To bed or not to bed: the sleep question?

BACKGROUND: Sleep deprivation and fatigue from long-shift work impacts doctors' personal safety, inhibits cognitive performance and risks clinical error. The aim of this study was to assess the sleep quality of surgical trainees participating in European Working Time Directive-compliant training rotations within a UK deanery. METHODS: A trainee cohort numbering 38 (21 core, 17 higher surgical trainees, 29 men and 9 women, median age 31 (25-44 years)) completed a sleep diary over 30 days using the Sleep Time (Azumio) smartphone application and triangulated with on-call rosters to identify shift patterns. The primary outcome measure was sleep quality related to rostered clinical duties. RESULTS: Consecutive 1152 individual sleep episodes were recorded. The median time asleep (hours:min) was 6:29 (5:27-7:19); the median sleep efficiency was 86% (80%-93%); the median light sleep (hours:min) was 2:50 (1:50-3:49); and the median rapid eye movement (REM) sleep (hours:min) was 3:20 (2:37-4:07). Significant adverse sleep profiles were observed in trainees undertaking emergency on-call duty when compared with elective (non-on-call) duty; the median time asleep (hours:min) 5:49 vs 6:43 (p<0.001); the median sleep efficiency was 85% vs 87% (p<0.001); the median light sleep (hours:min) was 2:16 vs 2:58 (p<0.001); and REM sleep (hours:min) was 2:57 vs 3:27 (p<0.001). Recovery of sleep duration, efficiency and quality necessitated five full days of time. CONCLUSION: Surgical emergency on-call duty adversely influences sleep quality. Proper consideration of fail-safe rota design, prioritising sleep hygiene, recovery and well-being, allied to robust patient safety and quality of care should be made a priority.

Surgical academic reach: the higher degree effect quantified.

INTRODUCTION: Proof of professional specific academic attainment is embedded within the Joint Committee on Surgical Training 2013 general surgery curriculum, mandating that all higher general surgical trainees (HST) obtain three peer-reviewed publications to qualify for Certification of Completion of Training. Yet, Modernising Medical Careers (MMC) has been associated with a trend away from the gold standard postgraduate credentials of higher degrees by research. This study aimed to evaluate the academic achievements of a post-MMC UK Deanery HST cohort to determine what additional benefits higher degree study might confer. METHOD: The Scopus bibliographic database (Elsevier, RELX Group) was used to characterise the academic profiles of 101 consecutive HSTs and supplemented with Intercollegiate Surgical Programme Curriculum data. Primary outcome measures were numbers of publications, citations and Hirsch indices (HI). RESULTS: Thirty-seven HSTs (36.6%) had been awarded higher degrees (29 Doctor of Medicine, 8 Doctor of Philosophy). Academic profiles of HSTs with higher degrees were stronger than those of HSTs without, specifically: median (range) publication numbers 16 (2-57) vs 2 (0-11, P<0.001), citations 93 (0-1600) vs 6 (0-132, P<0.001), first author publications 6 (0-33) vs 3 (0-106, P<0.001), communications to learnt societies 30 (5-79) vs 8 (2-35, P<0.001) and HI 6 (1-26) vs 1 (0-6, P<0.001). CONCLUSION: Proof of academic reach by higher degree was associated with important enhanced professional credentials, strengthening HIs sixfold. Trainers and trainees alike should be aware of the relative magnitude of such benefits when planning educational programmes.

FRCS first pass variance: deanery and specialty contrariety.

BACKGROUND: FRCS exit examination success may be interpreted as a surrogate marker for UK Deanery-related training quality. The aim of this study was to evaluate relative FRCS examination pass rates related to Deanery and Surgical Specialty. METHODS: Joint Committee on Surgical Training-published examination first attempt pass rates were scrutinised for type I higher surgical trainees and outcomes compared related to Deanery and Surgical Specialty. RESULTS: Of 9363 FRCS first attempts, 3974 were successful (42.4%). Median and mean pass rates related to Deanery were 42.1% and 30.7%, respectively, and ranged from 26.7% to 45.6%. Median (range) pass rates by specialty were urology 76.3% (60%-100%), trauma and orthopaedic surgery 74.7% (58.2%-100%), general surgery 70.0% (63.1%-86%), ENT 62.5% (50%-100%), cardiothoracic surgery 50.0% (25%-100%), oral and maxillofacial surgery 50% (40.0%-100%), neurosurgery 50% (22.7%-100%), plastic surgery 47.6% (30.0%-100%) and paediatric surgery 25% (16.7%-100%). Significant variance was observed across all specialties and deaneries (p=0.001). CONCLUSION: As much as threefold variance exists related to FRCS examination first attempt success, trainees should be aware of this spectrum when preferencing deaneries during national selection.

