Oncologic emergencies and urgencies: A comprehensive review.

Patients with advanced cancer generate 4 million visits annually to emergency departments (EDs) and other dedicated, high-acuity oncology urgent care centers. Because of both the increasing complexity of systemic treatments overall and the higher rates of active therapy in the geriatric population, many patients experiencing acute decompensations are frail and acutely ill. This article comprehensively reviews the spectrum of oncologic emergencies and urgencies typically encountered in acute care settings. Presentation, underlying etiology, and up-to-date clinical pathways are discussed. Criteria for either a safe discharge to home or a transition of care to the inpatient oncology hospitalist team are emphasized. This review extends beyond familiar conditions such as febrile neutropenia, hypercalcemia, tumor lysis syndrome, malignant spinal cord compression, mechanical bowel obstruction, and breakthrough pain crises to include a broader spectrum of topics encompassing the syndrome of inappropriate antidiuretic hormone secretion, venous thromboembolism and malignant effusions, as well as chemotherapy-induced mucositis, cardiomyopathy, nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea. Emergent and urgent complications associated with targeted therapeutics, including small molecules, naked and drug-conjugated monoclonal antibodies, as well as immune checkpoint inhibitors and chimeric antigen receptor T-cells, are summarized. Finally, strategies for facilitating same-day direct admission to hospice from the ED are discussed. This article not only can serve as a point-of-care reference for the ED physician but also can assist outpatient oncologists as well as inpatient hospitalists in coordinating care around the ED visit.

Concordance Between Electronic Health Record-Recorded Race and Ethnicity and Patient Report in Emergency Department Patients.

OBJECTIVE: We assessed the concordance of patient-reported race and ethnicity for emergency department (ED) patients compared with what was recorded in the electronic health record. METHODS: We conducted a single-center, prospective, observational study of 744 ED patients (English- and/or Spanish-speaking), asking them to describe their race and ethnicity. We compared the distributions of ethnicity and race between patient-reported and electronic health record data using McNemar's test. We calculated percent agreement and Cohen's kappa, with 95% confidence intervals (CI), for the concordance of patient-reported race and ethnicity with electronic health record data. RESULTS: Of 744 ED patients, 731 participants who completed the survey reported their ethnicity, resulting in 98.2% of electronic health records obtained ethnicities matched self-reported data (kappa = 0.95; 95% CI: 0.92 to 0.98). For those who self-reported as Hispanic, only 92.3% agreement was observed between the self-reported and electronic health record values. For all patients who had race recorded, 85.4% agreement was observed (kappa = 0.75; 95% CI 0.71 to 0.79). High rates of agreement were observed for Black or African American patients (98.7%) and White patients (96.6%), with low rates for those who identified as "More than one race" (22.9%) or "Other" race (1.8%). In the subset of Hispanic patients, low rates of agreement (25.0%) were observed for race (kappa = 0.10; 95% CI 0.01 to 0.19). CONCLUSIONS: Documentation discordance regarding race and ethnicity exists between electronic health records and self-reported data for our ED patients, particularly for ethnically Hispanic and Latino/a patients. Future efforts should focus on ensuring that demographic information in the electronic health record is accurately collected.

Pilot intervention to increase uptake of lung cancer screening through the emergency department.

INTRODUCTION: The goal of this study is to demonstrate the feasibility of referring patients for lung cancer screening (LCS) from the emergency department (ED) as a method to increase the uptake of LCS. METHODS: This is a single-arm pilot study at a large safety-net ED. ED LCS-eligible patients were offered a referral to our LCS clinic upon ED discharge. The primary outcome was the frequency at which patients connected with the LCS clinic. RESULTS: During the study period, 105 patients were approached; 26 (24.8%) participated. Reasons for non-enrollment include 29 (27.6%) who were not interested in research, 10 (9.5%) who did not speak English, and 40 (38.1%) who did not meet the pack-years criteria. Seventeen patients (65.4%, 17/26) connected with the LCS clinic, with 10 (38.5%) having been seen in the clinic and received a low dose computed tomography (LDCT) scan. Of the 17 that were connected with the clinic, 7 (26.9%) had a non-LDCT chest CT scan in the past year. Of those that were not seen in the clinic (n = 9), 4 (44.4%) were unreachable via 3 phone calls and a post-marked letter, and 3 (33.3%) did not attend the scheduled appointment, and 2 (22.2%) were delayed due to COVID-19. Of those that had CT scans over the study period (n = 17), 0 scans were normal, one patient (5.9%) had asymptomatic lung cancer, 7 (41.2%) had pulmonary nodules, 11 (64.7%) had emphysema, and 9 (52.9%) had coronary artery disease. CONCLUSION: This pilot study suggests the feasibility and suggests initial indications of the efficacy of referring ED patients for LCS.

