RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Breast reconstruction is currently performed as standard practice. METHODS: A prospective study was performed of patients after total mastectomy who underwent autologous breast reconstruction with fat grafting (FG) combined with internal tissue expansion between September 2015 and December 2020. The patients were classified into groups A to F depending on the steps of breast reconstruction. Groups A and B described patients with completed breast reconstruction with FG and expander removal, with or without nipple/areola complex reconstruction. C described patients during deflation of the expander combined with simultaneous FG. D described patients after expander implantation and refilling. E described patients after first FG, and F included patients who discontinued reconstruction with the described method and converted to reconstruction with a breast implant. RESULTS: Among 22 treated patients' two were after first FG (9.09%' group E), two were after expander implantation and refilling (9.09%' group D), three were during deflation of the expander combined with simultaneous FG (13.63%' group C), and four (18.18%) had completed breast reconstruction-two (9.09%) without NAC reconstruction and symmetrization (group B) and two (9.09%) with completed breast reconstruction (group A). In 11 patients (50%), breast reconstruction was abandoned after expander implantation and one to three FG procedures (group F), converting to breast reconstruction with a breast implant. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated successful breast reconstruction using FG and expander implantation. Breast reconstruction using this method is safe and enables possible abandonment at any treatment stage, as well as conversion to breast reconstruction with implants.
RESUMO
Oncoplastic and reconstructive techniques are essential tools in the armamentarium of contemporary breast surgeons. The aim of the study was to identify oncoplastic reconstructive patterns in breast cancer centers across Poland. A questionnaire of 18 questions was sent by email to the members of the Polish Society of Surgical Oncology and the Polish Society of Plastic, Reconstructive and Esthetic Surgery via their dedicated websites. The numbers of breast cancer patients operated on in each center ranged from 120 to 904 per year. Breast-conserving surgery (BCS) predominated in all but one center (range 50-70%). Immediate breast reconstructions (IBR) accounted for 6-42% of procedures, The most frequent type of IBR was either a two-stage expander followed by a permanent implant or one-stage implant- based with or without synthetic mesh. The most frequent type of delayed breast reconstruction (DBR) was a two-stage expander followed by implant-based reconstruction. None of the surveyed cancer centers performed free flap reconstruction. Deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flaps were performed in the plastic surgery department. Reconstructions based on pedicled flaps were performed in cancer centers. Acellular dermal matrices (ADM) and fat transfer were used in selected centers. In the clinical scenario of adjuvant radiotherapy, delayed breast reconstruction was favored. The full range of oncoplastic BCS was performed. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROM) and complications were assessed. Our findings can act as a platform for further improvement in skills, certification, data collection and audit, including patient reported expectation measures. There is also an urgent need to address pan-European inconsistencies in procedural reimbursement.