A Case of Gallbladder Cancer with Trousseau Syndrome Successfully Treated Using Radical Resection.

Trousseau syndrome is characterized by cancer-associated systemic thrombosis. We describe the first case of a successfully treated gallbladder adenocarcinoma accompanied by Trousseau syndrome. A 66-year-old woman presented with right hemiplegia. Magnetic resonance imaging identified multiple cerebral infarctions. Her serum carbohydrate antigen 19-9 and D-dimer levels were markedly elevated, and a gallbladder tumor was detected via abdominal computed tomography. Venous ultrasonography of the lower limbs revealed a deep venous thrombus in the right peroneal vein. These findings suggested that the brain infarctions were likely caused by Trousseau syndrome associated with her gallbladder cancer. Radical resection of the gallbladder tumor was performed. The resected gallbladder was filled with mucus and was pathologically diagnosed as an adenocarcinoma. Her postoperative course was uneventful, and she received a one-year course of adjuvant therapy with oral S-1. No cancer recurrence or thrombosis was noted 26 months postoperatively. Despite concurrent Trousseau syndrome, a radical cure of the primary tumor and thrombosis could be achieved with the appropriate treatment.

A Case Report of Neoadjuvant Gemcitabine Plus Cisplatin for Locally Advanced Unresectable Ampulla of Vater Carcinoma.

INTRODUCTION: Ampulla of Vater carcinoma (AVC) with para-aortic node (PAN) metastasis is considered unresectable and is equivalent to distant metastasis, contributing to poor outcomes. CASE PRESENTATION: A 60-year-old man was referred to our hospital and was diagnosed with an unresectable ampulla of Vater carcinoma that had metastasized to the para-aortic nodes. The patient received a systemic chemotherapy regimen comprising a combination of gemcitabine and cisplatin. Following five cycles of treatment, imaging studies revealed a significant reduction in the primary tumor and para-aortic node metastasis, rendering detection difficult. Pancreatoduodenectomy with para-aortic node dissection was performed as a radical surgery. Upon pathological examination, no residual tumors were identified in the resected specimen, indicating that the systemic chemotherapy achieved a complete pathological response. The postoperative course of the patient was uneventful, and he was discharged on the 25th postoperative day. The patient was followed up as an outpatient and remained stable without any recurrence for two months after surgery. CONCLUSION: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy with gemcitabine and cisplatin was useful for downstaging the ampulla in patients with Vater carcinoma. This finding may help physicians manage patients with similar presentations.

Preoperative percent body fat in bioelectrical impedance analysis predicts pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy.

BACKGROUND: It is unclear which body composition affects postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) after pancreaticoduodenectomy. In the present study, we evaluated the relationship between nutritional factors, body composition, and POPF. METHODS: This was a prospective observational cohort study. Patients who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy between March 2018 and July 2021 were included in this study. Preoperative body composition was measured using a bioelectrical impedance analyzer. In addition, the predictive factors for POPF were analyzed using logistic regression model. RESULTS: The study included 143 patients. Among these patients, 31 had POPF (POPF group) and 112 did not (non-POPF group) after pancreaticoduodenectomy. For body composition, the percent body fat was significantly higher in the POPF group (26.90 vs 23.48, P = 0.022). Multivariate analysis revealed that alcohol consumption (odds ratio 2.95, P = 0.03), pancreatic duct < 3 mm (odds ratio 3.89, P < 0.01), and percent body fat (odds ratio 1.08, P = 0.01) were significantly independent predictive factors for POPF. When the patients were divided into three groups based on their percent body fat (< 25, 25-35, and ≥ 35), POPF occurred more frequently in the group with ≥ 35 percent body fat (47.1%) than in the < 25 group (15.5%) (P = 0.008). CONCLUSION: Predictive factors for POPF related to nutritional status, such as percent body fat, should be considered before proceeding to pancreaticoduodenectomy (ClinicalTrials.gov trial registration no. NCT5257434).

Favorable Outcome of Repeated Salvage Surgeries for Rare Metastasis to the Ligamentum Teres Hepatis and the Upper Abdominal Wall in a Stage IV Gastric Cancer Patient.

Gastric cancer with peritoneal metastases is typically a devastating diagnosis. Ligamentum teres hepatis (LTH) metastasis is an extremely rare presentation with only four known cases. Herein, we report salvage surgery of successive metastases to the abdominal wall and LTH in a patient originally presenting with advanced gastric cancer with peritoneal metastasis, leading to long-term survival. A 72-year-old man with advanced gastric cancer underwent curative-intent distal gastrectomy with D2 lymph node dissection for gastric outlet obstruction. During this procedure, three small peritoneal metastases were detected in the lesser omentum, the small mesentery, and the mesocolon; however, intraoperative abdominal lavage cytology was negative. We added cytoreductive surgery for peritoneal metastasis. The pathological diagnosis of the gastric cancer was tubular adenocarcinoma with pT4aN1pM1(PER/P1b)CY0 stage IV (Japanese classification of gastric carcinoma/JCGC 15th), or T4N1M1b stage IV (UICC 7th). Post-operative adjuvant chemotherapy with S-1 (TS-1)+cisplatin (CDDP) was administered for 8 months followed by S-1 monotherapy for 4 months. At 28 months after the initial surgery, a follow-up computed tomography (CT) detected a small mass beneath the upper abdominal wall. The ass showed mild avidity on 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron-emission (FDG-PET) CT. Salvage resection was performed for diagnosis and treatment, and pathological findings were consistent with primary gastric cancer metastasis. At 49 months after the initial gastrectomy, a new lesion was detected in the LTH with a similar level of avidity on FDG-PET CT as the abdominal wall metastatic lesion. We performed a second salvage surgery for the LTH tumor, which also showed pathology of gastric cancer metastasis. There has been no recurrence up to 1 year after the LTH surgery. With multidisciplinary treatment the patient has survived almost 5 years after the initial gastrectomy. Curative-intent gastrectomy with cytoreductive surgery followed by adjuvant chemotherapy for advanced gastric cancer with localized peritoneal metastasis might have had a survival benefit in our patient. Successive salvage surgeries for oligometastatic lesions in the abdominal wall and the LTH also yielded favorable outcomes.

Reconsideration of indications for third hepatectomy for colorectal liver metastases.

BACKGROUND: It is unclear which patients with recurrence after a second hepatectomy will benefit from a third hepatectomy. METHODS: Patients who underwent hepatectomy for colorectal liver metastasis (CRLM) between April 2005 and July 2021 were included. Factors affecting recurrence after each hepatectomy were analyzed. RESULTS: Sixty-four of the 167 patients who had recurrence after the first hepatectomy underwent a second hepatectomy. Then, 46 patients had recurrence and 18 patients did not have recurrence after the second hepatectomy. Sixteen patients who underwent a third hepatectomy had better overall survival (OS) than those who did not (52 vs. 31 months, p = 0.043). However, the multivariate analysis demonstrated that only tumor size (>5 cm) during the second hepatectomy (p = 0.022) and carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA 19-9) level (>50 U/ml) (p = 0.041) at recurrence after the second hepatectomy were poor prognostic factors for OS. CONCLUSION: While a third hepatectomy can be performed if it is technically and oncologically appropriate, tumor size >5 cm and CA 19-9 >50 U/ml should be considered in terms of long-term outcomes before proceeding to surgery.

Drug-induced anaphylaxis during general anesthesia in 14 tertiary hospitals in Japan: a retrospective, multicenter, observational study.

Since perioperative anaphylaxis occurs suddenly, and it can be life-threatening, anesthesiologists need to have sufficient knowledge of the epidemiology of perioperative anaphylaxis and appropriate coping strategies to deal with it. Recent studies conducted in Western countries reported the characteristics of perioperative anaphylaxis in each country. However, there are few studies of perioperative anaphylaxis in Japan. To bridge the gap between Japan and other countries, the data of 46 anaphylaxis patients at Gunma University Hospital and 13 neighboring hospitals between 2012 and 2018 were collected and analyzed. The recently developed clinical scoring system was combined with a skin test to include only cases with a definite diagnosis. The most common causative agents were sugammadex, followed by rocuronium, cefazolin, and antibiotics other than cefazolin. Furthermore, the characteristics of anaphylaxis for each causative drug were identified. Time from drug administration to appearance of the first symptom was the longest in the cefazolin group. The incidence of canceled operation was the highest in the rocuronium group. Although it is unclear whether the results of this study can apply to Japan as a whole, the information about the agents responsible for perioperative anaphylaxis and the characteristics of anaphylaxis due to each agent would be helpful to anesthesiologists.

Comparison of incidence of anaphylaxis between sugammadex and neostigmine: a retrospective multicentre observational study.

BACKGROUND: Although cases of anaphylaxis caused by sugammadex have been reported, its incidence remains uncertain. Conversely, no studies have evaluated the incidence of anaphylaxis to neostigmine. METHODS: This was a retrospective multicentre observational study of patients who underwent surgery under general anaesthesia between 2012 and 2016 to compare the incidence of anaphylaxis with sugammadex with that of neostigmine at four tertiary hospitals in Japan. To ensure the quality of diagnosis, only cases with a clinical history suggestive of anaphylaxis, along with positive results from in vitro or in vivo testing, were assessed. RESULTS: From a total of 49 532 patients who received general anaesthesia included in this study, 18 cases of anaphylaxis were reported, of which six were attributable to sugammadex and none to neostigmine. There were no fatalities attributable to anaphylaxis. The incidence of anaphylaxis caused by all drugs or by sugammadex was calculated as 0.036% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.022-0.057%) and 0.02% (of the number of sugammadex cases) (95% CI: 0.007-0.044%), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that neostigmine might be safer than sugammadex when assessing only the incidence of anaphylaxis. We believe that there is room for reconsideration of the choice of reversal agent for neuromuscular blocking agents by all anaesthetists. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: UMIN000022365; UMIN000033561.

Interpreting the results of early skin tests after perioperative anaphylaxis requires special attention: a case report and review of literature.

Skin tests are the gold standard for detecting the culprit drug of anaphylaxis, and should ideally be performed after an interval of 4-6 weeks after the reaction to avoid false-negative results. However, when re-operation cannot be delayed and early allergy tests are necessary, special attention is required during subsequent anesthesia, because early skin tests tend to produce false-negative results. This report presents a case of rocuronium-induced anaphylaxis in which early skin tests showed negative results for all the drugs tested. The second anesthesia was safely performed by avoiding all the drugs used for the first anesthesia. Ultimately, skin tests and basophil activation tests (BATs) performed after re-operation demonstrated rocuronium as the drug responsible for anaphylaxis. We recommend performing BATs in addition to skin tests to improve the accuracy of diagnosis of anaphylaxis. In this report, we also discuss interpretation of the results of early skin tests and subsequent selection of drugs for anesthesia. After postponement of surgery due to anaphylaxis, we are often required to perform allergy tests at an early stage if re-operation cannot be delayed. In such cases, skin test results alone should not be used to guide subsequent anesthesia management to avoid recurrent anaphylaxis.

[Multidisciplinary Treatment Aids Long-Term Stage â £ Pancreatic Cancer Survival-A Case Report].

A 56-year-old man presented at a local hospital with nausea, vomiting, epigastric pain, and white stool. CT scan showed hypovascular mass in pancreatic uncinate process and multiple peritoneal nodules. The diagnosis was stage Ⅳ pancreatic cancer(unresectable), and the patient underwent chemotherapy with GEM plus nab-PTX. He also claimed a severe cancer pain at presentation and was prescribed oxycodone 60 mg/day. After 43 months of chemotherapy, the duodenum was obstructed by tumor growth on CT scan, then he underwent duodenal stent placement. He eventually needed a total of 3 duodenal stenting for re-obstruction. He could keep adequate oral intake after the treatment. He also suffered from severe pain by progressed tumor, then underwent celiac plexus block and palliative radiation therapy(20 Gy/5 Fr). Afterwards his cancer pain has been under control. He underwent chemotherapy with FOLFIRINOX for next step. A patient with stage Ⅳ pancreatic cancer may survive for a long period with adequate QOL as a result of multidisciplinary treatment.

Required cefazolin concentration to maximize diagnostic accuracy of the basophil activation test for cefazolin-induced anaphylaxis.