Perspectives of emergency department physicians and nurses on reasons for preventable emergency department visits by patients with cancer.

BACKGROUND: Patients with cancer frequently visit the emergency department (ED) for medical care, yet approximately half of ED visits for patients with cancer are thought to be preventable. Preventable ED visits are associated with increased healthcare costs and poor patient experiences and outcomes. The voices of ED providers who work with patients with cancer in their everyday practices have not been solicited as it pertains to preventable visits. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study is to describe the perspectives of ED physicians and nurses on reasons for preventable ED visits by patients with cancer. METHODS: A qualitative descriptive design guided the study. We conducted 23 semi-structured interviews with ED physicians and nurses to query them about their perspectives on the reasons for preventable ED visits by patients with cancer. Content analysis was conducted to list and describe the reasons they discussed. RESULTS: Participants identified five "medical" and five "non-medical" causes of preventable ED visits. Medical reasons included uncontrolled cancer pain, gastrointestinal symptoms, anemia, fever, and on-going undiagnosed signs and symptoms. Non-medical reasons include patient hesitancy to contact primary care providers, lack of availability or responsiveness of primary providers, lack of access, lack of care coordination, and fears about diagnosis and treatment. CONCLUSION: The voices of ED providers should be included in discussions about the problem of preventable ED visits by patients with cancer. The reasons supplied by the participants suggest that solutions to the problem will need to occur at the patient, provider, system, and societal levels.

Retrospective review of patients with lung cancer presenting emergently.

BACKGROUND: A significant proportion of lung cancer patients receive their diagnosis as part of an emergency presentation (EPs) to emergency departments (EDs). OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to describe EPs of lung cancer at a safety-net hospital system. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients with lung cancer at a safety-net ED. EP was defined as a diagnosis of lung cancer due to an acute presentation with symptoms of undiagnosed lung cancer (e.g., cough, hemoptysis, shortness of breath). Non-EPs were the result of either incidental findings (trauma pan-scan) or as part of lung cancer screening. RESULTS: A total of 333 patient charts were reviewed who had lung cancer. Of those, 248 (74.5%) were defined as having an EP. EPs were more likely stage IV than non-EPs (50.4% vs 32.9%). The percent mortality was higher for EP versus non-EP, 60.0% vs 49.4%. which is driven by a high mortality rate for stage IV EPs (77.5%). Most patients with an EP were seen in the ED (177, 71.4%) as the location of initial visit that had a workup concerning for lung cancer. Most of the EPs were admitted for completion of either their diagnostic work up and/or for symptom management (117, 66.5%). Logistic regression identified significant predictors for an EP including stage IV at diagnosis (OR 2.49, 95% CI 1.39-4.48) and lack of primary care (OR 0.07, 95% CI 0.009-0.53). CONCLUSION: Most patients with lung cancer present acutely as an EP with advanced stage in a safety-net health care setting. The ED plays an important role in the initial diagnosis of lung cancer and coordinating subsequent cancer care.

Use of Adhesive Tape to Facilitate Optimal Mask Positioning and Use in the Emergency Department: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

STUDY HYPOTHESIS: We hypothesize that placing a piece of surgical tape at the bridge of the nose over the mask will improve proper mask use among emergency department patients by creating a physical deterrent to mask removal. METHODS: This study was an open-label single-center randomized controlled trial of a simple intervention to improve mask use performed at Eskenazi Hospital between April 2020 and October 2020. We permitted participants to either use their own mask or the surgical/cloth mask that we provided. We then randomized the participants to either the control group (no tape over the mask/nose) or to the intervention group (tape placed over the face mask at the bridge of the nose). The primary outcome of this study was the frequency at which participants correctly wore their masks upon reevaluation at 60 minutes. A subgroup analysis based on the mask type compared adherence in those with a hospital-provided mask versus in those with a patient-supplied mask. RESULTS: We enrolled 123 participants in this trial. At 60 minutes, 100% of the intervention group participants were correctly wearing their masks versus 69% of control participants (absolute risk reduction, 31%; 95% CI, 19% to 43%; number needed to treat=3.2 patients). Subjects who were observed wearing their masks incorrectly exhibited some combination of either their mask removed or their nose and/or mouth exposed. Hospital-provided masks were not more likely to be worn correctly (odds ratio, 3.4; 95% CI, 0.9 to 12.3). CONCLUSION: Applying a piece of tape to a mask on the bridge of the nose affords a simple, low-cost, and low-risk solution that resulted in 100% of patients wearing their masks correctly at a 60-minute reevaluation.

Retrospective review of patients with lung cancer identified in the emergency department.

BACKGROUND: Obtaining a diagnosis of cancer following an emergency department (ED) visit is associated with poor outcomes and advanced stage. Limited data is available from EDs in the United States. We describe a cohort of patients that obtained a diagnosis of lung cancer because of an ED visit. METHODS: This is a single center, retrospective cohort of patients with lung cancer who presented to the ED between December 2016 and December 2019. We investigated demographics, access to primary care, previous cancer screening, cancer type/stage, mortality, and imaging study that suggested cancer. The primary outcome is the percentage of lung cancer diagnoses over a 4-year period that resulted from an ED visit. RESULTS: Among the 268 patients with lung cancer, 152 patients (57.6%) had presented to the ED with a workup that was concerning for lung cancer. Patients were generally elderly (median 62-years old), African American (n = 77, 51%), and smokers (n = 145, 95.4%) with a median smoking pack years of 40. Only 24 patients (15.8%) had seen a primary care physician within 1 year of diagnosis, and only 8 patients were appropriately screened for lung cancer. The most common type of cancer was non-small-cell carcinoma (111, 73.0%), with 61.3% of those being adenocarcinoma (n = 68). Patients were most likely to be stage IV (n = 86, 56.6%), and the overall mortality was 53.3% (n = 81, 1 year follow-up). Most patients (88/152, 57.9%) of patients were admitted to the hospital, and Medicare patients (OR 2.7, 95% CI 1.37-5.23) and patients with stage IV disease (OR 2.22, 95% CI1.15-4.29) were more likely to be admitted. Patients were more likely to have a concerning finding on computed tomography (CT) versus chest x-ray (55.9% versus 36.8%, respectively). CT scan reports were more likely to mention malignancy (OR 5.9, 95% CI 2.5-14.0) or metastasis (OR 30, 95% CI 7.1-127.1) than chest x-ray. CONCLUSION: Patients that have lung cancer diagnosed through the ED are more likely to be advanced stage at time of diagnosis and are more likely to have CT scans demonstrate concerning findings. Given the lack of previous cancer screening, the advanced stage at presentation of lung cancer to the ED, and high mortality rates, the ED may serve a public health role in addressing lung cancer screening.

Emergency department management of chemotherapy related febrile neutropenia: An opportunity to improve care.

