Novel Supreme Drug-Eluting Stents With Early Synchronized Antiproliferative Drug Delivery to Inhibit Smooth Muscle Cell Proliferation After Drug-Eluting Stents Implantation in Coronary Artery Disease: Results of the PIONEER III Randomized Clinical Trial.

BACKGROUND: Accelerated endothelial healing after targeted antiproliferative drug delivery may limit the long-term inflammatory response of drug-eluting stents (DESs). The novel Supreme DES is designed to synchronize early drug delivery within 4 to 6 weeks of implantation, leaving behind a prohealing permanent base layer. Whether the Supreme DES is safe and effective in the short term and can improve long-term clinical outcomes is not known. METHODS: In an international, 2:1 randomized, single-blind trial, we compared treatment with Supreme DES to durable polymer everolimus-eluting stents (DP-EES) in patients with acute and chronic coronary syndromes. The primary end point was target lesion failure-a composite of cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction, or clinically driven target lesion revascularization. The trial was designed to demonstrate noninferiority (margin of 3.58%) of the Supreme DES at 12 months compared with DP-EES (URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT03168776). RESULTS: From October 2017 to July 2019, a total of 1629 patients were randomly assigned (2:1) to the Supreme DES (N=1086) or DP-EES (N=543). At 12 months, target lesion failure occurred in 57 of 1057 patients (5.4%) in the Supreme DES group and in 27 of 532 patients (5.1%) in the DP-EES group (absolute risk difference, 0.32% [95% CI, -1.87 to 2.5]; Pnoninferiority=0.002]. There were no significant differences in rates of device success, clinically driven target lesion revascularization, or stent thrombosis at 12 months, and the safety composite of cardiovascular death and target vessel myocardial infarction was 3.5% versus 4.6% (hazard ratio, 0.76 [95% CI, 0.46-1.25]) with Supreme DES compared with DP-EES, although rates of combined clinically and non-clinically driven target lesion revascularization at 12 months were higher with Supreme DES. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with acute and chronic coronary syndromes undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention, the Supreme DES proved to be noninferior to the standard DP-EES. Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT03168776.

Three-Year Efficacy and Safety of the Misago Peripheral Stent for Superficial Femoral Artery Disease: Final Results from the OSPREY Trial.

PURPOSE: This study evaluated the long-term outcomes of the Misago peripheral stent trial (Terumo) for atherosclerotic lesions in the superficial femoral artery (SFA) in patients with claudication. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a prospective multicenter, single-arm, clinical trial of primary stent placement for de novo cases of SFA disease conducted in the United States and Asia. The primary endpoint was freedom from clinically driven target lesion revascularization (CD-TLR) at 36 months. Secondary outcomes were ankle-brachial index (ABI), Rutherford score, Walking Impairment Questionnaire (WIQ), a quality of life survey, and rate of device fracture. RESULTS: A total of 276 patients (64.4% male; mean age, 69.3 ± 10.1 years) were enrolled. Freedom from CD-TLR was 78.5% (95% confidence interval [CI], 73.0%-83.0%) at 24 months and 75.4% (95% CI, 69.6%-80.2%) at 36 months. Baseline ABI was 0.7 ± 0.1 and 0.98 ± 0.20 (P < .001) at 30 days after the procedure. Baseline Rutherford score was 3.6 ± 0.6 and 1.6 ± 1.0 30 at 30 days after the procedure (P < .001). Mean (and changed) ABI and Rutherford score at 36 months compared to day 30 after the procedure were, respectively, 0.91 (-0.1 ± 0.2) and 1.5 (-0.2 ± 1.1). WIQ score at baseline was 21.49 ± 26.30 and 50.51 ± 38.49 at 30 days after the procedure ( P < .001). The mean WIQ score at 2 years was 46.65 ± 37.31 (P = .12). Stent fracture rate at 36 months was 2.0% (4 of 202 patients). CONCLUSIONS: OSPREY (Occlusive-Stenotic Peripheral Artery Revascularization Study) 36-month data demonstrated persistent freedom from CD-TLR and sustained improvement in ABI and Rutherford score with primary stent placement for SFA lesions.

Blinded outcomes and angina assessment of coronary bioresorbable scaffolds: 30-day and 1-year results from the ABSORB IV randomised trial.

