The postoperative use of Impella as a ventricular assist device in high-risk patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery: A case series and comparison.

INTRODUCTION: Prophylactic placement of intra-aortic balloon pumps (IABPs) for hemodynamic support has been used in high-risk patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) surgery. The use of the Impella CP (ICP) heart pump in high-risk patients undergoing CABG has not been reported. In this study, we report our experience using ICP and IABP devices in high-risk patients during the postoperative period. METHODS: This is a case series and retrospective comparison of ICP vs IABP at a single institution using data from 2017. Twenty-eight patients underwent postoperative placement of either the ICP or an IABP. Nineteen patients received IABP and nine received the ICP heart pump. Patient characteristics, comorbidities, and complications were compared using bivariate analysis. Exact logistic regression was used to compare risk-adjusted mortality. RESULTS: There were no statistically significant differences in epidemiologic characteristics, risk factors, or outcomes between both groups, except the ICP group had a lower preoperative left ventricular ejection fraction (22.5 vs 35; P = .028). Exact logistic regression analysis did not show a difference in 30-day mortality between both groups (P = .086). CONCLUSION: The postoperative use of the ICP heart pump, to support high-risk patients undergoing CABG, is a safe option. This practice has allowed us to perform CABG on sicker patients, specifically with depressed ejection fractions, with comparable results to the IABP. Further studies with larger patient populations are needed to draw definitive conclusions, but this pilot study demonstrates a possible expanded use of the Impella device.

Transcatheter aortic valve-in-valve implantation for early failure of sutureless aortic bioprosthesis.

We report a case of early failure of a Perceval sutureless aortic bioprosthesis (LivaNova, London, UK) which was treated with a transcatheter valve-in-valve implantation with an Edwards 3 bioprosthesis (Edwards Lifesciences, Irvine, CA).

State of the art: Proceedings of the American Association for Thoracic Surgery Enhanced Recovery After Cardiac Surgery Summit.

Despite the benefits established for multiple surgical specialties, enhanced recovery after surgery has been underused in cardiac surgery. A cardiac enhanced recovery after surgery summit was convened at the 102nd American Association for Thoracic Surgery annual meeting in May 2022 for experts to convey key enhanced recovery after surgery concepts, best practices, and applicable results for cardiac surgery. Topics included implementation of enhanced recovery after surgery, prehabilitation and nutrition, rigid sternal fixation, goal-directed therapy, and multimodal pain management.

A technique of minimally invasive aortic valve replacement: an alternative to transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR).

Minimally invasive aortic valve replacement (AVR) is increasingly being adopted worldwide, in which a right mini-thoracotomy (RT) approach plays an important role. Here we reported a novel technique of AVR via RT using sutureless prosthesis, without rib division or groin incision. Surgical access was performed through an anterior right thoracotomy with 5-cm skin incision placed in the third intercostal space. Percutaneous femoral-femoral cardio-pulmonary bypass (CPB) was applied under fluoroscopy guidance to avoid groin incision. A 5-mm stab incision was made in the right chest wall for aortic cross-clamping. A sutureless bioprosthetic valve was utilized in the limited operative field, which reduced the cross-clamp and CPB time. The patient was discharged on post-operative day 2, without obvious cross-valvar gradient, and with no pain or other complication. This report offers a more minimally invasive approach to AVR with proven durable valves, which can benefit high-risk patients.