BACKGROUND: Febrile neutropenia (FN) is an important oncological emergency seen in the emergency department (ED), and the American Society of Clinical Oncology recommends risk stratification of patients with febrile neutropenia using the Multinational Association for Supportive Care in Cancer (MASCC) Index, with ED discharge on oral antibiotics recommended for low-risk patients. OBJECTIVES: To determine the prevalence of FN neutropenia and medical system wide ED treatment guideline adherence. METHODS: We performed a retrospective chart review of all patients with an ICD-10 confirmed diagnosis of FN from January 2016-2019at 13 affiliated EDs within one medical system. Only cancer/chemotherapy related FN were included. Following the MASCC guidelines, we used post-hoc calculations to classify patients as low/high-risk, and compared key clinical variables (mortality, blood culture positivity, interventions). RESULTS: 203 patients were found to have FN. 97.9% (184/203) received broad spectrum antibiotics, including 92% of the low-risk group (60/65). All patients were admitted, and no observed in-hospital mortality was noted in the low-risk group, meanwhile 5.1% (7/138) of the high-risk group died. 14/203 patients had positive blood cultures, none in the low-risk group. CONCLUSION: The prevalence of FN is low among 13 EDs that had almost 1.7 million ED visits over a 3-year period. Guideline compliance for low-risk FN was poor. All patients were admitted, and nearly all patients received IV fluids and IV antibiotics. Improving FN management to align with national guidelines represents an opportunity to improved ED care of patients with cancer by reducing unnecessary hospitalizations.

Lower extremity pain and numbness.

CLINICAL INTRODUCTION: A 45-year-old man with no past medical history presents with bilateral lower extremity pain and perineal numbness after walking 10-15 min. The pain starts in his bilateral buttocks and radiates down into his thigh and into his toes. He has no back pain, fever, difficulty urinating or stooling, incontinence or trauma. Social history is positive for smoking. Physical examination was only remarkable for non-dopplerable lower extremity pulses, and he was unable to ambulate down the ED hallway without becoming symptomatic. Ultrasound of his abdominal aorta (figure 1) was performed.emermed;35/7/419/F1F1F1Figure 1Transverse view of distal abdominal aorta, just proximal to the bifurcation. (A) The aorta without Doppler. (B) The same image with Doppler mode activated. QUESTION: What is the most likely diagnosis based on the image?A. Lumbar stenosisB. Abdominal aortic aneurysmC. Aortic thrombusD. Aortic dissection.

Discovery of glycosyltransferases using carbohydrate arrays and mass spectrometry.

Glycosyltransferases catalyze the reaction between an activated sugar donor and an acceptor to form a new glycosidic linkage. Glycosyltransferases are responsible for the assembly of oligosaccharides in vivo and are also important for the in vitro synthesis of these biomolecules. However, the functional identification and characterization of new glycosyltransferases is difficult and tedious. This paper describes an approach that combines arrays of reactions on an immobilized array of acceptors with an analysis by mass spectrometry to screen putative glycosyltransferases. A total of 14,280 combinations of a glycosyltransferase, an acceptor and a donor in four buffer conditions were screened, leading to the identification and characterization of four new glycosyltransferases. This work is notable because it provides a label-free method for the rapid functional annotation of putative enzymes.

Intensive care unit design and mortality in trauma patients.

BACKGROUND: The architecture of medical care facilities ca affect the safety of a patient, but it is unknown if the architecture affects outcomes. We hypothesized that patients in rooms who are more visible from the central nursing station would experience better outcomes than those patients in less visible rooms. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 773 patients admitted to the trauma intensive care service over a 12-mo period were retrospectively evaluated. Outcomes were hospital mortality and intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay (LOS). The unit is designed with a bank of high-visibility rooms (HVRs) directly across from the nursing station and two side sections of low-visibility rooms (LVRs). No formal triage occurs, but patients are prioritized to HVRs as available. RESULTS: Patients in the HVRs had a 16% mortality (52 of 320); meanwhile, the patients in the LVRs experienced an 11% mortality (49 of 448, P = 0.03). ICU mortality did not differ significantly when controlling for age, Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), Head Abbreviated Injury Score, and the Injury Severity Score (ISS) (P = 0.076). Age, CCI, Head Abbreviated Injury Score, and ISS did individually correlate with mortality (age: P = 0.0008; CCI: P = 0.017; and ISS: P < 0.0001). Visibility was not a predictor of ICU LOS or complications among survivors (mean ICU HVR LOS = 4.8 d; mean ICU LVR LOS = 4.7; P = 0.88, n = 661). Only ISS was a significant predictor of ICU LOS and complications (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Trauma patient room placement within the ICU does not relate to mortality rate significantly when corrected for patient acuity. Instead, variables such as age, ISS, and CCI are associated with mortality. A policy of placing more critically ill patients in HVRs may prevent increased mortality in high-acuity patients.

