Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Poult Sci ; 103(2): 103277, 2024 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38096666

RESUMO

Transportation is a potential point of cross-contamination before broiler chickens arrive at the processing plant for slaughter. Previous studies have associated the use of uncleaned transport containers with the introduction of pathogenic bacteria onto uncontaminated broilers. The objective of this study was to quantify the transfer of Salmonella from transport drawer perforated flooring to broiler chickens during different holding times. For traceability, the flooring of each drawer was inoculated with fecal content slurry containing a marker strain of Salmonella Infantis. Three drawers per treatment were used, and each drawer was subjected to one of the following treatments: pressure wash, disinfectant, and pressure wash (A), pressurized steam followed by forced hot air (B), or no cleaning (C). Drawers were classified as top, middle, or bottom based on their relative position with each other. After treatment, broilers were introduced to each drawer and held for 2, 4, or 6 h. At each timepoint, broilers were removed from drawers, euthanized, and carcasses rinsed to obtain Salmonella counts. Samples under the limit of direct plating detection were enriched, plated, and later confirmed positive or negative. Differences were observed per treatment, holding time, and drawer relative position (P < 0.0001). Broilers placed in transport containers that underwent a cleaning procedure (A or B) had lower levels of Salmonella when compared to broilers placed in noncleaned containers (C). However, most of the samples below the limit of detection were positive after enrichment, indicating that both procedures evaluated need improvement for efficient pathogen inactivation. A decrease in Salmonella transfer was observed after 6 h in rinsates obtained from broilers placed in noncleaned containers (C). Rinsates obtained from top drawers had less Salmonella than the middle or bottom drawers when broilers were placed in transport containers that underwent a cleaning procedure (A and B). The application of pressurized steam and forced hot air was comparable to the use of water washes and disinfectant indicating a potential role in cleaning poultry transport containers.


Assuntos
Galinhas , Desinfetantes , Animais , Galinhas/microbiologia , Vapor , Salmonella
2.
Poult Sci ; 103(2): 103276, 2024 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38100941

RESUMO

In the United States, cleaning poultry transport containers prior to arrival at the broiler grow-out farm is not currently a widely adopted practice in the industry. However, previous studies have shown that transport containers have an important role in cross-contamination before the broilers arrive at the processing plant. The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of pressurized steam followed by forced hot air to clean transport container flooring and compare it to conventional cleaning procedures. Fiberglass and plastic flooring were cut into even pieces and inoculated with chicken intestinal contents containing Salmonella Infantis or Campylobacter jejuni. The cleaning treatments were pressurized steam, forced hot air, pressurized steam followed by forced hot air, water pressure washing, water pressure washing before and after disinfectant, and no cleaning. Counts for Salmonella, Campylobacter, Escherichia coli, coliforms, and aerobic bacteria were assessed. All reductions were made in comparison to noncleaned samples. Forced hot air applied by itself was not efficient in reducing Campylobacter, coliforms, and E. coli; and limited reductions (less than 1 log10 CFU/cm2) were observed for Salmonella and aerobic bacteria. Then, for all bacteria types evaluated, pressurized steam by itself showed reductions of 2.4 to 3.5 log10 CFU/cm2. Samples that were cleaned with a single-pressure water wash showed reductions of 4.0 to 4.6 log10 CFU/cm2 for all bacteria types. For Salmonella, Campylobacter, and E. coli, the greatest reductions were observed when samples were cleaned with pressurized steam followed by forced hot air (4.3-6.1 log10 CFU/cm2) or water washed before and after disinfectant (4.5-6.2 log10 CFU/cm2), and these treatments did not differ from each other. Pressurized steam followed by forced hot air was shown to be an efficient cleaning procedure to reduce poultry-associated pathogens on transport cage flooring, with the benefit of using less water than conventional water cleaning. Processors may be able to adapt this process to reduce potential cross-contamination and lessen the level of pathogens entering the processing plant.


Assuntos
Campylobacter , Desinfetantes , Animais , Vapor , Escherichia coli , Galinhas/microbiologia , Água , Aves Domésticas , Bactérias Aeróbias , Contagem de Colônia Microbiana/veterinária , Microbiologia de Alimentos , Manipulação de Alimentos/métodos
3.
Poult Sci ; 102(3): 102422, 2023 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36640558

RESUMO

Increased consumer concern for animal welfare has led some poultry producers to alter their stunning methods from electrical to controlled atmosphere stunning. The potential for different impacts on meat quality between commercially applied controlled atmosphere stunning (CAS) and electrical stunning (ES) using current US parameters needs further evaluation. Three trials were conducted in a commercial broiler processing facility that uses separate processing lines for ES and CAS. Blood glucose concentrations were measured from broilers stunned by either CAS or ES at: 1) lairage, 2) pre-stunning, and 3) post-stunning, using a glucose monitor. Occurrence of visible wing damage was evaluated post-defeathering and breast fillet meat quality was evaluated through measurement of pH, color, and drip loss at deboning and after 24 h. Data were analyzed using GLM or chi-square with a significance at P ≤ 0.05 and means were separated by Tukey's HSD. Blood glucose concentrations (mg/dL) from CAS and ES birds were not different at lairage (284, 272, P = 0.2646) or immediately prior to stunning (274, 283, P = 0.6425). Following stunning and neck cut, circulating blood glucose from birds stunned by CAS was higher than ES (418, 259, P < 0.0001). CAS carcasses had more visible wing damage than ES carcasses (3.6%, 2.2%, P < 0.0001). Breast fillet pH was lower, L* was higher, and a* was lower at debone for CAS fillets (5.81, 54.65, 1.96) compared to ES fillets (5.92, 53.15, 2.31, P < 0.0001, P = 0.0005, P = 0.0303). Drip loss did not differ between breast fillets from CAS or ES broilers (4.83, 4.84; P = 0.0859). The implications of increased blood glucose concentration post-CAS are unknown and require further evaluation. However, the increase in visible wing damage observed post-defeathering from CAS carcasses indicated a need for equipment parameter adjustments during the process from stunning through defeathering when using CAS for broiler stunning. Although differences were observed in breast fillet attributes at deboning, these differences would have minimal practical application and were no longer present at 24 h. Overall, use of CAS in a commercial facility resulted in differences in subsequent product quality when compared to ES.


Assuntos
Galinhas , Manipulação de Alimentos , Animais , Manipulação de Alimentos/métodos , Glicemia , Carne/análise , Atmosfera , Matadouros
4.
J Med Entomol ; 59(6): 2006-2012, 2022 11 16.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36130177

RESUMO

Muscid flies, especially house flies (Musca domestica L.) (Diptera: Muscidae), are a major pest of poultry layer facilities. Augmentative biological control of muscid flies with pteromalid wasps has gained increased attention in recent years. Knowing which pteromalid species are present in a specific area could produce more effective filth fly control. The purpose of this project was to survey parasitoid populations in poultry layer facilities in central and southeastern Pennsylvania from June through September. Two genera of parasitoids, Spalangia and Trichomalopsis, were collected over the course of the survey. Overall, out of 3,724 parasitized pupae the species collected in order of most to least common were Spalangia cameroni Perkins, Spalangia nigroaenea Curtis, Trichomalopsis spp., and Spalangia endius Walker. House fly parasitism overall and by each parasitoid species varied by location and over the four study months. A second objective was to evaluate a new parasitoid trap for surveying parasitoid wasp populations. This device uses a combination of house fly third instars and development media. This was compared to a more traditional method, the sentinel bag, which uses only fly pupae. A higher proportion of Spalangia spp. emerged from the new trap design and more Trichomalopsis spp. emerged from the sentinel bag. This suggests that using this new device alongside the traditional collection method may result in more accurate sampling of pteromalid populations.


Assuntos
Moscas Domésticas , Muscidae , Vespas , Animais , Aves Domésticas , Pupa , Controle Biológico de Vetores
5.
Poult Sci ; 100(12): 101504, 2021 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34710710

RESUMO

The presence of Salmonella in air of poultry houses has been previously confirmed. Therefore, it is important to investigate the entry of Salmonella into broilers through air. The present study aimed to evaluate different levels of Salmonella Enteritidis aerosol inoculations in broiler chicks for colonization of ceca, trachea, and liver/spleen and persistence over time. In 3 independent trials, 112 one-day-old birds were randomly divided into 4 groups (n = 28/group). On d 1 of age, one group was exposed to an aerosol of sterile saline and the remaining three groups were exposed to an aerosol generated from one of 3 doses (103, 106, or 109 CFU/mL) of S. Enteritidis inoculum. Aerosol exposure time was 30 min/group and was performed using a nebulizer. On d 3, 7, 14, and 21 of age, ceca, trachea, and liver/spleen were aseptically removed. Ceca were cultured for Salmonella counts (log10 CFU/g) and all tissues were cultured for Salmonella prevalence. All tissues from the control group were Salmonella negative for all sampling days. On sampling d 3 and 7, ceca Salmonella counts were highest (5.14 and 5.11, respectively) when challenged with 109Salmonella (P ≤ 0.0281). Ceca Salmonella counts increased from d 3 (2.43) to d 7 (4.43), then remained constant when challenged at 103Salmonella, and counts decreased over time for all other groups. Tissue Salmonella prevalence increased with increasing challenge levels at all sampling timepoints (P ≤ 0.0213). Salmonella prevalence was low (0/18 to 4/18) and did not change over time following 103Salmonella challenge (P ≥ 0.2394). Prevalence decreased over time in ceca and trachea following 106 and 109Salmonella challenge (P ≤ 0.0483). Liver/spleen Salmonella prevalence increased from d 3 (13/18) to d 14 (18/18) and then decreased at d 21 (10/18) in birds exposed to an aerosol of 109Salmonella but remained constant over time for rest of the Salmonella inoculated groups. Overall, this study demonstrated the Salmonella colonization and persistence in different tissues in broilers following exposure to aerosolized Salmonella.


Assuntos
Doenças das Aves Domésticas , Salmonelose Animal , Animais , Ceco , Galinhas , Doenças das Aves Domésticas/epidemiologia , Salmonelose Animal/epidemiologia , Salmonella enteritidis
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA