Automated versus self-monitoring of 'up-time' in chronic low-back pain patients: a comparative study.

The study compared up-time data gathered with automated and self-monitoring measurement systems. Six chronic low-back pain inpatients, 6 psychiatric inpatients and 6 hospital staff members were used as subjects. Concurrent recordings of up-time were taken over 4 consecutive days with the two measurement systems. Results showed that: (a) subjects across all 3 groups reported significantly less absolute up-time values from self-monitoring than automated monitoring, (b) non-patient staff subjects exhibited greater absolute up-time levels from both measurement methods than those reported by low-back pain or psychiatric inpatients, (c) low-back pain subjects showed a greater discrepancy between absolute up-time measures from the two measurement systems than differences found for psychiatric or staff subjects, and (d) automated and self-monitoring up-time values were positively correlated within each group of subjects. It was concluded that automated and self-monitoring up-time data were not directly comparable. Expanded development and usage of automated measurement systems was recommended.

Treatment Helpfulness Questionnaire: a measure of patient satisfaction with treatment modalities provided in chronic pain management programs.

The Treatment Helpfulness Questionnaire (THQ) is presented as a reliable and valid measure for assessing patient perceptions of the helpfulness of treatment modalities offered at multidisciplinary pain centers. It is easy to administer and score and shows good interscorer and test-retest reliability without order effects and with good internal consistency. Patients give diverse responses to items that fall into four factors, three of which represent identifiable components of multidisciplinary treatment for chronic pain. Findings that similar THQ items are positively correlated and that many items show positive correlations with treatment outcome support the validity of the instrument. The latter finding also suggests the potential of patient satisfaction measurement for improving treatment outcomes at pain centers.

American and Japanese chronic low back pain patients: cross-cultural similarities and differences.

The study compared and contrasted medical, psychological, social and general behavioral functioning of American and Japanese low back pain patients and normal controls. The Sickness Impact Profile and a standardized Medical Examination Protocol for Pain instrument were used to assess all subjects. Findings showed that the American and Japanese low back pain patients had similar and significantly higher medical-physical findings than their respective controls. Likewise, the American and Japanese low back pain patients showed significantly greater psychological, social, and general behavioral dysfunction compared to control subjects. Finally, despite similar medical and physical findings, the Japanese low back pain patients were significantly less impaired in psychological, social, vocational, and avocational functioning than the American low back pain patients. It was concluded that there were significant cross-cultural differences between the American and Japanese low back pain patients, primarily in the psychosocial and behavioral areas. However, given the small sample size, any conclusion should be considered with caution; replication is needed before more definite conclusions are possible.

Chronic low back pain patients around the world: cross-cultural similarities and differences.

OBJECTIVE: The current study sought to determine whether there were any significant cross-cultural differences in medical-physical findings, or in psychosocial, behavioral, vocational, and avocational functioning, for chronic low back pain patients. DESIGN: Partially double-blind controlled comparison of six different culture groups. SETTING: Subjects were selected from primarily ambulatory care facilities specializing in treating chronic pain patients. PATIENTS-SUBJECTS: Subjects consisted of 63 chronic low back pain patients and 63 healthy controls. Low back pain patients were randomly selected from six different culture groups (American, Japanese, Mexican, Colombian, Italian, and New Zealander). Ten to 11 were gathered per culture from a pool of patients treated at various pain treatment programs. Likewise, 10 or 11 control group subjects were obtained from each culture from a pool of healthy support staff. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The Sickness Impact Profile and the Medical Examination and Diagnostic Information Coding System were used as primary outcome measures. RESULTS: Findings showed that (a) low back pain subjects across all cultures had significantly more medical-physical findings and more impairment on psychosocial, behavioral, vocational, and avocational measures than controls did; (b) Mexican and New Zealander low back pain subjects had significantly fewer physical findings than other low back pain groups did; (c) the American, New Zealander, and Italian low back pain patients reported significantly more impairment in psychosocial, recreational, and/or work areas, with the Americans the most dysfunctional; and (d) findings were not a function of working class, age, sex, pain intensity, pain duration, previous surgeries, or differences in medical-physical findings. CONCLUSIONS: It was concluded that there were important cross-cultural differences in chronic low back pain patients' self-perceived level of dysfunction, with the American patients clearly the most dysfunctional. Possible explanations included cross-cultural differences in social expectation; attention; legal-administrative requirements; financial gains; attitudes-expectations about usage, type, and availability of health care; and self-perceived ability and willingness to cope.

Perceived treatment helpfulness and cost in chronic pain rehabilitation.

OBJECTIVE: This article examines the perceived helpfulness of treatment components in comprehensive interdisciplinary pain management programs as they relate to cost. DESIGN: Patient satisfaction results assessed by the Treatment Helpfulness Questionnaire (THQ) and treatment costs were compared for 309 subjects at three comprehensive interdisciplinary chronic pain management centers. All subjects completed the THQ immediately after treatment, and follow-up data were gathered 3 to 6 months after the end of treatment at two of the three centers. RESULTS: Ratings of treatment helpfulness were not found to be related to either demographic or medical variables. Mean THQ ratings for many treatment modalities did differ significantly between centers, but subjects at all centers generally gave higher THQ ratings to psychological and educational therapies than to physical therapy and medical modalities both at posttreatment and at follow-up evaluations. More costly treatments generally did not receive higher ratings than less costly ones. THQ ratings tended to decline modestly from posttreatment to follow-up evaluations. CONCLUSIONS: For the selected population of patients undergoing comprehensive interdisciplinary pain management, educational and psychological approaches received high ratings of helpfulness at a relatively low cost. Further research is needed to address whether comparative patient satisfaction data can be used at pain centers to produce improved outcomes at reduced costs.

An instrument to measure nurses' knowledge of behavioral methods with chronic pain patients.

A 32-item multiple-choice questionnaire is described to assess nurses' knowledge of behavioral methods with chronic pain patients. The instrument was designed to assess knowledge across four areas: (a) behavioral principles, terms, and facts about pain patients, (b) application of behavioral methods to decrease negative pain behavior, (c) application of behavioral methods to increase positive well behavior, and (d) when, and with which pain patients to apply behavioral methods. Factor analyses identified two basic factors measured by the instrument. These included general knowledge of behavioral methods with chronic pain patients and the ability to differentially apply these methods in various medical circumstances. Further analysis revealed that the instrument contained adequate internal consistency, reliability and validity.

The influence on patients' pain intensity ratings of antecedent reinforcement of pain talk or well talk.

This study sought to determine whether positive verbal reinforcement for pain talk or well talk could effectively influence chronic pain patients' subsequent ratings of pain intensity. Four female chronic pain inpatients were each exposed over seven consecutive days to two conditions within an alternating treatments design. Inter-rater reliability analysis from the audiotapes on occurrences of pain and well talk, verbal reinforcement and appropriate reinforcement of verbal behavior across conditions resulted in agreement values from 91 to 100%. Findings revealed that subjects' pain intensity ratings were consistently and significantly lower after verbally reinforcing well talk compared with verbally reinforcing pain talk.

Analysis of nurses' knowledge of behavioral methods applied to chronic and acute pain patients.

Thirty-seven nurses with no formal training in behavioral methods were assessed on their knowledge of basic behavioral principles and terminology, the application of behavioral methods with chronic and acute pain patients to decrease negative and increase positive behaviors, and when and with which patients such methods should be applied. Results showed that nurses failed to exhibit adequate understanding of behavioral methods except for their application to decrease negative behavior. Findings are discussed in terms of documenting the need for formal training in behavioral methods as part of nurses' academic curriculum and targeting specific areas that should be emphasized as part of such training.

A trimodal behavioral conceptualization of clinical pain.

A trimodal behavioral conceptualization of pain is outlined in the current article. It proposes that pain should be viewed as an interacting cluster of gross motor, cognitive, and physiological responses. Such a conceptual system is thought to contain the basic properties needed to incorporate current divergent views of pain held by medical and behavior science into a common conceptual framework.

Guidelines for program evaluation in chronic non-malignant pain management.

The current article offers guidelines to systematically evaluate programs which treat chronic non-malignant pain syndrome patients. The guidelines represent a basic program evaluation strategy and include specific recommendations and choices on measurement-assessment tools based upon available research literature and common clinical practice. They are based on evaluation by objectives, which include the program's ability to reduce the misuse of medications, increase physical function, increase productive activity at home, work and socially, improve overall mood, reduce subjective pain intensity, reduce the use of healthcare, when applicable, achieve equitable case settlement, and minimize pain treatment program cost without compromising quality of care. The method and timing of assessing each of these objectives are delineated with an emphasis on using reliable, valid measures which can be applied effectively within a clinical setting. The guidelines also advocate patient and staff satisfaction assessment, thus offering a fully integrated program evaluation system which can measure effectiveness and allow ongoing improvement in care.

Clinical practice guidelines for chronic non-malignant pain syndrome patients.

The current paper provides specific guidelines for treating chronic non-malignant pain syndrome patients. The guidelines were developed from an extensive review of existing literature on practice guidelines, the research literature, and common clinical practice across major pain treatment facilities in the USA. They are intended for application to all chronic pain syndrome patients (other than cancer pain) regardless of specific site or etiology of pain. They advocate goal directed treatment to reduce medication misuse and invasive medical procedures, maximize and maintain physical activity, return to productive activity, increase the patient's ability to manage pain, reduce subjective pain intensity, reduce or eliminate the use of healthcare services for primary pain complaint, provide useful information for case settlement, and minimize treatment cost without sacrificing quality. The guidelines recommend interdisciplinary integrated evaluation and treatment on a time limit basis with a focus on conservative medical, psychological behavioral, physical, and vocational interventions based upon the patient's needs. There is emphasis on increasing the patient's level of function and ability to manage pain and related problems. Outpatient care is strongly recommended, with specific upper limits regarding treatment intensity and the use of trigger point injections and nerve blocks delineated. The guidelines also recommend that the long term use of opioid or sedative-hypnotic medications, surgery, implantable spinal devices, or brain stimulation techniques be avoided with chronic pain syndrome patients. These guidelines are intended to serve as a starting point to effectively extend and complement those released by the Agency for Health Care Policy and Research for other types of pain problems such as cancer and acute low back pain.