Current gaps in emergency medicine core content education for oncologic emergencies: A targeted needs assessment.

Objective: The core content of emergency medicine (EM) residency training includes the management of oncologic emergencies; however, documented knowledge gaps continue to exist in this subtopic. This study represents a targeted needs assessment as indicated by Step 2 of Kern's curriculum design to determine the specific training gaps to be addressed within the oncologic EM curriculum. Methods: A multi-institutional cross-sectional survey of oncologists (surgical and medical) and emergency physicians (attendings and residents) was conducted during 2023 at five institutions. The voluntary survey consisted of general and specialty-specific questions exploring gaps in oncologic emergency-specific training/education topics. Descriptive statistics reported responses as frequencies and percentages. Results: Of the 833 surveys sent across the five sites, 302 (36.3%) were accessed by link; of these, 271 (89.7%) surveys were completed. There were no differences in the responses between early and later respondents and no differences in the characteristics of respondents between sites. A vast majority of the oncologist and EM groups (91.2% and 83.0%, respectively) reported a belief that emergency physicians would benefit from additional oncologic emergency training. Our survey identified 16 important topics for inclusion in an oncologic EM curriculum, including five topics not present on the 2022 Model of Clinical Practice of Emergency Medicine. Conclusions: Based on this needs assessment, an oncologic EM curriculum should include the topics listed under oncologic emergencies in the 2022 Model of the Clinical Practice of Emergency Medicine along with our respondent-identified topics of radiation therapy adverse effects, stem cell transplant complications, and the management of cancer-specific postsurgical complications, pain, and common diseases in patients with cancer.

Emergency department involvement in the diagnosis of cancer among older adults: a SEER-Medicare study.

BACKGROUND: Internationally, 20% to 50% of cancer is diagnosed through emergency presentation, which is associated with lower survival, poor patient experience, and socioeconomic disparities, but population-based evidence about emergency diagnosis in the United States is limited. We estimated emergency department (ED) involvement in the diagnosis of cancer in a nationally representative population of older US adults, and its association with sociodemographic, clinical, and tumor characteristics. METHODS: We analyzed Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program-Medicare data for Medicare beneficiaries (≥66 years old) with a diagnosis of female breast, colorectal, lung, and prostate cancers (2008-2017), defining their earliest cancer-related claim as their index date, and patients who visited the ED 0 to 30 days before their index date to have "ED involvement" in their diagnosis, with stratification as 0 to 7 or 8 to 30 days. We estimated covariate-adjusted associations of patient age, sex, race and ethnicity, marital status, comorbidity score, tumor stage, year of diagnosis, rurality, and census-tract poverty with ED involvement using modified Poisson regression. RESULTS: Among 614 748 patients, 23% had ED involvement, with 18% visiting the ED in the 0 to 7 days before their index date. This rate varied greatly by tumor site, with breast cancer at 8%, colorectal cancer at 39%, lung cancer at 40%, and prostate cancer at 7%. In adjusted models, older age, female sex, non-Hispanic Black and Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander race, being unmarried, recent year of diagnosis, later-stage disease, comorbidities, and poverty were associated with ED involvement. CONCLUSIONS: The ED may be involved in the initial identification of cancer for 1 in 5 patients. Earlier, system-level identification of cancer in non-ED settings should be prioritized, especially among underserved populations.

Defining function of lipopolysaccharide O-antigen ligase WaaL using chemoenzymatically synthesized substrates.

