Operative outcomes for wide awake local anesthesia versus regional and general anesthesia for flexor tendon repair.

Operative repair of flexor tendons after traumatic injury may be performed under general anesthesia (GA), regional blocks, or a wide-awake local anesthesia no tourniquet (WALANT) technique. To our knowledge there are currently no large-scale reports evaluating outcomes of flexor tendon repair in patients where wide-awake anesthesia was utilized in comparison to regional anesthesia (RA) and general anesthesia. We performed a retrospective analysis of patients who underwent treatment for flexor tendon injuries at a tertiary referral center for hand surgery over a two-year period. A total of 151 patients were included (53 WALANT, 57 RA, and 41 GA) and a total of 251 tendons were repaired (63 WALANT, 104 RA and 84 GA). No statistically significant difference was observed in rates of tendon rupture, adhesions, infection, or hand function. Flexor tendon repair under WALANT is found to be safe and presents comparable operative and functional outcomes to more traditional anesthetic techniques. Additional advantages, including the ability to test the repair intraoperatively, patient education, and the potential for boosting theatre efficiency. Further studies, preferably utilizing a randomized trial methodology, may further elucidate the benefits and risks of WALANT versus regional and general anesthesia.

Safety of major reconstructive surgery during the peak of the COVID-19 pandemic in the United Kingdom and Ireland - multicentre national cohort study.

BACKGROUND: The safety of surgery during and after the coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) pandemic is paramount. Early reports of excessive perioperative mortality in COVID-positive patients promoted the widespread avoidance of operations. However, cancelling or delaying operations for cancer, trauma, or functional restitution has resulted in increased morbidity and mortality. METHODS: A national multicentre cohort study of all major reconstructive operations carried out over a 12-week period of the 'COVID-19 surge' in the United Kingdom and Ireland was performed. Primary outcome was 30-day mortality and secondary outcome measures were major complications (Clavien-Dindo grade ≥3) and COVID-19 status of patients and healthcare professionals before and after surgery. RESULTS: A total of 418 patients underwent major reconstructive surgery with a mean operating time of 7.5 hours and 12 days' inpatient stay. Cancer (59.8%) and trauma (29.4%) were the most common indications. COVID-19 infection was present in 4.5% of patients. The 30-day post-operative mortality was 0.2%, reflecting the death of one patient who was COVID-negative. Overall complication rate was 20.8%. COVID status did not correlate with major or minor complications. Eight healthcare professionals developed post-operative COVID-19 infection, seven of which occurred within the first three weeks. CONCLUSIONS: Major reconstructive operations performed during the COVID-19 crisis have been mostly urgent cases involving all surgical specialties. This cohort is a surrogate for all major operations across all surgical specialties. Patient safety and surgical outcomes have been the same as in the pre-COVID era. With adequate precautions, major reconstructive surgery is safe for patients and staff. This study helps counsel patients of COVID-19 risks in the perioperative period.

Microbiological and functional outcomes after open extremity fractures sustained overseas: The experience of a UK level I trauma centre.

BACKGROUND: Open extremity fractures carry a high risk of limb loss and poor functional outcomes. Transfer of extremity trauma patients from developing countries and areas of conflict adds further layers of complexity due to challenges in the delivery of adequate care. The combination of extensive injuries, transfer delays and complex microbiology presents unique challenges. METHODS: A retrospective review was conducted to analyse the surgical and microbiological themes of patients with open extremity fractures transferred from overseas to our institution (Imperial College NHS Trust) between January 2011 and January 2016. RESULTS: Twenty civilian patients with 21 open extremity fractures were referred to our unit from 11 different countries. All patients had poly-microbial wound contamination on initial surveillance cultures. Five patients (25%) underwent amputation depending on the extent of osseous injury; positive surveillance cultures did not preclude limb reconstruction, with seven patients undergoing complex reconstruction and eight undergoing simple reconstruction to achievewound coverage. Hundred percent of patients demonstrated infection-free fracture union on discharge. CONCLUSION: Patients with open extremity fractures transferred from overseas present the unique challenge of poly-microbial infection in addition to extensive traumatic wounds. Favourable outcomes can be achieved despite positive microbiological findings on tissue culture with adequate antimicrobial therapy. The decision to salvage the limb and the complexity of reconstruction used should be based on the chance of achieving meaningful functional recovery, mainly determined by the extent of bony injury. The complexity of reconstruction was based on the predicted long-term functionality of the salvaged limb.

Intralesional excision with topical intralesional cryotherapy improves the treatment of keloid scarring in a paediatric patient.

Recurrent keloid scarring has a significant impact on quality of life. Management is complex, particularly for scars resistant to conventional treatments and in paediatric cases where radiotherapy is not a suitable adjunct to surgical excision. We present the case of a nine-year-old African Caribbean girl with multiple large and recurrent keloid scars on both ears and bilateral sensorineural deafness. Following repeated intralesional excisions, corticosteroid and botulinum toxin injections, she continued to experience rapid recurrence of her keloids, worsening pain and pruritus. She was no longer able to wear her hearing aids because of the large size of the keloids. We employed a novel technique using topical intralesional cryotherapy, applying liquid nitrogen intraoperatively to the inside of the skin flaps immediately post-intralesional keloid excision and before wound closure. At 26-month follow-up a good aesthetic and symptomatic result was achieved, with minimal hypopigmentation, significantly reduced scar volume and significantly slowed recurrence. We discuss this case and review the current literature on the use of topical intralesional cryotherapy for keloid scarring.