Influence of Trainer Role, Subspecialty and Hospital Status on Consultant Workplace-based Assessment Completion.

OBJECTIVE: Performance assessment is challenging to administer and validate, yet remains central to patient safety and quality of care. The aim of this study was to evaluate Consultant Surgeon trainer performance with respect to Workplace Based Assessment (WBA) completion. DESIGN: All WBAs for 60 Core Surgical Trainees (n = 2932) recorded in one academic year were analyzed using the Intercollegiate Surgical Curriculum Progamme. Primary outcome measures were numbers of WBAs performed related to trainer role (Assigned Educational Supervisor vs. Clinical Supervisor vs. No Training Role), gender, surgical subspecialty, hospital status (teaching vs. district general), and trainer RCSEng. TrACE course accreditation. SETTING: A core surgical training program serving a single UK (Wales) deanery. PARTICIPANTS: Sixty consecutively appointed core surgical trainees. RESULTS: Median WBA number performed irrespective of trainer role was 6 (range 0-51), consisting of CBD 2 (0-18), mini-CEX 2 (0-22), DOPS 2 (0-32), and PBA 0 (0-10). Assigned Educational Supervisor trainers were more likely to complete the full range of WBAs compared with Clinical Supervisor and No Training Role assessors; WBA 17 vs. 6 vs. 3; CBD 5 vs. 2 vs. 1; mini-CEX 5 vs. 2 vs. 1; DOPS 4 vs. 2 vs. 1; and PBA 0 vs. 0 vs. 0 (p < 0.001). WBAs completed varied by subspecialty; first quartile performance: ENT, Plastic Surgery, (median 12, interquartile range 13), compared with fourth quartile: OMFS, Urology, T&O, and Cardiothoracic Surgery (median 5, interquartile range 11, p = 0.016). Hospital status, gender, and TrACE accreditation were not associated with WBA performance. CONCLUSIONS: Important variations in trainer WBA completion were apparent; training programme directors and trainees alike should be aware of this when agreeing educational contracts.

Rural Rotations at Core: Rarefied Exposure or Real Experience?

OBJECTIVE: Surgical rotations involving rural General Hospitals (rGH) are frequently associated with recruitment challenges, partly because of adverse perceptions regarding distances from social support networks and training opportunities. The aim of this study was to determine the outcomes of core surgical training rotations involving rGHs when compared with urban hospitals in a single UK Deanery. DESIGN: Online Intercollegiate Surgical Curriculum Programme portfolios from 163 core surgical trainees (CST) were examined related to postlocation, operative experience, workplace-based assessments, and academic achievement. Of the 163 CSTs, 27 had completed at least 50% of their 2-year training posts at rGHs and were compared with 136 control CSTs completing rotations in urban general and teaching hospitals (uGH). The primary outcome measures were MRCS pass rate and success at national ST3 selection. SETTING: A core surgical training program serving a single UK Deanery. PARTICIPANTS: Consecutive 177 CSTs appointed to a single UK Deanery between 2010 and 2016. RESULTS: Success at MRCS and national ST3 selection were similar for CSTs from rGH vs uGH rotations-MRCS success: 70.4 vs 72.8% (p = 0.816), and ST3 success: 22.2% vs 27.0% (p = 0.811). Median rGH vs uGH curriculum-based outcomes were operative case load: 378 vs 422 (p = 0.300); workplace-based assessments completed: 79 vs 94 (p = 0.499); audits performed: 4 vs 4 (p = 0.966); learned society communications: 1 vs 2 (p = 0.020); and scientific publications: 0 vs 0 (p = 0.478). CONCLUSION: CST rotations including rGHs produced a different spectrum of training experience compared with uGH rotations but overall primary outcomes were similar.