The WaaL-mediated ligation of O-antigen onto the core region of the lipid A-core block is an important step in the lipopolysaccharide (LPS) biosynthetic pathway. Although the LPS biosynthesis has been largely characterized, only a limited amount of in vitro biochemical evidence has been established for the ligation reaction. Such limitations have primarily resulted from the barriers in purifying WaaL homologues and obtaining chemically defined substrates. Accordingly, we describe herein a chemical biology approach that enabled the reconstitution of this ligation reaction. The O-antigen repeating unit (O-unit) of Escherichia coli O86 was first enzymatically assembled via sequential enzymatic glycosylation of a chemically synthesized GalNAc-pyrophosphate-undecaprenyl precursor. Subsequent expression of WaaL through use of a chaperone co-expression system then enabled the demonstration of the in vitro ligation between the synthesized donor (O-unit-pyrophosphate-undecaprenyl) and the isolated lipid A-core acceptor. The previously reported ATP and divalent metal cation dependence were not observed using this system. Further analyses of other donor substrates revealed that WaaL possesses a highly relaxed specificity toward both the lipid moiety and the glycan moiety of the donor. Lastly, three conserved amino acid residues identified by sequence alignment were found essential for the WaaL activity. Taken together, the present work represents an in vitro systematic investigation of the WaaL function using a chemical biology approach, providing a system that could facilitate the elucidation of the mechanism of WaaL-catalyzed ligation reaction.

Worsened outcomes of newly diagnosed cancer in patients with recent emergency care visits: A retrospective cohort study of 3699 adults in a safety net health system.

INTRODUCTION: Many patients receive a suspected diagnosis of cancer through an emergency department (ED) visit. Time to treatment for a new diagnosis of cancer is directly associated with improved outcomes with little no describing the ED utilization prior to the diagnosis of cancer. We hypothesize that patients that have an ED visit in proximity to a diagnosis of cancer will have worse outcomes, including mortality. METHODS: This study is a retrospective cohort study of all patients with cancer diagnosed at Eskenazi Health (Indiana) between 2016 and 2019. Individual health characteristics, ED utilization, cancer types, and mortality were studied. We compared those patients seen in the ED within 6 months prior to their diagnosis (cases) to patients not seen in the ED (controls). RESULTS: A total of 3699 patients with cancer were included, with 1239 cases (33.50%). Patients of black race had higher frequencies in the cases vs. controls (46.57% vs. 40.68%). Lung cancer was the most frequently observed cancer among cases vs. controls (11.70% vs. 5.57%). For the cases, 232 patients were deceased (18.72%) compared with 247 patients among the controls (10.04%, p < 0.0001, OR 2.06 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.70-2.51). An ED visit in past 6 months (OR = 1.73, 95% CI 1.38-2.18) and Medicaid insurance type (versus commercial, OR = 4.16, 95% CI 2.45-7.07) were associated with of mortality. Female gender (OR = 0.76, 95% CI 0.67-0.88), tobacco use (OR = 1.62, 95% CI 138-1.90), and Medicaid insurance type (versus commercial, OR = 2.56, 95% CI 2.07-3.47) were associated with prior ED use. CONCLUSIONS: Over one third of patients with cancer were seen in the ED within 6 months prior to their cancer diagnosis. Higher mortality rates were observed for those seen in the ED. Future studies are needed to investigate the association and impact that the ED has on eventual cancer diagnoses and outcomes.

Brief training in ultrasound equips novice clinicians to accurately and reliably measure jugular venous pressure in obese patients.

Introduction/Purpose: Measurement of jugular venous pressure (JVP) by novice clinicians can be unreliable, particularly when evaluating obese patients. Measurement of JVP using ultrasound (uJVP) is simple to perform and provides accurate measurements. This study evaluated whether students and residents inexperienced with ultrasound could rapidly be taught to measure JVP using ultrasound in obese patients with the same accuracy as cardiologists measuring JVP via physical examination. Additionally, this study also evaluated the correlation between qualitative and quantitative JVP assessment. Methods: This prospective, blinded study compared uJVP measurements performed by novice clinicians after brief training to JVP measurements performed by cardiologists (cJVP) on physical examination. Association between uJVP and cJVP was assessed using linear correlation, agreement and bias were assessed using the Bland-Altman analysis and inter-rater reliability of uJVP was assessed using intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). The association between qualitative and quantitative JVP assessment was assessed using linear correlation. Results: Novice clinicians (n = 16) obtained 34 measurements from 26 patients (mean BMI 35.5) and reported moderate-to-high confidence in all measurements. uJVP correlated well with cJVP (r = 0.73) with an average error of 0.06 cm. The estimated uJVP ICC was 0.83 (95% CI = 0.44, 0.96). Qualitative uJVP had only a moderate correlation (r = 0.63) to quantitative uJVP. Discussion: Novice clinicians often have difficulty assessing JVP on physical examination, particularly in obese patients. Our findings show a high degree of correlation between JVP measurements performed by novice clinicians using ultrasound compared with JVP measurements made by experienced cardiologists on physical examination. Furthermore, novice clinicians were able to be trained quickly, their measurements were determined to be accurate and precise and they expressed moderate-to-high confidence in their results. Conclusions: After brief training, novice clinicians were able to accurately assess JVP in obese patients as compared to measurements made by experienced cardiologists on physical examination. Results suggest that ultrasound may greatly improve novice clinicians' JVP assessment accuracy, particularly in obese patients.

