Response of spinal cord blood flow to the nitric oxide inhibitor nitroarginine.

OBJECTIVE: The extent to which nitric oxide (NO) is involved in the modulation of spinal cord blood flow (SCBF) in the uninjured and injured cord is unknown. To elucidate these questions, the following experiments in anesthetized rats were conducted. METHODS: Because NO is an unstable free radical with a half-life of seconds, its role can be understood through the study of the NO synthase inhibitor L-NG-nitroarginine (L-NOARG). L-NOARG was administered intravenously for 30 minutes at a dose of 100 or 500 micrograms/kg/min in 12 and 10 uninjured animals, respectively. SCBF fluctuations at C7-T1 were measured using laser doppler flowmetry. In a second set of 12 rats, L-NOARG (500 micrograms/kg/min) was administered 10 minutes before spinal cord injury using a modified aneurysm clip at C7-T1 and continued for 30 minutes thereafter. RESULTS: In the uninjured animals, L-NOARG was associated with a dose-dependent increase in mean arterial pressure of 20 to 80% above baseline (P = 0.0001), together with a dose-related decrease in SCBF (P = 0.0373). In the injured animals, L-NOARG was associated with a 48% increase in mean arterial pressure. With L-NOARG, the changes in SCBF from baseline after injury were similar to those of noninjured controls (n = 25) and significantly less than injury controls (n = 18) or those receiving phenylephrine (n = 8). CONCLUSION: NO synthase inhibitors, by reducing available NO, cause systemic vasoconstriction and a decrease in SCBF in the uninjured spinal cord. In the injured spinal cord, the administration of L-NOARG results in a redistribution of blood flow with an augmentation in posttraumatic SCBF at the injury site.

In vitro biomechanical analysis of three anterior thoracolumbar implants.

OBJECT: The goal of this study was to evaluate the comparative efficacy of three commonly used anterior thoracolumbar implants: the anterior thoracolumbar locking plate (ATLP), the smooth-rod Kaneda (SRK), and the Z-plate. METHODS: In vitro testing was performed using the T9-L3 segments of human cadaver spines. An L-1 corpectomy was performed, and stabilization was achieved using one of three anterior devices: the ATLP in nine spines, the SRK in 10, and the Z-plate in 10. Specimens were load tested with 1.5-, 3-, 4.5-, and 6-Nm in flexion and extension, right and left lateral bending, and right and left axial rotation. Angular motion was monitored using two video cameras that tracked light-emitting diodes attached to the vertebral bodies. Testing was performed in the intact state in spines stabilized with one of the three aforementioned devices after the devices had been fatigued to 5000 cycles at +/- 3 Nm and after bilateral facetectomy. There was no difference in the stability of the intact spines with use of the three devices. There were no differences between the SRK- and Z-plate-instrumented spines in any state. In extension testing, the mean angular rotation (+/- standard deviation) of spines instrumented with the SRK (4.7 +/- 3.2 degrees) and Z-plate devices (3.3 +/- 2.3 degrees) was more rigid than that observed in the ATLP-stabilized spines (9 +/- 4.8 degrees). In flexion testing after induction of fatigue, however, only the SRK (4.2 +/- 3.2 degrees) was stiffer than the ATLP (8.9 +/- 4.9 degrees). Also, in extension postfatigue, only the SRK (2.4 +/- 3.4 degrees) provided more rigid fixation than the ATLP (6.4 +/- 2.9 degrees). All three devices were equally unstable after bilateral facetectomy. The SRK and Z-plate anterior thoracolumbar implants were both more rigid than the ATLP, and of the former two the SRK was stiffer. CONCLUSIONS: The authors' results suggest that in cases in which profile and ease of application are not of paramount importance, the SRK has an advantage over the other two tested implants in achieving rigid fixation immediately postoperatively.

A biomechanical comparison between anterior and transverse interbody fusion cages.

STUDY DESIGN: Human cadaveric lumbar spines underwent placement of threaded fusion cages (TFCs) in either an anterior or transverse orientation. Spines underwent load testing and angular rotation measurement in the intact state, after diskectomy, after cage placement, and after fatiguing. Angular rotations were compared between cage orientations and interventions. OBJECTIVE: To determine which cage orientation resulted in greater immediate stability. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: There has been extensive biomechanical study of interbody fusion cages. The lateral orientation has been increasingly used for intervertebral fusion, but a direct biomechanical comparison between cages implanted either anteriorly or transversely in human cadaveric spines has not been performed. METHODS: Fourteen spines were randomized into the anterior group (anterior diskectomy and dual anterior cage placement) and the lateral group (lateral diskectomy and single transverse cage placement). Pure bending moments of 1.5, 3.0, 4.5, and 6.0 Nm were applied in flexion, extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation. Load testing was performed while intact, after diskectomy, after cage placement, and after fatiguing. Angular rotation was compared between anterior and lateral groups and, within each group, among the different interventions. RESULTS: Segmental ranges of motion were similar between spines undergoing either anterior or lateral cage implantation. CONCLUSIONS: These results demonstrate few differences between angular rotation after either anterior or lateral TFC implantation. These findings add to data that find few differences between orientation of implanted TFCs. Combined with a decreased risk of adjacent structure injury through a lateral approach, these data support a lateral approach for lumbar interbody fusion.