Xenografting for disease modeling of intramedullary spinal cord tumors: a systematic review.

STUDY DESIGN: Systematic review. OBJECTIVES: The overall incidence of intramedullary spinal cord tumors (IMSCT) remains low and clinical trials or standardized treatment strategies are missing. Therefore, multiple animal-based xenograft models (AXM) have been developed to foster preclinical research efforts on IMSCT. We constructed a systematic literature review to summarize and compare all AXM for IMSCT, published until April 16, 2018. METHODS: The review was conducted using 4 independent research databases following the PRISMA (preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses) guidelines. Studies were included, if they reported on surgical transplantation of tumor cells or tumor tissue to the spinal cord. Methodological study quality was assessed according to the SYRCLE (systematic review center for laboratory animal experimentation) risk of Bias tool. RESULTS: Systematic search yielded 20 publications dealing with AXM for IMSCT. In summary, 4 tumor entities were analyzed in 23 experiments using ~337 animals, mainly investigating glioblastoma or gliosarcoma biology. Studies varied regarding the use of engrafted animals, surgical techniques and tumor burden. Most commonly authors used heterotopic, transdural injection of immortalized brain tumor cell lines (1 × 105 in 5 µl) into the thoracic spinal cord of immunocompromised rats. Quality assessment demonstrated an unclear risk of bias in most cases. CONCLUSION: Although different AXM for IMSCT have been described so far, one rat model is technically feasible, enables robust experiments and demonstrates reproducible results. However, there is a need for new AXM using orthotopic engraftment of patient-derived tumor cells and for genetically engineered animal models.

The CHESS score: a simple tool for early prediction of shunt dependency after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Acute hydrocephalus is an early and common complication of aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH). However, considerably fewer patients develop chronic hydrocephalus requiring shunt placement. Our aim was to develop a risk score for early identification of patients with shunt dependency after SAH. METHODS: Two hundred and forty-two SAH individuals who were treated in our institution between January 2008 and December 2013 and survived the initial impact were retrospectively analyzed. Clinical parameters within 72 h after the ictus were correlated with shunt dependency. Independent predictors were summarized into a new risk score which was validated in a subsequent SAH cohort treated between January and December 2014. RESULTS: Seventy-five patients (31%) underwent shunt placement. Of 23 evaluated variables, only the following five showed independent associations with shunt dependency and were subsequently used to establish the Chronic Hydrocephalus Ensuing from SAH Score (CHESS, 0-8 points): Hunt and Hess grade ≥IV (1 point), location of the ruptured aneurysm in the posterior circulation (1 point), acute hydrocephalus (4 points), the presence of intraventricular hemorrhage (1 point) and early cerebral infarction on follow-up computed tomography scan (1 point). The CHESS showed strong correlation with shunt dependency (P = 0.0007) and could be successfully validated in both internal SAH cohorts tested. Patients scoring ≥6 CHESS points had significantly higher risk of shunt dependency (P < 0.0001) than other patients. CONCLUSION: The CHESS may become a valuable diagnostic tool for early estimation of shunt dependency after SAH. Further evaluation and external validation will be required in prospective studies.

Does the expression of glial fibrillary acid protein (GFAP) stain in glioblastoma tissue have a prognostic impact on survival?

OBJECTIVE: Several parameters are known to predict the survival of glioblastoma (GB), including extent of resection and MGMT promotor methylation. Staining for glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) is a common component of routine histological work-up, but its clinical utility in GB is unclear. The aim of the present study was to analyze the predictive value of quantitative GFAP measurements for survival of patients with GB. METHODS: All subjects in our institutional database of patients with primary GB who underwent surgery between 2011 and 2014 with examination of immunohistochemical staining of GFAP were included. Percentage GFAP staining was measured in 5% increments (5-100%). Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed between GFAP values and survival data. Clinically relevant cut-offs for GFAP staining were identified by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. RESULTS: The final cohort consisted of 272GB patients with available quantitative GFAP measurements (mean age, 62 (±11.1) years, 117 females [43%]). Overall survival was 11.4 months (±8.6). Median GFAP value was 70% (range, 5-100%). The ROC curve showed the clinically relevant cut-off for GFAP at 75% (area under the curve: 0.691). Accordingly, GB patients with GFAP≥75% presented poorer survival on Kaplan-Meier survival estimation (P=0.021). Multivariate analysis adjusted for age, extent of resection, preoperative Karnofsky performance status scale, IDH1 mutation and MGMT methylation status confirmed the independent predictive value of GFAP≥75% for overall survival (P=0.032). Finally, patients with GFAP≥75% showed significantly poorer long-term survival than those with GFAP<75%: 5.8% vs. 15.2% (P=0.0183) and 0.8% vs. 8% (P=0.0076) for 2- and 3-year survival, respectively. CONCLUSION: Quantitative immunohistochemical assessment of GFAP staining could provide a novel biomarker for overall and especially long-term survival of patients with GB. Prospective multi-center validation of the prognostic value of GFAP for GB survival is needed.

