Pregnancy and offspring sex ratio following insemination with SexedULTRA and conventional semen in cows in a commercial beef operation.

Pregnancy rate per AI (PR/AI) and breeding season pregnancy rates between insemination with sexed semen (SS; at 18 hr after the onset of oestrus) and conventional semen (CS; at 12 hr after the onset of oestrus,) and offspring gender ratio between two groups were compared. Angus cross cows (n = 686, during 2019 and 2020 breeding seasons) were oestrus-synchronized using Select-Synch + CIDR protocol and were observed thrice daily for oestrus until 72 hr after PGF2α administration. Cows expressed oestrus (n = 513) were inseminated with either SS (n = 246; SexedULTRA 4M™; y chromosome-bearing sperm) or CS (n = 267). Cows (n = 173) that failed to express oestrus at 72 hr after PGF2α received 100 µg of GnRH and CS insemination concomitantly. Two weeks later, cows were penned with natural service sires (bull:cow ratio 1:25) for 45 days. Pregnancy was diagnosed 30 days after bull removal. Calves' gender was determined at birth. For cows that expressed oestrus, PR/AI did not differ (p > .1) between SS (65.0%) and CS (66.7%) groups. The overall PR/AI differed (p < .05) between SS (65.0%) and CS (56.4%) groups. The natural service PR differed (p < .001) but breeding season PR (p > .05) did not differ between SS vs. CS groups. Bull:heifer gender ratio following AI was 88:12 and 52:48 for SS and CS groups, respectively, with an overall 66:34 ratio. Bull:heifer gender ratio for the two breeding seasons was 79:21 and 52:48 for SS and CS groups, respectively, with an overall 62:38 ratio. In conclusion, the fertility of SS insemination at 18 hr after onset of oestrus was 97% of CS insemination at 12 hr after onset of oestrus. Though breeding season pregnancy did not differ between SS and groups, preferred calf gender was 25 percentage points greater for SS over CS application. The gender accuracy was 88%.

Presynchronization with CIDR, with or without GnRH, prior to CO-Synch in beef heifers.

Objectives were to compare ovarian responses and pregnancy per AI (P/AI) in Angus-cross beef heifers (n = 521; 4 locations) synchronized with CIDR-CO-Synch (CCOS) versus CIDR-GnRH-CO-Synch (CGCOS) protocols. Heifers were assigned a reproductive tract score (RTS: 1, immature, acyclic; 5, mature, cyclic), body condition score (BCS: 1, emaciated; 9, obese) and temperament score (0, calm, 1, excitable). Heifers in the CCOS (n = 261) group received a CIDR on Day -20 (removed on Day -13), 100 µg GnRH on Day -10, 25 mg PGF2α on Day -3 and were timed inseminated 60 h later, with concomitant GnRH (Day 0). Heifers in the CGCOS (n = 260) group received a CIDR on Day -26 (removed on Day -19), 100 µg of GnRH on days -16 and -10, 25 mg of PGF2α on Day -3 and were timed inseminated 60 h later, with concomitant GnRH (Day 0). Ovarian ultrasonography was done in a subset of heifers (n = 60; 30 in each group) to determine number and size of ovarian follicles and presence of corpus luteum (CL). There was increased (P < 0.05) percentage of heifers with CL in CGCOS group compared to heifers in CCOS group on Day -10 (82.3 vs 68.2%) and on Day -3 (88.3 vs 75.1%). Average size of the largest ovarian follicle on Day 0 was greater for heifers in CGCOS group compared to CCOS group (P < 0.05). However, P/AI did not differ between CCOS and CGCOS groups, 55.0% (143/260) and 59.8% (156/261), respectively (P > 0.1). In conclusion, CIDR presynchronization with or without GnRH (CCOS and CGCOS protocols) in beef heifers resulted in similar P/AI. Adding GnRH to presynchronization with CIDR resulted in more heifers with a CL at PGF2α and increased preovulatory follicle diameter at AI. Future studies are needed with bigger sample size and CIDR + CO-Synch treatment as control to determine economic benefit.

Estrous response and pregnancy percentages following use of a progesterone-based, split-time estrous synchronization treatment regimens in beef heifers.

Mean estrous response rate (%ERR) and pregnancy/AI percentages (%P/AI) were determined after imposing split-time AI (STAI) and fixed time AI (FTAI) following 14-d controlled internal drug release (CIDR)+PGF2α or 5-d Select Synch + CIDR regimens. In Experiment 1, 1152 heifers (five locations) were randomly assigned to 14- or 5-d and to 54 + 74- or 64 + 84-h STAI treatment combinations. Estrous detection patches were affixed at PGF2α administration (19 day after- and on day 5 at- CIDR removal for 14- and 5-d regimens, respectively), assessed at 54- or 64-h and again at 74- or 84-h after PGF2α. Heifers determined to be in estrus at respective times were inseminated and non-estrous heifers at 74- or 84-h were given GnRH and inseminated concomitantly. The %ERR between 54 + 74- and 64 + 84-h STAI combinations differed (73.2 % and 78.8 %, respectively; P < 0.05), but %P/AI did not. In Experiment 2, 2014 heifers (eight locations) were randomly assigned to 14- or 5-d regimens and were inseminated split-time (64+84-h combination, similar to Experiment 1) or at fixed time (72- or 56-h after PGF2α for 14- or 5-d regimens, respectively). There were differences (P < 0.01) between STAI and FTAI treatments for %ERR (81.3 % and 64.4 %) and %P/AI (61.2 % and 55.4 %). Estrous synchronization regimen by AI treatment interaction (P < 0.05) showed that the %ERR were 79.8 %, 82.6 %, 66.2 % and 62.8 % and the %P/AI were 58.9 %, 63.4 %, 56.5 % and 56.5 % (for 14-d/STAI, 5-d/STAI, 14-d/FTAI and 5-d/FTAI, respectively). In conclusion, the 5-d CIDR with 64+84-h STAI combination was the most effective because of the greater %P/AI when this regimen was imposed.