PURPOSE: Identifying the causative agent of perioperative anaphylaxis is key to preventing its recurrence. Besides skin testing, the basophil activation test (BAT) is increasingly being accepted as an additional and reliable method. Cefazolin seems to be a major cause of perioperative anaphylaxis. However, few studies have described use of the BAT for cefazolin-induced anaphylaxis. In this study, we aimed to determine the optimum cefazolin concentration required in the BAT for an accurate diagnosis. METHODS: Seven patients who presented with immediate hypersensitivity to cefazolin and 21 control subjects were studied. We conducted skin tests and performed BATs using both CD203c and CD63 as markers of activated basophils. We measured the ratio of activated basophils after stimulation with serial dilutions of cefazolin and investigated the cefazolin concentration that resulted in better sensitivity and specificity. RESULTS: All patients demonstrated positive reactions to cefazolin, while all control subjects showed negative reactions on skin tests. The net percentage of both CD203c- and CD63-labeled activated basophils was greater when higher concentrations of cefazolin than previously reported were used. In control subjects, however, the number of activated basophils by cefazolin stimulation was negligible regardless of its concentration. In the case of CD203c, the sensitivity was 86% with a cefazolin concentration of 3 mg/ml, while in the case of CD63, the sensitivity was 100% with a cefazolin concentration of 10 mg/ml. CONCLUSION: Using a higher concentration of cefazolin than previously reported for the BAT might increase the accuracy of diagnosis of cefazolin-induced anaphylaxis.

[A Case of Rocuronium-induced Anaphylaxis in a Man with Kounis Syndrome in which Basophil Activation Test was Valuable in Determining the Causative Agent].

We experienced rocuronium-induced anaphylaxis in a 62-year-old man who was scheduled for laparoscopic ileocecal excision for cecal cancer under general anes- thesia. The patient did not have a preoperative history and examinations suggestive of heart disease, or pre- disposing factors for myocardial infarction. Just after induction of anesthesia, we noticed abnormally low blood pressure and ST segment elevation on his elec- trocardiogram. The surgery was postponed and percu- taneous coronary intervention was performed to treat coronary artery stenosis. Re-operation was planned 73-days after the first operation. The patient suffered cardiac arrest just after induction of general anesthesia At the same time, we noticed systemic erythema all over his body, which led to the diagnosis of anaphy- laxis. Cardiopulmonary resuscitation was performed and the surgery was postponed once again. Cardiovas- cular agents, including adrenaline, noradrenaline, atro- pine and amiodarone, improved his hemodynamics. In addition, steroids and anti-histamines were also admin- istered to treat anaphylaxis. We advised him to undergo skin tests to determine the causative agent of anaphylaxis, but he declined. Instead, a basophil activa- tion test was performed, which showed a positive reac- tion to rocuronium. Therefore, we planned general anesthesia without using muscle relaxants such as rocuronium for the third attempt at surgery. The sur- gery was performed safely with this protocol. It is likely that his symptoms in the first general anesthesia were caused by Kounis syndrome. We conclude that the basophil activation test seems to be valuable in determining the causative agent of anaphylaxis, partic- ularly when a patient does not agree to undergo skin tests.

[Abnormal Low Blood Pressure after Induction of General Anesthesia in a Patient on Medication for Depression].

A patient under medication for depression underwent orthopedic surgery for osteoarthritis of the knee four times. For the second surgery, general anesthesia was induced with propofol, remifentanil, and rocuronium. Immediately after induction, she developed severe hypotension that was resistant to vasopressors. The hypotension likely resulted from the effect of psychotropic drugs, including levomepromazine, olanzapine, and clomipramine, which she had been receiving for a long time. Although her blood pressure recovered, the surgery was cancelled. We performed spinal anesthesia for the subsequent surgery to minimize interactions between anesthetic and psychotropic agents. A continuous infusion of the local anesthetic bupivacaine through a epidural catheter was started during the surgery. Although her general condition was stable during surgery, she developed hypotension after returning to the ward. We suspected an interaction with the psychotropic agents, and thus stopped infusion of the local anesthetic, after which, her blood pressure gradually increased. The first and fourth surgeries were performed uneventfully under spinal anesthesia. This case suggests that anesthesiologists should pay special attention to the interaction between anesthetic and psychotropic agents during anesthesia. Further, psychotropic drug withdrawal before surgery should be considered, if possible. Moreover, vasopressin may be utilized to treat catecholamine-resistant hypotension.

The Clinical Features of Late Postoperative Cholangitis After Hepaticojejunostomy Brought on by Conditions other than Cancer Recurrence.

PURPOSE: Postoperative cholangitis and anastomotic strictures (AS) are long-term complications of biliary-enteric anastomosis (BEA). METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed data of patients who underwent bile duct resection with or without hepatectomy and investigated the risk factors for postoperative cholangitis, benign AS, and incidence of Clavien-Dindo (C-D) >Grade III complications. RESULTS: Overall, data of 189 patients (115 men and 74 women) were retrospectively analyzed. The median patient age was 73 years. Thirty-five patients (18.5%) developed postoperative cholangitis, and 16 (8.4%) developed postoperative AS. Male sex and serious postoperative complications (C-D ≥ Grade III) were independent risk factors for cholangitis. The incidence of serious postoperative complications was 32.3%. Hypertension, preoperative biliary drainage, C-reactive protein-albumin ratio ≥.22, and bile duct resection with hepatectomy were potential risk factors for serious postoperative complications. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence rates of postoperative cholangitis and AS after BEA were 18.5% and 8.4%, respectively. Male sex and serious postoperative complications (C-D ≥ Grade III) were independent risk factors for postoperative cholangitis.

Duodenojejunostomy for endoscopic management of biliary enteric anastomotic stricture inaccessible via balloon-assisted endoscopy: a case report.

BACKGROUND: Stricture formation is a long-term complication of biliary enteric anastomosis (BEA). BEA stricture often causes recurrent cholangitis and lithiasis, can significantly affect quality of life, and promote the development of life-threatening complications. In this report, duodenojejunostomy and subsequent endoscopic management as an alternative surgical technique for strictures of the BEA is described. CASE PRESENTATION: Case 1: An 84-year-old man who underwent left hepatic trisectionectomy for hilar cholangiocarcinoma 6 years prior presented with fever and jaundice. Computed tomography (CT) revealed intrahepatic lithiasis. The patient was diagnosed with postoperative cholangitis secondary to intrahepatic lithiasis. Balloon-assisted endoscopy could not reach the anastomotic site, and stent insertion failed. A biliary access route was hence created via duodenojejunostomy. After the jejunal limb and duodenal bulb were identified, duodenojejunostomy was performed using a side-to-side continuous layer-to-layer suture. The patient was discharged without serious complications. Endoscopic management through duodenojejunostomy was successfully performed, and intrahepatic stones were completely removed. Case 2: A 75-year-old man who underwent bile duct resection for hilar cholangiocarcinoma 6 years prior was diagnosed with postoperative cholangitis due to intrahepatic lithiasis. Removal of the intrahepatic stones was attempted using balloon-assisted endoscopy; however, the endoscope could not reach the anastomotic site. The patient underwent duodenojejunostomy and subsequent endoscopic management. The patient was discharged without complications. Two weeks after the operation, the patient underwent endoscopic retrograde cholangiography through the duodenojejunostomy and the intrahepatic lithiasis was removed. CONCLUSIONS: Duodenojejunostomy allows easy endoscopic access to a BEA. Duodenojejunostomy and subsequent endoscopic management may be an alternative treatment option in patients with BEA strictures that are inaccessible via balloon-assisted endoscopy.

Internal hernia caused by exposed structures after laparoscopic lateral lymph node dissection for rectal cancer: A case report.

Internal hernias secondary to exposed structures after lateral lymph node dissection (LLND) for rectal cancer are rare. A 53-year-old man who underwent laparoscopic ultra-low anterior resection and bilateral LND presented to our emergency department with sudden-onset severe abdominal pain and vomiting. Computed tomography demonstrated a closed loop obstruction of the intestine in the right lateral pelvic cavity and a significantly dilated small bowel in the abdominal cavity. Laparoscopic surgery revealed small bowel migration into the space between the right ureter and umbilical artery. The herniated bowel was laparoscopically reduced, and the small bowel exhibited no ischemic changes. Meanwhile, the hernial orifice was left unrepaired. The patient was discharged on the seventh postoperative day without complications. An internal hernia caused by exposed structures after lymphadenectomy should be a differential diagnosis in patients who have undergone LLND for rectal cancer and then present with severe abdominal pain and vomiting.

Two cases of unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma treated via atezolizumab and bevacizumab combination therapy.