Site-selective glycosylation of hemoglobin with variable molecular weight oligosaccharides: potential alternative to PEGylation.

Poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG) conjugation (i.e., PEGylation) is a commonly used strategy to increase the circulatory half-life of therapeutic proteins and colloids; however, few viable alternatives exist to replicate its functions. Herein, we report a method for the rapid site-selective glycosylation of proteins with variously sized carbohydrates, up to a molecular weight (MW) of 10,000, thus serving as a potential alternative for PEGylation. More importantly, the method developed has two unique features. First, traditional protecting group strategies that typically accompany the modification of the carbohydrate fragments are circumvented, allowing for the facile site-selective glycosylation of a desired protein with variously sized glycans. Second, the methodology employed is not limited by oligosaccharide size; consequently, glycans of MW similar to that of PEG, used in the PEGylation of therapeutic proteins, can be employed. To demonstrate the usefulness of this technology, hemoglobin (Hb) was site-selectively glycosylated with a series of carbohydrates of increasing MW (from 504 to ∼10,000). Hb was selected on the basis of the vast wealth of biochemical and biophysical knowledge present in the literature and because of its use as a precursor in the synthesis/formulation of artificial red blood cell substitutes. Following the successful site-selective glycosylation of Hb, the impact of increasing the glycan MW on Hb's biophysical properties was investigated in vitro.

Low Rates of Lung and Colorectal Cancer Screening Uptake Among a Safety-net Emergency Department Population.

INTRODUCTION: A suspected diagnosis of cancer through an emergency department (ED) visit is associated with poor clinical outcomes. The purpose of this study was to explore the rate at which ED patients attend cancer screenings for lung, colorectal (CRC), and breast cancers based on national guidelines set forth by the United States Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF). METHODS: This was a prospective cohort study. Patients were randomly approached in the Eskenazi Hospital ED between August 2019-February 2020 and were surveyed to determine whether they would be eligible and had attended lung, CRC, and breast cancer screenings, as well as their awareness of lung cancer screening with low-dose computed tomography (LDCT). Patients who were English-speaking and ≥18 years old, and who were not critically ill or intoxicated or being seen for acute decompensated psychiatric illness were offered enrollment. Enrolled subjects were surveyed to determine eligibility for lung, colorectal, and breast cancer screenings based on guidelines set by the USPSTF. No cancer screenings were actually done during the ED visit. RESULTS: A total of 500 patients were enrolled in this study. More participants were female (54.4%), and a majority were Black (53.0%). Most participants had both insurance (80.2%) and access to primary care (62.8%). Among the entire cohort, 63.0% identified as smokers, and 62.2% (140/225) of the 50- to 80-year-old participants qualified for lung cancer screening. No patients were screened for lung cancer in this cohort (0/225). Only 0.6% (3/500) were aware that LDCT was the preferred method for screening. Based on pack years, 35.5% (32/90) of the patients who were 40-49 years old and 6.7% (6/90) of those 30-39 years old would eventually qualify for screening. Regarding CRC screening, 43.6% (218/500) of the entire cohort was eligible. However, of those patients only 54% (118/218) had been screened. Comparatively, 77.7% (87/112) of the eligible females had been screened for breast cancer, but only 54.5% (61/112) had been screened in the prior two years. CONCLUSION: Many ED patients are not screened for lung/colorectal/breast cancers even though many are eligible and have reported access to primary care. This study demonstrates an opportunity and a need to address cancer screening in the ED.