Combined radiotherapy and concurrent tumor treating fields (TTFields) for glioblastoma: Dosimetric consequences on non-coplanar IMRT as initial results from a phase I trial.

BACKGROUND: Glioblastoma is a rapidly proliferating tumor. Patients bear an inferior prognosis with a median survival time of 14-16 months. Proliferation and repopulation are a major resistance promoting factor for conventionally fractionated radiotherapy. Tumor-Treating-Fields (TTFields) are an antimitotic modality applying low-intensity (1-3 V/cm), intermediate-frequency (100-300 kHz) alternating electric-fields. More recently interference of TTFields with DNA-damage-repair and synergistic effects with radiotherapy were reported in the preclinical setting. This study aims at examining the dosimetric consequences of TTFields applied during the course of radiochemotherapy. METHODS: Cone-beam-computed-tomography (CBCT)-data from the first seven patients of the PriCoTTF-phase-I-trial were used in a predefined way for dosimetric verification and dose-accumulation of the non-coplanar-intensity-modulated-radiotherapy (IMRT)-treatment-plans as well as geometric analysis of the transducer-arrays by which TTFields are applied throughout the course of treatment. Transducer-array-position and contours were obtained from the low-dose CBCT's routinely made for image-guidance. Material-composition of the electrodes was determined and a respective Hounsfield-unit was assigned to the electrodes. After 6D-fusion with the planning-CT, the dose-distribution was recalculated using a Boltzmann-equation-solver (Acuros XB) and a Monte-Carlo-dose-calculation-engine. RESULTS: Overdosage in the scalp in comparison to the treatment plan without electrodes stayed below 8.5% of the prescribed dose in the first 2 mm below and also in deeper layers outside 1cm2 at highest dose as obtained from dose-volume-histogram comparisons. In the clinical target volume (CTV), underdosage was limited to 2.0% due to dose attenuation by the electrodes in terms of D95 and the effective-uniform-dose. Principal-component-analysis (PCA) showed that the first principal-position-component of the variation of repeated array-placement in the direction of the largest variations and the perpendicular second-component spanning a tangential plane on the skull had a standard deviation of 1.06 cm, 1.23 cm, 0.96 cm, and 1.11 cm for the frontal, occipital, left and right arrays for the first and 0.70 cm, 0.71 cm, 0.79 cm, and 0.68 cm, respectively for the second-principal-component. The variations did not differ from patient-to-patient (p > 0.8, Kruskal-Wallis-tests). This motion led to a diminution of the dosimetric effects of the electrodes. CONCLUSION: From a dosimetric point of view, dose deviations in the CTV due to transducer-arrays were not clinically significant in the first 7 patients and confirmed feasibility of combined adjuvant radiochemotherapy and concurrent TTFields. PriCoTTF Trial: A phase I/II trial of TTFields prior and concomitant to radiotherapy in newly diagnosed glioblastoma. DRKS-ID: DRKS00016667. Date of Registration in DRKS: 2019/02/26. Investigator Sponsored/Initiated Trial (IST/IIT): yes. Ethics Approval/Approval of the Ethics Committee: Approved. (leading) Ethics Committee Nr.: 18-8316-MF, Ethik-Kommission der Medizinischen. Fakultät der Universität Duisburg-Essen. EUDAMED-No. (for studies acc. to Medical Devices act): CIV-18-08-025247.