BACKGROUND: Treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) varies widely depending on the patient's condition. In recent years, combination therapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors has emerged as the treatment of choice due to its superior antitumor effects for unresectable HCC (uHCC). Conversion surgery (CS) after systemic chemotherapy is expected to be an effective treatment strategy for uHCC. Here, we report two cases of uHCC with bilateral porta hepatis invasion, in which atezolizumab plus bevacizumab therapy regressed the tumor invasion of the porta hepatis, followed by CS with R0 resection. CASE PRESENTATION: The first patient-a 71-year-old man with S4 HCC-developed porta hepatis, and the tumor compressed the right portal vein and bile duct. R0 resection with left trihepatectomy was impossible because of insufficient liver function, and combination therapy using atezolizumab and bevacizumab was initiated. After ten courses of treatment, the tumor shrunk with regression of the porta hepatis contact, and segmentectomy of S4 was performed with a sufficient surgical margin. Histopathological findings showed that the primary tumor was mostly necrotic with no residual viable tumor cells. The second patient was a 72-year-old man with an S4 HCC extending to the porta hepatis. The patient's condition was almost similar to that in the first case and required left tri-segmentectomy with R0 resection; however, insufficient liver function made liver resection impossible. An atezolizumab plus bevacizumab regimen was administered, and after seven courses of treatment, porta hepatis compression regressed, following which left lobectomy was performed with adequate surgical margins. The pathological diagnosis was moderately differentiated HCC, most of which was necrotic, and R0 resection was confirmed. CONCLUSIONS: Atezolizumab plus bevacizumab therapy has the potential to facilitate radical resection in patients with uHCC.

Risk factors for remnant gastric cancer after distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a retrospective database review.

Background: The number of patients with remnant gastric cancer (RGC) following gastrectomy for gastric cancer (GC) is increasing due to the increasing number of patients undergoing function-preserving gastrectomy and improved outcomes for patients with GC. A few studies involving a small number of cases reported male sex, old age, differentiated type, tumor depth and synchronous multiple GC were associated with RGC development. However, the risk factors for RGC development had not been fully understood. This study aimed to examine the clinicopathological features, followed up patients with GC after they underwent distal gastrectomy (DG), and evaluated the potential risk factors for RGC development. Methods: A retrospective database review of 438 patients who underwent DG for GC at a single institution, from 2006 to 2017, was conducted. We investigated the relationship of clinicopathological features, operative findings, and postoperative course with RGC development was estimated using Cox proportional hazard analysis. The cumulative incidences of RGC were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Results: We retrospectively analyzed 405 cases. The median patient age was 69 years, and the patient cohort consisted of 263 men and 142 women. The Billroth-I reconstruction method was used in 204 cases, Billroth-II method was used in 3 cases, and Roux-en Y method was used in 198 cases. RGC was diagnosed in 11 of the 405 patients. The median follow-up period was 5 years. The cumulative incidences of RGC calculated by the Kaplan-Meier method were 3.0%, 4.1%, and 10.5% at 5, 10, and 15 years after DG, respectively. During the initial surgery, differentiated type was significantly associated with RGC development [hazard ratio (HR): 4.71, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.02-21.80, P=0.05]. Male sex (HR: 2.97, 95% CI: 0.64-13.75, P=0.16), old age (≥70 years) (HR: 2.72, 95% CI: 0.78-9.47, P=0.11), and synchronous multiple GC (HR: 1.31, 95% CI: 0.28-6.08, P=0.73) were not associated with RGC development. Conclusions: Patients who have undergone DG for differentiated type GC were statistically significantly associated with developing RGC. Intensive endoscopic surveillance would be needed for the patients who underwent DG for differentiated type GC.

Postoperative chylous ascites after total gastrectomy successfully treated using peritoneovenous (Denver) shunt: a case report.

BACKGROUND: Chylous ascites (CA) is a rare complication of gastrectomy for gastric cancer. While most cases of postoperative CA improve with medication or nutritional support, some are refractory to conservative treatment. A peritoneovenous shunt (PVS) may help patients who are poor candidates for surgery. However, PVS placement for postoperative CA after gastroenterological surgery has been rarely reported. Herein, we present a case of postoperative CA following total gastrectomy with para-aortic lymphadenectomy, treated successfully by PVS placement. CASE PRESENTATION: A 74-year-old man who underwent total gastrectomy with para-aortic lymph node dissection was hospitalised because of insufficient oral intake and dehydration. His abdomen was markedly distended with severe bilateral lower extremity oedema. On admission, abdominal computed tomography (CT) showed a high volume of ascites and no signs of cancer recurrence. Accordingly, postoperative CA resulting from drainage of fluid on paracentesis was diagnosed. Despite nutritional support, diuretics, and octreotide administration, his abdominal distension and nutritional status did not improve. We could not identify the sites of lymphatic leakage in the three intranodal lymphangiographies followed by CT. Although we considered a surgical treatment in our patient, we decided against it. Because we could not identify lymphatic leakage site during lymphangiography, surgical treatment might have a potential failure of detection and closure of leakage site. Furthermore, the patient's general condition was poor because of malnutrition resulting from the loss of lymphatic fluid. Consequently, we decided to place PVS. After PVS placement, his abdominal distension improved rapidly, and he was discharged without serious complications. Thirteen months after PVS, patient has no relapse of abdominal distention and nutrition status has improved. CONCLUSION: PVS might be a good option to manage refractory postoperative CA, as the leakage point cannot be detected on lymphangiography.