BACKGROUND: Previous studies showed more adverse events with coronary bioresorbable vascular scaffolds (BVS) than with metallic drug-eluting stents (DES), although in one randomised trial angina was reduced with BVS. However, these early studies were unmasked, lesions smaller than intended for the scaffold were frequently enrolled, implantation technique was suboptimal, and patients with myocardial infarction, in whom BVS might be well suited, were excluded. METHODS: In the active-controlled, blinded, multicentre, randomised ABSORB IV trial, patients with stable coronary artery disease or acute coronary syndromes aged 18 years or older were recruited from 147 hospitals in five countries (the USA, Germany, Australia, Singapore, and Canada). Enrolled patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive polymeric everolimus-eluting BVS (Absorb; Abbott Vascular, Santa Clara, CA, USA) with optimised implantation technique or cobalt-chromium everolimus-eluting stents (EES; Xience; Abbott Vascular, Santa Clara, CA, USA). Randomisation was stratified by diabetic status, whether patients would have been eligible for enrolment in the previous ABSORB III trial, and site. Patients and clinical assessors were masked to randomisation. The primary endpoint was target lesion failure (cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction, or ischaemia-driven target lesion revascularisation) at 30 days, tested for non-inferiority with a 2·9% margin for the risk difference. Analysis was by intention to treat. The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02173379, and is closed to accrual. FINDINGS: Between Aug 15, 2014, and March 31, 2017, we screened 18 722 patients for eligibility, 2604 of whom were enrolled. 1296 patients were assigned to BVS, and 1308 patients were assigned to EES. Follow-up data at 30 days and 1 year, respectively, were available for 1288 and 1254 patients with BVS and for 1303 and 1272 patients with EES. Biomarker-positive acute coronary syndromes were present in 622 (24%) of 2602 patients, and, by angiographic core laboratory analysis, 78 (3%) of 2893 of lesions were in very small vessels. Target lesion failure at 30 days occurred in 64 (5·0%) patients assigned to BVS and 48 (3·7%) patients assigned to EES (difference 1·3%, upper 97·5% confidence limit 2·89; one-sided pnon-inferiority=0·0244). Target lesion failure at 1 year occurred in 98 (7·8%) patients assigned to BVS and 82 (6·4%) patients assigned to EES (difference 1·4%, upper 97·5% confidence limit 3·4; one-sided pnon-inferiority=0·0006). Angina, adjudicated by a central events committee at 1 year, occurred in 270 (20·3%) patients assigned to BVS and 274 (20·5%) patients assigned to EES (difference -0·3%, 95% CI -3·4% to 2·9%; one-sided pnon-inferiority=0·0008; two-sided psuperiority=0·8603). Device thrombosis within 1 year occurred in nine (0·7%) patients assigned to BVS and four (0·3%) patients assigned to EES (p=0·1586). INTERPRETATION: Polymeric BVS implanted with optimised technique in an expanded patient population resulted in non-inferior 30-day and 1-year rates of target lesion failure and angina compared with metallic DES. FUNDING: Abbott Vascular.

One-year outcomes of the U.S. and Japanese regulatory trial of the Misago stent for treatment of superficial femoral artery disease (OSPREY study).

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to assess the safety and efficacy of the Misago stent (Terumo Corp, Tokyo, Japan) in occlusive and stenotic superficial femoral artery (SFA) disease. METHODS: The safety and efficacy of the Misago SFA stent were evaluated prospectively in this initial collaboration trial between Japan and the United States. Because this trial enrolled patients mainly from Japan and the United States and because there is a question as to whether a race difference exists in SFA stent performance, the race difference on outcome was also analyzed. In addition, results were compared with a prior SFA stent trial. RESULTS: The Misago stent was implanted in 261 subjects with TransAtlantic Inter-Society Consensus (TASC) type A and type B SFA lesions (201 subjects in the United States, 50 in Japan, 9 in Taiwan, 1 in South Korea). The mean age of the patients was 69.3 ± 10.0 years, and the mean lesion length was 83.8 ± 41.3 mm. The overall 12-month primary patency rate and clinically driven target lesion revascularization were 82.9% and 13.0%, respectively. Regional differences within the Occlusive/Stenotic Peripheral Artery Revascularization Study (OSPREY) and outcomes between U.S. and Asian patients were similar, including primary patency (82.9% vs 83.0%; P = .889), clinically driven target lesion revascularization (13.4% vs 11.7%; P = .829), stent fracture rate (1.3% vs 0.0%; P = 1.000), and stent thrombosis rate (0.5% vs 0.0%; P = 1.000). CONCLUSIONS: OSPREY 12-month data showed satisfactory outcome of the Misago stent for the treatment of TASC type A and type B SFA lesions and appears to be comparable to recent stent trials. In addition, the lack of difference in outcome among races supports the value of international trials.

