Small Bowel Imaging from Stepchild of Roentgenology to MR Enterography, Part II: The Reliable Disclosure of Crohn's Disease and Non-Inflammatory Small Bowel Disorder Plot through MRI Findings.

MRE has become a standard imaging test for evaluating patients with small bowel pathology, but a rigorous methodology for describing and interpreting the pathological findings is mandatory. Strictures, abscess, inflammatory activity, sinus tract, wall edema, fistula, mucosal lesions, strictures, and mesentery fat hypertrophy are all indicators of small bowel damage in inflammatory and non-inflammatory small bowel disease, and they are all commonly and accurately explained by MRE. MRE is a non-invasive modality that accurately assesses the intra-luminal, parietal, and extra-luminal small bowel. Differential MRE appearance allows us to distinguish between Crohn's disease and non-inflammatory small bowel disorder. The purpose of this paper is to present the MRE pathological findings of small bowel disorder.

Small Bowel Imaging from Stepchild of Roentgenology to MR Enterography: Part I: Guidance in Performing and Observing Normal and Abnormal Imaging Findings.

MRE has become a standard imaging test for evaluating patients with small bowel pathology, but the indications, interpretation of imaging findings, methodology, and appropriate use must be standardized and widely known. Several signs of small bowel damage in inflammatory and non-inflammatory small bowel pathology include strictures, abscess, inflammatory activity, sinus tract, wall edema, fistula, mucosal lesions, and mesentery fat hypertrophy, all of which are widely and accurately explained by MRE. MRE is a non-invasive modality that accurately assesses the intra-luminal, parietal, and extra-luminal small bowel. The differential MRE appearance allows us to distinguish between different small bowel pathologies, such as neoplastic and non-neoplastic small bowel diseases. The purpose of this paper is to present the MRE technique, as well as the interpretation of imaging findings, through the approach of a rigorous stepwise methodology.

Bib Sign in Proximal Descending Thoracic Aorta Rupture on CT Angiography: Presentation of a Paradigmatic Case.

Thoracic aortic rupture may present with subtle clinical and CT-angiography findings. Recognition of the imaging features of early rupture is key for timely diagnosis and treatment. This report presents a new sign of incipient proximal thoracic aortic rupture on CT-angiography.

Assisted patency with primary stent placement in distal anastomotic stenoses of lower limb bypass grafts.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the feasibility and effectiveness of primary stent placement for treating distal anastomotic infragenicular bypass stenoses in terms of technical success and middle-term (2-year) patency rates. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-one patients underwent primary stent placement for the treatment of distal anastomotic stenoses after infragenicular bypasses. Patients underwent clinical and color flow and duplex Doppler ultrasonographic (US) examinations 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after the endovascular procedure and every year thereafter if no complications occurred. Angiography was performed in patients with positive findings at the clinical and US examinations to evaluate the need for repeat endovascular and/or surgical treatment. The mean follow-up was 18.3 months (range, 2-30 months). RESULTS: Twenty-two clinically significant (>50%) distal anastomotic stenoses were detected in 22 infragenicular grafts created in the 21 patients. The median time between endovascular treatment and surgery was 7.5 months (range, 3-18 months). The mean stenosis length was 1.4 cm (range, 0.8-2.4 cm). Twenty-four stents were implanted, two of which were used to treat restenosis immediately below the previously implanted stent. The technical success rate was 100%. No complications occurred during any of the treatments, and no periprocedural major events or complications were registered. At follow-up, the cumulative primary, primary assisted, and secondary patency rates for the treated graft stenoses were 95%, 95%, and 100%, respectively, at 6 months; 71%, 81%, and 86% at 1 year; and 71%, 76%, and 81% at 2 years. The limb salvage rate was 88%. CONCLUSIONS: Although this study was limited to a small number of patients, stent placement seems to be a feasible and effective tool in the endovascular treatment of distal anastomotic infragenicular bypass graft stenoses.

Multidetector CT in abdominal aortic aneurysm treated with endovascular repair: are unenhanced and delayed phase enhanced images effective for endoleak detection?

PURPOSE: To retrospectively determine the sensitivity and specificity of unenhanced, delayed enhanced phase (DEP), and arterial enhanced phase (AEP) multi-detector row computed tomography (CT) for depicting endoleaks during follow-up of endovascular aneurysm repair. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty patients (two women, 48 men; mean age, 72 years) underwent follow-up multi-detector row CT 1, 6, and 12 months after endovascular aneurysm repair. Unenhanced CT was performed with 2.5-mm collimation; 1-mm collimation was used with AEP and DEP examinations. Two independent readers assessed the presence of endoleak in three reading sessions: AEP (session A), unenhanced and AEP (session B), and AEP and DEP (session C). At 6- and 12-month follow-up, a fourth set was included: 1-month unenhanced and AEP (session D). Sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value of each session were calculated. Triple-phase multi-detector row CT was the reference standard. RESULTS: At 1 month, sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value, respectively, were 79%, 75%, and 55% for session A; 93%, 97%, and 93% for session B; and 93%, 78%, and 62% for session C. At 6 months, sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value, respectively, were 92%, 68%, and 48% for session A; 92%, 100%, and 100% for session B; and 100%, 84%, and 67% for session C. At 12 months, sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value, respectively, were 80%, 80%, and 50% for session A; 90%, 98%, and 90% for session B; and 100%, 80%, and 56% for session C. Sensitivity did not significantly differ (P > .05) among reading sessions A, B, and C, whereas specificity and positive predictive values in session B were significantly higher (P < .001). For 6- and 12-month follow-up, no significant differences (P > .05) were found between sessions D and B. CONCLUSION: The combination of AEP and unenhanced imaging performed at 1-month follow-up offers improved specificity and positive predictive values compared with AEP alone. DEP imaging does not significantly increase sensitivity for detection of endoleaks, but it does depict low-flow endoleaks not seen at AEP.