[Development of quality standards for patients with rheumatoid arthritis for use in Germany]. / Entwicklung von Qualitätsstandards für die Versorgung von Patient*innen mit rheumatoider Arthritis zur Anwendung in Deutschland.

Despite a qualitatively and structurally good care of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in Germany, there are still potentially amendable deficits in the quality of care. For this reason, the German Society for Rheumatology (DGRh) has therefore decided to ask a group of experts including various stakeholders to develop quality standards (QS) for the care of patients with RA in order to improve the quality of care. The QS are used to determine and quantitatively measure the quality of care, subject to relevance and feasibility. The recently published NICE and ASAS standards and a systematic literature search were used as the basis for development. A total of 8 QS, now published for the first time, were approved with the intention to measure and further optimize the quality of care for patients with RA in Germany.

[Development of quality standards for patients with axial spondyloarthritis for use in Germany]. / Entwicklung von Qualitätsstandards für Patient*innen mit axialer Spondyloarthritis zum Einsatz in Deutschland.

Quality standards (QS) are measurable constructs designed to quantify gaps in care and subsequently to improve quality of care. The Assessment of SpondyloArthritis International Society (ASAS) recently generated and published international QS for the management of patients with axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) for the first time. The German Society of Rheumatology (DGRh) then decided to translate, review and possibly adopt these standards by a group of experts from different care settings. Against this background, national QS for the management of patients with axSpA for Germany were developed for the first time. The main focus was on feasibility and practical relevance. Ultimately, nine QS were defined with which the quality of care in Germany can and should be measured and improved.

[Quality in acute inpatient rheumatology 2021 : Current aspects of the KOBRA quality label of the Association of Rheumatological Acute Care Clinics]. / Qualität in der akutstationären Rheumatologie 2021 : Aktuelle Aspekte zum KOBRA-Qualitätslabel des Verbandes Rheumatologischer Akutkliniken (VRA e.V.).

A comprehensive health policy quality campaign launched in 2021 aims to improve the quality and transparency of hospital care for people with diseases in Germany. Legal requirements for minimum volumes and the expansion of quality contracts between cost units and hospitals as well as the use of quality indicators relevant to planning for demand-oriented and quality-oriented further development of inpatient care will increase competition in the quality of care between hospitals. The topic of development and definition of quality in medicine was also comprehensively addressed by the Association of Rheumatological Acute Care Clinics (VRA) shortly after its foundation in 1998. At the center of acute inpatient quality management are binding structural criteria linked to the continuous outcome benchmarking in acute rheumatology care (KOBRA) project launched in 2003 in rheumatology (and continuously implemented to date) measuring process and outcome quality. Based on this framework (fulfillment of the structural quality and participation in the KOBRA project) successfully participating rheumatology units can acquire the KOBRA seal of approval for 2 years at a time, which is awarded by the project management, the aQua Institute. The outstanding position of the project is exemplified by data evaluation on treatment change in active rheumatoid arthritis, diagnosis confirmation of connective tissue diseases and vasculitis during the inpatient stay as well as on participatory decision-making processes concerning rheumatoid arthritis (referring to the results of the data collection period 2018). By anchoring projects for structural, process and outcome quality acute inpatient rheumatology is well prepared for the paradigm shift demanded by health policies. Additionally, the KOBRA project is a good prerequisite to meet the requirements concerning quality management fixed in the Federal Joint Committee (G-BA) guidelines for recognition as a rheumatology center.

Mission statement from rheumatologists in the German Society of Rheumatology (DGRh e. V.) : We live rheumatology.

Systemic disease demands systemic thinkers. In this mission statement we define rheumatology, describe the role of the German Society of Rheumatology and the rheumatologist's spirit to their discipline. Rheumatologists are dedicated to improving the quality of life of their acute, chronic, and rehabilitative patients on the basis of up to date evidence and strong physician-patient relations. We think, act and interact systemically, scientifically, consistently, transparently, reliably, inclusively, innovatively and enthusiastically.

[Mission statement from rheumatologists in the German Society of Rheumatology (DGRh e. V.) : We live rheumatology. German version]. / Leitbild der Rheumatologinnen und Rheumatologen in der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Rheumatologie e. V. (DGRh e. V.) : Wir sind die Rheumatologie.

Systemic disease demands systemic thinkers. In this mission statement we define rheumatology, describe the role of the German Society of Rheumatology and the rheumatologist's spirit to their discipline. Rheumatologists are dedicated to improving the quality of life of their acute, chronic, and rehabilitative patients on the basis of up to date evidence and strong physician-patient relations. We think, act and interact systemically, scientifically, consistently, transparently, reliably, inclusively, innovatively and enthusiastically.

[Spondyloarthritides]. / Spondyloarthritiden.

Spondyloarthritides (SpA) are inflammatory rheumatic diseases affecting the axial skeleton, peripheral joints and entheses, and also manifest at extraskeletal sites. According to the more recently introduced nomenclature, predominant axial SpA is distinguished from predominant peripheral SpA. Axial SpA is further divided into radiographic and nonradiographic axial SpA. Genetic factors are relevant, with HLA-B27 being most important. The interleukin 23/17 pathway seems to be relevant and points towards new therapeutic targets. Inflammatory back pain is the leading symptom in axial SpA and has certain characteristics. In addition, HLA-B27 and sacroiliitis on imaging are important for diagnosis. Therapy consists of physiotherapy, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (first line) and biologicals (second line). Conventional disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs are effective only in peripheral arthritis.

[Uveitis in spondyloarthritis]. / Uveitis bei Spondyloarthritiden.

Acute anterior uveitis (AAU) is the most frequent uveitis subtype. It is often associated with HLA-B27 and with inflammatory rheumatic diseases, in particular with spondyloarthritis (SpA), which itself is strongly associated with HLA-B27. About 40-60% of patients with AAU have an associated spondyloarthritis, and 20-40% of patients with spondyloarthritis also have uveitis. The incidence of AAU in patients with SpA clearly correlates with disease duration. The AAU has an acute onset, usually affects only one eye at a time, and shows a tendency for recurrence. Early therapy of AAU with topical steroids is relevant for good visual outcomes. Minimum duration of therapy of flares of AAU is 6-8 weeks in order to prevent early recurrency. The rate of local complications correlates with the rate of AAU flares and the visual outcome is often good. Refractory uveitis and frequent recurrencies of AAU may be treated with conventional disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs, such as sulfasalazine and methotrexate) and biologicals (e.g. TNF-alpha inhibitors). Any first episode of AAU diagnosed by an ophthalmologist should prompt referral to rheumatology for suspected SpA, particularly if rheumatic symptoms are present.

[Evidence-based recommendations on diagnostics and therapy of axial spondyloarthritis : S3 guidelines of the German Society of Rheumatology (DGRh) in cooperation with the Association of the Scientific Medical Societies in Germany (AWMF)]. / Evidenzbasierte Empfehlung zur Diagnostik und Therapie der axialen Spondyloarthritis : S3-Leitlinie der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Rheumatologie (DGRh) in Kooperation mit der Arbeitsgemeinschaft der Wissenschaftlichen Medizinischen Fachgesellschaften (AWMF).