First case report of neoadjuvant gemcitabine and S-1 for locally advanced unresectable duodenal adenocarcinoma.

BACKGROUND: The usefulness of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for patients with duodenal adenocarcinoma remains unclear. We report the case of a successfully resected duodenal adenocarcinoma managed by neoadjuvant chemotherapy using gemcitabine and S-1. CASE PRESENTATION: A 72-year-old female presented with a one-week history of abdominal bloating and vomiting after meals. Esophagogastroduodenoscopy revealed a circumferential epithelial lesion in the second portion of the duodenum. Abdominal computed tomography scan revealed thickened walls and narrowing of the duodenum. Further, an adenocarcinoma was noted on biopsy. Though she was diagnosed with duodenal adenocarcinoma, pancreatic cancer could not be completely ruled out. Therefore, she underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy using gemcitabine and S-1 after bypass surgery. After six chemotherapy cycles, the tumor significantly reduced in size. Further, lymph nodes and distant metastases were not noted on abdominal computed tomography. The patient underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy. Pathological examination revealed a 0.5-mm lesion and surrounding fibrosis at the duodenum, distal from the ampulla of Vater and the pancreas. Her postoperative course was almost uneventful, and she was discharged on the 31st postoperative day. The patient was followed up and had no tumor recurrence at 24 months after surgery. CONCLUSION: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy with gemcitabine and S-1 was useful in reducing the size of a duodenal adenocarcinoma. This finding would aid physicians in managing patients that present with a similar presentation.

Epithelioid angiosarcoma of the duodenum: a case report.

BACKGROUND: Angiosarcomas are rare malignant tumors that arise from the endothelium of blood vessels. They occur most commonly in the skin and soft tissue, and less commonly in the breast, liver, bone, and spleen. Gastrointestinal angiosarcomas are extremely rare. Herein, we present a case of duodenal epithelioid angiosarcoma that was treated with surgical resection. CASE PRESENTATION: A 68-year-old man presented with a 1-month history of fatigue and hypotension. He visited the outpatient clinic for a routine follow-up. Laboratory examination revealed anemia. Esophagogastroduodenoscopy revealed multiple duodenal lesions with central ulceration. A biopsy showed a sheet-like arrangement of large round and spindle-shaped tumor cells that were positive for CD31. Based on the histological and immunohistochemical staining findings, an epithelioid angiosarcoma was diagnosed. Computed tomography (CT) and positron emission tomography-CT revealed no lymph node metastasis or distant metastasis. Radical subtotal stomach-preserving pancreatoduodenectomy with lymphadenectomy was performed. After removing the specimen, reconstruction was performed using the Child procedure. Grossly, two dark-red polypoid tumors were found in the second portion of the duodenum. Histological evaluation revealed proliferation of malignant round and polygonal cells arranged in sheets and spindle-like cells arranged in bundles. Vasoformative structures were recognized as slit-like spaces containing red blood cells. Immunohistochemical staining demonstrated that the tumor cells were positive for CD31. These findings confirmed the diagnosis of epithelioid angiosarcoma in the duodenum. The patient's postoperative course was uneventful. The patient was discharged on postoperative day 19 without any complications. At a follow-up examination in the outpatient clinic at postoperative 4 months, no evidence of recurrence was detected. CONCLUSION: The present report describes a case of duodenal epithelioid angiosarcoma. Duodenal angiosarcomas may cause anemia and gastrointestinal bleeding. Because angiosarcomas sometimes show epithelioid cytomorphology, immunohistochemical analysis is useful for confirming the diagnosis.