5-Year Outcomes After Bioresorbable Coronary Scaffolds Implanted With Improved Technique.

BACKGROUND: Bioresorbable vascular scaffolds (BVS) were designed to improve late event-free survival compared with metallic drug-eluting stents. However, initial trials demonstrated worse early outcomes with BVS, in part due to suboptimal technique. In the large-scale, blinded ABSORB IV trial, polymeric everolimus-eluting BVS implanted with improved technique demonstrated noninferior 1-year outcomes compared with cobalt chromium everolimus-eluting stents (CoCr-EES). OBJECTIVES: This study sought to evaluate the long-term outcomes from the ABSORB IV trial. METHODS: We randomized 2,604 patients at 147 sites with stable or acute coronary syndromes to BVS with improved technique vs CoCr-EES. Patients, clinical assessors, and event adjudicators were blinded to randomization. Five-year follow-up was completed. RESULTS: Target lesion failure at 5 years occurred in 216 (17.5%) patients assigned to BVS and 180 (14.5%) patients assigned to CoCr-EES (P = 0.03). Device thrombosis within 5 years occurred in 21 (1.7%) BVS and 13 (1.1%) CoCr-EES patients (P = 0.15). Event rates were slightly greater with BVS than CoCr-EES through 3-year follow-up and were similar between 3 and 5 years. Angina, also centrally adjudicated, recurred within 5 years in 659 patients (cumulative rate 53.0%) assigned to BVS and 674 (53.3%) patients assigned to CoCr-EES (P = 0.63). CONCLUSIONS: In this large-scale, blinded randomized trial, despite the improved implantation technique, the absolute 5-year rate of target lesion failure was 3% greater after BVS compared with CoCr-EES. The risk period for increased events was limited to 3 years, the time point of complete scaffold bioresorption; event rates were similar thereafter. Angina recurrence after intervention was frequent during 5-year follow-up but was comparable with both devices.(Absorb IV Randomized Controlled Trial; NCT02173379).

Polymer-free Biolimus A9-coated stents in the treatment of de novo coronary lesions with short DAPT: 9-month angiographic and clinical follow-up of the prospective, multicenter BioFreedom USA clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: BioFreedom is a polymer- and carrier-free drug-coated stent that delivers Biolimus A9 to the vessel wall. Our purpose was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of this DCS in patients with short-duration dual antiplatelet therapy. METHODS: The BioFreedom US IDE feasibility trial was a single-arm, open-label, prospective study of patients requiring stenting of de novo lesions. Patients received 3 months of DAPT, repeat angiography at 9 months, and clinical follow-up at multiple intervals. A subgroup also underwent intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) interrogation. The primary safety end point was major adverse cardiac events, defined as a composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction, target lesion revascularization, or stent thrombosis. The primary efficacy end point, in-stent late lumen loss at 9 months, was compared with a historical control from a first-generation paclitaxel-eluting stent. RESULTS: A total of 72 patients from 10 sites received BioFreedom DCS implanted in 83 de novo lesions. At 9 months, the incidence of composite MACE was 8.4%, and TLR was 1.5%. Short DAPT was safe without occurrence of stent thrombosis. The primary end point of LLL was 0.32±0.53 mm. Paired IVUS analyses comparing postprocedural with 9-month measurements showed low in-stent neointimal volume obstruction (5.39±5.28%) and low neointimal hyperplasia (7.43±8.04 mm3). CONCLUSIONS: This study's angiography and IVUS assessments demonstrated that the BioFreedom DCS has anti-restenotic efficacy similar to first-generation DES. In the absence of concerning safety signals, this DCS should be considered effective and safe for patients who require a shorter duration of DAPT.

Carotid artery in-stent restenosis after carotid artery stenting.

Carotid in-stent restenosis is a potential long-term sequela that may occur after carotid artery stenting. We report a single-center experience with this procedure and reviewed the database for individual patient characteristics and possible management options.