The clinical course of axial spondyloarthritis (SpA) is variable and characterized by chronic back pain and extraspinal manifestations, such as asymmetrical arthritis, dactylitis and enthesitis. Extra-articular manifestations in the eyes (anterior uveitis), skin (psoriasis) and intestines (chronic inflammatory bowel disease) are also frequent manifestations in patients with SpA. Due to the heterogeneity of disease manifestations and the partial concentration on structural alterations in the sacroiliac joints visible in X­ray images, the diagnosis is often delayed for many years. An important step in the direction of improved early recognition of axial SpA was establishment of the Assessment of SpondyloArthritis International Society (ASAS) classification criteria published in 2009, which focused on the initally deep-seated back pain and chronicity in relatively young patients as well as the importance of magnetic resonance imaging and HLA B 27 determination in the early stages of the disease. In order to achieve the foundations for an effective and timely therapy of affected patients, in 2014 on the initiative of the German Society of Rheumatology, S3 guidelines on axial SpA including Bechterew's disease and early forms were formulated in cooperation with other specialist societies. This article gives an overview of the contents of the S3 guidelines on axial SpA.

[Spondyloarthritides]. / Spondyloarthritiden.

Spondyloarthritides (SpA) are inflammatory rheumatic diseases affecting the axial skeleton, peripheral joints and entheses, and also manifest at extraskeletal sites. According to the more recently introduced nomenclature, predominant axial SpA is distinguished from predominant peripheral SpA. Axial SpA is further divided into radiographic and nonradiographic axial SpA. Genetic factors are relevant, with HLA-B27 being most important. The interleukin 23/17 pathway seems to be relevant and points towards new therapeutic targets. Inflammatory back pain is the leading symptom in axial SpA and has certain characteristics. In addition, HLA-B27 and sacroiliitis on imaging are important for diagnosis. Therapy consists of physiotherapy, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (first line) and biologicals (second line). Conventional disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs are effective only in peripheral arthritis.

[International quality indicators in rheumatology. Suggestions for rheumatoid arthritis]. / Internationale Qualitätsindikatoren in der Rheumatologie. Vorschläge für die rheumatoide Arthritis.

Quality measurement of medical care has become increasingly important in Germany in recent years. Essentially, three areas can be distinguished: the quality of structure, process and outcome. For the measurement of quality, quality indicators are necessary. The Federal Joint Committee has recently been responsible for defining such quality indicators. Because proposals for quality indicators for the indication for rheumatoid arthritis in have already been published in international rheumatology, we selected and translated the three most important European publications in order to present them to the rheumatology community. The ultimate aim is the initiation of a process for the joint development of quality indicators within the professional association and the two associations in Germany in order to then be able to adequately discuss these with policy-makers.

[Treat-to-target (T2T) recommendation for patients with spondyloarthritis - translation into German]. / "Treat-to-target (T2T)" Empfehlungen für die Behandlung von Patienten mit Spondyloarthritis ­ Übersetzung ins Deutsche.

The management of patients with spondyloarthritis (SpA) has experienced a paradigm shift in recent years. This is true for the treatment of axial as well as peripheral manifestations. International treat to target (T2T) recommendations for SpA based on the T2T strategy have now also been published, which contain 5 higher level principles (A-E) in addition to the 15 recommendations. In order to make the recommendations known and to promote national distribution, German experts have now issued a translation of the T2T recommendations for SpA into German.

[Standards of care for people with rheumatoid arthritis in Europe : Translation and comments of the eumusc.net recommendations supported by EULAR performed by a national task force of the professional organisations DGRh and VRA supported by "Deutsche Rheumaliga"]. / Europäische Versorgungsstandards für Menschen mit rheumatoider Arthritis : Übersetzung und Kommentierung der von der EULAR unterstützten Vorschläge des eumusc.net durch eine Task Force von DGRh und VRA mit Unterstützung der Deutschen Rheuma-Liga.

In a joint initiative by the boards of the German Society for Rheumatology (DGRh) and the Association of Rheumatology Clinics (VRA) the European "standards of care" for rheumatoid arthritis, recently suggested by the European Musculoskeletal Conditions Surveillance and Information Network (eumusc.net) and supported by the European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR), were translated and annotated. The recommendations include aspects of the management of the disease, actual medical care, and access to information - this includes all types of support people with RA need, and, last but not least communication of the necessary knowledge. Furthermore, health care structures such as the availability of medical staff with relevant expertise are also important.

EULAR recommendations for the use of imaging in the diagnosis and management of spondyloarthritis in clinical practice.

A taskforce comprised of an expert group of 21 rheumatologists, radiologists and methodologists from 11 countries developed evidence-based recommendations on the use of imaging in the clinical management of both axial and peripheral spondyloarthritis (SpA). Twelve key questions on the role of imaging in SpA were generated using a process of discussion and consensus. Imaging modalities included conventional radiography, ultrasound, magnetic resonance imaging, computed tomography (CT), positron emission tomography, single photon emission CT, dual-emission x-ray absorptiometry and scintigraphy. Experts applied research evidence obtained from systematic literature reviews using MEDLINE and EMBASE to develop a set of 10 recommendations. The strength of recommendations (SOR) was assessed by taskforce members using a visual analogue scale. A total of 7550 references were identified in the search process, from which 158 studies were included in the systematic review. Ten recommendations were produced using research-based evidence and expert opinion encompassing the role of imaging in making a diagnosis of axial SpA or peripheral SpA, monitoring inflammation and damage, predicting outcome, response to treatment, and detecting spinal fractures and osteoporosis. The SOR for each recommendation was generally very high (range 8.9-9.5). These are the first recommendations which encompass the entire spectrum of SpA and evaluate the full role of all commonly used imaging modalities. We aimed to produce recommendations that are practical and valuable in daily practice for rheumatologists, radiologists and general practitioners.

Autoantibodies against CD74 in spondyloarthritis.

BACKGROUND: Spondyloarthritis (SpA) is a common debilitating inflammatory disorder. Establishing the diagnosis is often difficult, since abnormalities in conventional X-ray develop with a latency of several years and only HLA-B27 is used as a laboratory marker. The goal of our study was to identify new autoantibodies as diagnostic markers of SpA. METHODS: Protein array technology was used to screen for new autoantigens in ankylosing spondylitis. Then, the results were confirmed by ELISA using Class II-associated invariant chain peptide domain of CD74 as antigen. Sera for the ELISA were obtained from 216 patients with axial (n=156) and peripheral (n=60) SpA. Sera of patients with psoriatic arthritis without axial involvement as another subtype of peripheral SpA, rheumatoid arthritis, systemic lupus erythematosus, HIV infection and blood donors served as controls. All donors provided informed consent for the study which was approved by the local ethics committee (project number 4928). RESULTS: Using protein arrays, we detected IgG antibodies against CD74 in SpA sera. Using ELISA technology on sera that had previously been frozen for several years, IgG autoantibodies against CD74 were found in 67% of the SpA patients and were even more frequent in patients with a short disease duration. In the controls, the prevalence of the new autoantibodies was 18/40 (45%) in psoriatic arthritis without axial involvement, 9/80 (11%) in rheumatoid arthritis, 6/40 (15%) in systemic lupus erythematosus, 1/40 (2.5%) in HIV and 1/125 (0.8%) in blood donors. CONCLUSIONS: Antibodies against CD74 could provide an important additional tool for diagnosis of SpA.

Efficacy and safety of infliximab plus naproxen versus naproxen alone in patients with early, active axial spondyloarthritis: results from the double-blind, placebo-controlled INFAST study, Part 1.

OBJECTIVES: To assess whether combination therapy with infliximab (IFX) plus nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) is superior to NSAID monotherapy for reaching Assessment of SpondyloArthritis international Society (ASAS) partial remission in patients with early, active axial spondyloarthritis (SpA) who were naïve to NSAIDs or received a submaximal dose of NSAIDs. METHODS: Patients were randomised (2 : 1 ratio) to receive naproxen (NPX) 1000 mg daily plus either IFX 5 mg/kg or placebo (PBO) at weeks 0, 2, 6, 12, 18 and 24. The primary efficacy measure was the percentage of patients who met ASAS partial remission criteria at week 28. Several other measures of disease activity, clinical symptoms and patient-rated outcomes were evaluated. Treatment group differences were analysed with Fisher exact tests or analysis of covariance. RESULTS: A greater percentage of patients achieved ASAS partial remission in the IFX+NPX group (61.9%; 65/105) than in the PBO+NPX group (35.3%; 18/51) at week 28 (p=0.002) and at all other visits (p<0.05, all comparisons). Results of most other disease activity and patient-reported endpoints (including Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score, Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index, Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index, multiple quality of life measures and pain measures) showed greater improvement in the IFX+NPX group than the PBO+NPX group, with several measures demonstrating early and consistent improvement over 28 weeks of treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with early, active axial SpA who received IFX+NPX combination treatment were twice as likely to achieve clinical remission as patients who received NPX alone. NPX alone led to clinical remission in a third of patients.

Maintenance of biologic-free remission with naproxen or no treatment in patients with early, active axial spondyloarthritis: results from a 6-month, randomised, open-label follow-up study, INFAST Part 2.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether biologic-free remission can be achieved in patients with early, active axial spondyloarthritis (SpA) who were in partial remission after 28 weeks of infliximab (IFX)+naproxen (NPX) or placebo (PBO)+NPX treatment and whether treatment with NPX was superior to no treatment to maintain disease control. METHOD: Infliximab as First-Line Therapy in Patients with Early Active Axial Spondyloarthritis Trial (INFAST) Part 1 was a double-blind, randomised, controlled trial in biologic-naïve patients with early, active, moderate-to-severe axial SpA treated with either IFX 5 mg/kg+NPX 1000 mg/d or PBO+NPX 1000 mg/d for 28 weeks. Patients achieving Assessment of SpondyloArthritis international Society (ASAS) partial remission at week 28 continued to Part 2 and were randomised (1:1) to NPX or no treatment until week 52. Treatment group differences in ASAS partial remission and other efficacy variables were assessed through week 52 with Fisher exact tests. RESULTS: At week 52, similar percentages of patients in the NPX group (47.5%, 19/40) and the no-treatment group (40.0%, 16/40) maintained partial remission, p=0.65. Median duration of partial remission was 23 weeks in the NPX group and 12.6 weeks in the no-treatment group (p=0.38). Mean Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index scores were low at week 28, the start of follow-up treatment (NPX, 0.7; no treatment, 0.6), and remained low at week 52 (NPX, 1.2; no treatment, 1.7). CONCLUSIONS: In axial SpA patients who reached partial remission after treatment with either IFX+NPX or NPX alone, disease activity remained low, and about half of patients remained in remission during 6 months in which NPX was continued or all treatments were stopped.

Efficacy of certolizumab pegol on signs and symptoms of axial spondyloarthritis including ankylosing spondylitis: 24-week results of a double-blind randomised placebo-controlled Phase 3 study.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of certolizumab pegol (CZP) after 24 weeks in RAPID-axSpA (NCT01087762), an ongoing Phase 3 trial in patients with axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA), including patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS) and non-radiographic axSpA (nr-axSpA). METHODS: Patients with active axSpA were randomised 1:1:1 to placebo, CZP 200 mg every 2 weeks (Q2W) or CZP 400 mg every 4 weeks (Q4W). In total 325 patients were randomised. Primary endpoint was ASAS20 (Assessment of SpondyloArthritis international Society 20) response at week 12. Secondary outcomes included change from baseline in Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI), Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI), and Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Metrology Index (BASMI) linear. RESULTS: Baseline disease activity was similar between AS and nr-axSpA. At week 12, ASAS20 response rates were significantly higher in CZP 200 mg Q2W and CZP 400 mg Q4W arms versus placebo (57.7 and 63.6 vs 38.3, p≤0.004). At week 24, combined CZP arms showed significant (p<0.001) differences in change from baseline versus placebo in BASFI (-2.28 vs -0.40), BASDAI (-3.05 vs -1.05), and BASMI (-0.52 vs -0.07). Improvements were observed as early as week 1. Similar improvements were reported with CZP versus placebo in both AS and nr-axSpA subpopulations. Adverse events were reported in 70.4% vs 62.6%, and serious adverse events in 4.7% vs 4.7% of All CZP versus placebo groups. No deaths or malignancies were reported. CONCLUSIONS: CZP rapidly reduced the signs and symptoms of axSpA, with no new safety signals observed compared to the safety profile of CZP in RA. Similar improvements were observed across CZP dosing regimens, and in AS and nr-axSpA patients.

Treating axial and peripheral spondyloarthritis, including psoriatic arthritis, to target: results of a systematic literature search to support an international treat-to-target recommendation in spondyloarthritis.

BACKGROUND: Current recommendations for the management of axial spondyloarthritis (SpA) and psoriatic arthritis are to monitor disease activity and adjust therapy accordingly. However, treatment targets and timeframes of change have not been defined. An international expert panel has been convened to develop 'treat-to-target' recommendations, based on published evidence and expert opinion. OBJECTIVE: To review evidence on targeted treatment for axial and peripheral SpA, as well as for psoriatic skin disease. METHODS: We performed a systematic literature search covering Medline, Embase and Cochrane, conference abstracts and studies in http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. RESULTS: Randomised comparisons of targeted versus routine treatment are lacking. Some studies implemented treatment targets before escalating therapy: in ankylosing spondylitis, most trials used a decrease in Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index; in psoriatic arthritis, protocols primarily considered a reduction in swollen and tender joints; in psoriasis, the Modified Psoriasis Severity Score and the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index were used. Complementary evidence correlating these factors with function and radiographic damage at follow-up is sparse and equivocal. CONCLUSIONS: There is a need for randomised trials that investigate the value of treat-to-target recommendations in SpA and psoriasis. Several trials have used thresholds of disease activity measures to guide treatment decisions. However, evidence on the effect of these data on long-term outcome is scarce. The search data informed the expert committee regarding the formulation of recommendations and a research agenda.

[Core set of behavioral recommendations for patients with ankylosing spondylitis]. / Kernsatz von Verhaltensempfehlungen für Patienten mit ankylosierender Spondylitis.

OBJECTIVES: Patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS) can contribute to a favorable disease course by their own behaviour and environmental adaptations. However, no standardized consensus recommendations on patient behavior and adaptations exist, neither internationally nor nationally. The aim of this study was to establish a core set of recommendations concerning favorable patient behavior to be given to patients with AS by rheumatologists. METHODS: An extended literature research in the scientific and patient-oriented literature revealed 70 recommendations. These recommendations were evaluated and ranked by importance at a meeting of the Ankylosing Spondylitis International Federation (ASIF, 26 participants from 13 countries) in November 2011. The remaining 59 recommendations were extensively discussed, supplemented, partially reworded, condensed and those with the highest priority were selected by consensus at a seminar of local branch leaders of the AS patient organization in Germany (Deutsche Vereinigung Morbus Bechterew) in March 2012 (80 participants, 95% patients with AS). RESULTS: The core set encompasses 1) a general statement on living with AS and 2) recommendations in the areas of sitting position, walking, sleeping, at work, exercising, sports and recreational activities, diet and life style, sexuality and pregnancy, fall prevention, car driving and membership in an AS-specific patient organization. The selected recommendations received agreement by 80-100% of the patients. Some recommendations (e.g. fall prevention and car driving) are more relevant to patients with advanced and usually longstanding disease, i.e. with advanced ankylosis or osteoporosis. CONCLUSIONS: For the first time a core set of recommendations for the behavior of patients with AS was created in collaboration with many persons affected by the disease. Patients with AS should receive these recommendations from their rheumatologists, ideally early in the disease course. The German version of this core set is presented in this article.