEX11. While many additional candidate genes have been proposed, many have yet to be verified or are so infrequent in the population that screening is cost-ineffective. Much research is still required in the genetics of non-obstructive azoospermia and will require multi-institutional initiatives to better understand the genetics of condition.


Assuntos
Azoospermia/genética , Mutação , Síndrome de Resistência a Andrógenos/diagnóstico , Síndrome de Resistência a Andrógenos/genética , Azoospermia/diagnóstico , Azoospermia/epidemiologia , Deleção Cromossômica , Cromossomos Humanos Y/genética , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Predisposição Genética para Doença , Testes Genéticos/métodos , Humanos , Infertilidade Masculina/diagnóstico , Infertilidade Masculina/genética , Síndrome de Klinefelter/diagnóstico , Síndrome de Klinefelter/genética , Masculino , Aberrações dos Cromossomos Sexuais , Transtornos do Cromossomo Sexual no Desenvolvimento Sexual/diagnóstico , Transtornos do Cromossomo Sexual no Desenvolvimento Sexual/genética , Espermatozoides/anormalidades , Espermatozoides/metabolismo
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA